YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: The BOE Looks at Operations After All


by turfgrrl


April 19th, 2007 · 75 Comments

Lo and behold, what a difference a day makes. Well, probably not, I always had a feeling that all members were not drunk on kool-aid over at the Board of Ed. Bruce Kimmel has emerged from the Corda kool-aid eclipse in the Hour today:

“I have not agreed with Dr. Corda’s approach to exclude administration personnel from budget cuts. My view is that we start by assuming the schools are sacrosanct, that they are the option of last resort — and that includes after-school programs,” Kimmel said.

Other board members said they want to look at cuts to operations before they discuss eliminating teachers or reducing athletic programs, but board members Tom Vetter and Jody Bishop-Pullan said program cuts may be inevitable.

Ah yes, perhaps a look at operations would be in order. But Corda likes to play fast and loose with the game of words, and suggests that it would be hard to find savings in “supplies”, an oblique reference to office supplies without trending toward the cliched paperclips.

“But you don’t find $3 million by saying spend less money on supplies,” he said. “My concern is we don’t want to do anything that’s going to disrupt the educational progress we’ve already been able to make. There will be decisions some people aren’t going to like and other decisions people are going to applaud.”

Kimmel and Bishop-Pullan agreed the first place to look for cuts would be operations.

Of course Xerox has a whole marketing campaign on how to save millions by getting rid of “stuff” meaning stacks of paper, which might be a good place to start by asking how can the school system reduce the use of paper. And while Corda is dismissive of the diminutive nature of the office supply, he perhaps is unfamiliar with the old Boeing adage, “watch the ounces and the pounds will take care of themselves”, which is just an aerospace engineer’s way to saying that small savings add up.

But maybe Corda doesn’t have to look all that far. It seems from the comments here that there’s plenty of questions to ask Stu Opdahl, who has made numerous presentations before the Common Council with numbers that have not added up. Maybe there’ll be a reformer on the BOE who will say enough is enough, and post the budget and actuals of BOE spending on the Internet so that all is open and transparent.

And those energy costs? Last night the third floor of city hall, day 3 of the vacation week, was cranking enough heat to qualify as a sauna. The thermostats were set to 74! At 7PM! When all the offices were empty. The previous night the council chamber was hot too. Were all the schools cranking out heat at 74 degrees during a vacation week? Is there a mandate to use up all of this years energy budget? Feel free to periodically report thermostat settings in the comments as you find them.

source: The Hour, School board scrambling to cut costs, By ANNA GUSTAFSON, April 19, 2007

Tags: In the News · Local · Norwalk

75 Responses so far “Norwalk: The BOE Looks at Operations After All”


Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All



  • 1 Anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 11:04 am

    As a taxpayer, I thank Mr. Kimmel for recognizing that the real work done in a school system is done at the building level, and there aren’t enough teachers there now. As a teacher himself, he is more sensitive to that than others seem to be. Doesn’t anyone remember the article about NHS and BMHS students in an unbelievable number of study halls? With the cuts proposed for the high schools, that isn’t going to get any better. I hope that the BOE (and people who read this blog) will demand a thorough report of just who works on the third floor of City Hall. The superintendent’s executive assistant and the human relations officer are two positions that could be eliminated tomorrow without any adverse impact on our kids.

  • 2 Anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 12:42 pm

    You are right #1. Get rid of those who do not earn what they are paid. Has anyone looked into the stripper story working in the food service?

  • 3 Watchdog // Apr 19, 2007 at 12:48 pm

    Yes, Number 1. I totally agree with you. Thank you, Mr. Kimmel. However, waste still remains at the building level which deserves further scrutiny, such as the positioning of a vice-principal in each and every building, regardless of its size. These VP’s were hired with the good intent of implementing the “new” evaluation plan that was designed to “support” teachers. Sadly, it hasn’t truly played out that way. Accountability remains amiss, since building administrators are supposedly “evaluated” by central office, and are far removed from the concerns of the building employees. Parents also need to be provided with some sort of forum - ALL parents - to truly get a proper spin on how each building is being run and what is needed to improve important issues such as communication and follow-up.

    A 360 model would ensure ownership in accountability for an entire building in which teachers and parents evaluate administration and administration evaluates teachers, with parental input. Ideally, wouldn’t it be far more effective to get the students involved in the process as well? I tend to feel that we could best benefit from this cycle of accountability with direct ownership in the highest of standards to build schools that foster efficiency, motivation, and pride. Ah, I can dream, can’t I? Say… anyone wanna go in on a charter school, hmm?

  • 4 AnonymousDem // Apr 19, 2007 at 1:06 pm

    Bruce Kimmel has always been a practical politician. The writing on this one has been on the wall.

  • 5 AnonymousDem // Apr 19, 2007 at 1:30 pm

    Carvin and Phyllis were both under immense pressure to switch votes because of the crap leadership in place in the Democratic party. Instead of taking advice from the grump who managed to lose the mayor seat while pissing off anyone in sight, they should have listened to what was being said here by actual people, who work at the schools.

  • 6 Anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 2:19 pm

    #3. The teacher evaluation plan is so labor intensive as to require more administrators in the elementary schools? Then maybe it isn’t such a good plan. Norwalk doesn’t have that many elementary schools that are so large as to justify two fulltime administrators. The superintendent will go down fighting before he agrees to cut them though. What if we leave them in the very largest schools and have smaller schools share VP’s?

    Cutting teachers is not the answer. Mr. Kimmel, continue fighting to save teaching positions. Other BOE members, please be open-minded and don’t rubberstamp the superintendent’s proposed budget reconciliation. The mission statement of the district mentions a “supportive learning community” that “challenges all students” to learn. You can’t do that without enough teachers. How about this? Fire every administrator who doesn’t come into daily contact with students. I guess that will never happen because most of central office would be in the unemployment lines because most of them would need directions to get to the schools.

  • 7 Anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 2:26 pm

    #6. I love it! You should run for office, it seems some out there have a good sense of reason. Until people like you are in office nothing will be accomplished.

  • 8 anon // Apr 19, 2007 at 2:38 pm

    I bet if Corda had come in with a smaller admin staff and more teachers, less overhead spending and more flexibility he would be working on a larger budget than he got through his way or the hiway method. Maybe he should teach a class on the award winning budget process.

  • 9 Anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 2:54 pm

    Anon you are right. How can you teach an old Dog a new trick? He has no idea what his working force is all about.

  • 10 indythinker // Apr 19, 2007 at 4:54 pm

    It is simply amazing that all of a sudden the BOE doesn’t agree with Corda’s cuts, well now this is what I call being politically correct after the horse is out of the barn. Why didn’t any of these people speak up prior to Tuesday? Why did they have to drag this on forever? This is a typical Democrat tactic, let them stew before we cave. This is so digusting that elected officials come out now, after we have been hounded day and night with these criminal tactics to destroy those on the coiuncil who would do what is right for all Norwalk citizens. Each and every BOE member and His Highness Corda owe this town and especially its children an appology of great proportions. These kids were brain washed into believing their lies and now at the end of the day, it was exactly as some had tried to tell us from the start. One of the council made mention of no child left behind and told the BOE that they should re-read it and see that what they were proposing was not allowed under its guidlines. These programs that Corda wishes to cut are actually part of the NCLB and he can’t cut them if he wants to. We should start listening to some of our elected officials a little more closely and maybe we will waste less time believing the crap being thrown at us.

  • 11 hardto believe // Apr 19, 2007 at 5:32 pm

    Isn’t Kimmel on the BOE? Why hasn’t his voice been heard over the last several months? NOW that the budget is fixed, his voice is heard. It’s hard to believe.

  • 12 anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 5:47 pm

    Yes, just what does the executive assistant to the superintendent do???????

  • 13 NWLK is watching // Apr 19, 2007 at 6:10 pm

    Kimmel made some noises last week about the need to fully fund the BOE requests and now he is talking out of the other side of his mouth. Good come back Brucey why didn’t you say this in your OP ED and at the hearings and at the Council meeting Tuesday night? I guess you won’t be getting a job at central office even if you wanted it. Corda ain’t gonna like your comments in the paper my friend. Well at least the kids can go back to school after spring break knowing that everyone lied to them. I’ll bet they won’t take to these bulling tactics too kindly. Hey parents of kids, make sure they know that they were used as pawns in a game that Corda played. And voters, make sure you don’t pull the same BOE lever this year. We want responsible people in our government. To the teachers, keep doing a great job and don’t let them intimidate you.

  • 14 Anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 6:19 pm

    Unbelievable, these political opportunists! Miklave and now Kimmel! What is up with the Dems? Are they to be trusted?

  • 15 Anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 6:21 pm

    Understand that the executive assistant is not to be confused with his executive secretary. I would imagine that the assistant does those things that the superintendent doesn’t want to do, but I don’t really know.

    Keep in mind that he also has an assistant superintendent, a chief operating officer, a director or elementary schools, a director of secondary schools, a director of special education, a human resources officer and a human relations officer. The director of special education has assistant directors, too. All this for a relatively small school district. So just what DOES the executive assistant to the superintendent do?

    Put the money in the schools. Where I work, I am held accountable by my superiors, and I have to explain anything they ask me to explain. If they don’t like the explanation, they are quick to tell me and direct me to do otherwise. I accept this because I work there by choice. If I don’t like it, I can leave. The same is true of the people who work for me. The BOE needs to meet its obligation to provide appropriate oversight, and that means at least occasionally telling the superintendent (who works for them, by the way) when he needs to shift direction.

  • 16 anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 6:34 pm

    Hey number 15, the BOE and Corda work for us the taxpayers! Its time they start answering to us. Start running the BOE like a business or we the stockholders can and will withdraw our money!

  • 17 Anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 6:38 pm

    #15. Everything you stated is excellent and many of us wonder about the purpose of so many at central office. I thought they tried at one time to get rid of all the supervisors down town. I guess they had friends that needed those jobs and to heck with what worked.

  • 18 Anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 6:53 pm

    Reading turffies DTC meeting coverage reveals the big problem of the Democrats, and the Republicans. They talk to their own and don’t hear the things that represent the other side. Maybe if turffie didn’ sit in that meeting, we wouldn’t know what was said. But by posting it here, maybe that made Kimmel look at what we were saying. I don’t know. I do know that if this blog wasn’t here I’d be sitting at home, shaking my head over a budget that seemed big and not knowing what was going on. This site is an eye opener. So don’t knock Kimmel for being late to the party. We all in some way have been late to the party.

  • 19 Anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 6:57 pm

    #17: I wasn’t even including the academic supervisors, but unless the superintendent and assistant superintendent and directors are prepared to roll up their sleeves and personally coordinate all of the curriculum work, the BOE probably needs academic supervisors. The people I know who work for the BOE say that the supervisors are among the few central office administrators who actually visit the schools.

  • 20 anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 7:11 pm

    #15 re: thought they tried at one time to get rid of all the supervisors down town. They did try, but not under Corda’s watch, that was when Victor Herbert came on board. He made it perfectly clear that these people would go back to the schools where they belonged and that didn’t sit well with many of the over paid /underworked admins so he was given his walking papers which cost the city and the taxpayers a whole lot of money. Hey Dems. don’t bother defending the firing of Herbert because he was doing what a good superintendant should do. get rid of the dept heads at city hall and send them back to the kids as well as all those high priced admins that sit around all day eating catered lunches and wining and dining on tax payers money. Does anyone know why the admins need to have breakfast delivered everyday? What happened to the good old days when these people actually worked for a living. some of the former employess/secretaries are still at central office and have always done a helluva good job without the beaurocracy. These are the ones who should be running central office. I’ll bet they could write a book about what they see. And can someone tell me what the heck does sherry McCready do anyway besides run around looking like a fashion model?

  • 21 anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 7:16 pm

    can someone tell me what supplies Corda and friends are talking about? seems to me that the teachers and students aren’t benefitting from them.

  • 22 indiga // Apr 19, 2007 at 9:45 pm

    Here’s what I’ve gleaned for all y’alls posts. I’ll cut though the “bloviating” (great word) and sum up the gist. Democrats are low-life, pond sucking scum — probably criminals — who are “exsanguinating” (another great word) taxpayers. The root of the problem is that these pond sucking scum were elected to the Board of Education. Republicans, on the other hand, are altruistic visionaries working for the good of mankind (or at least the good of “the children”.) The Democrats that vote with the Republicans are good also — but not as good. And if the vote might expose them for what they are, they don’t show up. Gee whilikers, don’t you love bipartisanship — Norwalk 2007 style?

  • 23 whistle blower // Apr 19, 2007 at 9:52 pm

    The stuff that has appeared on Opdahl, his princess, and the toad is not only true, but represents only a very small sample of the crap that he has pulled during his time in Norwalk. He has lied to us. He has
    lied to Corda & the BOE. He has lied to just about everyone. With all due respect doesn’t anyone on the BOE, or the City CC have the balls do to do what is right, and stop this craziness. Or are they waiting for the little people who work on the third floor to come forward and speak out, and then get fired for doing what they feel is right and that no one else will do. Does anyone really care about the people on the third floor who have had to see Opdahl in action for fours years, and forced to look the other way because they have absolutely no one to reach out to? It appears that no one, and I mean no one, really cares, because you have let it go on, and on! Do you have any idea how the average person who works on the third floor feels about being made part of this mess, when they have had nothing to do with it. It is very sad that this is happening, but even worse that our BOE and City leaders have been unwilling to do anything about it! Shame on you all!

  • 24 anonymous // Apr 19, 2007 at 10:02 pm

    indiga, indiga, indiga. The Board of Ed is waking up. All is not lost for the Dems, as long as they do that oversight thing. You know, the oversight that the Dems in congress are doing which has uncovered the Federal Attorney scandal, the Jimmy Doolittle scandal amongst the others?

  • 25 indiga // Apr 19, 2007 at 10:03 pm

    then, if that’s so, whistleblower, blow the whistle. If you don’t you’re as guilty as those you accuse. Norwalk has a long history of crap being shoved under the rug — by good old boys and backroom alliances on both sides of the aisle. How about a truly independent ethics committee to start looking into ethics violations? There’s plenty to spread around, I’m sure.

  • 26 ENrwlker // Apr 19, 2007 at 10:19 pm

    indiga — Don’t be so harsh on the Dems (”Democrats are low-life, pond sucking scum — probably criminals — who are “exsanguinating” (another great word) taxpayers”). I don’t think they’re criminals!

    The fact is, with a few rare exceptions (e.g., Tom Cullen), most BoE members of both parties have been pretty awful at exercising any kind of fiscal responsibility over the years. Most of them ‘go native’ (i.e., get taken over by the existing BoE / staff culture) and cease to show any independence.

    But the bottom line here is that the Democrats have controlled the Board for 8 straight years now; 7-2 from ‘99 - ‘01 and 9-0 since then. I know you like to blame all the City’s problems on Esposito, who’s been gone for 6 years. At what point do the people in power have to take responsibility? I’d say after 8 years of overwhelming control, the current Democratic BoE members have reached that point.

  • 27 ashamed // Apr 20, 2007 at 7:34 am

    Comment to #23 - Indiga

    Hey Indiga I think you missed the point Whistleblower was trying to make. If the BOE & Norwalk CC and Mayor (who have nothing to loose) are unwilling to do anything about Opdahl, then why should a little guys (who have lots to loss) stick there necks out. Take your head out of your butt Indiga! The leaders of Norwalk should be assamed of themselves. They can do something, and won’t!!!!!!!!!

  • 28 Anonymous // Apr 20, 2007 at 7:52 am

    #27 - Is it entirely possible that the Common Council and Mayor CAN do anything about BoE personnel? I believe Doug Hempstead and Rick McQuaid tried to expose suspect activities before and could only go so far. It wasn’t easy for these two, as it was, since McQuaid works for the Board and Hempstead’s wife is an elementary teacher. This is the elected BoE’s domain and if they won’t intervene it can only go so far. They are elected to be the check and balance for the school system.

  • 29 ashamed // Apr 20, 2007 at 8:19 am

    To anonymous #28. We know that Doug and Rick have taken the lead in exposing Opdahl, and demanding his ouster, and it has been the only glimmer of hope for four years. But look what past mayors and council members have done to get rid of good supers in the past like Sloan & Herbert. They had no trouble stepping over the line then and demanding things be done! Your comments are very discouraging. Having no confidence in our City or BOE leadership, I guess this stench will be allowed to go on forever.

  • 30 Anonymous // Apr 20, 2007 at 8:30 am

    Hold on, number 29. I’m not sure if you understand me. I think it’s the BoEs domain and the city can’t do too much legally. By the way, Sloan was not ousted, he took another job in Simsbury and Herbert was run out of town by Bruce Mellion and the NFT, not the mayor.

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All