YourCT.com header image 2

Guest View: An Editorial Cartoon


by turfgrrl


April 21st, 2007 · 14 Comments

This is part of an ongoing series of guest posts about issues in Norwalk. yourCT.com is a non-partisan site dedicated to airing all sides of an issue. That can’t happen without valuable contributions from our readers.

by Jack Chiaramonte

Ed Cartoon

Tags: In the News

14 Responses so far “Guest View: An Editorial Cartoon”



  • 1 Anonymous // Apr 21, 2007 at 11:04 pm

    When can we expect Dr. Corda to release the Bruce Morris job application? Or has someone removed it from the files already?

  • 2 Anonymous // Apr 22, 2007 at 5:40 pm

    Excellent cartoon! HAHAHA

  • 3 anonymous // Apr 22, 2007 at 7:34 pm

    If he is releasing the Bruce Morris application, how about releasing the Executive Assistant to the Superintendent’s position description. Is this a full time job? The person who holds that position doesn’t think so.

  • 4 anonymous // Apr 22, 2007 at 7:40 pm

    Seems like no-one in that department thinks their job is fulltime hours, only fulltime pay with bennies!

  • 5 Anonymous // Apr 22, 2007 at 8:03 pm

    #3: If times were better, maybe these jobs wouldn’t raise so much concern, but when we already know that there aren’t enough teachers for our children, we have to ask how the BOE can justify them.

  • 6 anonymous // Apr 22, 2007 at 10:08 pm

    Jack thank you for the cartoon. The not so funny thing is he probably did stay at the holiday inn on our tax dollars!

  • 7 Greg // Apr 23, 2007 at 4:54 pm

    Jack,

    Good meeting you at the BOE meeting a few weeks ago.
    You’ve got talent!

  • 8 anonymous // Apr 23, 2007 at 5:10 pm

    Honestly, this is not very funny. Is anyone, more importantly, doing anything to get rid of this sharleton? Or should I say “Sharpeton”? He is a disgrace.

  • 9 Anonymous // Apr 23, 2007 at 5:16 pm

    This cartoon reminds me of my college history class.

    Does anybody the remember the William ” Boss” Tweed cartoons? These cartoons were famous for showing the greed on behalf of Boss Tweed and his corrupt political buddies.

    Go Jack!

  • 10 ENrwlker // Apr 23, 2007 at 5:23 pm

    Since Morris’s contract is obviously a very important issue to many people on this blog, I suggest that one of the concerned posters write a letter to the BoE requesting copies of (i) the job description for Mr. Morris’s position and (ii) his resume. Under the Freedom of Information Act, the BoE must provide you with hard copies of both within 4 days. You’ll then have hard facts to go on regarding whether or not Morris is legitimately holding his current position.

  • 11 ENrwlker // Apr 23, 2007 at 5:35 pm

    Yes, the Nast political cartoons about ‘Boss Tweed’ were wonderful; my favorite is the second under this link (http://www.harpweek.com/09Cartoon/BrowseByDateCartoon.asp?Month=August&Date=19), titled “Who Stole the People’s Money? ‘Twas Him.”

    Historical tid-bit — Boss Tweed and some of his henchmen from the great 19th century New York City political machine spent their summers in Greenwich and — Norwalk! They originally built Shorefront Park in South Norwalk (see http://www.historicproperties.com/detail.asp?detail_key=Nenor029).

  • 12 Vet Park Junkie // Aug 2, 2007 at 1:38 pm

    While I enjoy a cipher as much as anyone, I’m clueless on these. I even checked my edlin manual page. Perhaps they’re just thread resurrection pings.

    However, maybe the Hour would follow up on post #10.

  • 13 Anonymous // Aug 2, 2007 at 2:36 pm

    I’m just curious Vet Park Junkie you suggested having the Hour follow upon this,,anyones thought about how the papers have been doing? like a report card on our news papers ,,,,it is election time and everyone has been asking for some sort of accountability maybe we should start with our news sources,,any thoughts?

  • 14 Vet Park Junkie // Aug 2, 2007 at 3:41 pm

    My recommendation was based on my desire for some reputable, researched information. My attention to this thread was based on seeing some “chatter” over the last day.

    I, for one, love the Hour. I hear and understand the well-thought out critiques on-line in this blog but love has its own master. The Hour’s driving force is subscriptions so I understand their reticence on tackling some issues. Like great, take a stand, lose your business and any voice that you might have had — right.

    Also, they’re in a medium with hundreds of years of false steps. We’re not. Things that we’re ignorant of, they regard as obvious rules of the road. Sure, like any organization there is room for improvement, but I’ve been impressed with how they’ve interacted with me personally. Not all of my letters to the editor get printed, but my point is more than covered with a cartoon or some other feedback.

    Take Amanda Pinto’s two articles yesterday. I was impressed that the messages were divided into two articles. Give out some kudo’s and prod some mixed results. I especially liked the mention of “literacy specialists.” Maybe I’m reading too much into it but it sure looked like a lob for someone to spike.

    Any on-line endeavor physically deals with a pre-selected audience. Not as much as in the past but we’re still a pretty select few. A newspaper is a child of the mass media with all that entails.

    BTW, my other papers are the NYT, Wall Street Journal, South China Morning Post, and a regular check-in at Haaretz.