YourCT.com header image 2

State Law On School Suspensions Concerns Local Superintendents


by turfgrrl


May 2nd, 2007 · 7 Comments

Brian Lockhart digs deeper into the the recent bill passed the the House last week. Apparently Sal Corda, superintendent of Norwalk Public Schools and Joshua Starr, superintendent of Stamford Public Schools, are concerned that this will impact their budgets. From the Advocate:

School superintendents in Stamford and Norwalk are concerned that new state limits on out-of-school suspensions will have a negative effect on their already tight budgets.

State law defines a suspension as a student’s exclusion from school privileges, though not necessarily school, for five consecutive days.

School districts have traditionally had flexibility when determining whether suspended students should be sent home - depending on their infraction and whether their school can provide instruction outside their classes.

Concerned that students often were simply being sent home for a few days and missing valuable instruction, the state House of Representatives last week unanimously passed a bill requiring administrators to provide alternative, in-school programs unless the suspended student is too disruptive or too dangerous to people or property.

It also expands the maximum length of a suspension from five to 10 days.

The bill now heads to the Senate.

Superintendent Joshua Starr at least has his budget online, a organization chart and runs a more transparent operation in Stamford. Corda is still relying on his unique brand of faith based accounting. Starr relies on a financial director.
House Minority Leader, Larry Cafero-R Norwalk sponsored the bill, which also has the support of State Rep Bruce Morris-D Norwalk and State Rep Jim Shapiro-D Stamford.

House Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero, R-Norwalk, and state Rep. Bruce Morris, D-Norwalk, yesterday said they understand that the tighter restrictions on out-of-school suspensions could place a greater financial burden on their city.

Cafero has been the expulsion officer for Norwalk’s schools for 14 years, and Morris is the district’s director of human relations.

“Parents have made it clear they prefer for their kids to stay in school,” Morris said.

Cafero said the state budgets proposed by Gov. M. Jodi Rell, the Democratic majority and Republican minority all offer significant increases in education grants to cities and towns.

He said the school districts could use some of those funds to bolster in-school suspension programs.

It’s a shame that Lockhart didn’t ask Morris how many parents he’s talked to, since Morris has a credibility problem these days.

source: Norwalk Advocate, School leaders are not sold on suspension proposal, Published May 2 2007

Tags: CT House · Education · In the News · Norwalk

7 Responses so far “State Law On School Suspensions Concerns Local Superintendents”



  • 1 ENrwlker // May 2, 2007 at 9:15 am

    It’s also a shame that Cafero, Morris et al apparently didn’t bother to talk to anyone in their city’s school system before proposing another unfunded state mandate on us.

  • 2 Charles the Hammer // May 3, 2007 at 6:33 pm

    “Parents have made it clear they prefer for their kids to stay in school,” Morris said.

    If they truly “preferred” such, then parents of chronically misbehaving students would do their parental duties and properly discipline their children at home. A better comment would be “The parents of well-behaved students prefer not to have their kids’ education derailed by the misconduct of others.” Or better yet, “Taxpayers would prefer their hard-earned dollars not be squandered on the small percentage of those who refuse to follow the most basic rules of civil society rather than properly spent on books, libraries, science labs, computers, extra help, intercoms, swimming pools, athletic fields, reading specialists, teachers, heating oil, and the infinite other needs of our schools.”

    As for Mr. Cafero, I am agog at his lack of respect for educators. He has allied himself with Mr. Morris, which speaks for itself. He has repeatedly stated that suspending a seriously misbehaving student “doesn’t help anyone.” Nothing could be more false. It helps those remaining at the school who may now work in quietude and safety absent the offender. It helps those thinking of possible misconduct to pause and quell their urges. It even helps those actually suspended, in many cases, to reflect upon the error of their ways. Properly chastened, an individual might feel remorse and resolve to improve. What a concept! Mr. Cafero’s failure to consult anyone in the educational professions of his district shouts hubris. He would throw out a practice that has endured over a century of public education because HE knows better. His prior public service on the BOE and his experience as the hearing officer worthy of note, his most recent rulings in expulsion hearings warrant scrutiny. Parents would be suprised by the violent students he failed to exclude permanently.

  • 3 anonymous // May 3, 2007 at 8:39 pm

    Charles you are RIGHT! In every comment you have just made you hit a vain I hope it gets to Caffero and Morris. Their supporting of this in house suspension was not thought out.

  • 4 Anonymous // May 8, 2007 at 8:46 pm

    That’s interesting stuff

  • 5 Anonymous // May 17, 2007 at 4:11 am

    I believe the bill is moving things in the right direction. In the bigger picture it benefits all to make every effort to keep kids in school.

  • 6 Larry Cafero is making the bacon but Norwalk is not! // May 17, 2007 at 5:06 am

    Cafero’s Bill is very disrespectful of educators. This was another one of his Half-Baked schemes to appeal to voters. Shameful!

  • 7 Norwalker // May 17, 2007 at 8:53 am

    They used to have in house suspensions in NHS. When did they stop?