YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Museum Operation Reform


by turfgrrl


July 26th, 2007 · 53 Comments

After a contentious discussion the Historical Commission voted to accept a proposed agreement that would spell out the role that the Friends of the Norwalk Museum will run day-to-day operations. From the Hour:

Douglas E. Hempstead, council liaison to the Historical Commission and member of the Land Use Committee, urged commissioners not to argue over the proposed agreement at this point.

“This is conceptual. It’s very broad. It has to reviewed. Everybody is going to have their hand in this,” said Hempstead, referring to the council, the city’s law department and the municipal union to which Gunn belongs. “This will probably turn into a 20-page document.”

Under the proposed agreement, now a one-page document, the city would continue to house the collection and lease the building in which the museum is housed.

The Friends would be responsible for fundraising, staffing, providing volunteers, opening and closing the building, responding to emergencies, performing inventories and caring for the museum collections, putting on exhibitions, maintaining the museum’s reference library, and other activities in conjunction with the curator.

While the role of the Friends has long been understood, having the relationship codified is a good thing. It will not likely solve the ongoing issues between the current curator and the Friends.

Acceptance of the conceptual operating agreement came after sparring between commission Chairman Peter A. Bondi and former Friends President Scott M. Gibson.

Gibson said he and others met Tuesday with James Haselkamp, the city’s director of personnel and labor relations, to discuss Gunn’s schedule and getting into the museum. Gibson said Friends volunteers have had problems getting into the building and reaching Gunn by telephone.

“This meeting was one step, hopefully, in resolving some of that and we’ll see how it goes,” Gibson said.

When Gibson, however, said that Gunn has left a portion of the museum now being used for an exhibition cluttered, and “dismantled permanent fixtures,” Bondi stepped in to halt the allegations.

“Scott, I’m going to stop you right now, because we’re not here to talk about the curator, and No. 2, there’s no proof that that (space) belongs to The Friends,” Bondi said. “We’re not talking about the curator today. … She’s not here and that becomes a personnel issue. All I asked for was your report.”

Said Gibson: “Right, and my report is that we are concerned about clutter in public spaces in the museum. There is a long history of it and this another example.”

Gunn, who has had a rocky relationship with The Friends and some Historical commissioners, returned to work June 1 after a five-month absence, during which Friends volunteers ran the museum. She was absent from Wednesday night’s commission meeting.

On the access issue, Historical commissioners agreed, albeit not unanimously, to explore getting Gunn a cell phone. As curator, she is designated as first responder to the building in the event of an emergency. The commission chairman is second responder.

Recent examples beyond what Gibson mentioned also include volunteers who have shown up for work only to find the doors to the museum locked. Peter Bondi, chair of the Historical Commission contends that it is the volunteers who are not showing up for work. The facts however might lie in the record of opening and closings that the alarm system tracks, yet Bondi, who was asked for the records in June, has not provided them to the commission for review.

Despite the addition of summer interns, the museum doors were locked on Sunday, July 25th. The summer interns are not without controversy too. Commissioners are concerned that original documents are being handled by interns who are not using protective gloves. Paper that is old is susceptible to chemical reactions that weaken, discolour or make it become brittle. Heat, light, dampness, airborne pollutants and the oil from human hands are all contributors. Inks can fade with too much exposure to light, especially fluorescent light and sunlight, which is why you often see flash photography banned in museums. Mentioned, has been a project involving an intern and original Lockwood letters from the 1800’s.

After two months since the Curator, Sue Gunn, has returned, the issues of performing basic curatorial duties and being held accountable to a work schedule have not been resolved.

source: The Hour, Commission OKs curator role in museum accord, by By ROBERT KOCH, July 26, 2007

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

53 Responses so far “Norwalk: Museum Operation Reform”


Pages: [1] 2 » Show All



  • 1 overtaxed // Jul 26, 2007 at 7:51 am

    This may be a stupid question but isn’t Ms Gunn supposed to attend the HC meetings? Last month she didn’t attend and now this month. What gives?

    Mr Bondi seems to defend her to the hilt. Me thinks Daddy G has a new member of the family to support.

  • 2 FCM // Jul 26, 2007 at 8:13 am

    The article in the Hour is incorrect. Although it is easy to make the situation into a soap opera about personalities, the actual comment from a commissioner was about the Friends working with “a” curator, not “the” curator. The question asked was whether the Friends intended to work with a curator whether City employed or employed by the Friends. The Commissioner’s concern seemed to be the operation of the museum with a curator. This was not an endorsement of the current curator.

    Mr. Koch failed to add that despite the Commission’s intention (stated in the previous month’s minutes) to table the propsal last month for review and to vote this month, Commission Chair Peter Bondi had not put the matter on the agenda and attempted to squelch any discussion or vote last night. Commissioners pointed out that this was stated in last month’s minutes, was old business, and proper for discussion.

    It appears that with all of the attempted manipulation by the Chair, Daddy G may have another mouth to feed, but this relationship has already been documented.

  • 3 Watchdog // Jul 26, 2007 at 8:19 am

    Alright… now may I ask a stupid question?

    What exactly is Peter Bondi’s position? Is he a volunteer or is he on payroll?

    PS: Turfie - are you going to run a post on the Republican BOE candidates and Kimmel’s comments? He seems a little nervous about “them.” Ahem.

  • 4 Watchdog // Jul 26, 2007 at 8:23 am

    Oops…
    “Nevermind,” as Emily Latella would say.

    Peter is Commission Chair. Hence his focus. He HAS to protect the city from potential lawsuit. His position does not dictate that he run roughshod over an employee of the city. That’s a no-brainer, isn’t it?

  • 5 indiga // Jul 26, 2007 at 8:29 am

    The only one running “roughshod” is Soo Gunn over the collection and the Museum.

  • 6 turfgrrl // Jul 26, 2007 at 8:42 am

    watchdog: Good morning. Yes I plan to run a post about the BOE candidates, not necessarily today. Lots of day job activities going on, not to mention the server going down last night.

    While Chairman Bondi needs to act deliberatively, the reality is that the situation with the curator is untenable. We should have a zero tolerance for work not being performed in our government. I don’t think there’s much gray area in this, either the museum is open or it is closed. There’s no reason why the phone is not answered during operating hours. There’s no reason why exhibit areas are cluttered, or contested as to who is “responsible for them” or whether it should take 2 months for a bid to be sent out to fix a chimney.

  • 7 turfgrrl // Jul 26, 2007 at 8:43 am

    watchdog: Or 4 months for Corda to deliver on the official “policy” regarding hours kept by BOE employees who take additional part time jobs during work hours, eg. Morris and Lang.
  • 8 city employee and taxpayer // Jul 26, 2007 at 9:42 am

    If she was held to the same standards of the rest of her fellow employees, by the time Gunn returned to work in June, she would have used all of her accumulated vacation and sick time.

    Nevertheless, according to today’s and previous postings, she has missed at least two working days and two Commission meetings in the past eight weeks.

    In other towns, even politicians and unions eventually wash their hands of deceitful and unethical employees.

    Will our city managers, appointees and unions protect any employee who claims to need a vacation or a sick day because of a hangnail at taxpayer’s expense, or is that protection only available to people whose daddys are gunn?

  • 9 overtaxed // Jul 26, 2007 at 10:45 am

    #8
    There are many city employees that work very hard at their jobs. They show up everyday, on time and get nothing for their effort. Then you have employees like Ms Gunn that thumbs her nose at the city and her fellow city workers, union and tax payers. Something really smells here. Maybe the hardworking city employees should all stand up and shout from the rooftops that you should get the attention for a job well done rather than a spoiled brat hiding behind her Daddy’s pant leg sticking her tongue out at everyone.

  • 10 Anonymous // Jul 26, 2007 at 11:14 am

    Sounds like a good time for some investigative journalism to get to the bottom of this issue, if such a concept exists in Norwalk. Clearly, with a protector like Bada Bing Bondi Jr., nothing will be done while he’s chair of the HC.

  • 11 Truthfull Taxpayer // Jul 26, 2007 at 12:03 pm

    #10 Investigative journalism is an oxy-MORON in Norwalk. Bada Bing Jr. (as you call him) only got his job like the curator got hers-through cronyism and corruption.

  • 12 Mr Greenpeace // Jul 26, 2007 at 12:49 pm

    you need to suggest this to Donna Bertoli dbertoliQthehour.com and John Breunig from the Advocate 964 2258 where the Hour has come into the 21st century the Advocate still holds out for phone calls there is no addy for John that is listed up front.I’m sure he has one.

    These are the two editors who relize we are hungry for the news and we are a city not a back woods town running a carnival of sorts with our news desks.

    They have over the years even taken Norwalk to court over access but those stories pass and are forgotten.We live on press releases if you havn’t already figured out, the police does thin out what gets reported, city hall lets go what its want and the BOE well they are the BOE along with the Supt office.The fire dept has no calls or anything to say usually last explosian and fire we had in town the thoughts of one ranking member was no big deal,,the EPA and the Ct Dep did not think so though.

    So with that complain or suggest I find pointing out shortfalls is better than the first two they listen they respond the papers get better or at least bigger,,now if we could only get Moose and Molly to run for office we would be so much better off.

    by the way they all read this blog its news each day in all newsrooms they see the dissent they understand what the city is going thru,,but they still need to stroke the news release people for normal news and realize they need to do thier job,,

    I imagine everyone saw the mayor had to go to Stamford to get his picture in the Norwalk news,,yes we all see this and realize its journalistic talents that is going to make the differance here in Norwalk..Not politics..

  • 13 Jason Lee // Jul 26, 2007 at 1:42 pm

    PS

    I might ad that it seems that Cablevision News 12 is as useless as tits on a log. Their coverage of Norwalk info is next to zero. I heard more about a Stamford MC accident that the 2 in Norwalk. For a company that has offices in Norwalk they are a disgrace in the local news dept.

    The kids in Elementary school could come up with a better local news report then Cable 12.

  • 14 MGeake // Jul 26, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    When I called Channel 12 to ask if they would cover a Second Taxing District event, they asked “Where’s that?”

  • 15 Jason Lee // Jul 26, 2007 at 2:27 pm

    They love to brag that if you go to Direct TV you will not get their local news. I could get more local news from the BBC.

  • 16 Indiga // Jul 27, 2007 at 9:00 pm

    What does Daddy Gunn have on Norwalk politicos that they are bowing to his wishes to give his dysfunctional daughter lifetiem employement? It seems that the Bondi’s are involved…but it also crosses party lines to grapb Nolin and Moccia. What could it be?

  • 17 Anonymous // Jul 29, 2007 at 2:16 am

    Indiga: As the curator repeatedly told people when she was first hired: “It’s not what you know, it’s who you know. My godfather, Frank Zullo, got me the job.” Remember the picture in the Hour with three laughing people: Esposito, the curator and Zullo. The joke was on the taxpayers. Daddy and Z have repeatedly been seen in City Hall lobbying on her behalf. How do you think she got her one of a kind union deal? Why do you think she has been given carte blanche for a work schedule with no accountability for the hours actually worked or any need to produce mesurable work product? Why do you think it is so hard to find the political will to end this insanity despite gross and repeated examples of incompetence and insubordination?

    This is just one example of the shadow government at work in Norwalk. Other examples may be seen in other threads on this blog. Once you know what to look for, the background jumps out at you. The obsession of some for distinctions between Democrat or Republican is quaint. The real power here is the self-serving members of both parties who have joined in anti-democratic efforts to subvert local government. There are good people genuinely concerned with the best interests of Norwalk’s taxpayers. These are the people we should be identifying and supporting no matter what their party affiliation.

  • 18 Anonymous // Jul 29, 2007 at 8:27 am

    Names, please. Sunshine is the best disinfectant, right?

  • 19 anonymous // Jul 29, 2007 at 8:35 am

    Frank Zullo needs to go. Isn’t he representing the Gault Company in their bid to put up toxic tanks in Rowayton. He has single handedly done more to harm this town than anyone in recent memory. What a profiteering politician. Hopefully, Walter Briggs does not take his firms money during the campaign season, lest he become another one in the greasy former mayor’s talons.

  • 20 Anonymous // Jul 29, 2007 at 1:26 pm

    FYI, here is some background on this bi-partisan saga, with 3 administrations seemingly protecting a problematic and highly paid employee:

    On June 9, 2005 the Norwalk Historical Commission submitted to the Personnel Department a 12 page Bill of Particulars supporting a vote of no confidence in the curator. It began with documents from 2000, during Ms. Gunn’s hiring probationary period, which the Historical Commission sent to the Assistant Corporation Counsel and Mayor Esposito on 2 occasions expressing “grave concerns about the erratic museum hours, the quality of exhibits, the security of the collections and its readily accessible community use.” Those early concerns were rejected by Mayor Esposito, and Ms. Gunn refused to take direction from the Historical Commission saying the Mayor told her she reported to him alone. Mayor Esposito did not contradict her. For nearly 4 years, Ms. Gunn was essentially an unsupervised employee, unless you believe Mayors Esposito and Knopp were actually monitoring her work.

    Mayor Knopp dealt with this increasingly obvious problem by firing (refusing to reappoint) the Historical Commission chair, presumably in hopes it was she who was the problem, not the curator. He appointed 5 new commissioners – but the problem only increased. Finally, in 2004, Mayor Knopp did decree that the curator reports to the Commission, not to the mayor, which was a small step forward. However, when the Commission submitted a vote of no confidence in the curator in 2005, with a long list of egregious incidents and actions, the Personnel Department did nothing. Did Knopp direct Personnel to protect the curator?

    Mayor Moccia fired (refused to reappoint) 4 Historical Commissioners and filled 3 other vacancies, as well as appointing councilman Doug Hempstead to the Commission, thus making the Commission his own, with Peter Bondi, friend of the curator, voted in as chair. Are Mayor Moccia and the “new” Commission now protecting Ms. Gunn? Her father holds the purse-strings to foundation money and is said to use that money as leverage to keep his daughter’s job. It is also said that the last 2 mayors feared lawsuits and the curator has sued the city once.

  • 21 anon // Jul 29, 2007 at 4:58 pm

    No one is entitled to be reappointed to any board. Get over yourself.

  • 22 Anonymous // Jul 29, 2007 at 5:10 pm

    Not unless you happen to be servicing Moochie…

  • 23 Anonymous // Jul 29, 2007 at 8:40 pm

    So who was servicing Knopsie?

  • 24 i told you so-not! // Jul 29, 2007 at 10:54 pm

    To #20 and beyond you need to reread the article.A portion of it is below. Changes are in the wind. Mr Bondi was over written on moving the agreements forward.
    IE by Mocchia’s appointments

    Under the proposed agreement, now a one-page document, the city would continue to house the collection and lease the building in which the museum is housed.

    The Friends would be responsible for fundraising, staffing, providing volunteers, opening and closing the building, responding to emergencies, performing inventories and caring for the museum collections, putting on exhibitions, maintaining the museum’s reference library, and other activities in conjunction with the curator.

  • 25 Anonymous // Jul 30, 2007 at 7:01 am

    Sounds like they’re legitimizing the curator’s non-performance to me. Now she can go on vacation all she wants without any pretense at oversight.

  • 26 Jacqueline Vogt // Jul 30, 2007 at 8:12 am

    Moochie and Knopsie

    Is this kind of like the kids TV show “Tele Tubbies?”

  • 27 Watchdog // Jul 30, 2007 at 8:24 am

    #25, I’m not so sure. It sounds as if they’re building a case to eliminate the position of “curator” altogether.

  • 28 Anonymous // Jul 30, 2007 at 8:30 am

    What in the world is going on here? Forget Knopp, Esposito and Zullo. They are history, irrelevant to the many voters who are not part of the old townie system. A political campaign that successfully introduces Moccia to these voters can win on this issue alone. It’s an easy story to tell. Envision a campaign piece that includes pictures of the office and a report card focusing on attendance and jobs undone highlighted with year by year newspapear headlines to illustrate how long this has been going, etc. Information from campaign finance reports detailing Daddy’s contributions, regardless of candidate party . . .

    Can someone publish the curator’s job description? There must be one. She must have agreed to perform the functions listed in it before she was hired. Has she been successful in getting it changed to a “no show” job?

    Can somebody verify her attendance record? Her travel, shopping and dining sitings during the time she was too sick to work?

    Why does her union, the voice of so many conscientious hard workers continue to defend her? When did the taxpayaers of this town agree to pay a generous allowance to this spoiled child and god-child of old, rich, corrupt politicians? You can’t blame a child who believes she’s entitled to her allowance even though she can’t even keep her room clean! But, you can send her away.

  • 29 Anonymous // Jul 30, 2007 at 8:43 am

    Moochie running on a campaign pledge to oust Sue(you) Gunn? Sounds a bit like the Esposito stunt that opened the can of worms that is Heritage Park right before his 14-year reign of incompetence ended.

    The majority of voters in Norwalk could care less about the curator at the Norwalk Museum. They want quality of life issues dealt with: streets paved, taxes lowered, etc.

    The Dick will be re-elected, if at all, because he has done nothing but keep his head down and play it safe.

  • 30 anonymous // Jul 30, 2007 at 8:55 am

    What do you mean forget Zullo ? He is relevant and still behind much of this. As to Mr. Gunn look at the recipients that received the scholarship’s that he oversees. Very intriguing !!!!!!!

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a Reply