YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: BOE Burning Issues


by turfgrrl


April 25th, 2007 · 84 Comments

Sal Corda apparently is under fire from more than the “blogs”. Although he alluded to the criticism from comments in this comment from The Hour:

During the meeting, Corda criticized recent postings in “local blogs,” and said comments posted “can be hurtful to individuals and can hurt reputations.”

“I have seen blogs in which people are saying, “I heard that,” and the next person gets on the blog and believes that to be fact because it’s written,” Corda said. “There’s a feeding frenzy going on.”

It appears that criticism arrives in all flavors. There’s the state of course, the Connecticut Department of Education that has singled out Jefferson and Kendall schools as being “dangerously” racially imbalanced. Corda added that Silvermine is headed that way too. Corda’s solution as it were, is to make Kendall and Silvermine magnet schools. Of course, having three magnet schools sort of seems like a dodge to avoid having to redistrict schools.

And then there’s the Norwalk Federation of Teachers, who have filed a grievance with the BOE over the duties and pay of the two high school athletic directors. From The Hour:

NFT President Bruce Mellion and James Ferguson, attorney for the NFT, discussed the grievance with Board of Education members during Tuesday night’s board meeting. According to Mellion and Ferguson, the grievance stipulates that Norwalk High Athletic Director Wayne Mones and Brien McMahon Athletic Director Joseph Madaffari should receive a higher salary for their position, should receive greater secretarial help and should have their workload decreased.

Mellion and Ferguson said Madaffari and Mones have been working two jobs as athletic director — director of boys sports and athletic of girls sports — but have not been paid accordingly. Madaffari has worked as both since around 2001, and Mones is finishing his third year of being athletic director for both boys and girls sports.

And Corda is right to think that the comments of this blog serve as a red flag about people who operate under the cloak of “Education Secrecy” and hope to avoid public scrutiny of their behaviors. It’s the teachers in Norwalk’s schools who see and hear things that don’t contribute towards “Education Excellence” that have lost faith in the administration of Corda. There are to sure, some allegations raised that have no merit. But rather than deal with the substance of the ones that do have merit, Corda prefers to shoot the messengers with offhand dismissal instead of working diligently at ferreting out the bad apples in his administration.

I will note again that the controversy swirling around Bruce Morris could be easily quelled by transparently providing evidence that Morris is not being paid for work hours he is clearly not providing to the BOE.  A salaried individual still has to account to work hours performed, and sitting up in Hartford is not hours that should be paid for by the BOE. Then there’s the question of the position itself that once required significantly more educational requirements than Morris has. True, Corda inherited the Morris problem, but it is up to him to clear it up, publicly and openly. He has, and by extension the BOE, chosen not to. That very public inaction is part of the credibility gap that will only widen as more and more allegations surface without response. The controversy of Stuart Opdahl continues also. Opdahl is another case where the public meeting minutes show that his credibility is questioned by the repeated misinformation presented to boards and committees concerning financial details of his recommendations. Corda is being ill served by Opdahl, and the news of Opdahl’s misconduct will likely grow as more details and documents emerge.

I’m sure that they didn’t teach how to deal with all of this in superintendent school. And part of Corda’s inaction may be uncertainty over what course of action to take. But the time for action is now, and Corda owes the public explanations, even if his board members sit silently without questions of their own.

 source: The Hour,  Federation files complaint with BOE over pay , By ANNA GUSTAFSON, APril 25, 2007

Tags: Education · Local · Norwalk

84 Responses so far “Norwalk: BOE Burning Issues”


Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All



  • 1 Gingerbread man // Apr 25, 2007 at 11:10 am

    Corda: “Run, run as fast as you can- cuz you can’t catch me, I’m the BOE man.”

  • 2 anonymous // Apr 25, 2007 at 11:23 am

    This is not a feeding frenzy. I’ve read these comments, and I suspect that so many of them are written as ‘I heard that’ so that the trail does not lead back to the writer. People are probably out to protect their own jobs.

  • 3 Anonymous // Apr 25, 2007 at 11:35 am

    Once again Corda holds himself above the people who work for him and dismisses our concerns as “frenzied”. Is it any wonder why we don’t participate in his “chats.” The threats to our jobs is real.

  • 4 Watchdog // Apr 25, 2007 at 11:46 am

    Turf: Is is a fact that if you work for the taxpayer, you open yourself up to public scrutiny? Surely the mayor, the council members, members of all public agencies and boards, the governor, and even the president of the United States expect a fair amount of public criticism, whether it is warranted or not. Such is the nature of politics and,criticism goes with the “turf,” no pun intended. But Turf, what about those city employees of high visibility hired by elected members? Are they open to the same scrutiny and public criticism of those same elected members, or are they not? The interesting thing is, we have witnesssed what appears to have been manipulation of the taxpayer to support what could be called a political cause: the increase of the cap, by a city employee, Mr. Corda. Does this make him an agent of petty politics? As such, does Mr. Corda fall into the category of “politician?” I’m rather confused about this.

  • 5 turfgrrl // Apr 25, 2007 at 12:45 pm

    Watchdog: I think so. From a basic standpoint, as a worker in a governmental agency, someone like Corda is subject to complying with the Freedom of Information Act. From a practical standpoint, as the head of a municipal agency, he is a public official. Is he a politician? I think yes. the school system is part of government.
  • 6 politicians are elected // Apr 25, 2007 at 12:51 pm

    he is selected by the BOE-

    the BOE’s are politicians. They are elected.

  • 7 anonymous // Apr 25, 2007 at 12:59 pm

    The thing Corda doesn’t realize is that for resident taxpayers, this blog is so great because you feel affirmation when your own thoughts or questions are aired by others. It’s unfortunate when there are misstatements but TG has described her mechanics for taking down false posts. Anyway, if Corda ascribed to transparency in BOE operations a lot of what’s written would by moot!

  • 8 turfgrrl // Apr 25, 2007 at 12:59 pm

    politicians are elected: And ambassadors are appointed, and they are politicians. So are cabinet members, agency heads, staff etc. But let’s go the video tape: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/politician

    pol·i·ti·cian (pl-tshn)
    n.
    1.
    a. One who is actively involved in politics, especially party politics.
    b. One who holds or seeks a political office.
    2. One who seeks personal or partisan gain, often by scheming and maneuvering: “Mothers may still want their favorite sons to grow up to be President, but . . . they do not want them to become politicians in the process” John F. Kennedy.
    3. One who is skilled or experienced in the science or administration of government.

  • 9 Anonymous // Apr 25, 2007 at 1:05 pm

    We need to fire Corda!

  • 10 Watchdog // Apr 25, 2007 at 1:18 pm

    Informed Residents of Reading, Massachusetts is a website dedicated to providing news and documentation relating to education in its community and surrounding towns.

    Have a looksee at this very interesting article about Dr. Harutunian, a former superintendent with the Reading school system:

    http://www.iror.org/harutunian.asp

  • 11 Politician or not // Apr 25, 2007 at 1:18 pm

    He is under the control of the BOE. ONLY the BOE can deal with him.

    WE elect the BOE.

    Without pressure to the BOE, they blithely agree to whatever Corda wants. They are volunteer politicians.

  • 12 turfgrrl // Apr 25, 2007 at 1:39 pm

    Watchdog: There’s an eerie Rod Serlingesque feeling when reading about Superintendent Harutunian.
  • 13 Anonymous // Apr 25, 2007 at 1:52 pm

    I know many of the comments about the central office to be true. They need to begin caring about the people who actually work in the classrooms, in the offices, in the cafeterias, etc., in the schools. Instead, there is pathetically little information. The principal of my school has made references to the “learning community” that all of us should be, but I don’t see where the central office has joined this community. Instead, they have their own little community, one that has little, if any, connection to the schools. This is no way to run a school system.

    The BOE members have a great deal of responsibility, and they receive no pay. However, it was the individual BOE members’ own choice to run for the BOE. Once a person runs and is elected, he or she has the responsibility to live up to the community’s expectations or to resign the BOE.

  • 14 Watchdog // Apr 25, 2007 at 1:53 pm

    Haha…Turfie, are you sure it’s not Herbertsque and House Harkonnen?

  • 15 Anonymous // Apr 25, 2007 at 1:53 pm

    (Correction on #13: “there is pathetically little information” should be “there is pathetically little communication”

  • 16 turfgrrl // Apr 25, 2007 at 2:10 pm

    Watchdog: Not much a Dune fan, but we could find many a fictional and no so fictional contemptible leaders that would seem familiar to the genus of school system administrators.
  • 17 Watchdog // Apr 25, 2007 at 2:56 pm

    FYI
    According to case law:
    Ghafur v. Bernstein et al.
    California Court of Appeal, First District, Div. 4
    Aug. 11, 2005
    ….. We likewise conclude here that plaintiff, as the superintendent of a charter school system, was, like other public school superintendents and board members, a public official under New York Times….and as such fall under the….First Amendment protection of open discussion of the performance and qualifications of those with “substantial responsibility for or control over the conduct of governmental affairs” (Rosenblatt v. Baer, supra, 383 U.S. at p. 85, 86 S.Ct. 669)….

    Furthermore ….. The school argued that, as a nonprofit corporation, it had the same powers as any individual to sue or be sued. The court concluded, however, based on the state laws governing the charter school, that the school “should be treated similarly to a school district” (id. at p. 868), and thus as “a governmental entity, at least within the context of this case” (ibid.). Since New York Times and Rosenblatt v. Baer, supra, 383 U.S. 75, 86 S.Ct. 669, 15 L.Ed.2d 597, “held that a generalized criticism of government policy cannot be punished,” the charter school was barred from suing for defamation. (Nampa Charter School, Inc. v. DeLaPaz, supra, at p. 867.) Moreover, the school could not obtain an injunction preventing the teacher from making unfounded false statements about the school’s administrators because such relief would be “an impermissible prior restraint on speech that is critical of public officials”…..

  • 18 Anonymous // Apr 25, 2007 at 3:47 pm

    #13–BINGO–the BOE is not a fiefdom created solely to exsanguinate Norwalk property taxpayers with 75.1 positions at the Central Office!

  • 19 AnonymousToo // Apr 25, 2007 at 3:49 pm

    He may not be a politician, running for office or promoting someone/something on the ballot, but the Superintendent is a bureaucrat…that means he does what he is instructed to do in government and he tries to keep his job in so doing…in my opinion.

  • 20 anon // Apr 25, 2007 at 5:23 pm

    Public figures should be aware, whether elected or hired (and the BOE administration is no different)are subject to scrutiny about decisions they make. If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen. As with the mayor, the council or any board members, whether paid or not, these people chose to be in these positions to make the best educated decisions they can and are held accountable for any actions or inactions by the community as a whole. The taxpayers are their employers. Therefore, the taxpayers have a right to know how their money is spent and if it is being spent the correct way. Apparently some people feel that once they have garnered certain positions they have to answer to no one. This is not the case. It is a shame that so much controversy has surrounded the decisions by the BOE administration because all it does is hurts the kids. Opdhal should be fired immediately and anyone who thinks otherwise should be fired with him along with the taste tester, his son and anyone else he has hired because they used to work for him or they are friends of his. $60,000 a year for someone who is a stripper by profession to taste test foods in the central kitchen is absolutely insane. There are employees already in place who should be doing this. When was this job posted on the city website and how many applicants applied? How did someone from up north, is it Simsbury or somewhere that this person came from? Thats a whole lot of driving to taste food for the schools, but I guess at $60,000 a year none of us would mind driving that far. But, the best part is this person gets paid for not showing up? I think a little FOIA is due here. as well as the other positions that were hired by him. no one seems to remember any of these jobs posted so can we see the other applicants and who was involved in the final decision. What are the qualifications for a food tester and why $60,000? As for Sal Corda’s remarks in the paper, maybe he should look at his long time buddy Opdhal and see what a coniving waste he is. But then he won’t do that because he hired him and they go back a long long way. Way before Opdhal was let go from his last job for misappropriation of funds.

  • 21 Watchdog // Apr 25, 2007 at 6:29 pm

    Yes, Anon, I agree with you that Dr. Corda et al are open to public scrutiny and criticism on decisions made. Decisions made, yes.

    However, behaviors like hiring an alleged “stripper,” or catering to her on off-time with lavish gifts, are not necessarily issue-based discussion and might be considered libelous in the private sector. Of course, I’m certain most of us would agree that the public has a right to know whether its city officials are credible and with high standards, particularly when the position involves overseeing our children.

    My questions and research today is an attempt to satisfy just how much “criticism” one can toss at these highly visible public employees? This would be Dr. Corda, Mr. Opdahl, and also Mr. Morris. Are these individuals unprotected from speculation and open to all levels of public scrutiny, even if it involves hearsay or rumor?

  • 22 anonymous // Apr 25, 2007 at 6:41 pm

    I think if you follow alot of what has been said here you will see that these are not the only people being scrutinized. A blog is a blog is a blog…if the comments are untrue then someone needs to come forward and set the record straight. If they are true then something needs to be done about it. I would imagine that those posting here do not want to be identified because of the possibility of losing their jobs. I would also imagine that there have to be some truths about what is being said since the information had to come from somewhere. an istance is the pagano restaurant scandal that started here. however, many said that none of it was true yet there is, after some detective work by turf and others much truth to the alegations. So there has to be something that was discovered by someone close to the matters that decided it was important enough to put it on this blog. many of the people here are employees at city hall or teachers and yes, public figures who know what goes on behind the scenes and have decided that the public needs to be aware of some things that effect the taxpayers. They must have some inside information if this amount of accusations and scrutiny is available.

  • 23 anonymous // Apr 25, 2007 at 6:51 pm

    #20. I tend to always love your postings. I have a question about Opdahl- if he was let go for misappropriation of funds why did our BOE let his hire go through? Who approved his hiring? Whom shall we hold accountable for it?

  • 24 anon // Apr 25, 2007 at 7:02 pm

    #23-for the record, there are several anon posters here. So, not sure which one you like better.
    But, in answer to your question,it is assumed that Sal Corda hired Stu Opdhal. As far as him being let go for misappropriation of funds, this I found somewhere on this blog and is what I was refering to. perhaps I am as guilty as the next for assuming that the information was correct and for that I am sorry. I’ve been reading this blog for sometime and posted several times when something gets my attention. I had read the article in ttodays paper and had to come here to see what people were saying and I was right, many had made comments.

  • 25 Anonymous // Apr 25, 2007 at 7:40 pm

    You know something? I know Sal Corda and I think he is a decent — and probably moral — person. However, he has a blind side to the flaws of some people. Stu Opdahl is one of those people because he so often seems to me to be closed-minded to the opinions of others. Whether those others know more than he does or not, their opinions are important for him to make his judgments, but he seems (again to me) to be uninterested in the opinions of others.

    As for Sal: He fails to communicate effectively with those people he is supposed to lead, whether they be teachers or administrators. Sal, please wake up. You are more than capable of doing the job, but you have to be more attentive and connected to your people.

  • 26 anon // Apr 25, 2007 at 7:55 pm

    #25-you are probably right about Sal Corda, but why won’t he listen when people are trying to tell him that his refusal to listen about some of the decisions he has made and some of the people he has hired just might be his downfall. its really a shame that he would let others ruin a good reputation and a rewarding career. These people don’t seem to be his friends and the BOE are enabling him to continue on this path. Can anyone get through to him?

  • 27 anonymous // Apr 25, 2007 at 10:10 pm

    It’s not just Sal but the whole BofE that stopped listening. And what are we to make of the council people who wanted to fully fund? It’s not like this blog was the only place these questions were posed. Now there’s a record out in the open. But privately, many people were told what to look at.

  • 28 anon // Apr 26, 2007 at 7:11 am

    The BOE has hit rock bottom. #26-I couldn’t agree more. From knowing what I know, seeing what I have seen and hearing what I have I heard (from folks that I consider to be very reliable and creditable) the comments, and testimony posted over the past several days appears valid and correct. At least in the case of those directed at the #2 guy at the central office, Mr. Opdahl. Unfortunetely, some of the postings, in my opinion, have been a little over the top, a bit too hateful and often mean spirited. I believe that Dr. Corda has done a reasonably good job, under some very difficult situations. Running and guiding an 11,000 student, 1,200 staff public school system, in the envirornment that exists here in Norwalk, is by no means an easy task, most often a thankless one, and a job that I wouldn’t want for all the tea in China. Being an older resident of Norwalk, I can go back in time and remember very clearly the five Superintendents, spanning a 40 year period, that Dr. Corda has followed. Let’s start with Becker, Briggs and Sloan, all successful, mostly well liked and respected Supers. In my opinion, Dr. Corda, as Superintendent of our schools for the last five years, has performed at a level equal to these 3 gentlemen, but under conditions that are far more difficult and demanding then his predecessors. And who out there in blogland will remember the names Rosenberg (sp) and Herbert. Two Supers who performed at such a poor & low, unacceptable level, could not even last two years on the job.I don’t believe that anyone who was around when these two were in power could with a straight face say that Dr. Corda is in the same fraternity as these imposters. So what am I saying? Do we have problems here in Norwalk with the leadership of the schools? It certainly appears so! Does something need to be done with the leadership of the schools in order to remove the problems associated with this turmoil and to bring back a heightened level respectability, creditablity and trust. It should go without argument that the answer is yes! Believing in what I do, I am ever hopeful that Dr. Corda will come to his senses soon and take the actions that he must take to bring back the level of trust and creditability that once existed (and must be restored) between the schools, the City and the public. I believe that the first step in this process will be to remove Mr. Opdahl from his position as Chief Operating Officer, and #2 man at the helm. It is obvious to me, and I assume many others, that this is the man that has lied to Dr. Corda, the BOE, the City, all along, about his activities, what is being spent, where, and how. Most of what has been reported about this man appears to be very true. This is the man that should be blamed for creating the hostilities that now exist in Norwalk between the schools, the City and the public. This is the man that single handed has taken it upon himself to destroy whatever trust and creditability was in place, and he did so in a very short period of time, and with little help from anyone else.This man has been bad for Norwalk! I believe that the idea of forming committees, city and schools, to meet monthly, in order to discuss opening and honestly what is going on, how money is being spent, etc. is a very, very good idea, and one that will prove successful. But my question would be how can you achieve this goal with the idea that the man that has caused the problems in the first place will be sitting at the same table. Will Mr. Opdahl all of a sudden promise to change his ways, tell the truth, be honest with his answers and explanations, open the checkbook for eyes to see? Do you believe in Santa Claus?

  • 29 Bewildered // Apr 26, 2007 at 8:40 am

    Time to Do Our Jobs!

    Everyone is talking about what Sal Corda does and doesn’t do but let’s remember that most of what he does needs to be approved by the Board of Education. There is an elected group that the city has put into position to make sure the district schools are headed in the right direction. Let’s all take a step back and take a close look at the BOE.

    If Corda is making bad decisions, why aren’t they questioning them? Why aren’t they standing up and demanding that the student programs be protected and cuts be made in other areas. The proposed budget cuts came from Corda. The first presentation was made without any discussion with the building administrators, parents, teachers, students. If the proposed ideas aren’t right - why aren’t the BOE members that we elected doing their work to represent the citizens of this city and make sure we make the right cuts.

    And speaking of cuts, why is it that it is ok to take a proposed $2.1 million from secondary education and less than $900,000 from elementary education. Are we going to fail the secondary education students and push them through the system until they are gone?

    And why are most of the cuts coming from one side of town. We are losing more teachers at Nathan Hale than any other school - why? We need to make sure that the cuts are taken across the board and that there is research done to make sure that we have equity in our schools. We need to put pressure on the Board of Ed to make sure they are on top of this and don’t allow this inequity.

    Looking for money - get the out-of-district students out of our schools. It can’t be that hard to find out where these students live. There are policies in place. Let’s use them. And why does the Norwalk tax payer pick up the tab for teachers / adminsitrators / etc. who chose to have their children come to Norwalk to school? Pretty pricey benefit huh?

    Stop using Norwalk taxpayer money to pay a per-pupil fee for the students at the Center for Global Studies. Stop using Norwalk taxpayer money to pay for anything related to the CGS. Let’s not count the CGS students in the student numbers for BMHS when it comes to allocating staff, resources, housemasters, etc. And yet we never count the CGS staff in the BMHS numbers when looking at staff. Why doesn’t the board of ed spend some time looking into this?

    Let’s have the BOE look to standards for buildings; one high school gets everything and the other will look worse when the renovations are done than when they started. The board of ed should be taking time to make sure that some district planning is done.

    Let’s have some standards for course offerings - why rip the radio/tv studio out of one high school with the statement that it isn’t offered across town, only to install a brand new, state of the art radio and tv studio at BMHS less than a year later? Why have a fabulous Culinary Arts program at one school and a room that will remain empty because there is no funding for the kitchen across town?

    Where is the equity in our spending? If we are going to spend so much money on education, shouldn’t it be divided equally?

    Let’s have the BOE look at the district’s emergency plan. What is the big picture when it comes to student safety? Why is each building administrator doing the same work. Wouldn’t one good plan work for everyone - to be tailored to the specifics of each building? Some schools get buzzer systems, some get monitored video systems, and some schools have antiquated systems that work intermittently and sometimes not at all. Do you know, as a parent, what you are supposed to do in case of an emergency? Do you know who is in charge? How will the schools and the city work together in a time of crisis?

    Why would we get rid of the dean of students at the high schools to try and save money. These two people, one at NHS and one at BMHS have the lowest cost per pupil of any program on the cut list. They service not only every student in the school, but they play an important role in keeping the schools safe for all the students, teachers, staff and administrators in the buildings. Let’s use some common sense when making cuts. If the tiny $ figures that can be saved from cutting administration aren’t worth making the cuts, how can the salary of two people so important to student safety on the chopping block.

    Please, everyone, remember in November that the BOE is elected. Take a look at each members voting record. Look at the input they give and the contributions they make. We need to take some responsibility especially if we re-elect the same people who have allowed our school system to get to the point that it is now. Let’s check their qualifications and their track records and make smarter choices in the future. If we don’t “fire” them with our votes, we are just as guilty for allowing them to keep their jobs as some suggest they are for allowing Corda to keep his.

    And for those who don’t remember - didn’t the BOE recently vote to extend Dr. Corda’s contract and give him a raise because of the fantastic job that he is doing?

    Let’s all be sure that do our jobs and vote this November. That is the one time that we can be sure we are heard!

  • 30 anonymous // Apr 26, 2007 at 11:41 am

    # 29 you are right on target. I am not commenting on #25. I know better.
    This BOE has given complete freedom to people who are taking advantage and is responsible for allowing so many things that are wrong in the district. Open your eyes, BOE and voters!

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All