YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Museum Curator May Return


by turfgrrl


May 29th, 2007 · 120 Comments

According to a Matt “mad Max” Breslow article in the Advocate the return of Susan Gunn is imminent.

The Norwalk Museum’s only paid employee - curator Susan Gunn Bromley, who has been on extended personal leave since December - could return to work Friday, city Personnel Director H. James Haselkamp Jr. said last week.

Meanwhile, the Friends of the Norwalk Museums - the nonprofit group whose volunteers have been staffing the facility in Bromley’s absence - are trying to become its administrators.

“This place needs hands-on administration,” former curator Ralph Bloom, a Friends member and city historian, said last week.

Bromley’s leave began Dec. 19 and was extended through Thursday, Haselkamp said. He said he expects Bromley, who is not being paid, will return on or after Friday.


Haselkamp said Friday he was reviewing Bromley’s requests for conditions under which she would return to work. He said he planned to send a response letter, and then it would be up to Bromley to decide how to proceed.

Haselkamp indicated he did not know whether Bromley will return if the city doesn’t agree to her requests, which he said he could not discuss. A representative for Bromley could not be reached Friday.

Conditions?  How did a curator job become a unionized one? What is the job description? And with the entire employment apparently contentious since day one, isn’t it time that the city conclude that the job performance has not been there?source:, Norwalk Advocate, “Museum curator may return to work Friday“, , May 29 2007

Tags: In the News · Norwalk

120 Responses so far “Norwalk: Museum Curator May Return”


Pages: [1] 2 3 4 » Show All



  • 1 FCM // May 29, 2007 at 9:39 am

    How does a city employee from the NMEA union get away with taking off 20 times the amount of days that she is scheduled to work, doesn’t do any work when she is there, refuses to do anything in the job description but personal business - How does this employee have the NERVE to set conditions about her return?

    Turf Girl - Could you investigate if other employees set conditions upon abandoning their jobs? Do other employees get up to 6 months of person leave besides FMLA leave? And find out just who is sick in the curator’s family which would qualify her to receive FMLA leave. Municipal employees personnel records are available through Freedom of Information.

  • 2 Museum Pro // May 29, 2007 at 10:06 am

    If Sue was out for a medical leave, do her Dr.s have to agree she is fit to return to work? Do all city workers get to negotiate individual contracts?

  • 3 Dump the Dead Weight // May 29, 2007 at 11:32 am

    Let’s see what the Mayor does about this. More likely, what he doesn’t do. If this position was any other in the City government, would this be happening? I doubt it.

    Turfie: you seem to have the resources to delve into the whys, whos, wheres and hows of issues like this, how about some investigative enlightenment for us all?

  • 4 Bye Bye // May 29, 2007 at 12:09 pm

    I would imagine that Ms. Gunns contract has to run out soon. Get rid of her as soon as it is. She has to go, no two ways about it. Norwalk has way too many people fleecing tax payers money. There has to be a clause in her contract that even her godfather Zullo can’t defend. I don’t think this mayor can do anything about this contract but there has to be a way out and someone in City Hall needs to find it.

  • 5 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 1:44 pm

    Hey, let’s blame it on the Historical Commission! What do you bet Moccia kicks it back to them?

  • 6 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 1:52 pm

    #5-get over it. Moccia has nothing to do with Gunn’s contract, it was given to her long ago and there has to be terms and conditions that someone has investigated yet. What a shame that the Norwalk Museum is being run by a no show incompetant curator who does nothing but fleece the taxpayers. I say get her gone and lets open the doors to Norwalk history with someone with the gumption and know how to make it the showcase it can be. Stop throwing around blame and start finding solutions. If the mayor can have input so be it, he should, but I think the roots have dug down way too deep in some circles that anything he can say will have no impact on those who would have her there.

  • 7 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 1:58 pm

    #6 - Who do you think has the “gumption” to “get her gone”? Someone has to step up. This situation is not going to fix itself. My understanding is that it’s a union contract that cannot be voided. Shall we blame it on previous administrations?

  • 8 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 2:03 pm

    Don’t know who to blame it on but thats a good start! And those who got her the job in the first place. Contracts do come to an end and hopefully hers comes sooner than later.

  • 9 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 2:10 pm

    Typically union contracts are three years. When did she get hired? Did someone renew the contract? Turf can you do something?

  • 10 indiga // May 29, 2007 at 2:14 pm

    Esposito hired her. Knopp made her an offer she refused. Moccia allowed her to be the “no-show”. And TG won’t investigate because Soo Gunn has more powerful ju-ju than TG — or anyone in the administraton for that matter. What that is, God only knows…but whatver it is, it’s gonna bring her back to bedevil Norwalk. I pity the HC having to put up with her incompetence again.

  • 11 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 2:22 pm

    Indiga-just to set the record straight, Moccia has not allowed her to be a no show, her contract did. Is there a clause that says the mayor can force her to work if her contract says otherwise? There are legal ramifications to the city and taxpayers if a contract is violated. Her contract should not be renewed. BOTTOM LINE!

  • 12 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 2:23 pm

    Turffie keeps posting on it, what makes you think she’s not investigating?

  • 13 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 3:13 pm

    Bet if there was porn and a “cover up” involved we’d have some investigating tout suite…

  • 14 anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 3:13 pm

    The article says that Haselkamp is going to respond to Gunn’s requests. Are Gunn’s requests supported by her union? If so, shouldn’t Gunn’s requests be made public? Shouldn’t all the other members of her union be able to see the deal Gunn wants if she gets it? Shouldn’t they be allowed to negotiate similar deals?

  • 15 anon // May 29, 2007 at 3:17 pm

    Gunn has hired a private attorney of her own. Corp counsel has been known to cave when that happens.

  • 16 anon // May 29, 2007 at 3:20 pm

    Number 13, don’t you think TG might have other investigations in the works too? My guess is that its more difficult to get personnel records.

  • 17 indiga // May 29, 2007 at 3:27 pm

    Boy, I’ll bet a lot of emplyees would want that “nobody can make me work” clause in their contracts. I’ll bet those personnel records are impossible to get — and have probably been doctored anyway. Face it, we are stuck with her and paying her salary, her disability, and her retirement. And she still won’t do a damn thing except create chaos and pointless problems.

  • 18 anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 3:27 pm

    Let’s face it, the money ties on this one all source to powerful democrats in this town.

  • 19 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 3:32 pm

    There ya go with those “powerful Democrats” again. So powerful, in fact, they’ve got the Republicans running the City. Dastardly planning!

  • 20 anon // May 29, 2007 at 3:44 pm

    Who is really running the city? The mayor can’t do anything without council approval. Last I checked the council was run by Democrats.

  • 21 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 3:45 pm

    You mean Mike Coffey? He’s not a Democrat. He’s a chameleon. Five Norwalk “outers”. Not much power there, so who’s really running the show?

  • 22 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 4:08 pm

    In case you hadn’t noticed, now that election time is upon us, theother dems have gone back to the fold. No more give and take if they want to get the nominations this year. So, that said, looks like the dems are running the show again. So maybe the dems can get rid of their favorite daughter, but I doubt it.

  • 23 Al B. // May 29, 2007 at 4:30 pm

    You are right Mike Coffey is not a democrat. He had a real chance to lead the democrats however, this loser found a way to screw that up, Take you and your evil sister DK and run for the hills.

    He should run on the GOP ticket! Maybe, he could get a uncommon result!

  • 24 Party Loyalty // May 29, 2007 at 4:41 pm

    What’s with all the hate towards Coffey? ANd why is that Democrats keep trying to convince the rest of folks that their party members aren’t Democrats and instead are Republicans? I’ve never seen such ridiculous postering! Some of us folk like to see our officials show a little independence once in awhile. It seems that there’s little positive talk here by Democrats. Why is that? I think it says more about the people than they realize.

  • 25 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 4:45 pm

    COFFEY WILL NOT BE NOMINATED FOR ANYTHING BY THE DEMS. Rumor has it that he will petition to run for mayor independently like Joe Lieberman. He doesn’t have enough supporters to run a good campaign but he could be the spoiler IF the Dems get a good candidate.

  • 26 Al B. // May 29, 2007 at 4:50 pm

    I dont think anybody hates Mike Coffey however, being president of the council has shown the party who he really is - a GOP member. I just think he would be happier campaigning for Moccia’s re-election.

    I am not going to vote for a Joe L. democrat!

  • 27 Coffey For Mayor // May 29, 2007 at 4:50 pm

    Coffey will primary and win a Democratic slot. Idiots that run the Democratic party will then be on strike three against Coffey.

  • 28 Anonymous // May 29, 2007 at 4:52 pm

    Who cares about Joe Lieberman. This is an important municipal race. Put in a no name, and get real Republicans elected. How dumb is that?

  • 29 Al B. // May 29, 2007 at 5:03 pm

    Who would support Mike Coffey for Mayor?

    Nobody- he would get spanked 3 to 1.

  • 30 Party of Lincoln // May 29, 2007 at 5:04 pm

    So Coffey is a Republican now? Geez. This town is filled with the strangest people. Everything that Coffey has forced down our throats is liberal crap. He’s given away the taxpayer’s money to the unions. He says he wants to keep taxes low, and then turns around and approves contracts right and left then give bennies and pensions to people with multiple pay raises. And we’ve been fighting his brand of ethics reform for months. We don’t have an ethics problem in Norwalk, we have a problem with liberals wanting to makes laws about things that make everything cost more. If it ain’t broke don’t fix it.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 » Show All