YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Opdahl Proving Inept At Construction Management


by turfgrrl


May 16th, 2007 · 17 Comments

What more evidence does this town need that PriceWaterhouse Coopers 2002 report was spot on regarding the lack of financial reports and construction management. I wrote about it here and you will also find links to the original report there. So here we have Opdahl stating that somehow “drop ceilings and pipe covers, a communication system, culinary equipment and exterior painting at Norwalk High; auditorium seating at Roton Middle School and drop ceilings in the halls of Columbus Magnet” are newly discovered items needing funding.

Opdahl has got to be the most incompetent COO on the planet. The BOE members were more restrained in their assessment of the situation. From The Hour:

Board member Bruce Kimmel voiced concerns about the allocation of funds and said he was worried the transfer could leave Jefferson Elementary without needed moneys in years to come. The money being moved from Nathan Hale and Ponus Ridge was originally allocated from the Jefferson Elementary account.
“There are a number of capital pressures, and I just want to make sure we’ll be able to get the money we need for Jefferson,” Kimmel said. ” … I’m just wondering if the political will will be there.”

Board members Rosa Murray and Greg Burnett asked Opdahl if this transfer would be the last moving around of funds or if the district should take a closer look at what is needed for construction.

“Do we foresee anything other Norwalk High School items coming down the line before we stop at the $840,000?” Burnett asked of the $841,840 to be transferred to the high school. “I mean, the drop ceiling, the painting, I don’t know how that got missed. Have we looked at everything that needs to be addressed?”

The BOE should immediately request a comprehensive accounting for the all of the cumulative construction projects including current current contract amount in terms of the original contract amount, the executed changes, and the pending changes. The number one rule that you learn in business school is that you can’t manage what you don’t know. And Opdahl clearly has demonstrated that he doesn’t know way too much for someone in his position.

The other shocker from the BOE meeting is the apparent deficit in food services. From The Hour:

Members from Whitsons Culinary Group, the Long Island-based company that controls the district’s food services, presented information about projected revenues and losses. According to Whitsons personnel, there will be a $56,475 deficit in food services this year, compared to a $145,727 loss during the 2006 fiscal year.

source: The Hour, BOE mulls $900K transfer to cover costs, By ANNA GUSTAFSON, May 16, 2007

Tags: In the News

17 Responses so far “Norwalk: Opdahl Proving Inept At Construction Management”



  • 1 Grinder // May 16, 2007 at 6:14 pm

    Opdahl knows little about construction management. The Facilities construction comission is to blame also.This commission has been bought by the municipal contractors working for the city…A tour through these buildings will show the shoddy workmanship being done,with prevailing wages being paid in some cases.The board is overpaying for what they contract for, thus the projects are rarely fully completed beacuse they run out of money……In some instances when project bids are accepted the space in time until the job is completed could be a year plus…So prices of everything go up causing an increase in job costs…The contractors pass this on to the city……….

    Did you notice the use of “funneling money” in the Hour by Opdahl to move money between accounts?..He’s a pro at it..been doing it all his life…Got fired from his previous job for that…..(MISS USE OF FUNDS)…
    People dont realize that he’s only around till he gets his 5 years in and becomes vested in his pension…. He retires moves to his palatial estatee and leaves everyone wondering what happened……Just like a fairy tale story..

  • 2 anonymous // May 16, 2007 at 6:56 pm

    Response to Grinder on Opdall…..Your comments on him are probably correct, as are those that have been made by many others over the past several weeks. However, it seems that many people are confused with how the school construction projects work. The BOE is not in charge of these capital projects….the City is! The City hired the architects and Gilbane, and they report directly to them. The City goes to contract with the construction manager, and they work for the City. The City, in this case the Mayor, appoints the members of the NFCC (Norwalk Facilities Construction Commission) and the Mayor chairs the group. The Land Use & Bldg Management Committee of the Common Council oversees everything, as does the Common Council, and they are people elected by the citizens of Norwalk. Gilbane controls the check book for every project account, and not the BOE. Gilbane approves all payments to contractors, and not the BOE. There is no member of the BOE on the NFCC (only Opdall), and of course no BOE member sits on the Land Use, or Common Council. So you can see that the BOE is pretty far removed from the process, and frankly this is how the City wanted it to be, and had it setup. So in conclusion, it is really unfair to blame the BOE for any problems asociated with the Capital school construction program, or how the money is being spent, or not spent. The City has the final say on everything!

  • 3 anonymous // May 16, 2007 at 8:57 pm

    Opdahl isn’t well. Cut the guy some slack. I hear he is leaving at the end of the year.

  • 4 anonymous // May 17, 2007 at 6:40 am

    he should leave. he is a disgrace and an embarassment.

  • 5 concerned citizen // May 17, 2007 at 7:54 am

    #3 Opdahl hasn’t EVER been “Well” He is sick Mentally as henis Physically. I’m with you #4, He has been a total disgrace to the BoE. He Needs to Go - NOW!!

  • 6 L'arlequino // May 17, 2007 at 8:14 am

    #5 - You’re skating on the edge of a libelous statement there, pal. Turfie, haven’t you spanked this guy before for making statements like that?

  • 7 concerned citizen // May 17, 2007 at 9:18 am

    Really? Why don’t you talk to the teachers about Mr. Opdhal. Unless your in the administrtative office, then of course, you wouldn’t know a thing about what the teachers think. How are those wood lathes doing there Stu?, How about your “food tester chef” that has apparently disappeared without a trace? Ask Stu how he flubbed the free lunch program at Cranbury and we almost lost 100K. Thank God for the city grants writter who may be able to salvage that mess. Mr. L’arlequino, don’t talk about things you know nothing about. Election time will be here soon enough and this “BoE” administration will have PLENTY to answer for. Then well see who needs to be spanked.

  • 8 Grinder // May 17, 2007 at 6:24 pm

    Concerned:Who votes for the BOE?…How long is the term?…The only way to make change is to start at the top and work down because “stuff” rolls dowm hill!
    Most people who have a job know that.
    Administrators who have nothing to do but hang around and make plans all day should be ashamed…How do you justify those 100k+ salaries?…Should donate half to charity….

    The Grinder

  • 9 Concerned Citizen // May 17, 2007 at 6:43 pm

    Ginder.. there are 9 elected seated to the Board of Education. They are 2 year terms and they are staggered. This Year, I believe, 5 seats are up for election, one in each of the 5 districts. Next year the other 4 seats will be up for election, but at Large. This means, this year you’ll have one vote for the person who runs in your district and next year, you’ll vote for 4 people for the board. This board has been Strictly of the democratic party for just about a decade now and they’ll have PLENTY to answer to this fall for a pathetic record.

  • 10 Dick Lindsay // May 17, 2007 at 9:34 pm

    I don’t live in your town, but I found this article when doing a google search on school construction. As a 20 year professional I can assure you that you don’t “overlook” drop ceilings. There are times that architects will submit project scope changes based on having to restore or refurbish more than what was anticipated. The process though, for a drop ceiling is more of a cosmetic change, rather than strucutral. So there’s not a good reason for being in a position of throwing it in at the last minute. Especially in a school environment where lighting fixtures, code and HVAC units and ducts would have to be reworked to accomodate. Like all drive by advice, I’m not there on the ground, but keeping construction costs on budget is one of those things that pays for itself. Hope you folks get some professional help soon. The Internet is a fascinating place.
    Dick Lindsay

  • 11 Mr Greenpeace // May 24, 2007 at 10:26 am

    wow makes all the things I actually reported out here on the shortfalls of what was happening true report or not,,thats ok radon was an issue $10,000 was spent on a report without telling anyone unless it was dealt with right evey two years the same buildings the same rooms the same money will have to be spent as rule of thumb in protecting our children I’m glad i wrote it all out months ago but I wish i could bring it all back for all to read it won’t be written in the Hour or the Advocate it was fact laced with knowledge something that is not news worthy.

    Mr. Greenpeace

  • 12 Mr Greenpeace // May 27, 2007 at 3:00 am

    I’m sorry I was wrong about the amount of the study, seems i might be able to work for then city after all.

  • 13 Grinder // May 27, 2007 at 8:36 am

    Mr Greenpeace..Radon issue has beem addressed somewhat..4 radon removal systems have been installed at Briggs CVA and Wolfpit..2 at each school..They were installed nearest the high radon levels..A retest will be coming to see if the systems have worked at all…
    No extra monies should have been used for these systems as the in house maintenance workers performed the installs during daily work projects….FYI….. The Grinder

  • 14 Mr Greenpeace // Jun 3, 2007 at 4:26 am

    thats great what about the other schools that were targeted? after installing systems for the last 15 years and having children in the schools myself I would trust a better monitoring program than another can to be sent to a lab,, Brooks does not impress me or some state agencies as well ,is there paperwork public record?

    all it takes is another crack in the foundation to emit new readings,,again testing every two years just like the one they had is Industry standard not Norwalk policy,,

    what type of systems, the ones i would expect cost money to put in and operate, even with the labor thrown in,,

    a smoke test only takes dragor smoke a drill and a shop vac , are the systems passive systems? if it is I would be concerned.

    I also pointed out it was said the reading were not that high for the amount of time spent in the classroom,my only concern is that the preschool and the elementry levels that have children more at risk with thier small lung capacity that also may have it at home ( any real estate agent can tell you Norwalk has a high risk in homes) would be effected,,as in Royaton where their is a hint of sickness among teachers and students and a school tested and has positive readings above the norm..

    I have never seen a system installed with knowledge and never worked,,that in itself is a red flag..of course its only money,,our money.

    I do agree with your comments about 100 k salaries grinder and thank you for the update,,it shows we are all interested in the outcome and safety of our kids

    watch for the next Brooks lab report on the old police station, the contamination in the storm drains on the property caused by leaking fluids from the cars behind the station, this is free information I have just given, Brooks will certainly charge us for it,

    another example of waste

  • 15 Mr Greenpeace // Jun 14, 2007 at 7:26 pm

    to Aunt Bertha,Watchdog read this Radon laced thread please I have more to say on it including teachers who have been sick but no conclusive link between the schols and their health.

  • 16 Aunt Bertha // Jun 14, 2007 at 9:04 pm

    Dear Mr. Greenpeace,
    I do remember reading this when it came out and I find that you give good information about posting questions. I thank you for that because your concern is visible in how you write. I grew up going to Norwalk schools, many of the teachers I had in the High school have passed away of cancer. I would hear every now and then that it was being looked into but I always wondered who was doing the looking. Then some new crisis would come up and we would not hear about it again until something new is discovered. I have friends all over the city in many different buildings that have had mold problems from leaking roofs, dust and bus fume problems from poor ventalation, sewage smells that came through the vents in the floors and ceilings and had to live through some really crumby construction situations. Why is it Brooks that does the testing and has there ever been another outside sorce that has tested for anything in our buildings? And has the teaching public and the student population been taught how to read the stat postings of the numbers that Brooks reported? We are told no big deal should we believe and drink the kool-aid?

  • 17 Mr Greenpeace // Jun 15, 2007 at 8:38 am

    I respect your postings and read what you say Aunt Bertha