YourCT.com header image 2

Guest View: Norwalk Proposed Grading System Deforms


by turfgrrl


May 30th, 2007 · 12 Comments

This is part of an ongoing series of guest posts about issues in Norwalk yourCT.com is a non-partisan site dedicated to airing all sides of an issue That can’t happen without valuable contributions from our readers

By Elliot Kalner, Norwalk

As a retired Greenwich High School social studies instructor of 30 years and current adjunct professor of history at Norwalk Community College, I am absolutely appalled by the contemplated reforms of the Norwalk Public Schools’ grading system - particularly as it affects the high school level (news stories, May 20 and 28).

How can we promote and inculcate a diligent work ethic, a pride of ownership in academic achievement and a sense of personal responsibility and accountability when we systematically depart from those values by pandering to the poorest-performing elements of Norwalk’s school system? By lowering Norwalk’s educational standards beyond recognition to pad the graduation-rate statistics - or to minimize the ubiquitous “achievement gap” of non-performing students that currently afflicts public education, we are, in fact, being self-serving and providing a major disservice to our students.

Manipulating the grading system to provide a more positive self-image and a greater sense of self-esteem may be well-intended (to improve the retention rate), but it is misguided and counterproductive. We provide a disincentive to the conscientious and hard-working student who gets to class (on time), turns in his/her assignments (on time), completes his/her homework (on time), participates in class, and studies and prepares for exams. Instead, we reward tardiness, absenteeism and non-performance in and out of the classroom. Are these the values and messages we seek to impart to our students as we prepare them for the 21st century?

How low do we stretch the safetynet before it snaps? Are these the graduates we seek to send out into the world to meet the challenges of the competitive workplace? Would today’s employers tolerate ill-equipped, irresponsible, semi-literate, absentee, non-performing workers? Are we really doing a service for these youngsters by not being steadfastly insistent that they are to be held to those values that will help them meet the challenges of the “real” world? Or, rather, shall we perpetuate the myth of a fairyland of endless second chances, low expectations and a poor work ethic?

By seriously diluting and demeaning our currently held educational standards, we define, and are complicit in, our collective failure to hold the next generation of students to those values that will be needed to assure America’s continuing role in the global marketplace. What a tragedy for us if these so-called “reforms” go through! Rather than “reforming” our educational system, we are, in fact, “deforming” it.

Tags: Education · In the News · Norwalk

12 Responses so far “Guest View: Norwalk Proposed Grading System Deforms”



  • 1 L'arlequino // May 30, 2007 at 5:26 pm

    Bravo. An enlightened view of the dumbing down of our educational system. When will the coddling of subpar performance and pandering to underachievers end?

    Every child is a star in today’s culture and everyone gets a shot at the golden hoop no matter what their ability. No wonder our children grow up with attitudes of entitlement. All they have to do is threaten a parent or teacher and scream “unfair!” and they have schools and governments cowering in fear.

    I grew up believing advancement was achieved through hard work and merit. No more. I am glad I am not raising a child or trying to advance my career in today’s marketplace.

  • 2 anonymous // May 30, 2007 at 6:35 pm

    Thank you, thank you, thank you, a million times thank you for this post! Those of us who teach are also amazed at the lack of thought put into these changes. Some time down the road it will all fall apart and Norwalk will look pitiful. These rules will not enforce the rigor that parents want their children to experience and it will give a free pass to those who find school as a social spot and nothing else. Please continue your coverage about this so that the citizens of Norwalk will be aware of these horrible attempts at change. This will make those who want their children to be held accountable go to private school or even worse move to other towns that know this is not the path to take.

  • 3 Big-brother // May 30, 2007 at 9:45 pm

    A desperate attempt made by a failing system. The NPS administration is failing the students, parents, and teachers. All the crazy decisions and disregard for the community is overwhelming. It’s time for the Board of Education to wake up from their long slumber!

  • 4 anonymous // May 30, 2007 at 10:39 pm

    Well, you have to admit, Corda has been effective at changing the subject from his budget fiasco…

  • 5 Mike Lyons // May 30, 2007 at 10:58 pm

    My 15-year-old daughter read about these proposed grading changes in the paper tonight and kept exclaiming her shock over them. She said “it allows kids to be lazy and get away with it over and over again!” Funny that a high school sophomore can figure that out but the school administration apparently cannot.

  • 6 Norwalk Teacher // May 31, 2007 at 5:25 pm

    I would love to see our teacher evaluations to also be given the same consideration as the scoring of our proposed grading system for our students. This way, all of the teachers who underperform can still feel good about themselves when they don’t do well and get a second or third chance to do something they should have done correctly the first time. Then we will dumb down our aides and paraprofessionals as well. And then, we will add in the nurses and the custodial staff. Then, we will all be so dumb that we won’t even realize that our administrators are dumb too! What a utopia! This will prepare all of us in the real world where competition to excel in your profession gets you raises and promotions and lackluster performance and mediocrity gets you knowhere but the door. Bravo Norwalk. Thanks again for making me feel worse than I already do about our failing school system and administration. I’m going home now to make sure my kids don’t study for their test tomorrow because they’ll still get a 50 if they don’t do well on it. Maybe if they raise their GPA to a “C” by the end of the semester they can be president one day! Or maybe they can work at a Nookler Power Plant.

  • 7 Charles the Hammer // May 31, 2007 at 6:34 pm

    Mr. Elliot Kalner, you are a credit to our profession. Thank you for speaking the truth on this proposed “deform” to the grading system used in the Norwalk Public Schools. The adjustment suggested by Dr. Sal Corda and Dr. Karen Lang are detached from reality. They seek to address underachievement by a devaluation of the currency we use to gauge performance: grades, tests, and homework.

    Imagine if all deficits were settled in a similar fashion. If one is behind on one’s obligation to the bank, just make a penny worth fifty bucks and, voila, default is a mere mirage. Deadlines have no meaning. If it’s Sunday evening and there’s a big test coming up, why stress out studying? That’s for fools. Just get a good look at the test and then go for a retake. Isn’t that the way the “boss” looks at quarterly reports, sales targets, and production quotas? When engineers calculate the stress loads on a bridge deck or a carpenter estimates the materials needed for a project they always get a couple of “do-overs”, right?

    What this policy presents to young people is insidious in its faux compassion. While purporting to “help” students by lowering requirements, it defrauds them with a con. The world is not a warm and fuzzy place. Being late, missing deadlines and appointments, procrastinating, and doing the bare minimum are not sign posts on the road to success. They have serious costs. When we encourage such behaviors as institutionalized “policy”, we are liars, not teachers.

    This outrageous flim-flam cannot be allowed. It’s akin to the accounting razzamatazz of the ENRON crowd. The administrators who tout this nonsense will be long gone when our town and our children pay the real price. Don’t fall prey to their siren song. We cannot really improve achievement by changing a zero to a fifty, the reduction of homework, or by diminishing preparation for tests. The road to success by young people goes past the “Hard Work Hotel” and “You Can Do It Junction”. To tell them any less is betrayal.

    Contact your BOE Members:

    http://www.norwalkpublicschools.org/board.html

    JPullan@optonline.net
    RosaM3@aol.com
    Susanhamilton203@sbcglobal.net
    Robert.Polley@snet.net
    RFuller6@optonline.net
    Vettert@snet.net
    MRivas1219@yahoo.com
    Greg.Burnett@sbcglobal.net
    brucekim@optonline.net

  • 8 anonymous // Jun 1, 2007 at 6:49 pm

    Ditto Ditto Ditto

    #4 is absolutely correct also!

  • 9 Time for a referendum on Corda // Jun 1, 2007 at 6:58 pm

    Contact the BOE- but be prepared for the sound of the seashell up to your ear……………………one big vacuum of nothing.

    What did this study cost that says teachers have to give up their judgement and instead follow a proscribed system of 2nd chances, 3rd chances….which also gives the parents something else to come in and demand. AND THEY WILL.

    Cut the teachers some slack…RAISE expectations, not lower them.

    The kids are not hoodlums. But we keep this up and we are driving them to UNDERPERFORM- it’s okay not to do your work- HAH.

    How about this? Don’t grade homework, but if it is not handed in, give demerits. If you get 3 demerits, no extracurricular activities. Kids care more about their sports than their grades…. go for it.

    HAH

  • 10 Anonymous // Jun 2, 2007 at 8:50 am

    Individual students should be treated as just that, individuals. Where some students are just born achievers, there are those who lack self confidence and gumption. IF THEY CAN FIND A WAY OUT THEY WILL.
    A students ability to learn stems from many aspects of their lives. We need to start addressing the underlying probrems. If they have a learning disability, give them more help, if they are lazy, give them incentives, if they are just plain disruptive, put down rules with them and the parents and the administrators need to follow through. To white wash the problems with across the board leniency is wrong. Some kids have underlying problems, ADHD, unsettling home lives etc. To cast them off in a pool of underachievers by allowing them to slide by with no direction is nothing more than laziness on the BOE to address the individual problems. Many kids don’t want their classmates to know they have ADHD or home problems so they do not make these things apparent to anyone except in their schoolwork. Many of them want to achieve. After school programs for these kids could be the answer. Demarits for not turning in their homework on time is a good start, but if the problem is not a habitual one, a period of time to do so is certainly a good step forward instead of a “0″. Some of these kids just say why bother, I’m not going to get a good grade anyway. ADHD kids are not below average learners, they just have a problem with attention and hyperactivity that gets in the way. Kids with problematic home lives have bigger fish to fry. To say they can slide by even if they fail is sending the wrong answer. Kids are individuals with individual problems and we need to look a little more closely at what is happening with these kids.

  • 11 anon parent // Jun 2, 2007 at 8:44 pm

    Maybe the BOE should concentrate on the PA system and no bathrooms in the science wing at Norwalk High before theymake decisions to allow students to scate by with no direction. Its time someone gets the ball rolling on things that are for the good of all students, present and future. The BOE needs to figure out why the PA systems does not wok properly and the problems that will arise through neglect if this is not taken care of. This is a security problem amd should be adressed as such. Are there no funds available through Homeland Security grants or funding to update this system so that it reaches required specifications? And how the heck does the BOE and the city allow a wing of a school to not have bathrooms for its students. Who the heck caused this? Where are the specs that someone was looking at that woulsd have sent up a signal that probably during the course of the day at least 1 student might have to go to the bathroom? Come on, this is just poor planning at its best. Who is responsible for these things and who is going to fix them? The safety and well being of our kids are at stake and someone needs to answer for this.

  • 12 Alfonso Salazar // Jun 6, 2007 at 9:24 am

    Do I understand this correctly, they want to drop the standards instead of raise them? NO! that cannot be true. So what we are saying is that we want a 3rd World educational system. China, and India are raising their standards of education and we want to lower them, we truly are catering to the lowest common denominator.