YourCT.com header image 2

State Legislators No Longer Have To Disclose Employer


by turfgrrl


May 18th, 2007 · 50 Comments

With all the tempest over House Speaker Jim Amann’s role as fundraiser for his employer and role in the House, it is a surprise that the disclosure of who the employer of each legislator was has been dropped form the comliance forms issued by the state ethics office.

Form the Courant:

State legislators no longer have to disclose where they work in the private sector, removing one of Connecticut’s oldest and most basic safeguards against conflicts of interest.

The disclosure requirement disappeared without fanfare or legislative action, the victim of a legal interpretation by the new Office of State Ethics.

The absence was discovered as The Courant obtained copies of the annual financial disclosure forms that legislators were required to file this month.

“I’m shocked,” said Andy Sauer, the executive director of Common Cause. “It’s bewildering.”

Legislators said they were surprised to find for the first time in about 25 years that they were not asked to disclose the source of outside income.

“If you don’t know where people work, how can you detect a conflict?” said Rep. Christopher L. Caruso, D-Bridgeport. “That’s a monumental oversight.”

As explanation, the Office of State ethics said there was no law that required the disclosure. Barbara Housen said to the Courant that the forms should reflect what the statute requires. Notably not a single legislator who filled out the forms this year noticed that there was no line for name of employer. The feigned shock over the situation is somewhat disingenuous. They filled out the form and didn’t notice until the Courant started calling them for comment. I suppose it was more important to deal with the myriad frivolous bills that were worked on then maintaining the appearance of a concern for conflicts of interest.

And let’s not forget that the legislature is going to ignore the request to adopt GAAP, and continue to argue over spending projected revenue instead actual revenue, furthering the unstable and non transparent accounting of the state’s business.
source: Courant, Ethics Safeguard Vanishes, By MARK PAZNIOKAS, May 18, 2007

Tags: CT House · CT Senate · In the News

50 Responses so far “State Legislators No Longer Have To Disclose Employer”



  • 1 L'arlequino // May 18, 2007 at 8:15 am

    Transparency? What transparency? Not good. Looks like they’re circling the wagons. How will da boyz on the Common Council interpret this? A role model for a revamped Ethics statute in Norwalk?

  • 2 turfgrrl // May 18, 2007 at 8:34 am

    Considering how there’s only been Democratic opposition to revising the ethics code here in Norwalk, I suspect that status quo will prevail. It’s odd that local Democrats prefer a 40 year old vague code versus a more stringent up to date code, but stranger things have happened. I guess protecting Anne Carbone from her bad judgement repercussions was more important.

    Maybe our local newspapers will ask if any of the Norwalk Delegation noticed the omission, and were planning to voluntarily disclose their employment. Without that disclosure it makes it much harder to track conflicts of interest, like pushing legislation concerning an industry you are employed in.

  • 3 high road // May 18, 2007 at 8:56 am

    Why do you interpret a desire to keep politicians from controlling the ethics committee as opposition to a revised ethics code? Seems to me it’s just the oppossite. Coffey seems focused on a “lip service” ethics code while allowing politics to continue to run the process.

  • 4 turfgrrl // May 18, 2007 at 9:01 am

    highroad: Have you read the draft? Looks Coffey has been reading comments here, and the draft reflects that.
  • 5 Larry Cafero is making the bacon but Norwalk is not! // May 18, 2007 at 10:23 am

    Cafero is currently under fire from people in his district and Hartford- for what some say is bad ethics.

    The question on my mind- Is Larry Cafero shaking down the city of Norwalk?

    It seems to me if you want more bacon from Cafero- you have to hire his Law firm.

    The Norwalk Redevelopment Agency paid Cafero’s law firm $50, 000 of our taxpayers dollars.

    Moccia also paid Cafero’s Law Firm Thousands to lobby in DC. If Moccia has Chris Shays for a buddy- why do you have to pay Cafero’s Law Firm?

    The Maritime Center paid them thousands too. (Something is fishy!)

    Why do you have to pay Cafero’s law firm to get results?

    Any of the local GOP- want to defend Cafero or Moccia’s actions?

  • 6 Anonymous // May 18, 2007 at 11:07 am

    Bob Duff is a realtor. Yet he wants to get rid of the real estate conveyance tax. Conflict!

  • 7 L'arlequino // May 18, 2007 at 11:17 am

    As a Norwalk property taxpayer, I have no problem with getting rid of the conveyance tax. It was supposed to be temporary anyway. Municipalities will be the entities most in favor of keeping it since the revenues go to them, not the state. I don’t trust the City to use that revenue to reduce my property taxes. I would rather see the state increase the ECS revenues that the city gets.

  • 8 Anonymous // May 18, 2007 at 11:34 am

    The state only manages to take our tax dollars and give them upstate. At least with the real estate conveyance tax is does go to the city and you do see your property tax go down. Didn’t you see the property tax rate go down from an increase of 4.4 to 3.%? Duff gets big $$$$ from the real estate lobby. Do you think that’s a conflict?

  • 9 Larry Cafero is making the bacon but Norwalk is not! // May 18, 2007 at 11:39 am

    Cafero has not produced- after 13 years he has the same tired excuse. “The Upstate Democrats” - blocks Norwalk from a fair share of education funding.

    Maybe the taxpayers should hire Larry’s Law firm to change the ECS?

  • 10 L'arlequino // May 18, 2007 at 11:43 am

    As they say, show me the money (Duff’s real estate lobbying $, that is). Until then I have to assume you have some kind of political axe to grind.

  • 11 Hartford Axe Grinder // May 18, 2007 at 2:09 pm

    Mr. Duff’s campaign contributions are public record, read ‘em and weep.
    –against real estate conveyance tax repeal

  • 12 Anonymous // May 18, 2007 at 2:18 pm

    Got a link where those campaign contributions can be found?

  • 13 turfgrrl // May 18, 2007 at 2:27 pm

    Yes, that is also good netiquette, if you refer to something that can be verifiable on the internet please try to link to it. You just have to cut and paste it in the comment, the site usually turns them to links.
  • 14 Broad River Guy // May 18, 2007 at 2:54 pm

    Rep. Cafero’s Law firm should not get paid from the city.

    Does anybody know why the city agreed to pay Rep. Cafero’s Law Firm?

    If he votes on bills that his firms lobbys that is really a ethical issue.

  • 15 Larry Cafero is making the bacon but Norwalk is not! // May 18, 2007 at 5:35 pm

    #14 BRG The GOP cannot defend paying this law firm. When you ask them a question- they just point fingers at other elected officals. Just look at their above post.

    So according to the GOP plan- you must hired Brown, Rudnick to bring home the bacon.

    Why elect Lobbyist- Lawyer Larry Cafero?

  • 16 lobbyist // May 18, 2007 at 6:59 pm

    If you are a Democrat why don’t you pick on a Republican lobbying firm. BR is Tom Ritter’s firm.
    Good Democrats deserve the business.

  • 17 Anonymous // May 18, 2007 at 7:02 pm

    To Broad River Guy-Bruce Morris shouldn’t be getting paid by Norwalk either. For the record, any work that is done by Brown, Rudnick Larry is not part of the equation. If you want to argue that monies eventually trickle down to him then you probably need to take into consideration anyone who does business with the city is in the same position. This is just rediculous that one person who started this dumb bacon bits hype has single handedly tried to discredit a man who has spent the better part of his adult life working for the interests of this city. What is wrong with you people? Lets see, Chris perone is a realtor, Bob Duff is a realtor, and I’ll bet they don’t recuse themselves from bills ans proposal that deal with any type of real estate. We need to start looking at all the representation in Hartford for our shortages.

  • 18 Concerned Citizen // May 18, 2007 at 7:44 pm

    Thank you #16 & #17.. I see jen, the broken record, is still at it. Here’s a woman who thinks that the Democratic leadership in Hartford is ONLY a boring excuse for “Larry Not bringing home the bacon”. Why should FACTS get in the way, huh Jen? She is still on her “Show me my ignorance tour”. Get this, according to jen and her other personalities, Perrone, Duff & Morris are excused because Larry been in Hartford longer.LOL!!! ROFL!!! Like this has anything to do with it! Perrone, Duff & Morris CAN’T EVEN get THEIR OWN leadership in Hartford to listen to them and A DUH, it’s Larry’s fault!!!

  • 19 Concerned Citizen // May 18, 2007 at 7:53 pm

    Mr. L’arlequino on Post #7 - WOW! Nice post. You and I agree! Who says we can’t find common ground.

  • 20 Larry Cafero is making the bacon but Norwalk is not! // May 18, 2007 at 8:46 pm

    Concerned Citizen- first you dont know how to treat a lady! I am only asking the hard questions - why does Larry continue to make excuses?

    In my fact-finding mission aka “Show Me the Money Tour” I found out that the Norwalk city government paid Larry’s firm to bring home the bacon.

    Continue with - its Jen, or other elected officals- we did not hired Brown, Rudnick - Moccia did and Larry’s firm took our taxpaying dollars.

    Dump Cafero

  • 21 Fighting 142nd // May 18, 2007 at 8:53 pm

    Gotta laugh at the dump Larry posts. You must have moved here recently. Open your eyes, Alex Knopp signed the deal!

  • 22 Anonymous // May 18, 2007 at 9:35 pm

    I think Jen is saying it was Moccia. Can anyone verify?

  • 23 Larry Cafero is making the bacon but Norwalk is not! // May 18, 2007 at 10:09 pm

    My last post- was telling the local GOP to stop blaming me or the elected officals for Larry’s failures.

    Larry’s Big Score

    Moccia hired Cafero’s firm to lobby Washington and then paid them to lobby for the Norwalk Redevelopment Agency. ($50,000)

    The Maritime Center had to pay them too.

    The question -Is Larry Cafero shaking down the city for business?

  • 24 Concerned Citizen // May 18, 2007 at 10:10 pm

    They are kinda funny, aren’t they #21? Jen seems to think because she “is a lady” she can get away with her trashing of Larry Cafero - Jen, I will buy you all the bacon (and snausages) you want, if you’d stop eating those funny brownies already.

  • 25 Fighting 142nd // May 18, 2007 at 10:39 pm

    Ha! Gotcha there now. It was Mayor Alex Knopp who hired his long time buddy Ritter. You see you can blame Larry for working at BR but you know have to come clean on who pursued whom. An all Democrat affair on that dotted line. But please keep on posting. Larry abd the rest of the GOP team will gladly use your posts about that bacon that Duff, Morris and Perone keep sending over to Hartford.

  • 26 Larry Cafero is making the bacon but Norwalk is not! // May 19, 2007 at 1:25 am

    Hey Larry Ca- Zero dollars (Fighting 142nd) take it to the other members of the GOP- take it to the governor- you think I care. You are going to do what you were elected to do and the city of Norwalk is NOT going to pay you or your lawfirm another dollar!

    Does Cafero want to debate Jen online? Let’s do it!

  • 27 conservdem // May 19, 2007 at 6:23 am

    Hey Jen, Dump larry, or whatever/whomever you are today, perhaps you should re-read the posts and really get the answers you so willingly ignore, ALEX KNOPP hired Brown, Rudnick NOT MOCCIA. Get your facts straight and please stop accusing the GOP for the shortcomings of your buddies. Your posts are getting old and tiresome and only prove to be entertaining at most. Next thing you know you’ll be blaming larry for global warming. get over it. Your posts will not determine the outcome of the elections, just like the ones about bruce morrisa haven’t changed that situation one bit. he’s still double dipping and not working for norwalk.

  • 28 Larry Cafero is making the bacon but Norwalk is not! // May 19, 2007 at 8:46 am

    The Show Us The Money Tour- is not a political stunt! The GOP is really rolling out all of the clowns on this one. The speaker Amann called Larry Ca- Zero “out” and I am bringing the debate before the people. You can attack me all you want but- Jen is not going to stop fighting for the people of the 142nd and the citizens of this district.

    Cafero support is trending downward- and he knows this. A young guy was here for 5 mins and almost beat him. What would happen if Larry faced somebody that was here for 10mins. He would lose-that simple.

    Dump Cafero

  • 29 Concerned Citizen // May 19, 2007 at 11:00 am

    Still eating those funny brownies and drinking the tainted Kool-aid, Huh jen? Your “show me my ignorance tour” is catching on. Speaking of clowns, “lady Clowns” in your case, You fill those big floppy shoes well. Really Jen, this is getting old. As I stated already, your posts hold water like a colinder in Pasta Nostra’s kitchen. You constantly leave out facts, toss hard facts aside that don’t suite your argument as “excuses”. Blame Moccia when Knopp is the culprit who you should blame, Quote Amann as an Albiet supreme infalable leader when he has many ethicical questions about himself to be answered, you keep yapping about Brown, Riduck when it’s a dem, Tom Ritter, who runs it and was hired by Knopp. ETC etc. Unfairly focus on Larry, while failing to hold Perrone, Duff & Morris accountable for “no Bacon”, Totally ignor the Bruce Morris robbing the taxpayers issue, which you claim you are “so Concerned” (HA HA) about. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD - STOP CONSUMING THOSE “BROWNINES & KOOL-AID” ALREADY. I’ve had fun with you, but your posts are NOT truthful, misguided and grossly repeative. Just because you keep saying it, will not make it true.

  • 30 Larry Cafero is not for Universal Healthcare // May 19, 2007 at 4:40 pm

    Ok, I am going to change the subject- to Universal Healthcare. Many Norwalk residents are without Healthcare coverage. Sen. Duff, Reps. Perone and Morris came to hear the stories of working people without healthcare. Guess who decided not to attend- you guessed it Larry Cafero.

    Larry Cafero is not interested in doing anything for this district! His empty seat -says a lot about him and he skills as a elected offical.

    When you need healthcare coverage- Larry Cafero is a no-show!

    Dump Cafero

  • 31 Concerned Citizen // May 19, 2007 at 7:09 pm

    Ha Ha Ha!!! Universal Health care Coverage??? are you kidding. Look we have ANOTHER hillary!! You mean Health care like in Canada? Do you know if you have cancer, it will take 3 months for a doctor to see you in Canada. You just might be dead waiting to get proper care. I guess your for giving Illegals health care too huh jen… Who do you think PAYS for this wonderful free health care these illegals are sucking up? We do the tax payers. Another reason health care costs so much is because of your trial layers lobby that is in your dem’s pockets. Did you know my dear Jen that when a doctor retires, he continue to pay malpractice insurance for 7 YEARS after he’s done doctoring because some old patient might come out of the wood work and want to sue him. George Bush Sr. & Jr. wanted to CAP medical malpractice law suits but your dear Democratic LOBBY (YES JEN, DEMOCRATS HAVE LOBBIST’S TOO!) known as the TRIAL LAWYERS OF AMERICA Lobbied NOT to have Caps, So those “wonderful slip & fall lawyers” out there can Sue the pants off of doctors. Just pick up ANY phone book and look at the ads on the cover or all over TV- they’re all over the place - “did you fall? Do you know ANYone who fell? Call us for a free consultation….We don’t get paid unless you get money, ETC ETC. Dear Jen who pays for this?? That’s right, we all do. we pay for it in HIGH premiums for health care coverage…and back to the illegals sucking up free health care when hard working Americans are stuck footing their Bills and then can’t afford it for their own families!!!

  • 32 Anonymous // May 19, 2007 at 7:15 pm

    The US has the most expensive and worst healthcare system in the the western world. It seems like blowhards like concerned citizen thinks that paying some crappy corporation thousands of dollars a year so you can wait for approvals, wait for payment reimbursement and wait for referrals is some sort of great healthcare system.

    Jen/Dump wants to blame Larry Cafero for not advancing universal healthcare, but really this is a national disgrace.

  • 33 Larry Cafero is not for Universal Healthcare // May 19, 2007 at 7:24 pm

    Does your buddy Larry Cafero care about people without healthcare? By the way Cafero is a member of the trial lawyers. It was sad that he did not come to hear all the sad stories of people without healthcare- I told you Cafero is so right wing- he makes Moccia look he is a member of the Green Party, By the way- Moccia did come to this event.

    Cafero’s actions are shameful- and you are a sorry excuse for a human being!

    Dump Cafero

  • 34 Concerned Citizen // May 19, 2007 at 7:32 pm

    And that goes for you too jen!

  • 35 Larry Cafero is not for Universal Healthcare // May 19, 2007 at 7:46 pm

    Concerned Citizen- you speak for Larry Cafero enough said.

  • 36 Concerned Citizen // May 19, 2007 at 7:46 pm

    “cafearo a trial lawer too blah blah blah. Hey dopey so is bill clinton , so is John Edwards WHO”S MADE A FORTUNE ON SILP & FALL CASES, I could go on & On. These case should be capped period and then americans wouldn’t have to foot the bill for ridiculous law suits. Idiot’s statement”we have themost expensive and worst healthcare system in the the western world. blah blah blah.” BREAK IT DOWN MR. I.Q, - WHY IS IT THE MOST EXPENSIVE IN THE WORLD?? Can it be we give billions in free health care to Illegals? When a Doctor has to pay the insurance company half a million a year for malpractice insurance, how do you think the Doctor is going to get that money??? Do you think he picks it off the liberl tree? And Most importantly, WHY DOES THE DOCTOR HAVE TO PAY SO MUCH FOR MALPRACTICE INSURANCE? You think your smart, so think what the answer is. You KNOW what it is. Pour yourself a tall glass of reality there bub.

  • 37 Concerned Citizen // May 19, 2007 at 7:48 pm

    And you Jen speak MORE THAN ENOUGH TRASH ABOUT HIM and I won’t let you get away with it.

  • 38 Anonymous // May 19, 2007 at 7:58 pm

    Enough with the Cafero stuff, both of you. No one wants to read it because it adds nothing to the discussion. Turffy can you do something?

  • 39 Larry Cafero is not for Universal Healthcare // May 19, 2007 at 8:01 pm

    Anon 38 We are now talking about Healthcare- would you like to join in?

    I was making a comment- that my state rep did not show up!

  • 40 Concerned Citizen // May 19, 2007 at 8:05 pm

    *39 I too wouldn’t mind if turfgirl DID do something about it..Quite frankly I’m tired of seeing Jen constantly trash Larry without being Factual and if they resort to vicious attacks on me Like “blowhard” and “sorry excuse for a human being”, Then they deserve a verbal whacking back. I could of stated the above health care Without the adjectives, but THEY chose to initate it.

  • 41 Jenny // May 19, 2007 at 10:33 pm

    Healthcare is a very important issue- and I look forward to the debate. Some might say that my style is cool, hip or rude but we need people to hold politicans feet to the fire.

    I will continue to ask the tough questions- the show me the money tour is coming to a street near you.

    Today- we were in Silvermine- tomorrow West Norwalk!

  • 42 concerned citizen // May 20, 2007 at 8:22 am

    Jen, we could agree Health Care is a very important issue and its a complex one at that with many reasons for its shortcomings. I have No problen in holding politicians (notice with an “S” at the end) feet to the fire, however, up to now your are fixated on only ONE Politician, Larry Cafero, and that’s it. You refuse to mention any other legislators who need their feet burned, so it looks like your on a witch hunt for Larry.

  • 43 anonymous // May 20, 2007 at 8:41 am

    These posts trashing our esteemed State Rep sound like Lex Paulson or Anna Duleep Hill. Nothing like a carpetbagger who does not own a house in town having something to say.

  • 44 Vet Park Junkie // May 20, 2007 at 8:41 am

    My hat is off to those who so successfully managed to highjack this thread. “Don’t ask me where I get my money because, uh, because, uh. Oh, you are an ill-born varlet! And uh, and uh, your kids have no doctor and are going to DIE!”

    It is nice to know that, in Connecticut, compensation does not influence behavior. How noble we are…

  • 45 Anonymous // May 20, 2007 at 9:07 am

    If I recall corredctly, Anna Duleep Hill is Lex Paulson’s girlfriend. Hey Jen/Anna me thinks you”ve been identified. No wonder you are making all these accusations. Guess you want little Lexy to meet daddy’s high standards eh? One problem though, Little Lexy should probably live in this town before he wants to represent it. Renting a room from Galen Wells isn’t exactly what I call living and contributing to Norwalk. besides, he hasn’t been seen since election day. Tsk tsk, its not nice to fool Norwalk voters.

  • 46 Jenny // May 20, 2007 at 9:36 am

    Is the GOP trying to “out” Jen? First, I told you before I am married and not to Lex Paulson.

    I think it is rude to put peoples personal business out. What Anna and Lex Paulson does is their business.

    Lex Paulson is a young law student and I am proud of the job he did! He almost beat Larry Ca-Zero. This young man started as a lamb and ended as a tiger- Go Lex -you have a future in town. Over 3,000 people agreed it was time for a new direction. Cutting Larry’s 6,000 votes in half- from the election before.

    I am just wondering how Larry matches up against a stronger candidate?

    Do you think Dave Watts can knock off Larry?- I think so.

  • 47 Anonymous // May 20, 2007 at 9:52 am

    My guess is that “Jen” is Galen Wells, who is married but not to Lex Paulson. The errors in the factual nature of this political muckracking are her trademark. IF she spent more time promoting Democrat candidates instead of hiding over here, then maybe we’d have an actual mayoral candidate instead of Alex “Grumpy” Knopp, who has the politcal vision of a corn dog. Cancelling the dtc meeting is just another lame excuse because she’s not getting her way.

  • 48 Watchdog // May 20, 2007 at 9:52 am

    Wow… the above comments keep me right where I feel safest - in my cushy apolitical box. How can people be reduced to name-calling and stone-throwing just to turn over an election? And so emotional!

    Mr. Cafero has been in office for quite some time and I’m certain he has managed to accomplish a few things. Let’s see where the votes settle at election time. I certainly hope that Mr. Paulson understands the nature of politics because he, too, will become targeted for apathy and unproductivity once, and if, he is elected.

  • 49 anonymous // May 20, 2007 at 10:22 am

    Jen sounds like she could be mrs david watts or anna duleep hill. Also, wonder what potential candidate owns property in a redevelopment area. can we say conflict of interest.

  • 50 Jenny // May 20, 2007 at 10:41 am

    I am every woman!