YourCT.com header image 2

Imagine This: Hartford Superintendent Says Cut Central Office


by turfgrrl


May 30th, 2007 · 6 Comments

Sal Corda likes to muddle the English language and obfuscate numbers. But Hartford apaprently has a new chief in town who doesn’t worry about sounding official, he just wants to get the job done. From the Courant:

The Hartford public schools may lack for many things, but candor from their latest schools chief isn’t one of them. Shortly after being hired a year ago, the former Cincinnati superintendent of schools crunched the numbers, perused the student performance data and said decisively: Hartford’s graduation rate is 29 percent; only 15 percent of its third-graders are reading at grade level.

“We intend to close the achievement gap, and you have to have honest numbers to use as a base line to benchmark against,” he said.

No muddled language, no numbers to misinterpret. And, oh by the way, the one-time Ansonia resident added, the new Hartford Public High School building under construction? It’s going to be obsolete the minute the doors open. The building is too cavernous at a time when high schools are going small.

If Hartford is ever going to make a sustained jump as one of the lowest performing school districts in a state with the widest achievement gap in the country, then it has got to hear and handle the truth.

Here’s another dose: Central office staff is bloated and needs to be downsized and, the new guy says, there are enough resources available now to make meaningful changes. Talk about shocking the system.

Adamowski last week introduced plans to radically shake up Hartford schools. The proposal was unprecedented in its ambition, depth and breadth. He wants to create a comprehensive school-choice system that would feature a year-round elementary school, all-boys and all-girls academies, Montessori schools and themed high schools specializing in such things as financial services, military studies and nursing. He also wants to duplicate the nationally renowned Amistad charter school in New Haven.

“There’s not a single original idea on my part on that list,” Adamowski said Tuesday. “These are all things that reflect aspirations of our community, but also included are things that have a sustained track record nationally in terms of improving student achievement and closing the gap.”

The schools chief’s willingness to be frank is bolstered by a 5-year contract and the reality that at 55, he’s in the twilight of his professional career. He’s not preoccupied with retribution or bruised egos. “I want someone to be candid with me,” said Laura Taylor, a parent who has a child at Capital Preparatory Magnet School. “I appreciate that. Don’t just give me minutiae but never give me answers or facts.”

If only we could get Norwalk schools into the 21st century too. But I guess total failure akin to the bureaucratic mess that Hartford became is the preferred model by the BOE.  It’s almost June. Where’s that budget Corda? And what about Morris’ part time status? Won’t he be in Hartford all day today?
source: Courant, Candor Oils The Wheels Of Reform, by Stan Simpson, May 30, 2007

Tags: Education · In the News

6 Responses so far “Imagine This: Hartford Superintendent Says Cut Central Office”



  • 1 Time for a referendum on Corda // May 30, 2007 at 10:09 am

    Ask the people if they think he is the person for the job.

    Clearly, the Superintendent in Hartford is a thinker and a leader — earning his pay.

    What is involved with getting a referendum on the ballot?? - we need to see if Corda has the vote of public confidence.

    Maybe that will light a fire under his behind.

  • 2 Anonymous // May 30, 2007 at 10:29 am

    Can we hire this guy? Corda would never last in a town with a backbone.

  • 3 anon // May 30, 2007 at 1:23 pm

    The BOE somehow thinks Corda is good. Why aren’t our newspapers covering Corda?

  • 4 Time for a referendum on Corda // May 30, 2007 at 1:35 pm

    #3: It is a puzzle. The BOE is asleep, shhhhh don’t wake them up.

    The newspapers don’t quite understand that the BOE has been rubber stamping the Corda recommendations. Little challenge has been forthcoming.

    Most recent example of BOE dozing is this 18 month work which culminated in a broadscale dumbing down of expectations and an increase in teacher work.

    They wonder why morale is so bad. Imagine being a teacher in this system. Being evaluated in every way by admins that are not evaluated; now being asked to bump up grades (losing a tool to gain student compliance), create custom tests, and manage to someone track who has turned it in (how many chances) etc.

    It is the stupidest piece of work created, yet the BOE blessed it. The teacher input was ignored.

    too bad, so sad. We need a new BOE and a new superintendent.

  • 5 Anonymous // May 30, 2007 at 1:38 pm

    #4-We all have a chance to change the BOE makeup in November. Excercise it and we will get changes needed. Don’t excercise it and we will stay in limbo once again.

  • 6 anonymous // May 30, 2007 at 10:15 pm

    Change is good but only when it is uplifting. The new policies on grading and testing are foolish and hurtful to the learning process. AHHH, that’s right, it is not about that any longer…it is about fairness and opportunity for those who do not apply themselves in the first place.