YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Friends of Museum Want Oversight


by turfgrrl


May 18th, 2007 · 15 Comments

The Norwalk Museum is an asset to the city. It should be operated like on. But with the continued absence of a the city employee designated as the museum curator, the situation clearly has deteriorated to a point where a new strategy needs to be enacted. The new way, is actually the old way or the best practice way, which has been something documented by the American Association of Small Museums. The American Association of Small museum’s web site is a good resource.
It’s time that either the city take seriously the process for creating accredited museums of its properties or concede that responsibility to outside groups that can. But the current system hasn’t worked.

From The Hour:

“We’re asking to codify the relationship that has existed for 35 years and worked up until (former museum Curator Ralph) Bloom retired and the structural dysfunction was really writ large,” said Friends President Scott Gibson. “This would be more of an operating agreement.”

Afterward, Gibson submitted to the Land Use Committee a letter, explaining the Friends’ formation in 1972, its non-profit status, its council-approved presence in the museum, and its request to “enter into an agreement with the City of Norwalk formalizing the existing relationship of 35 years in which the FNM has operated, funded and been responsible for the NM on a daily basis.” Gibson said arrangement would be similar to how the Norwalk Historical Society operates Mill Hill Historic Park or how the Lockwood-Matthews Mansion board of directors runs the mansion.

The request comes five months into the leave-of-absence of Norwalk Museum Curator Susan Gunn. Some members of the Norwalk Historical Commission — the body that has jurisdiction over the museum at 41 North Main St. — believe the curator’s absence is endangering the building and its collections.

source: The Hour, Non-profit group asks to take over museum operation, By ROBERT KOCH, May 18, 2007

Tags: Current affairs · In the News · Norwalk

15 Responses so far “Norwalk: Friends of Museum Want Oversight”



  • 1 L\'arlequino // May 18, 2007 at 10:36 am

    While having the Friends step in on a temporary basis to manage the Museum, there is too much potential for conflict of interest, given Ralph Bloom is part owner of the building, and the fact that the Museum needs a professional to run it, not a group of volunteers, no matter how good their intentions.

    And for pete’s sake, get rid of the junk that’s being sold in the gift shop. Makes the place look like a thrift shop.

  • 2 mansionmouse // May 18, 2007 at 11:16 am

    If it wasn’t for the volunteers there wouldn’t be a Museum. As far as a conflict of interest? The whole city is based on that fact. It’s who you know and who you are related to that gets you a job in this city! I think the city should pass out t-shirts that say Norwalk Where Bad Behavior Is Rewarded.

  • 3 L'arlequino // May 18, 2007 at 11:49 am

    No, without accredition there is no Museum. Until then you have the wrong people overseeing a non-curated, non-documented collection of artifacts. How much of the Lockwood House collection is sitting in someone’s living room?

  • 4 L'arlequino // May 18, 2007 at 11:49 am

    ‘Scuse… I meant to say accreditation.

  • 5 Museum Pro // May 18, 2007 at 11:59 am

    I wish to address the comments in the 1st post. As far as the intentions of the Friends, their job is to operate the museum, and they have done a fine job until the current “curator” stepped in.

    The Hour did make one mistake in the article - The Friends are not asking to run the museum, but to point out they have been running it!

    As far as Ralph Bloom goes, owning part of the building and him being a volunteer poses no conflict - Conflict occurs when you can realize a profit from a venture - Ralph has not seen one penny of profit from his investment, and probably never will. At the time Ralph made the offer of investing by taking out a mortgage to help this go forward for the good of the people of Norwalk.

    According to city code, a public hearing was held - Where were all the finger pointers then about a conflict that does not exist? Disclosure beats out conflict of interest - and that is the law.

    The agreement when the building was purchased and restored to use as the Museum was written up by the city, so they had full knowledge of what they were doing.

    The volunteers at the museum are trained, and DO NO HARM - very different from the paid staff person who has done harm to the collections. In many cases, trained volunteers are the backbone of many museums. If a person is bleeding at an accident, and a trained volunteer gives first aid, and stoppes or slows the bleeding until Emergancy workers arrive, would you rather NOT have a volunteer help you and wait for the Pro’s? What about communities where they only have volunteers for paramedics and firemen - Volunteers often provide high quality service in all areas of communities, and Museums across the country would be closed without them.

    Look at the current displays in the merchants court that were done by the friends - and compare to some other museums in the NYC area, and you will see many of the same fine qualities.

    As far as Pete’s Sake and the Shop - (Peter Bondi?) Many museums such as the Brooklyn museum combine new merchandise with second hand items. It’s a smart move because what you think of as used or second hand today becomes tommorows antiques and collectables. The profit margin is far greater, and if you ever watched programs like antiques roadshow, you would see the wisdom of it.

    The friends provides museum services at NO COST to the taxpayer, and I am grateful they provide this service, otherwise the museum would have a closed sign, with SUE and her frequent time away from her job. The Friends have kept the museum and the archives open and available as the city service it is supposed to be.

  • 6 Museum Pro // May 18, 2007 at 12:09 pm

    Addressing # 3 - Do you mean items in Sue’s Living room? And I beg to differ with you - the items in the collection were documented and curated - up until the time of the new “curator”

    If you have proof and first hand knowledge of Items missing, please do your duty and report it to the police, as it is more theft from the people.

    But if its from the whisper circuit of urban legends in Norwalk, then I would check my facts first

    ANd if you are talking about replacements, be sure the background is checked - no smoke in mirror resumes or half truths - I attended the Met in NY could also mean a casual visit or a VOLUNTEER handing out maps, and giving directions to the Men’s room.

  • 7 conflicts // May 18, 2007 at 12:13 pm

    A conflict occurs when an indivdual has a financial interest in something. Bloom does. It’s a conflict and the fact that it happened doesn’t make it right. Sunshine, baby.

  • 8 Museum Pro // May 18, 2007 at 12:26 pm

    #7 - If you receive a finacial benefit from it it’s a conflict. When The Curators Dad gives her a grant to get summer help, and does not go thru the proper channels (HC) DO you consider that a conflick of interest? No one seems to raise that point. Curator needs help, and still cannot complete the job.

    Ralph owns part of the building. If you live in Norwalk, and You pay taxes in Norwalk, then you Own a part of all the city Property, and You work for the city - Do you have a conflict?

    You have a finacial interest - and ownership - So what;s different? And where was this conflict when the Museum first opened in the building?

    Sounds like someone is making a diversion to keep eyes off all the other slimey things in local politics.

  • 9 Non Profit World // May 18, 2007 at 12:33 pm

    If you outlawed every grant that had strings attached you’d bring the whole non profit world to a screeching halt. I’m not in Norwalk but if you established arms length agreements and boards you’d minimize these conflicts.

  • 10 Museum Pro // May 18, 2007 at 12:45 pm

    #9 - The “grant” came in the back door, without going in front of the board or Historic commission. I work with a museum for more then 25 years, and turned down money that had strings attached. It’s part of having morals and following the Golden Rule - I guess it’s the first thing you lose when you play politics. How Sad.

    You can’t blame the Board when this was all done as an outside venture in City Hall - and it only helped Stir the Pot….

    I guess it’s a way for people to skim off the top, and use a 501 c 3 to do it.

    And I do not recall outlawing Grants - but I think you might be confusing them with Gifts - Grants have guidelines to follow to ensure they are given for set uses. A Gift can be given, with all sorts of requirements too, but of a more personal nature. (Hire my daughter for 1 year so she has something to put on her resume, and I will cover all costs of her employment plus give you a gift of $10,000 a year for 5 years.

    A Grant has more restrictions, is often overseen by a board or committee and must meet requirements in order to apply, and provide specific use of the funds, and provide documentation of how they were used.

  • 11 FCM // May 18, 2007 at 1:18 pm

    To # 9 You said the magic word - non profit! The curator is NOT a non profit and neither is the City. Also it is against the foundations these grants came from to give foundation money to any entity but a non profit to be used for specific projects. It is in their criteria.

    Otherwise people would ask if it isn’t job protection money? But this is Norwalk, where the “gravy train” goes on and on as long as the taxpayers don’t see it.

  • 12 Anonymous // May 18, 2007 at 5:27 pm

    Any grant experts out there? Are Govt. entities eligible vs. non-profits? Has grant money been accepted improperly or illegally? If so, where’s the evidence?

  • 13 FCM // May 18, 2007 at 7:17 pm

    The offices of the CT & NY Attorney Generals have the evidence and so do others even if Alex thought he took the records with him there are copies everywhere. Let’s see if they do anything about it!

  • 14 high road // May 18, 2007 at 8:30 pm

    I believe the grants fomr “daddy” started in the Esposito administration. So the “money trail” starts there…

  • 15 Museum Pro // May 21, 2007 at 9:26 am

    #14 They go way back to the days of Mr. Z - Whole dynasties of corruption were borne at that time, and with all the manure supplied flourish!