YourCT.com header image 2

Senate Dems Plan To Vote on Tax Increase


by turfgrrl


May 29th, 2007 · 17 Comments

According to the Courant, Senate Dems are convinced that voting on increasing taxes is a good thing. They frame it by saying it is an introduction of a progressive income tax. A progressive income tax is a good thing. A lower progressive income tax is a better thing. From the Courant:

Senate Democrats today intend to defy Gov. M. Jodi Rell by approving a progressive income tax scale that Democrats say will lower taxes for most residents and raise taxes on households earning more than $270,000 annually.

The announcement Monday by Senate President Pro Tem Donald E. Williams Jr., D-Brooklyn, comes as the legislature’s Democratic majority and the Rell administration are deadlocked over a tax-and-spending plan for the fiscal year beginning July 1.

Williams declined to predict if the tax vote would jump-start or further complicate budget negotiations as the legislative session lurches toward its adjournment deadline of midnight June 6.

“I can’t remember a situation quite like this,” Williams said.

Williams said he was unsure if Democrats could pass the tax package by the two-thirds margin necessary to overcome a gubernatorial veto.

Democrats can vote on taxes without Rell’s consent, but not spending. All budgets proposed this year - by the Republican Rell, legislative Republicans and Democrats - exceed the state spending cap, which cannot be topped without Rell’s permission.

Buoyed by rising revenues and pressured by fiscal conservatives in her own party, Rell has walked away from the across-the-board income tax increase she proposed in February to fund a major increase in state aid for local education.

She now opposes any tax increase.

State Senator Bob Duff can be reached here:

E-mail:

Duff@senatedems.ct.gov

Phone:

860-240-0414,
or toll-free
1-800-842-1420

source: Courant, Senate Move Defies Rell:Democrats Will Go Ahead With Tax Vote, By CHRISTOPHER KEATING, And MARK PAZNIOKAS,  May 29, 2007

Tags: CT Senate · In the News

17 Responses so far “Senate Dems Plan To Vote on Tax Increase”



  • 1 hitcow // May 29, 2007 at 10:42 am

    Sounds like a good idea. People, who earn more, also use more resources of society. A Wall Street investor is greatly enhanced by the SEC. Banking insurance exists for people with 100,000 or more of savings. So people, who earn more, should pay a little more percentage in taxes.

    As a gay guy, I’ve been paying more in health insurance, since people with kids just seem to eat up health care in this country.

  • 2 Healthy Skeptic // May 29, 2007 at 10:54 am

    Good to hear from another segment of Norwalk’s diverse community. I agree that of those to whom much is given, more should be expected, to paraphrase someone famous.

    The Republicans in the state legislature, as evidenced by the tax tables that were posted recently elsewhere on this thread, are bent on screwing the working class once again and giving breaks to the wealthy. Par for the course for the GOP.

    Health insurance? 45 million Americans have none. Meanwhile, the rest of us are paying the cost for them and the huge epidemic of citizens here who are overweight and the health problems associated with them.

    I’m looking forward to Michael Moore’s new film, “Sicko”, which skewers the healthcare providers, insurance companies and government policies that have failed the citizens of this nation.

  • 3 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 12:16 pm

    OH NO, now we hear from a Michael Moore fan? The anti everything person who along with some others consider our soldiers to be the real terrorists? The GOP are trying to give balance to a budget tha will delve into state surplus therefore hurting the under $100,000 a year earners because higher taxes will prevent these larger earners from conributing to programs that are needed to substidize the many programs needed for those who normally cannot affordwhat others take for granted. lets tax the big guys so they move out of CT and take their tax dollars with them. Now there’s a plan.

  • 4 Old Blue Meanie // May 29, 2007 at 12:37 pm

    Hey, the Repugnicants have Bill “pure spin zone” O’Reilly, Michelle Malkin, Bill Kristol, Sean Hannity, and a veritable rat’s nest of apologists for the neo-con-artists that have hijacked this nation and everything it stands for.

    One little ol’ Michael Moore got you salivating to kick some libtard butt? He manages to bring out the truths that all the conservative spinmeisters have managed to cover up since this halfwit-mouth-breathing-skidmark-on the-Oval-Office-executive-potty has done his best to obfuscate since being selected by the Supreme Court in 2000.

    Good old George “The Constitution is just a g**damned piece of paper” Bush. He wouldn’t know the truth if it bit him in the ass.

  • 5 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 12:59 pm

    I don’t believe I was defending GW which I don’t. I was only making mention of Moore’s twisted mind.

  • 6 ENrwlker // May 29, 2007 at 1:26 pm

    Boy, “Old Blue Meanie”, you sure picked a good moniker for yourself …

  • 7 Old Blue Meanie // May 29, 2007 at 1:29 pm

    Yeah, I figured since the Republicans have had the nation bent over with their pants around their ankles for the past seven years, it’s about time someone stopped pretending everything was just wonderful.

  • 8 anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 1:31 pm

    Why is old blue meanie focused on national issues when in Conn it’s the Democrats selling us all out?

  • 9 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 1:43 pm

    Rell has veto power, I guess you’ll have to see if she saves the day. Williams is quoted as saying he doesn’t know if the Dems have the votes to override her.

    So, if Rell has all that power I guess you have nothing to fear, right?

  • 10 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 1:43 pm

    And in fairfield county its the Democrats who hands in your pockets, taking all your money so that Amann and his boys can give it to Hartford.

  • 11 ENrwlker // May 29, 2007 at 2:54 pm

    Meanie, I’m a Republican but you won’t get much disagreement from me that the Republicans in DC have pretty badly screwed things up … some of that from behaving like Democrats once they took power (spending money like it grew on trees) …

    #8 and #10 — Obviously Meanie isn’t going to talk about Connecticut, since the Democrats here are robbing Norwalk’s taxpayers blind and giving us (as Turfie says) “bacon bits” back. In Meanie’s world, only Republicans can be bad.

  • 12 Old Blue Meanie // May 29, 2007 at 3:30 pm

    No, they’re not all bad, but it sure is fun to yank their chains.

    As far as the Dems robbing Norwalk’s taxpayers blind, maybe you could stop banging the “bacon bits” drum long enough to start considering how income taxes affect the BIG picture in Norwalk tax-wise. Republicans want us to pay more, Dems less. The comparison chart of the two plans is posted elsewhere on this blog.

  • 13 ENrwlker // May 29, 2007 at 3:55 pm

    OK, Meanie, I appreciate having some fun with the opposition. ;-)

    As far as taxes are concerned, I am very aware of the big picture. It is well established that Norwalk gets about 10 cents on the dollar back for the taxes it sends to Hartford … and Norwalk ain’t Greenwich.

    I have repeatedly noted that the Democratic legislature’s budget gives Norwalk a few hundred thousand dollars more for education while increasing our taxes by $15 million. You seem OK with that as long as the legislature is ONLY over-taxing our wealthier citizens. But while they over-tax wealthier citizens in all towns, some places (i.e., every City in the State outside of Fairfield County) will get multi-millions in additional education funding back under that budget, while Norwalk gets a few hundred thousand back. What’s the ‘good’ of nailing wealthier Norwalk citizens with your beloved ‘progressive’ income tax when the lower income Norwalkers get NO benefit from it (the way they DO get that benefit in New Britain, and Ansonia, and Waterbury, and Hartford, etc., etc.)? If you believe in redistribution, shouldn’t some of that redistribution come back to Norwalk? And shouldn’t your fellow Democrats in our legislative delegation fight harder to make it happen?

  • 14 turfgrrl // May 29, 2007 at 8:10 pm

    I should have stated in my original post that all this talk about raising revenues is useless as long as the legislature ignores GAAP and continues to spend without accountability.
  • 15 .Moderate voter. // May 30, 2007 at 7:29 am

    Once again the state dems make a huge mess! Several weeks ago the GOP proposed a suspension of the state gasoline tax and the dems refused to debate it. Why? because it was a good idea they wanted for themselves. Now they decided to proposed the almost exact bill and had to send it back to committee for who knows what reason and iy probably won’t make it out of committee before session ending on June 6th. This is exactly what happens when one party has all the power. A huge mess. Then if thats not enough, they tried to get their income tax hike into place and thanks to 2 dmes with common sense, Duff and McDonald who thought the idea was less than brilliant, that too went down the tubes. So, I guess the state is in a state of limbo on many issues including, but not limited to the energy bill and many others. Time to start looking at whats going in Hartford. But I guess they did get one all important bill passed, requiring inventory on scrap metal???? I guess so people don’t go stealing metal products from wealthy homes and selling them for scrap.

  • 16 Anonymous // May 30, 2007 at 9:25 am

    Too many lawyers regulating every aspect of living here. Even if you tax the wealthy 100% you will be short–there are not enough of them to tax!

  • 17 moderate voter // May 30, 2007 at 9:44 am

    And the more you tax them, the faster they move out leaving us with a huge debt. So, what are the dems up state thinking? Everything trickles down hill. If you tax the wealthiest, they move out so you now have to put the burden on the moderate incomes which in turn puts them in a position where they can no longer afford to live here and they move out. The surplus goes down the tubes, programs are cut to make up for the shortfall and the lower income shoulders the burden. The GOP house proposal would have benefitted Norwalk and surrounding towns in the best way possible but, when you have an unbalanced government deciding how to steal our hard earned dollars we will never get representation.