YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: West Ave. Plan Meets la Résistance


by turfgrrl


June 20th, 2007 · 45 Comments

The plan to redevelop West ave. still has some hurdles to clear, one of them being the properties that have still not sold out. The Advocate reports that Nancy Esposito, owner of Casey’s Sheet Metal has hung a banner across her building, reading “hell no we won’t go”.

West ave. is by no means a blighted neighborhood. The small businesses that line the streets are one of the few areas in Norwalk that resemble the naturally occurring mix of residences, light industry and retail. It’s a throwback to the time when much of Norwalk looked like this, at least in the urban corridors. The residential houses that line the streets behind West ave, are the types of houses that have fenced backyards, and front porches that overlook the sidewalks that complete the quintessential neighborhood.

From the Advocate:

“Hell No, We Won’t Go!” reads a banner slung from the side of her business at West Avenue and Merwin Street. That shop, Casey’s Sheet Metal, sits in the path of Seligson’s redevelopment plan.

Esposito is worried that talks with Seligson - who has purchased much of the property in his plan but still has several deals to make - will fail, and the city will pursue eminent domain to seize remaining land.

Eminent domain allows governments to appropriate private property for public use.

Ideally, Esposito said, Seligson would integrate her business into the redevelopment plan, or find her a new property in the neighborhood.

City officials have pledged to use eminent domain as a last resort, as Mayor Richard Moccia did earlier this year when he and Seligson unveiled the West Avenue master plan at City Hall.

But Christina Walsh of the Castle Coalition, a Virginia nonprofit group working to stem eminent domain abuse, said such promises are not always kept.

“What we see all over the country are these redevelopment areas where they say they’ll use eminent domain as a ‘last resort,’ ” she said. “That’s a trigger word. It never matters.”

In March, the city approved Seligson’s plan, which stretches several blocks along West Avenue and would resemble a traditional mixed-use Main Street.

Kind of ironic that the plan is to recreate what is already there. Of course nothing is stopping any developer from redeveloping slowly, organically, one property at a time. But for some reason, in Norwalk at least, it seems that the preference is all or nothing.

Officials hope to finalize the land disposition agreement by next year. In the meantime, Seligson will continue negotiating with property owners such as Esposito.

So far, one business is being integrated into the redevelopment plan - the showroom of Devan Acura at 625 West Ave.

That leaves Esposito nervous.

“We’re not going to go quietly,” she said. “We’re ready to go to battle.”

She put up the banner during negotiations because “it sends a strong message. It gets people’s attention,” Esposito said. “The developers have to work harder to not disrupt the lives of the people in this neighborhood.”

Douglas Adams, Seligson’s vice president of development, declined to comment on the banner. But he said negotiations will continue, and three deals have been struck with property owners in the West Avenue area this year.

“We’re working hard with property owners to try and reach private agreements with each of them,” Adams said.

Other property owners who have not sold to Seligson said they support Esposito’s strong words.

“I think it’s great. We have to stand up for our rights as American citizens,” said Tim Currie, who owns Currie’s Tires at 599 West Ave.

His words were echoed by Anthony Savas, who owns a three-story apartment building at 16 Chapel St., and Keal Evans, who owns European Auto Center at 539 West Ave.

“We’re not being treated fairly,” Evans said. “I hope this goes away. I hope I’ll wake up and this will have been a nightmare.”

But even the famous nail house in China got sucked up into redevelopment. The future does look bleak.

Over in Los Angeles, redevelopment is not immune to LA style redevelopment. From the LA TIMES:

Angelyne can barely squeeze into the 8-foot-wide storage room. And not just because she’s the buxom, bigger-than-life billboard queen of Los Angeles.

Boxes of printed posters and placards depicting her in glamorous poses fill the Hollywood self-storage space she is renting while she feuds with city redevelopment leaders and developers of a planned $500-million luxury project near the corner of Hollywood Boulevard and Vine Street.

The curvaceous blond teeters on her spike heels as she reaches into a box and pulls out a handbill.

Its full-color photograph shows her reclining voluptuously across the top of her pink Corvette wearing form-fitting pink pants, a tight, low-cut white blouse, sunglasses and a seductive pout.

But it’s the back of the handbill that Angelyne wants to show. It’s an invitation to join the Angelyne Fan Club by sending $20 to a Selma Avenue address.

Angelyne operated her promotional company from a Selma Avenue office building for 18 years until she was forced out last fall to make way for a W Hotel, upscale retail shops, condominiums and apartments.

Developers paid relocation expenses for her and about 35 other tenants who were occupying shops and offices in the path of the Hollywood and Vine project.

But they are balking at her demand that they also pay for the reprinting of perhaps 100,000 promotional and souvenir items that list her old address.

“One of the developers said that is too much. He said, ‘Honey, take me to court.’ He talked to me like I was his ex-wife,” she said, adjusting her dark glasses as sunlight streamed through the open storage room door. “I was stunned.”

The standoff underscores the changing face of Hollywood Boulevard, which is in the midst of a dramatic gentrification after decades of decline. The W Hotel is rising at the corner of Hollywood and Vine, the famed intersection that has seen better days.

While many in Hollywood support the new bars, upscale eateries and other developments in the district, there are some who fear revitalization is pushing out some old-Hollywood characters.

And Angelyne is definitely a character — though she’d dispute the “old Hollywood” characterization. She became famous (locally, at least) in the early 1980s when a series of billboards popped up around the city featuring her in various sexy poses. Although she has appeared in several movies, she said her billboards have been shown in “hundreds” of films and TV shows.

source: The Advocate, Property owner fights for a fair deal By Tim Stelloh, June 20, 2007

source: LA TIMES, Angelyne seeks enhanced deal: The Hollywood icon wants developers to shell out more for forcing her to relocate an office. They say her figures are inflated. By Bob Pool, June 20, 2007

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

45 Responses so far “Norwalk: West Ave. Plan Meets la Résistance”



  • 1 L'arlequino // Jun 20, 2007 at 10:11 am

    My eyes lit up when I saw Nancy Esposito’s name in that article. I have to wonder if she’s playing the “just how much can I get” game.

    A couple of months ago, she wrote a letter to the Hour espousing the taking by eminent domain of the East Norwalk area between the harbor and Gregory Blvd., and First and Fifth Streets. Her suggestion was since it was a run-down area it was ripe for the taking since the location would be such a great one to capitalize on the waterfront area for new retail and residential development.

    Why is she espousing eminent domain on the one hand while fighting it on the other? At the time she wrote the letter, I thought she was a front for a property developer but am really suspicious of her motives now.

  • 2 turfgrrl // Jun 20, 2007 at 10:25 am

    L’arlequino: Unless she was being sarcastic, since the area is not run down in the least.
  • 3 L'arlequino // Jun 20, 2007 at 10:33 am

    I am sure the people who live there would agree with you.

  • 4 Anonymous // Jun 20, 2007 at 10:34 am

    You may not think it is blighted but it is not a thriving, attractive area to do business. As far as retail walk-in traffic goes, there is none throughout most of the street. Loehmann’s Plaza is busy, but not much else happens on West Ave. Even the Y is in run down shape.

  • 5 Watchdog // Jun 20, 2007 at 10:37 am

    Good morning, L’arlequino.

    I suppose you’ll be calling me in for suggesting the city take Rowayton as an amusement park “on the sea.”

  • 6 L'arlequino // Jun 20, 2007 at 10:39 am

    No, actually, I think Roton Point would be a good place for mini-golf, a splash park, and an ampitheatre, with accompanying Jazz Festival and all the diversity that comes with it.

    I can hear butt checks clenching en masse at the thought…

  • 7 turfgrrl // Jun 20, 2007 at 10:44 am

    anonymous 4: The Norwalk Y is run down. But so is the Westport Y, and that has nothing to do with people not using it. But the storefronts on West ave are not empty. The storefronts on North Main, Water and Washington streets in SoNo are. What is better, empty store fronts or occupied storefronts. I’d say the latter. How long as the threat of eminent domain been hanging over the heads of property owners on West ave? Why hasn’t the city pursued policies that restore building facades and improve the look of the retail areas, instead of blithely chasing after the shiny promises of economic development?
  • 8 Watchdog // Jun 20, 2007 at 10:45 am

    Oh my…

    Is there really a sound involved?

  • 9 turfgrrl // Jun 20, 2007 at 10:47 am

    by L’arlequino: As long as they don’t come in trucks… ;)
  • 10 Zen Master // Jun 20, 2007 at 10:49 am

    What is the sound of one cheek flapping?

  • 11 Watchdog // Jun 20, 2007 at 10:51 am

    7 - Turf, I agree.

    What were the logistics with the city’s facade program some years back? Is that an idea that could be reinstituted? Problem is that friggin issue of partisan politics which calls for obstructive moves. Then, of course, there is the issue of unmotivated committee chairs who are not vigorously committed to their roles.

  • 12 Anonymous // Jun 20, 2007 at 11:19 am

    http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_049.html

  • 13 L'arlequino // Jun 20, 2007 at 11:37 am

    Speaking of the motivation of committee chairs, Turfie, have you heard back from Peter Bondi about his three accomplishments as head of the Historic Commission?

    Is there a time frame involved? These are accomplishments that have already been achieved, right? As opposed to open-ended rhetoric.

    Have you asked him if he plans to buy one of the Fodor Farm houses, as I’ve read here? If so, should he be recusing himself from any deliberations that the HC has regarding the fate of those properties?

  • 14 Watchdog // Jun 20, 2007 at 11:42 am

    Ha ha, L’arlequino… I think you and I need to get a life. It’s taking a little more time to check the email, eh?

  • 15 L'arlequino // Jun 20, 2007 at 11:47 am

    Tell me about it. One of the drawbacks to telecommuting. I dread the day videoconferencing becomes the norm.

  • 16 turfgrrl // Jun 20, 2007 at 11:47 am

    watchdog: I wasn’t aware Norwalk had a facade improvement thingee going on. Just goes to show you, that good government requires good communication too.

    Is it fair to call partisan politics the culprit though? I’d lay more odds on indifference, which is altogether a different problem.

  • 17 turfgrrl // Jun 20, 2007 at 11:50 am

    L’arlequino: No I haven’t heard a peep about the three things. No, I didn’t ask about Fodor Farms.
  • 18 Watchdog // Jun 20, 2007 at 12:15 pm

    L’Arlequino: Telecommunicating? Heavens! That would mean throwing on a clean shirt before checking the inbox!

    Turf: You’re right… partisan politics isn’t ALWAYS at fault. Nonproductivity is also due to those laaaaaazy chairs filled by.. well.. partisan politics.

    Heck… I tried.

  • 19 Watchdog // Jun 20, 2007 at 12:21 pm

    Turf:

    Wait. You mean I might have come up with the Facade Program myself? Hmm. That would mean I have to make it work. New facades cost money. I know! Let’s get larger successful businesses in Norwalk to join hands in partnership with small business owners. The business mentor can help finance the cost of upgrading the facade. When the city looks good, everyone wins.

    Wow… I’m so smrt.

  • 20 Mr Greenpeace // Jun 20, 2007 at 2:18 pm

    isn’t there a grant you can get for the Facade program, Watertown Ny did it and it became a temptlate for others, have we applied for one and if so where are we in the process,,I’d call the grant writer but it be out of character its not a social or police issue.

  • 21 turfgrrl // Jun 20, 2007 at 3:05 pm

    Mr. Greenpeace and Watchdog: I only know of the one implemented in New Haven, which allowed redevelopment of lower Chapel street while preserving the small main street look. A quick overview is here:
    New Haven Tax Incentives (pdf)
  • 22 Mr Greenpeace // Jun 20, 2007 at 3:37 pm

    If I’m not mistaken and I’m being told by someone I called in FEMA , they said a program based out of NY city deals with facade grants, and in and around NY they have been issued,,I have no idea of the criteria or the parameters but I’m told its a gov program though not based in Washington, but his a GOV program

    I was also was told that most facade grants have been awarded to turn of the century blocks ,,I guess 100 year old blocks,I’m sorry i didn’t catch where you and watchdog was talking about,,

    It was also confusing to get second hand info becuase it was also said if the block was new and the area was old it would make the new look old,,so as you can see I’m not sure of what the rules are or the specs the grant writers look at..

    I hope this helps ..and yes I looked at your link and think there is at least a shot for us,

    and in my usuall subtle way maybe a Andy of Mayberry station front to accomodate the a new Black and White would help the area.

  • 23 Dave Roberts // Jun 20, 2007 at 3:57 pm

    Post #6 L’arlequino wrote;

    “I can hear butt checks clenching en masse at the thought”

    Great line, LOL

  • 24 Norwalker // Jun 20, 2007 at 4:14 pm

    Norwalk had a facade program during the Espo administration.

  • 25 L'arlequino // Jun 20, 2007 at 4:33 pm

    Sorry, a small typo there. Should have read “cheeks” but I guess you figgered that out…

    By the way, if anyone has an answer to #10 I would be interested to meditate on that.

  • 26 indiga // Jun 20, 2007 at 4:36 pm

    24, was that the one that was responsible for the building on Wall Street? Don’t know the number but it’s where the World Gym is. I think there’s even a plaque about “most improved facade”. It jsut goes to show you that — without some sound design standards that are consistent wtih the character of the area — the best intentions can go astray.

    I think Redevelopment would be the place to go to clear up “facade grants”, “facade esements”, “tax credits for facade improvements”, etc.

  • 27 Norwalker // Jun 20, 2007 at 4:46 pm

    I think David Harvey took advantage of the grant. If I recall, the amounts were in the 18K area.

  • 28 indiga // Jun 20, 2007 at 5:06 pm

    Does anyone remember the source of the money? Was it Federal funds somehow tied to the flood? Redevelopment? Would be interesting to know. David Harvey did a great job on the facade. They get a lot of credit for staying on Wall Street.

  • 29 Mr Greenpeace // Jun 20, 2007 at 5:15 pm

    news flash! engine 5 a four man crew , a ambulance and a cruiser all dispatched to Neon S main st for a man down,,turns out just a passed out man in the street from drinking, suppose if it happened down town SoNo would there be any PR problem on our packed street full of tourism?

    just pointing out what goes on in South Norwalk ever day ,,or at least for the last 4 days once a day.

    An alarm problem at one of our housing complexes has not been fixed or addressed since last friday and numerous calls since friday has kept our fire dept responding numerous times since again today was another call. This is where people live and if it was the private sector or a non city bulding I assume something would of been done last friday to fix it,,fire alarms are not taken lightly where people live by any dept including Norwalk.

    just the facts people your tax dollar working , so next time we need a hike let it pass we are made of money.

  • 30 Charles the Hammer // Jun 21, 2007 at 6:47 am

    Norwalk property owners will now feel the chilling shadow of Kelo v. New London. The 5-4 victory by liberal constructionists, assumed that interpreters of the “takings clause” of the fifth amendment’s eminent domain power, could substitute “public purpose” for “public use”. This ruling means that governmental revenue needs trump individual property rights. The city says that it will only use eminent domain as a “last resort”, but it will be hard to play poker when one player has all of the cards and chips.

  • 31 anonymous // Jun 21, 2007 at 8:58 am

    You should drive over to New London and see the house and neighborhood involved in the Supreme Court case. I did. It is a ghetto. New London has a terrible economy and will benefit significantly from the redevelopment if they haven’t missed the window of opportunity from this case dragging on so long.

  • 32 Anonymous // Jun 21, 2007 at 9:00 am

    Bill Krummel is that you?

  • 33 anonymous // Jun 21, 2007 at 9:09 am

    No, it isn’t Bill Krummel. How immature, 32.

  • 34 Nancy Esposito // Jun 21, 2007 at 10:14 am

    I am new to blogging and just learned of this site last night. I want to respond to #1’s comment by saying that my suggestion of using eminent domain(ia) to develop East Norwalk was totally tongue-in-cheek. As was my later letter promoting the idea of taking a couple of dozen home in West Norwalk to develop another golf course for Norwalk.

    I am not playing the “how much can I get game” or any other game. This is my community. I live my life and make my living here, among my friends and neighbors. I am against eminent domain abuse and believe it is wrong for any city to have the power to take my property and give it to another private citizen. There is no amount of money that can make me whole for taking my land. The concept of “private property” no longer exists.

    I will close by saying that anyone who thinks they are immune from this happening to them is sorely mistaken. It is called “bogus blight” and it has been happening all over this nation.

    Nancy Esposito

  • 35 L'arlequino // Jun 21, 2007 at 10:36 am

    Nancy - Glad you are able to contribute your voice to this blog.

    When I read your letter in the Hour, the one I referred to, there was no hint of any humor in it and if I misinterpreted your intent, I apologize.

    I agree that eminent domain is a threat to all property owners - particularly homeowners and small business owners who don’t have the political clout or financial wherewithal to counter the forces that be.

    Until our state legislature pulls together a bill that deals with the problem beyond the superficial way that it’s been dealt with to date, we all remain under threat.

    The Common Council’s assurances that eminent domain will be a last resort gives cold comfort as long as property developers in Norwalk hold all the cards.

  • 36 Grinder // Jun 21, 2007 at 12:31 pm

    I am waiting for the redevelopment plan for the Wall Street area..Does anyone know of any plans currently in discussion?…The area near Fat Cat Pizza is prime real estate being near the water…I see that repairs are being done on the bridge at Wall Street,the first sign that there will be a major redevelopment coming..
    I hope to time the market correctly and sell my home near main street before the traffic/people/taxes increase….

  • 37 indiga // Jun 21, 2007 at 12:39 pm

    Grinder, ya’ snooze, ya’ lose…

    http://www.norwalkct.org/AgendaAction/wallstreet/WallStreetHome.htm

  • 38 small town store // Jun 21, 2007 at 1:15 pm

    Hi all. I have a question that I don’t know who to ask. What happens to all the small stores that are on Wall street and West ave when all this development takes over and raises the rent? Where do we go? It’s hard enough to keep open now. It’s sad to think what it is going to do going to all chains and high rents. I mean, who wants to work this hard just to pay the landlord?

  • 39 Anonymous // Jun 21, 2007 at 1:16 pm

    Try asking the Redevelopment Agency at the next public hearing. I wonder the same thing every time I drive down Wall St.

  • 40 small town store // Jun 21, 2007 at 1:46 pm

    My mother and I have talked to Tom Sheehan and he said that it wasn’t something that concerns us. I don’t understand why he said that.

  • 41 Anonymous // Jun 21, 2007 at 2:35 pm

    Anybody else having trouble downloading the Wall St. Master Plan documents from the link in #37?

  • 42 indiga // Jun 21, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    41 — Just tried it from the link and it worked. If not, go to norwalkct.org and Redevelopment Agency link. Should be no problem then.

  • 43 gfaux // Jun 22, 2007 at 6:31 pm

    one would ask with all these redevelopment plans why we do not have 1 a fire station on main ave? 2 where do we put all the buses for maritime ctr? 3 how many homes have been removed for city redevelopment plans so far? 4 how much did the logo cost us? 5 will the B.O.E. rule norwalks money? one has to ask is the city becoming bridgeport or will it dig it’s self out of these problems

  • 44 Jasmine Bullard // Jun 22, 2007 at 7:49 pm

    gfaux in post 42 wrote;2 where do we put all the buses for maritime ctr?

    This is for sure, Vets park is not the answer. First you can be pretty sure that those so called “over ruled” 8-9 Deed restrictions DO COVER COMMERCIAL BUS PARKING. That is NOT a park purpose. The city had better get off it’s butt and start to come up with a plan for a central bus parking lot. When Oyster Shell Park, Reed Putnam, Mathews Park all come to fruition, where the heck are you going to park 500 buses 7 days a week. Not in a city park, unless you plan on blacktopping it completely over. Is this another thing that will blow up in our faces sometime down the road, when the buses are log jammed from South Norwalk, all the way down West Avenue to Norwalk, and backed out onto the Connecticut Thruway, will those who run Norwalk be wringing their hands and asking “How did we let this happen?”

    What is the deal with the old bus barn property?

    You try to build a small apartment addition to your home, and the first thing you have to do is to have off street parking to get a building permit. Reed Putnam has no such area for the buses to park and the Maritime Aquarium is taking advantage of parking its problem in a city park. I understand that parking in Vets park was supposed to be a temporary stop gap for the Maritime Center to get on it’s feet. They built a huge tourist attraction with NO BUS PARKING.

    Same old, same old. Vision as far as the end of their nose.

  • 45 Beach Bum // Jun 23, 2007 at 12:25 am

    Gfaux: This is a partial answer to your 5th question. I was going to say that it was totally the teacher union that control the money but that is only part of the answer. Yes, they do have some of the highest average salaries compared to the rest of the country with only average results. And yes some of their contract demands may seem out of the ordinary. But some of the problem comes from federal and state mandated expenses Norwalk must procur in order to receive certain types of aid. For instance, most of the handicap aid comes from the federal government. In order to receive the money, Norwalk must follow certain steps. They must have so many administrators, buildings must meet certain requirements, etc… Of course all this cost money. As a result Norwalk BOE must spend lots of money in order to get a fraction of it back. Do you see the lunacy in this?

    How about cronyism on the administrator and board level? How dare Corda suggest letting go 4 speech therapists instead of eliminating directors of this and assoc directors of that. In this instance there needs to be a better check system on Corda because the Board of Ed is not doing it.