YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Celebrating Norwalk Revolutionary History


by turfgrrl


July 5th, 2007 · 33 Comments

Yesterday’s events at Mill Hill certainly gathered a nice sized crowd. Part of the fun of events like these is that you end up learning a bit more than simply reading about the past. Having reenactors dressed in colonial outfits, splicing songs and scenes from the local plays produced by the Crystal Theater, (which according to Fred Bondi is in need of donations and chairs) along with the live reading of the Declaration of Independence was a meaningful tribute to the period that gave us America, the country.

I missed the earlier tour of the cemetery at St. Paul’s, but you can get a flavor of that by this news12.com video:

video link. Unfortunately you have to be an optonline subscriber to access it.

One of the interesting things I learned was about the visit of General Lafayette to Norwalk following the Revolutionary war. I knew vaguely of General Rochambeau’s encampments in the Southbury area, and it occurred to me that Lafayette might have had a greater connection to Norwalk, than just passing through on a victory tour. Lafayette’s journals mention to the Norwalk burning;

About fourteen days ago, one British regiment (the forty-fourth completed) and three Hessian regiments were embarked, and
are gone, as is supposed, to Halifax. The operations of the enemy this
campaign have been confined to the establishment of works of defence,
taking a post at King’s Ferry, and burning the defenceless towns of New
Haven, Fairfield, and Norwalk, on the Sound, within reach of their
shipping, where little else was, or could be, opposed to them, than the
cries of distressed women and helpless children; but these were offered
in vain. Since these notable exploits, they have never stepped out of
their works or beyond their lines. How a conduct of this kind is to
effect the conquest of America, the wisdom of a North, a Germain, or a
Sandwich can best decide, it is too deep and refined for the
comprehension of common understandings and the general run of
politicians.

And then there’s this intrguing mention of the history of Francois Joseph Durand,

We know almost nothing of that home of Francois (Francis) Joseph in Norwalk. He dropped the name of Francois, which to him could be his name only as pronounced in French (”Frahnswah”), awkward in America and an unwise distinction. The name however, was renewed in that of his oldest son, Joseph (Francois) called by his first name. The second son was called Alexandre, from that time the French names were dropped and the names of the other children were strictly of New England. It is known that (I’ll just use the Francis Joseph from now on) Francis Joseph bought and sold land in Norwalk, and it also appears that he had a home at Stamford, near Norwalk, where many of the Weed (his wife’s family) were livingl In the census of 1790, Joseph Durand is listed as Norwalk and Stamford. Norwalk was almost entirely burned by the British in 1779, only a few houses remaining which may account for the Stamford home. In this Connecticut home, the family was brought; the older sons were married and their children were growing up about them, when a change came.

However, we find no record of his holding any official position during the war, nor have we any positive knowledge of his having any connection with Lafayette. The probable truth is that Francis Joseph was in French employ and under French pay if serving Lafayette as an interpreter, and there would be no Colonial record.

We know that Lafayette often paid and equipped the Colonial troops, and it seemms most reasonable that Francis Joseph’s personal services to hom as an interpreter were cared for by himself; yet, the Colonial record of such services would be invaluable to his descendants.

Surely, he must have filled that position, for the tradition comes to us from all sides. Lafayette was located not faar from Norwalk the first winter, and with such very patriotic relatives on the side of his wife, as Weed*, it would be strange, indeed, if one so well fitted should not have served Lafayette in every way possible. *Twenty three of the Weed family from Stamford alone fought in the Revolution. (source: From France to America, Francois Joseph Durand)

Patrick Linsey of The Hour reports on the ceremony at Mill Hill:

The largest crowd in recent memory packed the Mill Hill House museum for a celebration marking the day 13 colonies declared their independence from the British Empire.And what better a way to mark the bravery of the 56 patriots who signed the Declaration of Independence than a reading of the document? Roger Smith, a Revolutionary War re-enactor with the 3rd New Jersey Volunteers, wore period dress as he recited those words so famously crafted by Thomas Jefferson.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,” Smith intoned, silver buttons gleaming on his military coat, “and that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

And after Smith read the final words, in which the founding fathers pledge to one another “our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor,” the audience burst into cheers.

For Sarah Whiteman and her young daughter Indiana, the reading was a first.

“I liked hearing the declaration, because I’ve never heard that out loud before,” she said.

The reading was followed by a bell ringing precisely at 2 p.m. The Mill Hill House bell tolled 13 times, as did hundreds of others across the country as part of the Let Freedom Ring! program.

The usual round up of politicos spoke at the event, including State Senator Bob Duff, State Reps Chris Perone, and Toni Boucher, and Mayor Dick Moccia. Moccia concluded his brief remarks about the importance of honoring history with, “Young people don’t really learn enough about the courage of the men who signed the Declaration of Independence and the sacrifices that they made,” he said alluding to the loss of life, liberty and property the colonialists faced.

That sentiment shouldn’t be limited to just young people.

source: The Hour, Let freedom ring!, by Patrick Linsey, July 5, 2007

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

33 Responses so far “Norwalk: Celebrating Norwalk Revolutionary History”


Pages: [1] 2 » Show All



  • 1 Anonymous // Jul 5, 2007 at 9:34 am

    “Young people don’t really learn enough about the courage of the men who signed the Declaration of Independence and the sacrifices that they made,” he [Moccia] said alluding to the loss of life, liberty and property the colonialists faced. What a hypocrite.

    Perhaps the mayor would like to educate his good friend, Chris Handrinos, as well, regarding the sacrifices that Revolutionary War patriots made, such as those who lived in Norwalk.

    As owner of the Norwalk Motor Inn and the Grumman-St. John house, Handrinos wants to tear down the Grumman-St. John house at 93 East Ave. to build an extension to his tacky motel. His tolerance of the ongoing vandalism to and demolition by neglect of the property (on the National Registry of Historic Places) is testimony to his contempt for Norwalk’s legacy.

    From the CT Attorney General’s website at http://www.ct.gov/AG/cwp/view.asp?A=2426&Q=329186: “The house was in the path of British General William Tryon’s column during the July 1779 battle of Norwalk during which most of the town was burned. Heavily outnumbered troops under Norwalk’s Captain Stephen Betts held off British for hours all around Grumman’s home. Despite the fierce combat that took place around the house during this important Revolutionary War battle, the Grumman’s home was only partially damaged and was later rebuilt.”

  • 2 turfgrrl // Jul 5, 2007 at 9:55 am

    anonymous poster # 1: So much for accepting the Mayor’s commitment to history as something encouraging to all. Way to start off the comments with negativity.
  • 3 Anonymous // Jul 5, 2007 at 10:04 am

    Until I see the mayor actively doing something besides jumping on the publicity bandwagon at events like yesterday, you’ll have to forgive me for being realistic. You have to remember that this is the same man who is one record saying his used car had more value that the house at 93 East Avenue.

  • 4 Jerry Aldrich // Jul 5, 2007 at 10:11 am

    used car had more value that the house at 93 East Avenue.

    If you were the owner of the Norwalk Inn, I think you would agree with him.

    I myself am begging to wonder about the historical value of this building. We have truly historical sites and buildings in this city that are going to seed, these are truly a sad state of affairs.

    Were any historical buildings in the Reed Putnam development area? I am waiting for the owners of the Norwalk Inn, to bring this thing to a head in court.

    In the case of that building, it is time to fish or cut bait.

  • 5 Anonymous // Jul 5, 2007 at 10:12 am

    Jerry - Guess you haven’t been paying attention. The ball is in the Attorney General’s court right now.

  • 6 turfgrrl // Jul 5, 2007 at 10:14 am

    anonymous 3: Depending on what used car he might have, he may be right, just try and find a vintage corvette at prices less than house these days. However since the Mayor attended this event last year, and otherwise has been encouraging the application of the Wall Street area historic district, I’d say that you are off base and misguided. Endless bashing perceived opponents to any issue does little to get them to listen. ymmv.
  • 7 Anonymous // Jul 5, 2007 at 10:22 am

    I believe the mayor was referring to a 70’s or 80’s era Buick. It’s probably up on cinder blocks behind the Inn.

    As far as the Wall St. area goes, why would he not encourage that? It’s a no-lose situation. The house at 93 East Avenue would set a dangerous precedent for the hordes of developers who are greedy for Norwalk properties.

  • 8 Jerry Aldrich // Jul 5, 2007 at 10:22 am

    Jerry - Guess you haven’t been paying attention. The ball is in the Attorney General’s court right now. ‘

    I knew that, I just wanted to see what the feedback on this issue was.

    I feel that whoever owns the Inn, is at this point being kept from developing the full profit making potential of their property. They are facing the possibility of a competing Hotel complex going up in Reed Putnam. I think that they know that every month they are held up, they will stand more of a chance of loosing profit share to this new hotel development.

    The worst case scenario for Norwalk, is the Inn closing and another piece of tax base is lost, but the so called historic building is still there like an eyesore.

    I would hate to think what could be put there if the Inn closes.

    I am not against this building, I just want to see this thing settled. I think that sooner or later the S… has to hit the fan.

  • 9 Jerry Aldrich // Jul 5, 2007 at 10:24 am

    Thank God for the third district.

  • 10 L'arlequino // Jul 5, 2007 at 10:26 am

    Turfgrrl - I believe comparing the value of the house at 93 East Avenue to a used car - even if it’s one that holds its value well - is a red herring on your part. Disappointing.

    The issue is: the house is an historic property, it is in danger of being replaced by something that seems to be of questionable when considering what would be lost.

  • 11 turfgrrl // Jul 5, 2007 at 10:38 am

    L’arlequino: As a car buff, I resented the insinuation that cars are not valuable historic works of art, that’s all. The issue however, is not the Mayor’s. It’s between the Norwalk Inn and the AG. The Mayor, I believe, made a good faith effort prior to the law suit to get the sides to come to a settlement. It’s too bad that nothing came of that. Attack the Inn, and its owners freely, but understand that the office of the Mayor in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and now 2007, has had no jurisdiction over this.

    Jerry Aldrich: The Inn at any point could have resolved the issue. There’s nothing wrong with incorporating the house as part of the Inn and would differentiate the Inn from being another bland hotel that any chain could have put up. One needs only look to see how repurposed an old building, for $10.2 million, and created a unique destination for Middletown.

  • 12 L'arlequino // Jul 5, 2007 at 10:42 am

    I believe Indiga could shed light on whether the Mayor actually did anything to help resolve the issue? My understanding is that the efforts he made, if any, were minimal. His relationship with the owner of the Inn, if anything, would hopefully be one that would have him encouraging keeping the structure and restoring as per your example. But I fear that is not the case.

  • 13 turfgrrl // Jul 5, 2007 at 10:51 am

    i should have made the link to the finished Inn in Middletown http://www.innatmiddletown.com/ separated from
    the NYT article
  • 14 Jerry Aldrich // Jul 5, 2007 at 11:03 am

    There’s nothing wrong with incorporating the house as part of the Inn and would differentiate the Inn from being another bland hotel that any chain could have put up.

    Incorporating the house into the Inn is like adding a termite colony to a log home. Today we see especially in FF county. Beautiful homes being torn down 2 at a time to make room for a McMansion. Why, because the land is worth more than the buildings. It does not take a rocket scientist to realize that most cases unless you wish to spend more than the building is worth to restore or completely re plan your expansion, and have a complete new architecture phase bought into the mix, it is usually cheaper to tear down a building rather then try to make a silk purse out of a sows ear. 10.2 MILLION BUCKS, pretty soon you will be talking about some real money here.

    This would possibly be the perfect land for the Miniature Golf Course. Easy access to the Thruway, on a main street, plenty of parking, and it could be built with a historical theme to incorporate the building. Or maybe even a post apocalyptic theme using the building as the last of Earths wood structures.

    There ya go. 2 birds with one stone.

  • 15 Anonymous // Jul 5, 2007 at 11:10 am

    Ah, another wit with a sense of irony. Welcome to the machine. Too many sincere bores with tunnel vision maketh a boring blog.

  • 16 turfgrrl // Jul 5, 2007 at 11:26 am

    Jerry Aldrich: Ha! Well mini golf would trump any Inn like expansion, as amusing as that is.

    Yes, the tear down phenomena is happening all over. I like how westportnow.com documents the daily tear down. But in 2002, and I’m going from memory here, the Inn bought the property fully knowing they were buying an historic building, that needed more than the usual amount of repairs and maintenance. Kinda like when I buy an old car, I know economically it makes little sense to restore it, especially since I don’t do the work myself, but I do it because I love the car and wish to drive it. Plus I get to find my car much faster in parking lots since it doesn’t look like every other car. But I digress. The Inn could have come up with a plan that made financial sense. Having an authentic revolutionary tavern/inn makes for a tourist destination. As Middletown has proven. And btw, they serve a great selection of beers there too, including Samuel Adams, another brand that trades on history.

  • 17 Mr Greenpeace // Jul 5, 2007 at 12:03 pm

    I hate to ruin a great thread, but my family and myself enjoyed the day at the Mill Hill events, I found history Matching the Revere ride and the Bunker Hill monument and lets not forget the oldest Navy warship stil in service Old Ironsides.Still I was taken back by the sound of bagpipes and the organ what a jewel!

    The church reminds me of the First parish Church in Plymouth where my uncle played the organ, the bells that toll were also of familiar tone,,the stone work the very same type of contruction but still each one unique in holding such history.

    Its odd, I have had the kids all over , we started from 1620 and have gone through the years past the WWII ships at battleship cove to the airfcraft carriers all over the country, the Subs at Groton and the even Stonehedge in NH, but who would of thought I could of learned so much here in Norwalk just by walking Mill Hill.

    Sam Adams by the way is a Boston beer, along side of Harpoon seems we all have something in common..

    I will push my vintage plymouth Barricuda back into the garage its 383 earned me a speeding ticket in Delaware where they take you to court when caught speeding,,follow me to the judge is what I heard back in the late 80’s that was a 150 dollar fine so much for holly four barrels..

    I guess tearing down a building that holds so much history in the guise of progress saddens me, it be like tearing down the Barker Tavern where people from all over go to just to sit and dine,,Once it goes it be a forgotten jewel but not to those who rememeber past..

    quick qeustion what were those red flags at the cementary unmarked graves?

    so much for being all over the board!

  • 18 Jerry Aldrich // Jul 5, 2007 at 12:24 pm

    Turfgrrl wrote in post #16
    “Jerry Aldrich: Ha! Well mini golf would trump any Inn like expansion, as amusing as that is.”
    ————————————

    Of course I was being facetious, but stranger things have happened in Norwalk.

  • 19 Watchdog // Jul 5, 2007 at 12:29 pm

    GET OUT, Greenpeace!!! You have a Barracuda? Tell me.. is it blue? If so, can you give me some history about its former owners? I’ll give you my email, if you’re up to that. I’m very interested in this.

  • 20 Watchdog // Jul 5, 2007 at 12:35 pm

    I apologize, but I had posted about this issue in a previous July 4th thread. For the sake of clarification, it should be known that L’arlequino was NOT wearing the Hawaiian shirt with tartan trousers.

    But, Mr. Greenpeace.. alas, no shamrock, but I DID spy a green celtic cross, I believe it was.. on a black tee-shirt. Zat you?

  • 21 Norwalker // Jul 5, 2007 at 12:47 pm

    I know when I was a member of the NHS we used to mark the graves of those that fought in the revolution. So those flags may be for that.

  • 22 Mr Greenpeace // Jul 5, 2007 at 1:28 pm

    Thank you Norwalker may be the reason there was only three accross from the Lockwood crypt,,small triangle red flags,,I should of asked the clergy that was so helpfull when touring the church he took the time to explain to some of my children about the church itself..and its adornments,,the glass was another whole thread in itself,,just a awesome place to inhale detail..

    Yes Watchdog you are correct we had eye contact, the shamrock was on the U.S.S. Massachusetts hat next to the BB59 plate,the car was candy apple red the only previous owner was a friend ,it had been a pace car for New England Dragway..its not the hemi class but now sits with oil seeping into the pistons on blocks with a milk carton seat waiting for new leather, the black emeron paint job highlights the hood scops and a mopar fin on the back ,,only trouble I had when work was done on it the fender vents one side has two the other three,,I did find a blue one in the Ridgefield area almsot a match including the back fin..

    I can be reached at norwalk.news@yahoo.com I have found the info coming in there sometimes gets rerouted to others who have met Mr Greenpeace and can do much more with info than I..I listen as well even if others don’t agree they have something to say..sometimes sounding combative draws it all out, never knowing what the red herring actually is..

    shame we didn’t get the weigh station package, those who died in that truck accident in Ct died for what? How could something like that get by Duff while working so hard on our truck safety with 136,,being told what priority was and what is Sen Duff are two differant things,,sounds like political football to me..

    I would like to read more about this , how about it Advocate and Hour the holiday is over, and Norwalk is generating news…my paper was light this morning even the Stop and Shop circular was thin,, got give these carriers something to throw don’t we?

    Anyone notice the building from accross from the church a nice design on the fascade for a new building..

    the shirt ,,The Dropkick Murphys from South Boston the cross was the Warriors Code..by the way

  • 23 Edward Eckert // Jul 5, 2007 at 4:33 pm

    So, this is “the blog” I’ve heard so much about. Well, when I saw this thread, I knew I had to comment. For those of you who don’t know me, hello! I am a co-chair for the July 4th events that took place yesterday. I appreciate everyone’s concern about preserving Norwalk’s history, and that is what my wife Madeleine and I try to do with events like the July 4th celebration. I believe that yesterday was the success that it was because of the dedication of folks like you who understand the meaning and importance of our rich history. I hope that more programs such as the July 4th festivities will help generate even more interest. Perhaps in this way, we can begin to work towards convincing our city that preserving the remnants of that history can be beneficial and prosperous for all. If anyone has any ideas about how we can accomplish this, please share them. BTW, Madeleine and I are still researching Lafayette. We hope to find more exciting information about this fabulous man and a possible connection to Norwalk. If we find it, you can be certain it will be a segment in our “Did You Know?” Powerpoint presentation.

    Thank you all for your participation and support.

  • 24 L'arlequino // Jul 5, 2007 at 4:36 pm

    Hey, Ed - Great job you and Madeleine did yesterday. Keep up the good work. Perhaps the City, in its wisdom, will someday see fit to bestow the title of “City Historians” upon you both.

  • 25 Mr Greenpeace // Jul 5, 2007 at 4:42 pm

    Thank you Mr Eckhert and all the folks , my family and myself enjoyed the entire event.

  • 26 turfgrrl // Jul 5, 2007 at 8:54 pm

    Edward Eckert: Thanks for dropping in. You and your wife did a fantastic job making history come alive. If you would like the powerpoint presentation to be linked here shoot me an email turfgrrl@gmail.com, and I’ll put it up.
  • 27 Indiga // Jul 5, 2007 at 9:04 pm

    It was wonderful to see all those folks in the Town House…patriotic and proud of the real risks that real people, right here in Norwalk, took so long ago. I’m a sucker for that. I’m also a sucker for wonderful old cars because TG is right, they have character and soul. I had a 1967 Dodge Charger that would leave me stranded every once in a while — just to do it. But it was such a cool car. Unfortunately, I don’t think the Mayor’s comparison of the Grumman St. JOhn house to his 1980’s Checy was coming from that sort of nostalgia. I think he really meant “it’s old and useless” — something that preservationists tried their damndest to disprove with alternative plans that let the Inn expand AND save the house. Because no one’s against the Inn doing good business. I’m delighted that Paramount used them for a staging site. The irony, of course, is that Parmount shot here beacuse of the historic look of the area. The loss of the Grumman St. John house will irrevecoably change that — and may set the stage for futher losses. A lot depends on the judge’s decision but don’t expect a quick resolution. Even if the judge decides that the house is protected, Handrinos will surely appeal and re-appeal — just as he did when the variance was initially found to be illegal. He seems to have bottomless pockets for lawyers. Not so for a non-profit like NPT. His ZBA appeals and reappeals took 5 years to wind through the process until finally Dr. Stember got tired of throwing money at lawyers. At least for those 5 years, there were tenants in the house. Now it sits empty — victim of accelerated decay. I guess history is fine if it’s safely contained in the Town House, but don’t go spreading it around town to the sites where it actually happened! Acck — sorry to be so negative. It’s just an issue that is so difficult, especially when it has become such a political can of worms.

  • 28 anon // Jul 7, 2007 at 5:18 pm

    Dear Mr. Eckert, thank you and your wife for bringing history to life in Norwalk, it was wonderful to see.

  • 29 David Westmoreland // Jul 8, 2007 at 10:58 pm

    Mr. Greenpeace, et al. Thank you for your nice comments regarding the activities at St. Paul’s and Mill Hill. With regard to the mystery of the small red flags in the cemetery - they are actually just locations where we are considering planting a tree that a parishioner is donating in honor of his wife’s birthday!
    And I heartily agree with the other comments regarding the Eckert’s - they are wonderful people who are contributing so much towards bringing the history of Norwalk to life for all of us!

  • 30 Mr Greenpeace // Jul 9, 2007 at 10:21 pm

    To David Westmoreland, thank you for satisfying my curiosity , my children ask me things and if I don’t know I ask, being able to tell them later was another lesson in life.

    To your parishioner that is a lovely addition to such a historical place, I saw the workers at the church today knowing what goes into doing such work reflects back onto the church and its members the committment it takes to maintain such a treasure.

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a Reply