YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Corda Unveils The No-Cuts Plan


by turfgrrl


July 12th, 2007 · 38 Comments

At last night’s  BOE meeting, Sal Corda reiterated that he was “almost positive” there were no teacher layoffs after the final budget reconciliation which occurred prior to the Common Council’s vote to add more money to the BOE funding.

This is a very important detail, because as of Tuesday’s Common Council meeting, there were still some, in positions to know better, who insisted on spreading the story that there were. Draconian, I believe was the word used. Ah yes, draconian in that instead of buying a Mercedes S-Class, they were forced to settle for the C-Class. Somewhere in all this political posturing no one bothered to say that they were still out buying a new car, when that  serviceable 2006 model C-Class was still showing low miles.

As Phylis Bolden said, the BOE should learn that you sometimes just have to make do with what you have. A concept alien to most members of the BOE these past few months.

So from Alexander Fenwick’s artcile we learn:

His top priority is adding a new speech pathologist at a $30,680 cost, followed by filling a substitute nurse position left open during the 2006-07 school year for $69,000 and reinstatement of summer work for one middle school guidance secretary at each of the district’s four middle schools, for $30,000.

Donna Riddell, president of the Norwalk Federation of Educational Personnel, said summer work, including processing incoming sixth-graders’ registrations, organizing new students’ information, typing schedules and updating records, is necessary to ensure a smooth opening in September. Ideally, the secretaries should be 12-month employees, she said.

A reinstatement of outside secretarial services to record board minutes for $6,250 was the final item in Corda’s top priorities.

The items classified as “may need to do,” could change, Corda said.

Top on that list was adding an elementary reserve teacher for $76,700.

At Brookside Elementary School, another teacher is needed, and enrollment at Fox Run Elementary School is at the tipping point, Corda said. At two other elementary schools, enrollment could require the number of teachers to fluctuate.

A new state law requires that first- through third-grade students determined to be “substantially deficient” in reading skills must attend summer school and those that don’t pass must be held back.

Corda also increased his previous recommendation to add one new teacher at each high school to two teachers per school for $306,800.

“I would like to limit, to the extent possible, the number of youngsters we have in study hall,” Corda said.

In presenting his original budget, which called for seven additional high school teachers, Corda produced statistics that showed that of 375 seniors at Norwalk High School last school year, 94 had one study hall each day, while 192 had two and 68 had three.

At a recent Board of Education meeting, Corda presented a chart that showed the average number of students in study hall each period. The highest figure showed an average of 299 students in study hall during second period on a given day at Norwalk High School.

Also under the “may need” category, Corda listed two special education staff, either psychologists, social workers or a combination for $195,000, along with $70,000 in reinstated special education salary costs and $50 in special education consultant services.

The two items categorized as “under consideration” require more planning, Corda said. They include the addition of a new parent information and central registration officer for $53,820 and an extra teacher for a new special education program at $76,700.

I am pleased that Corda saw the need to put back the secretarial services for recording board meeting minutes. I’m sure you all will have something to say about the rest.

source: Advocate, Corda picks top priorities for schools, July 12 2007

Tags: Education · In the News · Norwalk

38 Responses so far “Norwalk: Corda Unveils The No-Cuts Plan”



  • 1 Aunt Bertha // Jul 12, 2007 at 12:04 pm

    Teachers and specialists are needed at all levels. I hope that they are not cut. The question that is still remaining is why is there no cleaning house in the central office? There are jobs there that really are a waste of the tax payers money. We do need more IT people and really it would be smart to have one in each high school.

  • 2 Watchingandlistening // Jul 12, 2007 at 1:44 pm

    As has been pointed out on this site and was outlined at the Common Council meeting by one of the “public comment” speakers, most of the “draconian” cuts to Corda’s budget were the inflated estimates he used to prepare his budget; $1.5 million in health benefits, $1.3 million in special ed costs, inflated enrollment numbers, padded expense amounts, etc.
    In the end, the budget AFTER the cuts represented the REAL needs of the school system. It was unfortunate that Moccia had made “promises” he should not have about giving them additional state funds. He had done a good job UNTIL then, in holding their feet to the fire, but like Knopp did, caved under pressure. Kudos to Mile Lyons, who tried to put his finger in the dike at the Board of Estimate and to Hempstead, Grant and Coffey for not supporting the Mayor’s giveaway.

  • 3 help me understand // Jul 12, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    Did the mayor really promise? I think it was only Corda who said that, and he’s a known liar.

  • 4 Watchdog // Jul 12, 2007 at 2:21 pm

    The sad part of gifting the BOE with this large amount is that Dr. Corda et al may now ease up on combing through their line-by-line budget, as they were forced to do previously. It is interesting that in working through their own finances, some money was discovered in surplus that may not have otherwise been found. I sincerely hope efforts continue to best utilize funding to maximize support and peak performance at the classroom level.

  • 5 anon // Jul 12, 2007 at 3:29 pm

    Just a point of fact, the mayor did say that if there were any money forthcoming from the state that he would allocate that amount to the BOE. No one at the time questioned it or refused to support it so i would say kudos to those members who kept their word. There was a lot of dialog on all of it the other night and one council person did make it clear that we the taxpayers want transparency and accountability and not for the kids to suffer. Thats what the papers said anyhow. But to the defense of those who voted to appropriate the money awarded from the state, it good to see that they were tru to their word for once.

  • 6 longtimer // Jul 12, 2007 at 6:18 pm

    Looks like more evidence Moccia is a better Democratic mayor than the previous Democratic mayor.

  • 7 inout // Jul 12, 2007 at 9:30 pm

    anon#5
    I do not think Moccia ever asked anyone for support. He made the statement on his own and assumed that everyone would follow. Not good leadership skills.

  • 8 Mike Lyons // Jul 12, 2007 at 11:35 pm

    As you may know, I made a motion at the Board of Estimate (BET) to give about 50% of the State money to the Board of Ed (BoE) and to use 50% (as allowed by State law) for tax reductions for our taxpayers. My motion was voted down, but having seen what happened at the BoE afterwards, I certainly feel even more certain that my motion was justified.

    Two things to note about the Advocate article above:

    First, the “priorities” stated in it by Dr. Corda are NOT the same priorities that he listed in the submission he gave to us on the BET last week; he’s already changed the prioritizing on the list significantly. Filling of teacher’s positions has now been shifted from “need to do now” into “may need to do” or “under consideration.” So he may not use any of the money we gave him for hiring teachers.

    Second, despite “$6.7 million in reductions”, “‘I’m almost positive no layoffs occurred,’ Corda said.” No layoffs at all? Remember how this budget was supposed to be “disastrous” for our schools? One councilman said Tuesday “I told you so” about the “disaster”. Yes, he told us so, and he was dead wrong then and is dead wrong now. I’ve lived through corporate layoffs. A budget that doesn’t lay off a single person is not “draconian”. Living through a budget where not one employee is laid off is NOT a “disaster”. All these lost positions we heard about were attrition losses that Dr. Corda may have planned to get rid of all along (or proposed new positions).

    Regrettably, I have seen nothing from Dr. Corda or the BoE (with the shining exception of Bruce Kimmel) to suggest that they have any intention of changing the abysmal way they do their budgeting.

  • 9 Need a new BOE // Jul 13, 2007 at 6:13 am

    We need analytical BOE members who can review and really hone this budget down on an itemized basis- can Mike Lyons get on the BOE even though he is on the BET?

    I think we need him or someone like him there!

    The current BOE lacks concern about the budget (other than inflating it) and apparently have stars in their eyes for Corda.

    At this point, we really need to elect ONLY Republican members in order to get some balance to the currently all DEM team- which has failed the taxpayers, the teachers and the students. The current Dem team has allowed Corda free rein to build an unwieldy infrastructure full of administrators.

  • 10 Watchdog // Jul 13, 2007 at 8:56 am

    Mike (# 8)

    None of it is surprising, but we would hope the board is starting to ask questions and raising the accountability factor. Thank goodness that Bruce Kimmel is rousing.

    I find the previous posting amusing (#9), regarding the fact that a Lyons is desperately needed on the board. Liz is sorely missed. She provided a great deal of check and balance on the board and brought a strong sense of intelligence and sound thinking with her. Unfortunately, it left with her, as well.

    But, hey! Not to worry. Whattaya get when you cross a BET member with the BoE?

    A winning candidate!

    Think about it for your next run.

  • 11 turfgrrl // Jul 13, 2007 at 9:18 am

    Mike Lyons: The other thing that concerned me about the council giving all the money to the BOE was that Corda gave an example of “finding” transportation savings by tweaking the routes and contracts. He then had to nerve to caution that if he told the council this they would start to expect that he does stuff like that all the time! Well duh, yeah I totally expect that all parts of government think about reducing operational costs all the time. There’s this thinking that bigger budgets is a sign of bureaucratic power. I’d like to see bigger cost savings and incent the cost savings finders with bonuses to spur the activity. Corda is incapable of putting a strong financial department to his “147 million dollar business.”
  • 12 Mike Lyons // Jul 13, 2007 at 10:06 am

    Thanks for the comments about Liz, Watchdog. She was pretty tough on BoE (you should see her negotiating the purchase of a new car!). ;-)

    Turfie, you are right about the mindset at BoE. Cost-control as an integral part of management policy has gradually ingrained itself in private business but is still foreign to the thought processes of most government officials — their solution is always to ask for more money.

    I think the BET did a good job this year (squeezing $6.7 million of pure waste out of the BoE budget was certainly a good start), but these budget crises will continue every year until a different cast of characters is in place on the BoE. All City departments other than the schools have a managing entity (Board, Commission, Council Committee) AND a fiscal watchdog (the BET). The schools have no watchdog (since we don’t have line item control over their budget, as we do with everyone else’s). BoE members therefore need to perform BOTH roles, but tend to only perform the former. Only Kimmel is adopting the watchdog stance. We need to elect more like him.

  • 13 turfgrrl // Jul 13, 2007 at 10:22 am

    Mike Lyons: You point then to the intrinsic failure of Corda, since squeezing more educational programs out of the BOE dollars only serves to bolster improving education. I think he’s exposed as a charlatan for refusing to put money into the classrooms and insisting that his administrative staff is the only “investment” he’s willing to fight for.
  • 14 indythinker // Jul 13, 2007 at 10:24 am

    The BOE members need to demand that they are given the right numbers and right tools in their budget process. A Finance director should be the first order of business. This year became a hot bed of accusations against the BOE and the Council of not caring about the kids. Perhaps someone should enlighten them that this exactly who they were caring about. What they were trying to do is get the money put in place for the benefit of the kids and not the beaurocratic bs that prevails each and every year. I don’t agree with “At this point, we really need to elect ONLY Republican members in order to get some balance” This would only make for onesided decision making and we all know how that has turned out over the years.

  • 15 Mike Lyons // Jul 13, 2007 at 10:45 am

    Indythinker, I think the “only Republicans” comment by #9 derives from the fact that the Board of Ed is currently 9-0 Democratic (including Bruce Kimmel, who admittedly quit the Democratic Party recently out of frustration over the BoE’s handling of its budget). If only Republicans were elected this year the Board would flip to narrow 5-4 Republican control (as even a split as you can get). I think the Republicans could pick up 4 of the 5 seats this year (which are elected by Council District); they can’t win the South Norwalk seat, but the others are open for competition. That would leave the Democrats in 5-4 control, but with a healthy GOP presence (and perhaps a defacto fiscally-responsible majority, if Kimmel votes with the Republicans on budgetary matters). One hopes that ending one-party rule would bring some diverse viewpoints into play.

    Turfie, I agree — Sal lost a lot of credibility when he refused to even CONSIDER central-office bureaucracy cuts while dangling large cuts in teachers and sports programs out in front of people to scare them (none of which cuts, of course, actually happened).

  • 16 turfgrrl // Jul 13, 2007 at 11:10 am

    Mike Lyons: Yeah I agree with you that the partisan label does little good. The problem to be solved is a lack of financial accountability interest on the part of candidates seeking the spots. I say this from a historic makeup of the board the last few years. Being able to fog up a mirror shouldn’t be the sole criteria for wanting to be on a board or commission. It’s a shame its been politicized, because no one should ever be looking for party affiliation on educational issues.
  • 17 Very Sad // Jul 13, 2007 at 11:30 am

    All of this is very sad because I am certain that Dr. Corda is shaking his head and smiling at the inability of the rest of us to understand that he is so much wiser and that we should understand that everything should be done his way.

    Do we need a BOE anymore, since Dr. Corda seems to be making all of the decisions on his own? We could save the costs of the recording clerk by simply eliminating the BOE and its meetings. (That was sarcasm, folks.)

    Despite the passions of those who write on this blog, most Norwalk voters aren’t paying attention, and Dr. Corda knows it. He has a 3-year contract and he’s going to sit happily in his office for the rest of his term. And then the BOE will extend his contract yet again.

    Sheesh!

  • 18 Beach Bum // Jul 13, 2007 at 12:17 pm

    Very Sad, You’re so right! Most people don’t care. How very sad!

    I find it interesting that our Common Council bought Corda’s fears and gave him the $1.6 million extra from the state. They seem not to care about their responsiblity to their constituents or are they just plain dumb? Or is it just Democrats taking care of their own? Money does mean power.

    How much budget control does the Board of Estimate have over the Board of Ed and Corda? Because the Board of Ed is elected by the people(it answers only to the people), I would wager that a fiscal watchdog w/authority can only be mandated by the state with good reason. Am I wrong? Otherwise, kiss the accountablity concept goodbye? Soccer moms and their ilk keep voting them in.

  • 19 Anonymous // Jul 13, 2007 at 3:22 pm

    I think those who are fed up with the BOE and Corda would rather whine about it on this blog than reach out to the public and let them know what’s going on (it’s called activism).

    The idiot who’s sitting in the White House was elected through the ignorance of the public, and such ignorance will continue to enable the election of unethical and irresponsible people until somebody decides they’re mad as hell and not going to take it anymore.

    As H.L. Mencken famously said, “Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.”

  • 20 turfgrrl // Jul 13, 2007 at 3:36 pm

    Anonymous 19: While the cynic on me wants to agree with you, because Kimmel and Burnett are the lone BOE members who question Corda, and because Bruce Morris still is getting paid for a full time job during the legislative session, and because textbooks are being replaced that were purchased a few years ago, and more kitchen stuff is being bought while the same stuff sits unopened and not in use … I could go on, the cynical listing of unresolved issues.

    But before the blog (btb), which should one day be a date acronym appended to all Norwalk acts, the types of concerns and discussions would start and end with a few people, and maybe an op ed letter or two. I think now at least, the truthier truths are out here for closer examination. And the untruthier truths are debunked or at least relegated to the myth category. I think that the blog serves to inform, rather than activate, and lets people sift through all sides of an issue rather than relying on a single side.

    Where it goes from there is hard to see. The more the merrier, the wider discussion from different perspectives the better, the easier to interact with government the greater involvement of people.

    No answers, just thoughts here. Good discussion point though.

  • 21 Very Sad // Jul 13, 2007 at 4:30 pm

    Turfgrrl,

    Have you considered running for the Norwalk BOE?

  • 22 Mike Lyons // Jul 13, 2007 at 5:43 pm

    Beach Bum — you are correct; we on the Board of Estimate can only control the gross total spending of the Board of Ed, not line item details (we CAN control such details with all other city departments). It would take a change in State law (not gonna happen) to give us that oversight.

    The bottom line is, will the voters put fiscally-responsible people on the BoE? They have the power of the ballot, but they have to use it.

  • 23 Beach Bum // Jul 13, 2007 at 10:30 pm

    Turfgirl, Thanks for clarifying the purpose of blogging.

    #19, It’s so very interesting that you should compare unrelated national politics w/a local issue. People, I know, tend to be more knowledgeable on national issues than local ones. It is probably because there are more experts from all sides explaining the issues better. Education laws, policies, regulations, etc… are so convoluted, they make the IRS code look like a See Spot Run book. Very few experts are willing to explain these ed laws to the local voter. As a result the local constituent votes from emotion not from facts.

    Corda used fear to get his budgets passed. For example, he stated that teaching positions will be eliminated if his budget was not passed. Moms and their ilk bought into this. Just read the editorial letters in The Hour. They either do not have the facts or do not understand them. Finally, when election time comes they resort to emotions when voting, remembering those elected officials who questioned Corda’s budgetary decisions: budgets that affected their child’s “educational well-being”.

  • 24 Mr Greenpeace // Jul 14, 2007 at 12:38 am

    geeez I thought this blog was for my pointless rants…………………….

    great discussion with great people, I have said it in the past I have found an intellectual goldmine of sorts out here , agree or disagree everyone for the most part are informative.The passion some have on subjects is admirable and at times comical.

    I like to think this blog lends accountability to some issues as well.

  • 25 anonymous // Jul 14, 2007 at 1:01 am

    I have heard that the Asst. Superintendent is teaching a full time class at City Hall for UCONN and is collecting full salary. Is this a position paid for by UCONN? Can anyone verify this?

  • 26 Anonymous // Jul 14, 2007 at 7:32 am

    #19 - You say “unrelated national politics with a local issue.” Ever heard the saying “all politics are local”?

    You say Corda used fear to get his budgets passed. I would say the same of our national leaders when they wanted to invade a sovereign country.

    You say local constituents vote from emotion, not from facts and people tend to be more knowledgeable on national issues than local ones.

    I must (sadly) disagree. Our country would not be in the sorry state that it is if more voters were knowledgeable on national issues, and they didn’t vote for presidents based on whether they believed they’d be worth sitting down and having a beer with.

  • 27 Beach Bum // Jul 14, 2007 at 11:16 am

    #26, What exactly are you trying to say? You won’t meet me at any of the IPA concerts in Bridgeport? Sit down on a blanket with my family on a warm summer’s eve? Drinking that cold one, listening to some really good music for free? Now, I’m sad, again. I was hoping you could explain to me why George Bush and his cronies gives a damn about Corda and his budgets. If not a cold beer, how about lemonade?

  • 28 turfgrrl // Jul 14, 2007 at 11:31 am

    Very Sad: I appreciate the suggestion, however, I’m not in a position to run for office yet. Something to do with changing the world in a different way during the day job. I’d be happy to help anyone who does want to change the the world of the BOE though.
  • 29 turfgrrl // Jul 14, 2007 at 11:49 am

    anoymous 26 and Beach Bum: I’d argue that US voters tend to my uninformed locally and and nationally. We don’t get analysis of the issues of the day, we get a score card of who says they support something instead of why they support something. Look at the presidential race, its a scorecard of how raised the most money instead of who raised the most discussion about the issues.
  • 30 Beach Bum // Jul 14, 2007 at 1:06 pm

    Turfgirl, I must disagree. There is such a wealth of information on the internet ready to be read. One has access to newspapers from all over the world. I read newspapers from the Middle East, Asia, and other cities in the USA. I read from primary sources, ie. individuals who witnessed events. I read from experts giving their opinions on matters. All free. Just goggle a little. Unfortunately, I don’t get this sort of information on the local level. I’m sure it does exist; I just have to goggle a little harder. Your blog is a good start.

    In terms of who raises the most money… It just means they are able to better package their message slickly. There are other messages out there. One just has to look for them.

    Turfgirl, I love you and your blog. Stop reading the NY times. You’ll feel better!

  • 31 turfgrrl // Jul 14, 2007 at 1:20 pm

    Beach Bum: Hey I only read the NYT for the weather ;). I read international/national news too , but my point wasn’t about we the few, the proud, the people who read news and news blogs online, but the great masses who don’t read either. Even on a good day, when I get 4k visitors, that still means 80k or so aren’t reading me. The same sort of equation applies to to news paper sites, in more or less the same ration of population to site. So in the US its television with the greater reach, and when was the last time television explained any issue? Storm front moves in next weekend, news at 12, 3, 5, 6, and 11.

    Of course if everyone had an iPhone, with 3G connectivity, then we everyone could tap into the net real time to get news thus finally killing the radio star …. or something like that. :)

  • 32 Anon // Jul 14, 2007 at 4:29 pm

    #25: I know that Dr. Lang has taught courses for UConn recently, but I don’t know at what time of day. She is paid by UConn. Are you saying that the course is offered at Norwalk City Hall? I can’t imagine that because there aren’t many places there to accommodate a class. Then again, stranger things happen altogether too often.

    I cannot imagine what she could be teaching; it certainly can’t have anything to do with how schools are run because she has never demonstrated any understanding of that. To know Norwalk’s schools, she (and Sal Corda) would actually have to spend time in them, and that doesn’t happen. It also can’t have anything to do with human interactions, unless she is presenting the “how not to” example. Wake up, Norwalk BOE!

  • 33 robert f // Jul 14, 2007 at 4:36 pm

    http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2007/07/09/070709crbo_books_menand

    The above link, a Louis Menand discussion about a book by Bryan Caplan from the most recent New Yorker issue, offers or refers to several theories as to who votes in an election, and how and why they vote the way they do.

    I offer this link, both because it may shed some light on the subject of voter tendencies for those of us with 15 minutes to read, and because it serves as a reminder to us, as one of the theories suggests, that a majority of voters don’t want to spend a lot of time learning about the issues. “We” prefer shortcuts. The “we” probably does not reflect the average blogger or forum participant.

    Personally, I believe the same voter tendencies in national elections would exist at the local level.

  • 34 Watchdog // Jul 14, 2007 at 5:51 pm

    According to the University of CT Stamford Class Guide for Spring 2007, the following class is posted:

    EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
    Contemp Educ Policy Issues
    EDLR 378
    Instructor: KAREN LANG

    Nothing is said about a specific site with the exception of the Stamford branch of UCONN.

  • 35 Dr. Greek // Jul 14, 2007 at 9:12 pm

    Karen Land should be teaching a course called:
    Contemporary Educational Failures: My Case Study

  • 36 Anonymous // Jul 16, 2007 at 7:09 am

    Cheers to more highly-paid do-nothings!

  • 37 Slayer // Jul 26, 2007 at 9:28 am

    #32 I believe that this course by Profession Lang (ha ha) is held right at Central Office, perhaps the room where they hold the b of e meetings. How would she know about leadership? Every time she opens her mouth she spouts elitist bs about Greenwich. She is in charge of curriculum and instruction, and yet, she has never visited any schools. Has anyone ever seen her walking a hallway, talking to students, or staff? How could she know anything abut what is going on in this district. The board continues to give her raises, pays for the days she does not take for vacation, and never holds her to any high expectations. She should have to give a monthly commentary to the board of ed about the state of the classroom. Yeah! I like that idea.

  • 38 Anon // Jul 26, 2007 at 9:35 am

    The course is taught at City Hall? Don’t the mayor and council members have the right to ask questions about the use of the City of Norwalk’s headquarters?

Leave a Reply