YourCT.com header image 2

Sunday Driving Open Thread


by turfgrrl


July 22nd, 2007 · 9 Comments

Nothing can be finer than to be leaving Carolina in the morning, so today you get an open thread. Was the haitain festival an 80db or less music fest? If the parking is on Haviland street, in the maritime garage, and in the Webster st. parking lot, then how was it that the DPW work on Washington street caused so much consternation? Were pedestrians impeded? That being said, what happened to communication here. A notice emailed to merchants, or a flyer could have alerted all to the fact that the street was going to be dug up and repaved.

Manresa wants to curb global warming, must be self interest, the plant sits on low lying land that juts out into the sound, higher water means the end of generatign electricity for them. My only question is whether they came to this conclusion because the water is already lapping at their door during high tide, or have they forecast when that will occur.

State Senator Bob Duff says the freshly minted state eminent domain law is good, Norwalk’s Redevelopment Authrority says not so good.

But other parts of the law could affect city residents, he said. Several property owners in the West Avenue redevelopment area - which stretches from Chapel Street to Butler Street - have opposed the plan, and are worried their businesses could be seized through eminent domain.

Under the new rules, residents would be reimbursed at 125 percent of their property’s fair market value and the city would have 10 years from the date it first used eminent domain to actually seize remaining properties within the redevelopment plan.

Another provision requires the city to say which properties could be seized under eminent domain before it has drawn up a development plan, Sheehan said.

While he said the 10-year deadline is good for the city because it provides “guidance” to the Common Council - which previously set eminent domain timelines - he is critical of other changes. Now, there is no reimbursement requirement, Sheehan said, and developers in redevelopment areas have offered “far beyond what the fair market value is.

“The provision might cause the reverse effect of what the state was seeking to do,” he said, meaning it won’t act as a deterrent to eminent domain. “From the developer’s standpoint, what is the impetus to go beyond 125 percent if the state is saying that 125 percent is fair market value?”

Sheehan said the provision that requires his department to identify properties that might be seized will also make the process more difficult.

“You are literally are in the dark. You don’t have a development plan right in front of you,” he said. “We should be specific, and only vote on properties that are essential. It makes absolutely no sense to me.”

Advocates working to stem eminent domain abuse have problems with the Connecticut law as well. The Castle Coalition, a Virginia-based nonprofit agency, graded state eminent domain laws around the country and gave Connecticut’s law an F.

“You’re talking about changes in compensation,” said Jenifer Zeigler, legislative affairs attorney with Castle Coalition. “Most of what (Connecticut’s) bill did was try to increase compensation. It doesn’t stop the abuse of power - it just tries to compensate people more after they’ve had their homes stolen.”

Norwalk Democrats think Corda is doing a great job and that the BOE isn’t spending too much money. How clueless is that? There’s a huge difference between wasting money, and spending too much. When the BOE provides to guidance and oversight to Corda, he doesn’t bother to spend tax dollars wisely. He hasn’t even bothered to file a monthly report of detailed expenses as he’s required to do under statute. And the Democratic vision for Jefferson school is what exactly? Empty promises, trailers for classrooms and a yearly request for new math textbooks because the central office hasn’t mastered basic math yet.

But feel free to discuss anything else.

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

9 Responses so far “Sunday Driving Open Thread”



  • 1 anon // Jul 22, 2007 at 4:05 pm

    There’s nothing that the dems have done about improving education. They’ll just throw money at it and pat themselves on the back.

  • 2 Mr Greenpeace // Jul 22, 2007 at 4:53 pm

    I heard two republicans were working at vets park, one was digging a line of holes, the next was filling them in , when asked what they were doing they responded planting trees,,the other guy is out sick today..

    no matter what party your talking they seem to want to blame the other for the shortfalls,,are we not the ones they work for?

    own a mirror? I do

    I try not and defend anyone, but is it a fact this year going into the school sessions they still have no idea how many illegals they need to plan for,,how many special ed they have to accomodate for , am i correct they can not turn any student away,they do have to communictae in native toungue with the parents and its not just our two or three or four or five standard spoken languages here in the US.. but yes lets simply focus in on the BOE, we must forget we have a police, fire, DPW and rec depts,,they have no hidden agendas, budgets or need for equipment..

    and while we are concerned about Vets park and its uses ,,as long as I smell that stench accross the street we should be pleased anyone wants to park a car or a bus go to an event or even consider staying there without a gas mask,,or is it me and everyone else is used to the aroma,

    has anyone seen the stats on the fire dept, the comparison chart for the other 4 top cities, I have given the police stats out here no one seems to have a problem with what we lack as a city there,,the fire dept has the same lack of manpower and future equipment needs , the same amount of calls that other cities experience for the population and area .

    I only brought these up , when looking at the grants applications some of the most recent applications lacked , acedemic facts seemed to be missing,,why was that? I have the numbers why not others,,but when it comes to the BOE the numbers are there and then some..simply depends what our priorities are I would assume..

    just a simple rant today, no one is not doing there job, everything is fine,,I found no problems with the last rental of Vets park, I took my family set the house alarm and drove north,,didn’t come back till it was over,,so yes the event did not inconveniance us at all..found no one sleeping in my back yard as most have found this summer along shorefront park..

    enjoy the day and whats left of it,,the news this weekend should be here by thursday the way the news papers have been lately..

  • 3 Beach Bum // Jul 22, 2007 at 8:27 pm

    Mr. Greenpeace, The BOE has to accept all Norwalk special ed children as defined by Federal law. If these children can not be adequately educated in the system, then they are sent to special schools paid for by BOE. The 2 qualifiers for the parents are to prove that the child meets the requirements and to get adequate services for their child.

    The BOE must accept all children residing in the city, citizens, legal and illegal immigrants. A couple of years ago the Common Council voted to make Norwalk a safe haven for illegal immigrants. This includes accepting their children in the school system. Because of this, the BOE can not establish an accurate head count before the start of the school year.

  • 4 Mr Greenpeace // Jul 22, 2007 at 8:42 pm

    thank you Beach Bum its simple to get clarification out here if one simply asks or wonders , as most know I’m not out here slamming everyone just pointing out how hard to plan until after the doors open…of course it doesn’t make any of the other facts go away,,but this fact I was to understand had a degree of uncertainty
    until after school starts..I have tried to follow all the figures being passed around I assume there was figures for this last year,,is it a high percentage of the budget or none at all..would be my next thought..

  • 5 mattw // Jul 23, 2007 at 1:32 am

    A couple of years ago the Common Council voted to make Norwalk a safe haven for illegal immigrants.

    That’s interesting — when was that?

    I wonder why that never became a big deal like the issues in New Haven and Danbury.

  • 6 anonymous // Jul 23, 2007 at 7:35 am

    Unfortubately, the Knopp administration was not a truly democratic administration and Alex Knopp was really a DINO.

  • 7 turfgrrl // Jul 23, 2007 at 8:46 am

    mattw: I don’t think the common council voted to “make Norwalk a safe haven for illegal immigrants.” Unless someone was referring to trees and invasive species ;)
  • 8 anonymous // Jul 23, 2007 at 8:56 am

    Mattw:

    It never became a big deal because many people do not want to be ultra liberal and create “safe havens” for illegal immigrants. We should not be subsidizing them, and it is horrible that our democratic state legislators now want us to subsidize their public educations. Hopefully, it will not happen here. Are you as campaign manager for Mr. Briggs saying it will be a centerpiece of Walter Briggs mayoral bid ? That will go over real well with the TAXpayers of this city.

  • 9 It Doesn\'t Make Sense to Me // Jul 23, 2007 at 5:36 pm

    I have read about a teacher who was once convicted of selling cocaine, but who is now being allowed to continue teaching in the public schools in Connecticut because he was undergoing extremely difficult circumstances when he sold the drugs and because the sale had nothing to do with students or with the schools. For the next couple of years, he will be limited to teaching in one of the charter schools, where the director is happy to have him, but after that he will be free to teach in any of CT’s public schools. Oh. He will also be subject to drug testing and, no doubt, other monitoring.

    The compassionate part of me wants to say give the man a second chance, but I look at what school districts do to students who sell drugs outside of school: They expel them. The drug sale can be in the middle of the summer, on a weekend, fifteen miles from the nearest school, and they still expel the student. The student can be someone with all kinds of problems, but they still expel the student.

    What is the message? If anyone thinks I’m being unduly harsh, please respond.

Leave a Reply