YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Crime & Punishment


by turfgrrl


June 12th, 2007 · 73 Comments

Another convenience store was hit. Time to dust off a better community based police patrol squad. From The Hour:

The most recent robbery took place at 9:45 p.m. at the Mobil Station located on the corner of North Avenue and France Street. According to police, two black males wearing nylon stockings over their faces entered the store, knocked over several displays, verbally threatened the clerk, assaulted him and walked out with an undisclosed amount of money designated for lottery tickets.

“The suspects struck him in the body and face, and he sustained slight injuries, but declined medical assistance,” said Lt. Thomas Cummings of the Detective Bureau.

Cummings said that there were no patrons in the store at the time of the robbery, but there were witnesses outside of the store.
“Apparently the suspected waited for the people in the store to exit before they went in,” he said.

These days I see more cop cars directing traffic than anywhere else. It seems that much of the streets of Norwalk seem to be undergoing some sort of construction. My car is not happy, and so neither am I. Not because the streets are blocked off, but because the aftermath of path paving is the most inept and atrocious patching I have ever seen. I’d almost say that Sal Corda is personally approving these pavement patches because they are so bad. Today’s outrage, Osborne street North of Fort Point. There is nothing acceptable about it. Maybe its supposed to be temporary, but yegads… you could loose a car in there. Osborne street is comfortably within East Norwalk, home of some pretty atrocious potholes. But no part of Norwalk is immune.

Mayor Moccia is not happy with the Fodor Farm District Committee’s attempt to hold another public hearing. From The Hour:

Mayor Richard A. Moccia put his foot down hard Monday on efforts to create a state-registered local historic district out of the former Fodor Farm off Flax Hill Road by blasting a legal notice announcing a public hearing on the plan.

“(The legal notice) did not go through the mayor’s office,” said Moccia, referring to the notice that was posted in Monday’s edition of The Hour by the Fodor Farm Historic District Study Committee. The study committee was “advised by (Corporation Counsel) Peter Nolin that their time had passed. We cannot have a parallel government running beside the elected government making decisions upon their interpretation.”

According to the legal notice, the study committee will hold a public hearing “on the establishment of a proposed Local Historic District at the property known as Fodor Farm” at 7:30 p.m. June 25 in the Common Council chambers of City Hall.
Moccia, however, said the notice request was not received by City Clerk Mary Roman, and that the study committee’s work is over after having missed a filing deadline for its draft report.

“(The study committee) had a mission. It’s over, it’s done. They missed the filing deadline,” Moccia said. The public hearing “is not going to happen.”

The study committee, formed by the Common Council during the administration of Mayor Alex Knopp, late last year completed a draft report recommending the creation of a state-registered local historic district out of the 9.2-acre city-owned parcel off Flax Hill Road.

Tod Byrant, study committee chairman and Norwalk Preservation Trust president, could not be reached for comment early Monday evening. In the past, however, Bryant has maintained that his committee is entitled to proceed with its work, even though it missed the January filing deadline for its draft report.

Why do I get the impression that the parties involved may prefer revolvers at dawn on Mill Hill? Being of the dollars and sense variety of blogger, I question the comedic timing of Corda wanting to codify do-overs for students, with Tod Bryant wanting a do-over on submitting the report. The hearing essentially, as I understand it, allows to study group to reset to a new deadline, or in Corda-sepak, would recreate an understanding of the date at which such studies can be submitted. Er, I got carried away on that. If there’s some economic benefit to securing funds for restoring the houses, which is what both plans call for, then why isn’t there an dollars and cents presentation made to that effect?

Meanwhile Mayor Moccia is looking for businesses to participate in the summer youth jobs program. They have funding but need employers.

The program, now funded largely through donations from area businesses, matches 14- to 18-year-olds with employers for six weeks of part-time summer work. City businesses and municipal departments have been among the jobs program’s participating employers.

And while Mayor Richard A. Moccia said Monday that the city has raised approximately $125,000, it needs 50 more job slots to reach its program goal.

In past years, the program has employed as many as 220 youths, but some businesses have chosen not to continue participating and Moccia has urged city departments only to hire summer employees for whom there is work.

source: The Hour, Police probe 3rd convenience store robbery in two weeks, by JILL BODACH, June 12, 2007

source: The Hour, Mayor: Fodor Farm committee’s time passed, by ROBERT KOCH, June 12, 2007

source: The Hour, Mayor seeks employers for city youth, by PATRICK LINSEY, June 12, 2007

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

73 Responses so far “Norwalk: Crime & Punishment”


Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All



  • 1 Another Dem // Jun 12, 2007 at 10:47 am

    The roads in town are bad. What’s with Connecticut ave before the exit?

  • 2 Anonymous // Jun 12, 2007 at 12:00 pm

    Biggus Dickus has spoken. All hail Caesar!

  • 3 Anonymous // Jun 12, 2007 at 12:15 pm

    Why add more properties to the Hysterical Commission when they can’t manage what they have? They can’t manage to meet deadlines? They can’t manage to work together? The flood of negativity in this town is awful.

  • 4 Anonymous // Jun 12, 2007 at 12:42 pm

    I guess if the mayor hadn’t loaded the HC with his cronies maybe they would be able to accomplish something. All you have to do is look at David Park’s comments on this blog to see what his attitude is.

  • 5 indiga // Jun 12, 2007 at 12:47 pm

    Ah, #3 — another Rip Van Winkle awakens, having missed all the facts about Fodor Farm. Whatever you think of the HC is totally irrelevant to the creation of a local historic district.

    Please read the Hour article to see that the only difference is that the study committee favors private ownership with the creation of a local historic district and the Mayor favors deed restrictions.

    Having a local historic district makes Norwalk eligible for grants and monies for preservation projects. Deed restrictions have no such advantage. Plus, since the city would be party to the restrictions, Corp Council would need to enforce, costing taxpayer money.

    The far more sensible and less expensive plan is the study committee’s recommendation for local historic district with a citizen’s board (appointed by Mayor and approved by Common Council) to provide the design guidelines. I don’t know why the Mayor is so blnd to that…

  • 6 Anonymous // Jun 12, 2007 at 12:52 pm

    Give Slow-Mo the boot.

  • 7 Anonymous // Jun 12, 2007 at 12:54 pm

    The other plan says private ownership with deed restrictions. So what’s wrong with dead restrictions? Or is there some other body that would enforce historic looks that the Mayor is objecting too?

  • 8 Anonymous // Jun 12, 2007 at 12:56 pm

    Perhaps because you and others have made this such a heated topic and can’t see past your own agenda’s. Why would the city want to give up all rights to this piece of land when their proposal is basically what you are asking for but would allow them to maintain it as city property? The funding from goverment grants doesn’t amount to much and once you get what you want, you’d be blaming the city for whatever went wrong with the project.

  • 9 Anonymous // Jun 12, 2007 at 1:02 pm

    The city would be giving up all rights to the project once it sold the properties with deed restrictions. Your argument doesn’t wash.

  • 10 Anonymous // Jun 12, 2007 at 1:07 pm

    #6 - More like Mo, as in Curly, Larry and Mo.

  • 11 Anonymous // Jun 12, 2007 at 1:09 pm

    #8 - I guess the City should give its Grants Coordinator the boot, then, according to your logic. What’s your agenda?

  • 12 turfgrrl // Jun 12, 2007 at 1:12 pm

    Anyone want to cough up the two proposals so that everyone is using facts instead of conjecture?
  • 13 indiga // Jun 12, 2007 at 1:15 pm

    #8, You’ve got some bad information there leading to some strange assumptions.

    Local historic district = private ownership with a city commission (similar to zoning or zba) to provide guidance on additons, renovation, expansion. Zoning and ZBA apply same as always.

    Deed restrictions = same private ownership but adherance to restrictions requires Corp Counsel, lawyers, and courts. Means $$ out for owners and city instead of $$$ into city with local historic district.

  • 14 indiga // Jun 12, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    Grants would still go through grants coordinator. With a local historic district, Norwalk qualifies for Certified Local Government status which opens the doors to a specifc pool of grants. Non-CLG cities cannot apply — grants coordinator or no grants coordinator. And, while the grants are not multi-millions, they’re not anything to sneeze at either.

    TG, study committee document is on file with city; land use or Alan Lo have deed restrictions as well. Study comittee doc is too large to post.

  • 15 L'arlequino // Jun 12, 2007 at 2:09 pm

    Indiga - can you post examples of grant awards and amounts that other CLG communities have received? Maybe seeing what they’ve gotten can shine some light on this issue.

  • 16 indiga // Jun 12, 2007 at 3:08 pm

    http://www.cttrust.org/index.cgi/142 describes the certified local government program on the CT Trust for Historic Preservation website.

    List of cities is available on the National Park Service site (which appears to be down as does the CT State Historic Presrvation Office site which I believ has a listing of the grants awarded.)

  • 17 L'arlequino // Jun 13, 2007 at 9:49 am

    The state historic preservation office website has this to say about financial incentives for preserving historic properties:

    “The Tax Code of 1986 allows owners of depreciable residential, commercial, and industrial buildings that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places to elect a 20 percent investment tax credit in conjunction with the certified rehabilitation of certified historic structures.

    Since 1977, the State Historic preservation Office has reviewed over 600 Tax Act projects, representing a total investment of more than $600 million. Buildings have been rehabilitated under the Tax Act program in more than 50 towns and cities throughout the state, including substantial numbers of projects in major urban areas such as Hartford, New Haven, and Norwich. In Connecticut, the use of federal tax credits for historic rehabilitation projects has resulted in several thousand units of housing, through either the upgrading of existing substandard buildings or the creation of new residential units by conversion of school and factory buildings.”

    As far as grants go:

    “Since 1987, more than 120 grants have been awarded through the Historic Restoration Fund. Projects located in over 45 towns and cities have included restoration and rehabilitation work associated with a wide range of cultural resources. Properties on the State Register of Historic Places which are owned and operated by a municipality or nonprofit organization are eligible for these 50 percent matching grants-in-aid.

    The Goodspeed Opera House in East Haddam and the Old State House in Hartford were early recipients of these grants.”

    Let’s see: 20 percent investment tax credits and 50 percent matching grants. What is not to be gained by the Fodor Farm Study Committee’s proposal?

    However, the City seems bent on turning away opportunities for Federal funding and attracting new investment through tax credits.

    I would say their reasons for abolishing the Study Committee (missed deadline) and the whole PR to-do about chasing more Federal dollars seems to be predicated on punishing the NPT for being a thorn in their side about 93 East Avenue, and chasing only the money that benefits projects that get votes, like Homeland Security funds.

    The whole “additional layer of government” argument is baseless when you consider that the Mayor has already created a new “Advisory Commission on the Arts and Culture” which has yet to manifest itself in any meaningful way. Link is here: http://www.norwalkct.org/NewPressReleases/ArtsCultureJan2007.htm

  • 18 Indiga // Jun 13, 2007 at 11:54 am

    Yesterday we read in the Advocate about Greenwich raising money to encourage preservation and the importance of preserving local history. Today in the Hour, we read about Westport’s recognition of the value of historic preservation by establishing a Historic District Commission office, “New Office Will Address Old Matters” june 13 Hour, page A3. THe reason includes: “Beyond assisting residents with their applications and questions, another incentive for hiring Leahy was to help the town secure more grant funding for town preservation projects, said Laurence Bradley, the town’s Planning and Zoning director. ‘There’s a lot of grant money out there, and we want to be able to tap into that.’”

    Wake up, Mr. Mayor! Preservation is GOOD for the city! Stop the stupid bickering about minutae and move on to create the local historic district our of Fodor Farm. The houses can then be sold and we can all move on. I promise; it won’t hurt. Get this off your plate and tackle the really big issues. Preservation is easy. Crime is hard.

  • 19 Anonymous // Jun 13, 2007 at 11:56 am

    Another negative editorial from the Hour today on Fodor Farm. Not surprising, though. I understand Reilly fought the revitalization of Sono, back when it was up for redevelopment. Guess the Hour’s track record on preserving Norwalk’s history isn’t too good.

    However, when towns like Greenwich or Westport want to support historical preservation, there’s plenty of space to cover those positive developments.

  • 20 Anonymous // Jun 13, 2007 at 1:27 pm

    It was not so much negative as realistic.

  • 21 Anonymous // Jun 13, 2007 at 1:33 pm

    I guess the Hour’s brand of realism, while purportedly expressed to support the growth of the City and its commercial vitality, backfired on that one. Look at Sono now.

  • 22 Anonymous // Jun 13, 2007 at 2:02 pm

    Yeah retail spaces that no one wants to shop in because they preserve historic retail layouts instead of modern efficient ones.

  • 23 Anonymous // Jun 13, 2007 at 2:34 pm

    When you come down off that hallucinogen you’re on (or did you just have a Mocciachino?), take a stroll through Sono on a Thursday or Friday evening.

    Clubs and restaurants are jammed to overflowing. New retail shops like American Apparel are opening up and old ones like Saga and &Company are doing fine. Donovan’s was just reopened as Bulldog, the old Amberjacks reopened under another name, and the Maritime Yards project is capitalizing on the redevelopment and historic preservation that started back in the 70’s.

  • 24 turfgrrl // Jun 13, 2007 at 3:16 pm

    anonymous #21 & #22: SoNo is vibrant and fun. The retail landscape throughout CT has been tough, and with the ebb and flow new business come and go. Including restaurants. I’ll add (correct) some of what #23 said. Burger Bistro, Press Cafe, The Gingerman, Ayden’s Closet, Bulldog and SoNo Silver Co. are all new. There’s also a new restaurant across from the maritime aquarium. O’Neil’s is expanding and moving into a new building. Maritime Yards is going to house Virgin Atlantic, and host some exciting new retail shops.

    Stalwarts like Sweet Rexie’s is a great place to get ice cream and candy, and home design stores are close to where Chocopologie is, and down the street the relatively new SoNo Bakery.

    There’s more but I’m sorta bad with names.

    Come on down and take a stroll.

  • 25 I remember SONO in the 70's // Jun 13, 2007 at 4:12 pm

    If it weren’t for the Historic Commission and a courageous mayor named Bill Collins, SONO would be another boring strip mall. That’s what the developers wanted. Thanks to the city officials’ determined struggle (Collins described it as “a war”) we have the vibrant redeveloped area. A little too successful for my taste-too much traffic now. I think the movie theatre was the straw that broke the camel’s back.

  • 26 Indiga // Jun 13, 2007 at 4:41 pm

    TG — some misudnerstanding on your part re: Fodor Farm. “If there’s some economic benefit to securing funds for restoring the houses, which is what both plans call for, then why isn’t there an dollars and cents presentation made to that effect?”

    NEITHER plan calls for the use of any city, state, or Federal funds to restore the Fodor Farm houses. BOTH plans call for selling the houses to private owners and the owners making the investment to restore the houses.

    The value of the local historic district over the deed restrictions is that having a local historic district allows the city (via a citizen’s board) to pass on renovations, restoration, etc. to retain historic chracter. No cost to the city. Plus, having a local historic district, lets Norwalk apply for grants available to “certified local governments” that can be used for the city’s historic preservation needs (like Mill Hill, for example.)

    Since owners have to vote on a local historic district, the thought was (way back when) that this would be a slam dunk since there was one owner and that was the City of Norwalk. What possible objection could the City have to enacting a local historic district — especially when the advantages accrue to the City? I still don’t understand the vehement objections from Moccia, Nolin, Bondi, etc. Go figure.

  • 27 anonymous // Jun 13, 2007 at 4:51 pm

    If the Mayor and Corporation Counsel believe what they say about the study committee missing their deadline, then why the heck haven’t they gone ahead and implemented their plan for Fodor Farm? The supposed missed deadline was months ago.

    I guess they don’t have much confidence in their own legal advice and are afraid of getting sued…then the corporation counsel would have some real work to do…

  • 28 turfgrrl // Jun 13, 2007 at 8:49 pm

    indiga: No, that’s not the economic effort I was attempting to refer to. I meant that there is an economic benefit derived from historic districts to municipalities and to homeowners within those districts. Kind of like how people pay more for Apple designed technology products because they look better than your typical routine technology product, even though they may have the same specs. :)
  • 29 its good to be mayor, 10 million reasons // Jun 13, 2007 at 10:16 pm

    Take a look at the land that the “courageous” bill collins owns in town. assessed value 10 million, probably worth 20 million. being mayor can be profitable also note no mortgage on the property owned by the former mayor who extols socialist values.

    PARCEL 5-22C-12-0
    LOCATION 560 MAIN AVENUE
    OWNER1 COLLINS WILLIAM CO-TR &
    MAILING ADDRESS 32 ALLEN RD
    MAILING CITY, STATE, ZIP NORWALK, CT 06851-1719

    ——————————————————————————–

    MARKET ADJUSTED VALUE FINAL 2006 GL
    BUILDING VALUE 9561900
    YARD ITEMS 59400
    LAND VALUES 1038400
    LAND AREA 0.83999
    TOTAL VALUE 10659700
    TOTAL ASSESSMENT 7461790

    SALES INFORMATION

    GRANTOR COLLINS WILLIAM,
    SALES PRICE 0
    SALE DATE 10/29/1999
    VALIDITY OTHER
    LEGAL REFERENCE 3810

  • 30 its good to be mayor, 10 million reasons // Jun 13, 2007 at 10:18 pm

    Its good to be a former mayor. look at the 10 million in property good old bill collins owns in town.

    PARCEL 5-22C-12-0
    LOCATION 560 MAIN AVENUE
    OWNER1 COLLINS WILLIAM CO-TR &
    MAILING ADDRESS 32 ALLEN RD
    MAILING CITY, STATE, ZIP NORWALK, CT 06851-1719

    ——————————————————————————–

    MARKET ADJUSTED VALUE FINAL 2006 GL
    BUILDING VALUE 9561900
    YARD ITEMS 59400
    LAND VALUES 1038400
    LAND AREA 0.83999
    TOTAL VALUE 10659700
    TOTAL ASSESSMENT 7461790

    SALES INFORMATION

    GRANTOR COLLINS WILLIAM,
    SALES PRICE 0
    SALE DATE 10/29/1999
    VALIDITY OTHER
    LEGAL REFERENCE 3810-8

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All