YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: The Budget Cap Was Not Raised


by turfgrrl


April 17th, 2007 · 63 Comments

The Cap was not raised and like Radio Free Europe, these are the following special messages:

Goldilocks is a weenie. I repeat Goldilocks is a weenie.

The powerpoint presentation will not be presented due to technical difficulties.

The rain is spain appears in Norwalk’s sewer drains.

****

Ah yes … at long last i certainly hope that I will never have to sit through another budget meeting. But I have several observations about this process. For one Corda really did a bad job making the case for the BOE budget. He misjudged what was being asked of him, and assumed that the status quo would prevail. The BOE members really didn’t help dig him out of this. By opening with the “I will not cut a single administrator speech” he came across as inflexible, where flexibility was what was needed. Eventually he came back with the 11th hour proposal that seemed, on the surface, and to me, entirely reasonable with the added checks of bringing back a finance director, and the monthly meetings.

The Norwalk-outers were ill served by whatever advice they were being sold. Was it Ken Slapin, Alex Knopp or Galen Wells who dreamed up the strategy of theatrics over substance? Who will really know, or more to the point admit to the machinations. At the end of the day, there should have been a debate about the performance and spending of the schools, but it should have been at the BOE level, and that debate should have been open and aired to the public. That is the key here, sunlight is the disinfectant, and the stink of political games was reeking from the BOE budget backers.

Even in the end, when I asked Matt Miklave for a copy of his statement, he declined. The very thing he said he most wanted, that open public debate, was being censored by himself. Enjoy the Cayman Islands there Matt.

When I look back at the BOE budget process, I remember when Rick McQuaid mentioned that the BOE had not responded to the BETs 32 questions. The 32 unanswered questions, and the lack of a response set the stage for everything that happened since.

And lastly, its time that Norwalk embraces the digital age. These council meetings should be video recorded and aired on government TV, and streamed off a web site. The public should participate and the technology is there to deliver it. Conference calls, webinars, websites devoted to issues, and yes even blogs, should be used by our government officials to educate the public about the issues.

The BOE budget should have been online. The BOE blog should have accepted comments. The BOE should open up the process of their budgeting to the public from this point on.

Lastly, Norwalk does get screwed by Hartford. Our attention to the budget locally must now be redirected to the helping our entire Hartford delegation get more ECS funding for Norwalk. And maybe a lesson on human anatomy for Bruce Morris, who somehow thinks that women can’t visit the urologist.

Tags: Local · Norwalk

63 Responses so far “Norwalk: The Budget Cap Was Not Raised”


Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All



  • 1 Where's Waldo? // Apr 18, 2007 at 1:07 am

    Mike Coffey was missing in action- says a lot about his leadership

  • 2 MGeake // Apr 18, 2007 at 7:27 am

    That is truly unfair. This was a special meeting, scheduled at the last minute, and it was announced that he had a prior commitment.

    I would never attack a Council member’s need to earn a living, unless you think $50/month can support you in Norwalk.

  • 3 Where's Waldo? // Apr 18, 2007 at 7:42 am

    Mike: If you think Mike wanted to raise the cap- think again. Both Mike Coffey and Herb Grant have been voting with the (R) the whole term. The President of the council missing- come on.

  • 4 MGeake // Apr 18, 2007 at 8:07 am

    Had he attended AND voted to raise the cap, it still would not have passed.

  • 5 Anonymous // Apr 18, 2007 at 8:29 am

    How about the 5 Dems voting against the unions last week? If you are going to accuse Coffey and Grant of voting with the Rs, you might want to say how Poruban, Miklave, Briggs, Sutton and Krummel Ds sold out on protecting working families. They voted against the living wage law too. Some progressive Ds we’ve got here.

  • 6 Watchdog // Apr 18, 2007 at 10:53 am

    My Dear Turfie and all,

    I have some thoughts, in retrospect, now that the dust has settled. Please bear with me. Over the past few weeks, we have seen how the BoE budget stirs up more emotional swill in a sea of raging female hormones than any other topic can. Through it all, I wondered exactly how and why this occurs. Most of the clamoring comes from women driven by some unforeseen force. Can anyone help me understand why a 5 million dollar increase would cause such commotion? Can someone help me understand what causes women to champion this very cause? Mind you, now, I say women, because the fight is emotional and the resulting letters and emails are as sharp as a harpy’s talon. Ms. Romano’s sentiments last night on this blog struck a nerve in me. I felt so sorry for her. What a horrific position to be in!

    Do these BoE warriors actually believe, in good faith, they are helping their own child’s education in return? Perhaps some, in a more altruistic sense, might believe they are helping all children and it is not purely self-serving. Still, do some act in the hope of making a name for themselves so they might get a job with the BoE in the somewhere near future? And what of aligning oneself with the powerbrokers of education to make oneself appear intelligent and educated? Could this be an underlying cause? What about the possible fixation with men in suits and doctoral degrees? Is there anyone who can help me understand why we have this collective mob behavior that occurs during budget time?

    Whatever the reason behind this clamoring, these emotional types send our city reps insulting emails, letters, and phone calls in an attempt to sway their thinking. The thinking is actually so convoluted that it is difficult to decipher exactly what it is they want. Statements are tossed like “My heartfelt condolences to the flood victims” in addition to “raise the cap.” You can’t have it both ways without losing ground. This two way doublespeak has also come from council members this week as evidenced by Mr. Miklave’s statements regarding his “I wish to support the taxpayer” and “raise the cap.”

    The interesting thing is that some city reps see the “squeaky wheel” as evocative in its significance and this greatly disturbs me. When I vote, I surely am looking for representation by individuals who hold true to conviction, or, at the very least, common sense. Our reps are pillars of our community, and like it or not, for a measy 50 dollars, we taxpayers demand sound decisions from them. Difference of opinion is one thing, but respectful, meaningful debate and compromise is expected.

    I’ve thought well and hard about what would make some council members compromise their own integrity for stage theatrics and obvious grandstanding. I once thought that Mr. Miklave’s attempts were driven by a need for higher political aspirations, but alas, in reality, he is dead. No decent hard working Norwalk taxpayer will ever believe that he can withstand a major decision in which strength of character is needed. In the final analysis, then, did these insults and abhorrent emails win out? Are these successful tactics to sway votes and move our reps to abandon common sense and the wishes of the majority of Norwalk’s citizens? Thankfully, no. We owe much to those 7 Council reps who can think for themselves.

    Lastly, I’d like to extend a HUGE thank you to Turfie for allowing all of us who did not attend to experience the thrill of each event as it transpired. I laughed, I shouted; I truly enjoyed the play by play and occasional comments. Also, thank you, thank you, thank you to all who attended the meeting and who had the courage to speak on behalf of not raising the cap. Basically, it became an infuriating match between holding kids hostage or using good leadership skills. Thank God, he wasn’t allowed to take our town.

    Finally, I’d like to extend a big THANK YOU to those council members who continue to hold true to their convictions. In the end, after all the insults and indignity you have suffered, you have earned the highest respect and gratitude of the Norwalk voter and that, Ms. Romano, is no small feat.

  • 7 Anonymous // Apr 18, 2007 at 10:54 am

    The ball is now in Corda’s Court. Let’s see how he will hurt the educational process of our children, while he and his friends continue to rake in the big bucks.

  • 8 Watchdog // Apr 18, 2007 at 10:58 am

    Oh, mannnnnnnnnnnnnn……. I really screwed that one up!

  • 9 turfgrrl // Apr 18, 2007 at 11:05 am

    watchdog: post again and I’ll replace the one you wrote above with the one you wanted to write … :)
  • 10 anonymous // Apr 18, 2007 at 11:23 am

    I absolutely agree with Turfgrrl’s message. That which is known is so much less threatening than that which is unknown. What’s it going to hurt to put all budgets and numbers on the city web site? It hasn’t impeded the city’s finances, why should it be a problem for the BOE? I enjoy reading this blog much more than actually attending a meeting, but I would really prefer to see the meetings live.

    We should get more money from Hartford but the governor’s 10% tax rate proposal scares me - I’m afraid we’ll get hit disproportionately on increased income tax, not get enough compensation for property taxes, and end up on the short end of more sticks.

  • 11 Watchdog // Apr 18, 2007 at 11:39 am

    Turf: You’re the best!

  • 12 turfgrrl // Apr 18, 2007 at 11:42 am

    watchdog: ok all fixed now.

    And anyone else, if you too want to fix something that got posted just let me know and I will do the same. :)

  • 13 newby // Apr 18, 2007 at 3:09 pm

    I’d like to hear more progressive Democrats here please. There’s a progressive income tax that the CGA is proposing, what does everyone think?

  • 14 anon // Apr 18, 2007 at 3:23 pm

    Now that the Norwalk Democratic party has been reduced to about 35 people who still think the sun rises in the west, can we please stop with the need to drive out everybody who disagrees with you out of the party? We are the party of the big tent, let’s all start acting like it. Also, thanks turf girl for opening up our meetings to this forum.

  • 15 Anonymous // Apr 18, 2007 at 3:30 pm

    Anon 14- you are so correct!

  • 16 Home on the Range // Apr 18, 2007 at 5:27 pm

    You can’t make this stuff up….
    BOE Sshould sell it as a reality show and cover there own budget….
    Food tester chef hired two months agoby Whitson Foods working at BOE Central kitchen. Opthal instructs Whitson to hire her and put on their payroll for $60,000p/yr. Then it is charged back to BOE..WHAT IS HER BACKGROUND…EXOCTIC DANCER worked for Stu in Oxford. She is very vocal on how she met Mr. Opthal, and how he hired her in Oxford, buys gifts for her 3 children and how he takes care of her.
    She took a week off from work she wasn’t entitled to, so Whitsons didn’t pay her for the week. She complains to Opthall, so Opthall calls Whitson and directs them to pay her the week and to charge it back to BOE. He has a long history with them.
    Then there’s his new purchasing agent(?) Mr. Giannitti,no experience other than running a deli and working in FedEx warehouse in Norwalk. Hired as a consultant first and then moved into Central office.
    Stu pushes Emma out the door to make room. It also works well for George’s wife…her aide position is bumped up to 30 hours so she gets full benefits too!!!!
    And finally James Opthall the new teacher at NHS…$35,000 to furnish his new classroom.
    Giannitti spends $20,000 on power tools on Feb.19th. at Woodworker shop in S.Norwalk with a BOE visa card and much more from Home Depot and Rings END….just to make junior happy.
    JUST A TIP OF THE ENDLESS SPENDING ICEBERG…

  • 17 Grounds for investigation // Apr 18, 2007 at 5:42 pm

    Didn’t Dr Corda previously state or infer that both he and Opthall had the prerequistite financial skills to manage the financial director role/responsiblities?

    After the “Lathe Adventure” wouldn’t the BOE be more vigilant at watching over this Opthall person? Isn’t he IN CHARGE of purchasing and contracts?

    The bad expenditures mentioned above are the kinds of things that would seldom get past a “true” financial director.

    Perhaps Sal and Opthall-latheman have their own valid reasons for managing the financial end of things but at the very least someone should “spot check” and certainly look into the situations alluded to above.

    Give us a break. We are losing our patience and wondering what else should be brought out.

    Is Corda worried that if he fires anyone at Central, they might tell how misspending is their “way of managing” our millions?

    It is hard to keep hands out of uncontrolled cookie jars - the greed is the undoing.

  • 18 Anonymous // Apr 18, 2007 at 5:44 pm

    As a school teacher in Norwalk, I am horrified to read this. Tell me… would you say our system is actual corrupt? How can we save our system and its reputation? Someone please help us!

  • 19 anon // Apr 18, 2007 at 5:59 pm

    Last nights meeting was if nothing else a grandstanding arena for the dems and Corda, I would like to say that Mr. Corda and friends are the most disrespectful bunch of money wasters I have ever seen.
    Each and every time the Repubs started to talked, they whispered or laughed out loud and made rude comments. was this because they were trying to draw attention away from the true facts? Stuart Opdhal should be fired along with his son, his girlfriend, the new purchasing guy and Sal Corda. We are letting them oversee our kids? Give me a break. To the teacher above, you can help by making sure that the public is made aware of any threats to teachers, students, and program cuts after last nights meeting. By students I mean the ones who’s parents did not support Corda and gang. Don’t let them retaliate and you’ll be doing us all a huge service.

  • 20 Anonymous // Apr 18, 2007 at 6:10 pm

    #18. I too am a Norwalk teacher disgusted with the what we just read in posting 16. I tend to believe it is true. I do not know if corrupt is a strong enough word. The mismanagement is appauling and insulting to the tax payers. Can we impeach Corda and Opthall? Then flush out all who were brought on board by them and give their jobs over to Norwalk natives who send their children to our schools.

  • 21 bruce Morris and the BOE are fleecing us // Apr 18, 2007 at 6:19 pm

    They are truly fleecing us and laughing at all of us all the way to the bank.

    This is truly disgusting.

  • 22 anonymous // Apr 18, 2007 at 6:55 pm

    It sounds like stuff you see on the Sopranos.

  • 23 ENrwlker // Apr 18, 2007 at 7:31 pm

    anon - “Mr. Corda and friends are the most disrespectful bunch … Each and every time the Repubs started to talk, they whispered or laughed out loud and made rude comments. Was this because they were trying to draw attention away from the true facts?”

    Yes, I heard they actually laughed when the GOP councilmen pointed out that our kids’ test scores are lower than other cities even though we spend a lot more on our schools than they do. They think that’s funny? Look at the Powerpoint on the Public Debate Should Continue thread on this blog and the test score results and tell me that’s something to laugh about.

  • 24 Anonymous // Apr 18, 2007 at 7:33 pm

    Disgusting. Absolutely disgusting.

  • 25 Anonymous // Apr 18, 2007 at 7:37 pm

    Since we’re at the bottom of the dirty hamper, what about the “stories” that Stu Opthall was fired from his previous YMCA job and also that Dr. Karen Lang was “let go” from Greenwich? What the hell is going on here? If these stories are true, what kind of business are we running?

  • 26 indythinker // Apr 18, 2007 at 7:54 pm

    Everyone should e-mail 2 friends who e-mail 2 friends and so on and so on this website so they can all see the powerpoint presentation. Then they need to start writing letters to the editor with the information so that the entire town can read it especially those who portray Corda as the almighty. That man has no concern about you teachers, his way or the highway I hear. I’ll bet there was more than one teacher who would have liked to speak last night but have already been told their jobs will be eliminated. Keep a real close look at the teachers no longer teaching your kids. How many think or have heard that Rick McQuaid is next? All because he’s honest! This is the biggest bag of BULL S— we have seen in a very long time. I have also heard tell that teachers have been asked what kids belong to which people who spoke against him. Think about it Norwalk, we no longer have free speach with Corda at the helm. But mark my words, things are gonna get ugly. Corda needs to know we are all watching and will not stand by quietly if even one teachers job is cut or one child is made to pay for this. Watch carefully at next years curriculum and see what he cuts and then everyone needs to band together to run him out of town!

  • 27 concerned citizen // Apr 18, 2007 at 10:52 pm

    If a Corporation in the real world waS RUN like the BOE, they all be investigated, fired or jailed. Sal and Stuart make Enron look good.

  • 28 itsridiculous // Apr 18, 2007 at 11:40 pm

    It started out just being ridiculous, and may well end being total incompetence at best, and criminal at worst. Guess I’ll be itscriminal soon. Regardless, a full investigation into the BOE & Central Office is in order and I am asking any council person, on either side of the aisle, who reads this blog to step up and initiate the process, either locally or through whatever state agency is appropriate - I’d see the attorney general as a good start, considering the money involved.

  • 29 Mike Lyons // Apr 19, 2007 at 12:39 am

    Regarding allegations of wrongdoing at the BoE — I’m not saying there’s nothing there, but in such situations I think the starting point should be a great line from one of SciFi author Isaac Asimov’s books: “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.” I don’t think corruption is the problem at BoE; I think a certain mindset is the problem.

    Back in 2001 the Common Council had a managerial audit done of the school system by PriceWaterhouseCoopers. The report is 3 inches thick. It recommended hundreds of changes in school system operations, and identified up to $7 million per year in possible savings.

    Sal Corda and the Democrats on the Council (then GOP-controlled) and BoE vociferously opposed the audit, but when it became clear that it was popular with the public, they switched course and the Democrats endorsed it during the election campaign. One of the campaign pieces for the Democratic BoE candidates in the fall of 2001 said “Our candidates pledge to implement proposals from the PriceWaterhouseCoopers study that will result in increased efficiency, real cost-savings and better performance in the operations of Norwalk’s education system. We will implement these recommendations because we must move forward faster.”

    After the election, the new 15-0 Democratic Common Council held a meeting with the PWC representatives at which they trashed PWC and the report, and, ignoring their campaign promise, they put the report in a drawer and have ignored it to this day. It is that kind of abysmal mismanagement, not corruption, which is the problem at BoE, in my opinion.

  • 30 Greg // Apr 19, 2007 at 7:02 am

    Mike,

    Accurate assesment of the willful mistreatment of the Norwalk property taxpayer–perhaps the pendulum can begin to swing in the opposite direction!

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All