YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: DTC Meeting April


by turfgrrl


April 16th, 2007 · 40 Comments

As part of the ongoing coverage of meetings, here’s the paraphrase of the Norwalk Democratic party meeting. As usual, I attempted to capture what was said, as best I could

DTC Meeting:

04/16/07

Roll Call called at 7:43

Agenda Item: Fill vacancy in District C appointed Alex Knopp.

Approval of minutes: Donna King added as attended, voted on unanimous

Treasurers Report: paid postage no other activity voted to accept was unanimous

Report From Chair (Galen Wells):
1. Trying to find a venue to hold a rally for healthcare. April 28th, (will send email out when and where it is) Foundation for Healthcare CCAG.
100 people there … Donna King suggested Mill Hill and to call Gail Wall about if (historical society)

2. Establish an editorial board for the web site. Used for things that “we have general agreement on” Someone suggested Galen and 5 district chairs. Vote was unanimous.

Legislative Report: ? (no council members)

Council Report

Bill Krummel: It’s on everyone’s mind to increase the cap of the budget. Most of the entire increase is for the BOE. 2.8

Walter Briggs: urges everyone to go to the public participation portion of the meeting tomorrow.

Bill Krummel: Last week council meeting had a low turnout. Moved to the concert hall, but there were very few people there. More flooding people there. One of my concerns too, when the council cut back on the cap, $2 million, half was BOE half city services. The resolution to restore and go beyond, it upsets me because there is a critically small amount that could be used to alleviate the flooding issues.

Bruce Kimmel: It’s only an advisory or recommendation, it still has to go to the BET. They will make decisions on whether its spent at all. So there is still room for a flexibility. There are people who are still in this building who understand the fund balance and that what it can be used for.

If the cap is altered, we keep the discussion going. When the cap was made, it made it more difficult to address the flooding issue.

Mel Silverstein: What about the sate funding, does anyone know this.

Bruce Kimmel: We don’t know yet. Rell said 2.3 million, but latest form the appropriations committee that they are only allocating 200k to Norwalk.

Rick Fuller: Mayor said publicly that the money will go to BOE.

Gwen Briggs: It still depends on our setting a budget cap, no matter what. If there’s no budget for it, it goes straight to the general fund.

Tom Vetter: The 3.8 they are talking about, it only gets us 1.6%. If we ran the exact same programs we ran next year, we …

Galen Wells: last thing we need is to go backwards.

Stuart Wells: It comes out of the high schools, because it is the most expensive place to run.

Tom Vetter: elementary school costs 2.8 million to run.

Stuart Wells: Nothing to cut because of state laws on the number of teachers.

Brice Kimmel: A lot has been said about where the cuts need to take place. When the BOE does the budget, the cuts will be as fair as possible. No one on the board is really going to take money from classrooms or program that directly impact kids first. We’ll do everything we can to find efficiencies and reorganization. Shame that discussion was where the cuts were to be made, instead of whether to make them.

Rick Fuller: As cuts come down, worse thing parts of BOE fighting games with each other. That’s the worse thing that can happen. We have a working plan to identify the priorities and directives. It’s within our own party too.

Bill Krummel: Is full board working with Corda?

Bruce Kimmel: Yes, but for the purpose of the budget there is a committee

Bill Krummel: Was the Mayor part of that?

Bruce Kimmel: Yes

Bruce Kimmel: But we got blind sided with the cap.

Bill Krummel: Concerned about the people being involved, like the mayor.

Bruce Kimmel: Final say is the BOE members.

Bill Krummel: If the council passes the increased cap you still might make some reductions.

Brice Kimmel: yes in some areas, our option of last resort is to cut kids programs.

Bill Krummel: That’s not Corda’s position

Rick Fuller: Class size is 28, we have functioned at 24 … Corda has instructed all of principals to make class size 28 not 24. You can have to be within the contract. Teachers are not happy with that.

Stuart Wells: Class room size is not insignificant

Kevin Poruban: Couple of questions: What were the comments of the mayor when the budget was presented.

Bruce Kimmel: I don’t recall

Rick Fuller: Moccia was higher at 4.2%

Kevin Poruban: Couple of comments, Rick you were bringing about increase in the classrooms, Teachers are really upset about that. Went to ROTC competition and cadets said that if their sports were cut that they’d go to another school for their sport (private or otherwise) ROTC program has to maintain 100 cadets to stay viable. He’s been issues a warning letter about the size of the (junior ROTC programs)

Kevin Poruban: Another issue is that the teachers are mad. My son is at Norwalk high, he has new teachers who energetic and full of knowledge, they are demoralized over the classroom size and whether they’s have their job.

Rick Fuller: Corda has set a curriculum program. We have a contract. We have to explore all the areas, somebody may be upset , these are the types of things that you have to do to explore all areas. Joan Romano’s daughter is complaining that she won’t have extra curricular activities.

Stuart Wells: Two people aren’t here tonight. Miklave will have to fly back to make the vote tomorrow, and Hilliard for keeping the issue alive, deserve some sort of praise for keeping it alive.

Bruce Kimmel: We didn’t cut it, every time something is mentioned, you can’t cut sports, you cant cut extra curriculum program. You could a dozen out of central office, you are lucky to get 1 million out of that. You’d end up being a violation of state and federal mandates. You can’t cut sports, ROTC, you can’t cut this or that. I agree, I don’t want to cut anything, but you have to balance you budget one way or the other. I think it was unfortunate that the superintendent took a hard line position in the begging. But since he’s been working with the board, when we’ll do everything we can to work with the budget. Corda will have another article In the Hour this week.

Galen Wells: Talking to a housemaster supervising 35 people. You can’t have it happen by using email.

Rick Fuller: You have state regulation, federal mandates and local funds. Until that changes, this is going to be an issue. Until that changes and that can be done here, line item issue are determined by the state. Until they realize it people don’t understand it.

Bruce Kimmel: back to the housemasters thing: Just imagine if we had no housemaster tings, how do we get to reaccredidation, because …. That’s the end, you can’t play around with those positions.

Joe Tamburi: The problems that the BOE is having, why does the BOE not have a finance director. Is this the root of all the problems that we have. We don’t we have a finance director:

Rick Fuller: That was one of those cuts, it was a duplication of services with the city.

Joe Tramburi: But this is about numbers.

Rick Fuller: Typical of a budget. Don’t need it.

Bruce Kimmel: Was on both sides of the issues. Didn’t think that last finance director wasn’t that good. Thought you guys really needed one, Corda and Opdahal are certified, they are very capable.

Joe Tamburi: In any organization that is the focus/basis.

Bruce Kimmel: We never had a finance director that didn’t follow the mayor. Jack Miller in his private moments would work for the mayor. Our finance folks work with the superintendent, they work closely with Tom Hamilton. Without a director of curriculum you can really screw up.

Joe Tamburi: Hamilton worked on the budget?

Rick Fuller: His recommendation was higher than the council cap.

Crosstalk:

Kevin Poruban: Corda was provided a finance list of everyone in central office, if you add them all up, you won’t find the savings. There are 79 individuals, 5 of them are funded through grants. That brings you downs to 74 people. It breaks down to (lists breakdown) and the IT computer. There are 6000 computers in the public schools, there are only 6 techs to support those computers.

Joe Tamburi: All that information needs to go out there.

Kevin Poruban: Yes, we have to have certain requirements by contracts, they tell you what we have, and in just about every case we are at a minimum. I find it interesting that there are folks that say we are top heavy and cut staff, but they say hire a finance director.

Rick Fuller: One thing that Sal has done has put the curriculum people in the schools, all this gets charged to to the schools. So if you look at it by schools, instead of levels up here, its vertical, and people tend to look at it horizontal.

Bill Krummel: The major thing here is perception. Corda said he wouldn’t cut central administration, he was going to cut sports and academic programs.

Crosstalk: (no he didn’t say that)

Bill Krummel: Housemaster reviewing teacher. That used to the Department chairmen were critical to evaluations of the teachers. Housemasters were taking care of the kids.

Bruce Kimmel: Evaluation of teachers is much much different than it used to be. It is contractual that is has to be done a certain way. I don’t know what it is in Norwalk, but some department head only taught 2 periods. Now it’s a very big thing, pre observation, post observation, it goes on and on …it is continue now, that’s the difference. If it is done correctly, (if you have an overworked department chair) they they are not done well, (because they have to evaluate text books etc.) You have to to do it right to evaluate teachers.

Bill Krummel: I don’t think there’s any person more important that the dept. chair.

The reports that I’m hearing, the teachers here in central office do not get into the schools, It s a perception problem. It gets reinforced when things like the third floor take off in a snow storm.

Crosstalk: Fuller and Poruban argue and …..

Kevin Proruban: Krummel is right there is perception problem.

Rick Fuller: storms out. [disagreeing with Krummel]

Kevin Poruban: Here’s an example, the mens bathroom has paper, it looks like there’s extra paper, and so the copy center is next to the bathroom. They move it there right before they have to make

Rick Fuller: [returns]

Rick Fuller: Fred Bondi is on the toilet paper end of it.

[room laughs]

Discussion Ends:

Walter Briggs: Moving forward on master plan, public hearings on master plan.

Bruce Kimmel: You keep qualifying that it will never happen

Walter Briggs: They will be in the month of may

Joe Tamburai: 2 greens under water. But …

Bill Krummel: On Oak Hills golf, west Norwalk neighborhood association is holding an open house, at Quarto Pazzi, good thing for people to go. April 30th.

Brice Kimmel: In 1997 ran for Mayor his issue was deferred maintenance David Korevaar. In Colorado now. [The deferred maintenance] It was right on the mark.

District Committee Reports:

B: (Geake) in association with NEON we are putting on a memorial community day BBQ. Tired of Ryan park being an open air drug market. Get police and little events happening You can see drug deals form Joe Mann’s office.

Brigss: Don’t you need to work with Parks and Rec.

Geake: Feelers to get performance at amphitheater down there. Still in planning stage. Trying to get community service funds.

Galen asks about District E fundraiser.

Taxing District Reports:

CT Clean Energy fund named second taxing district to get generator. Still working on it, nothing is signed, but they were selected.

Old Business:

New business: Sal is running the Kucinich campaign, if you have questions see me.
Watts: Support for HB 7395 The gay marriage Bill which passed the judiciary committee by a 2 to 1 margin. (lists sponsors) It’s a very important issue, it’s a civil rights issue. $0 years I couldn’t marry my wife, because there were laws that prevented interracial marriages. Asking for a letter of support. Q poll 70% say people support. Respectfully ask our legislators to support the bill.

Briggs: is there are motion.

David Watts: make a motion

Walter Briggs makes motion to table takes precedence. Tamburi seconds it.

Bruce Kimmel: We generally let people discuss it…

Walter Briggs: withdraws and Joe Tamburi withdraws it …

Dave Murchie: thanks Dave for bringing it up, to not support separate but equal … we should take a stand.

Mike Geake: it is a civil rights issue, it has been couched as a religious issue. It is recognized by the state of ct. Nothing in the bill requires an y religious performance of a gay marriage., it grants that the rights be recognized under state laws.

Galen Wells: they already have that under civil unions

Mike Geake: No that’s true

Kevin Poruban: I think its inappropriate to take up before this body. I’m not to sure Coffey would approve this. If you do want to have support, bring it to the mayor bring it to the council. I don’t think we should take a position as a town committee. I don’t want to force this on every one.

Bruce Kimmel: I wouldn’t vote on something sight unseen. I’d have to see the letter itself.

David Watts: I respect that, I wouldn’t vote on something that I didn’t see either. 70% of the voters according to the pool, says its ok to vote for it. You are probably going to table it, but I want you to talk away thinking about how it will effect people who are affected by this. Separate but equal is unequal. Labels are important to certain people.

Gwen Briggs: I strongly for it, but will vote for table.

Dave Watts: Says he had to sent it to the town chair.

Mel Silverstein: Motion to table to a time and date.

Peter Thor: This means it will be on the agenda.

David Murchie: This committee has expressed options on many issues. I think the time of for string others on this issue, I echo what Dave and Michael says …

Donna King: You can watch the public debate at CT-N at my desk. I did have the privilege of listening to it its been interesting and educational. It’s more than just the word marriage, Love Makes A Family, it would give couples in the state of CT to challenge the federal law. I marry people all the time for civil unions, from out of state. It’s lovely and quite nice. I think it is really important that the federal law will be the key. I will ask to make a separate motion, we’ve had these things in the past, I’m going to ask that an agenda item be created on this. David can give you language tonight on this. I will vote against a tabling motion.

Kevin Poruban: In regards to what Donna said anything that is presented that it also be presented early enough to be presented to district committee.

David Watts: Introduce a resolution in support of HOB 7395, that the Norwalk DTC is in full support of

Mike Geake seconds

Walter Briggs: Move to table the motion to the next town committee. SO district chairs have an opportunity to discuss this.

Joe Tamburi: seconds.

Votes counted by show of hands: favor 7 opposed 10

Resolution in favor 12 passes 3 opposed abstentions 1 (I think Galen mumbles the count)

Sal ??? asks if there is a candidate for mayor.

Donna King: Suggested that new resolutions should not go under new business, that they put on the agenda, so that there is a courtesy of time.

Peter Thor: State budget, I think its important that we contact our legislators supporting the budget, (Cafero is not) it’s an important budget, republicans are railing against it, but the fact is that those who are making less than 150k will see a cut. It really and truly does establish a progressive income tax. Its important to contact our legislator to say that we support it.

Bruce Kimmel: We should contact our legislator whether we support tit or not or if it is terrible to Fairfield County. You tell you representative that, I’ll tell mine something different

Adjourns at 8:56pm

Following the meeting

Bruce Kimmel wanted to go on the record with the statement that he is not looking for, or planning to take a Board of Ed job. He says that there should be no rumor to that effect. He also said that the resolution mentioned in a previous post was the Patriot Act, not an Iraq war resolution and that he was correct in that it would not pass if 2 clauses weren’t dropped. I have updated that post as well.

Tags: Local · Norwalk

40 Responses so far “Norwalk: DTC Meeting April”


Pages: [1] 2 » Show All



  • 1 MGeake // Apr 17, 2007 at 6:18 am

    In the interest of fairness, can we expect similar coverage of Republican Town Committee meetings?

  • 2 MGeake // Apr 17, 2007 at 6:26 am

    My mistake — I see a March 19th RTC meeting.

    That was before I started reding regularly ;-}

  • 3 Housemasters, Deans, Principals - OverManaging // Apr 17, 2007 at 6:45 am

    The issue is not Housemasters managing “35″ people via email. It is WHY does our system require a Housemaster position. The principal should be managing the teachers at the local level, not passing it off to four (4) Housemasters.

    Our teachers are highly paid. If they require that many layers of management, something is wrong with the system.

    In terms of utilizing technology- everyone at our school system should learn to type and manage their own documents- it is absurd to have the depth of secretarial service that we tolerate.

    Principal plus secretary
    Dean of Students
    Eight People- Four housemasters with four secretaries (one each)

    Plus within each subject area we have Dept Chairs and Subject Area Leaders- WHY aren’t they the ones monitoring the efforts of the other teachers- why do we need 10 administrators with secretaries also on the task.

    Plus, there are probably other “traveling evaluators” from central office.

    Doesn’t anyone see the problem here? We are so enamored with evaluating, that we are overspending on it when we should be putting the money into teaching hours.

  • 4 anon // Apr 17, 2007 at 6:56 am

    The RTC meeting was posted last month!

  • 5 anonymous // Apr 17, 2007 at 8:36 am

    The monthly RTC meeting scheduled for last evening was cancelled.

  • 6 Budget- by level or by school // Apr 17, 2007 at 10:10 am

    We, the people, are still waiting to see the BOE budget.

    WHERE can we look at it?

    How much does each level cost us?
    What is the spending per pupil per school?

    What does central office cost us?

    We have a PROBLEM- and that problem is that we ONLY have DEMOCRATS on the BOE- that needs to be changed.

    There is no open discussion, no exposure of the numbers, no ability for people to obtain the information.

    A PTO person asked the PUBLIC to TRUST.

    TRUST is not enough when you have a lack of checks and balance. TRUST is not enough when their is no OVERSIGHT for the budget- no director of finance.

    When the top administrators, CORDA and his (oops, those lathes are not for the taking- I had no idea!) COO OPTHAL are the creators and evaluators of the budget, TOO MUCH power is vested in them.

    It is a RECIPE for abuse.

    When the top administrator, CORDA, claims he will cut popular student programs (sports, AT, spec ed) and NO ADMINISTRATORS in an attempt to frighten parents and throw his weight around, that is ABUSE.

    When there are OPEN positions that could be cut by attrition (NO FIRINGS), but that is not even considered (where these promised to someone??), then no one is doing the analysis the public is demanding.

    The PUBLIC expects TRANSPARENCY- they are getting a cloaked budget. Even the few copies that are apparently out to the BET, etc. are by school and extremely hard to review- that is CLOAKING.

    The PUBLIC expects RESULTS - they are getting excuses about “ESL students lowering the average” - if that were the case then the students with higher minority % would have lower scores.

    STOP the MADNESS- Make Corda and BOE THINK!

  • 7 just1guysopinion // Apr 17, 2007 at 10:25 am

    To budget:

    As M. Lyons pointed out to me on this blog you can get copy of budget from Public Affairs Officer Sheri McCready at 854-4015. You are entitled to it under FOI.

  • 8 Public Affairs Officer is not in office this week // Apr 17, 2007 at 10:28 am

    School vacation week.

  • 9 anonymous // Apr 17, 2007 at 10:51 am

    Sadly, this IS exactly the issue: teachers are over evaluated, again, by evaluation-free layers of administrators. Furthermore, there is a general distrust for teachers by administrators with an overarching lack of support. Of course, additional monies are needed to perpetuate these errant layers of evaluation. Administration appears to disregard the premise that teachers are certified and quite capable of helping to run a system, or certainly, their own building. If we are looking at low test scores as the assessment piece for our schools, then obviously something continues to be awry. We are spending far too much time evaluating and overassessing, writing and rewriting documentation. Teachers have an overload of documentation with no secretarial assistance. ULtimately, teachers are brought together in think-tanks facilitated by these administrators who accept credit for ideas generated by teachers. At the risk of rambling, my point is this: administrators who are excited about the teaching and learning process, as well as regenerating motivation in students and teachers alike are worth their while. All others need not apply. What we truly need in our town is effective leadership, not defective layers of overseers who either could not cut it in the classroom themselves, or sadly, simply want fatter salaries then to work with kids directly.

  • 10 Dump Kevin Poruban (AGAIN) // Apr 17, 2007 at 11:05 am

    Kevin: Your comments in the above- posting is shameful.

  • 11 anonymous // Apr 17, 2007 at 11:16 am

    Mr. Poruban, what ARE you thinking? Most of all, how can you be USED by Mr. Miklave like this? My God, be a man!!

  • 12 enough already // Apr 17, 2007 at 12:02 pm

    So Kimmel says that there was low turnout at the council mtg but that the BOE budget had overwhelming support? How about parents being tired of the yearly fright the budget tactics?

  • 13 anonymous // Apr 17, 2007 at 12:52 pm

    Does anyone know if vice-principals are state mandated? If not, again this becomes an issue that deserves to be looked at. In smaller schools, couldn’t vice-principals be shared? Look at how we share specialists in reading, music, art, etc.

  • 14 ENrwlker // Apr 17, 2007 at 1:35 pm

    anonymous — Vice Principals are not state-mandated.

    enough already — This year its sports programs designated to ’suffer devastating cuts’. In 2003 it was kindergarten. A couple of years before that it was music programs and the high school bands. They have to rotate the ‘devastating cuts’ scares among different target audiences of parents so no group gets the scare tactic successive times (or that group will remember the last event and know it’s being used).

    Its an effective strategy (notice how they threw in elementary AT teachers this year to get elementary school parents riled, who might not have been concerned about high school sports?). And the PTO dutifully comes out on cue to parrot the superintendant’s line word for word.

    I get the sense, however, that this year the population at large just isn’t buying it. Take away the school board members, Democratic politicians, and PTOs from the turnout tonight, and look how many average citizens will be there to demand higher taxes for the school budget. Precious few will be, I’ll wager.

  • 15 Anonymous // Apr 17, 2007 at 1:51 pm

    Right on ENorwalker! Parents and teachers are tired of this. The democrats in this town are completely out of touch with what a working family pays already in taxes and utilities. I don’t have $100 more and if I did I’d spend it on my kids.

  • 16 anon // Apr 17, 2007 at 1:54 pm

    Fred Bondi is recuperating from surgery yet his fellow dems call him toilet paper. Class people.

  • 17 Anon // Apr 17, 2007 at 2:30 pm

    #13: The state doesn’t have any requirements regarding vice-principals. That is purely a local decision. In fact, for many years Norwalk’s elementary schools had no assistant principals at all. Then there were 6, each of whom was shared by 2 elementary schools. It is only within the past couple of years that each elementary school, regardless of size, has a vice-principal.

  • 18 Equality in Schools- a return to SINGLE location education // Apr 17, 2007 at 2:43 pm

    Not totally original but out of the box thinking for Norwalk’s BOE team that spreads bureaucracy around like Jam on toast.

    How about a throwback to our past?

    Put all the schools on ONE CAMPUS. All the kids go to one school- from Preschool to High School. All extra curricular is on campus.

    No more need to have schools to desegregate.

    One bus system picks up all the kids at one time. Parents don’t have to travel all over to drop/pick kids up after school. Less traffic overall around neighborhoods.

    Administration is shared. Fewer FIEFDOMS. Older kids help tutor younger kids.

    Put a senior center on the campus and have the seniors help out- would benefit seniors and the kids/teachers.

    Magnificant sports, extra curricular is all shared.
    The kids have lots of friends, the clique can’t exclude kids because there would be LOTS of cliques.

    Security is heightened.

    Totally fair, students get what they need.

    Sell off the current school facilities to businesses.

    Think of the cost savings from the combined system- think of the fairness- no need for “special schools” for a few….instead ONE FANTASTIC SCHOOL for ALL.

    Frankly, I am surprised it is legal to have special schools run with tax dollars- it is not fair to pay more for some kids than others…even with lottery systems, etc.

    Instead create the best environment and have everyone attend.

    AND put the CENTRAL admin on campus also. No ivory towers…. Let the superintendent really get to know her teachers and her team.

  • 19 anonymous // Apr 17, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    Ha ha… great idea, number 18, but I don’t know if it’s doable considering the size of our school population. Got some space?

    Vice-principals, once again, are a luxury for those principals with small student numbers. This layer only helps encourage less effort on behalf of principals already on fat salaries. Again, effective leadership earns its money. I cannot support giving away more money to the status quo that is unaccountable and less efficient then it ever should be. Show me more and perhaps I can support it.

  • 20 anonymous // Apr 17, 2007 at 3:02 pm

    What chumps, eh? Fred, we wish you well after your surgery. Hang in there, bud.

  • 21 annie c // Apr 17, 2007 at 3:23 pm

    Just say no, council members.

  • 22 Anonymous // Apr 17, 2007 at 3:43 pm

    Thank you #9. We are over assessed. We are trying to teach and we have to put on a dog and pony show when evaluation is happening. I remember a time in which we did our job and we told administrators what we needed to improve upon. Many of the old school people would agree the process has become invaild by the fact that we do not have a way to assess the assessor. Some administrators do not believe in giving out a distinguished title to their staff. (even thought they depend on those same teachers to make the daily running of the school go smoothly) It is a joke. Vice principals in the elementary schools are worthless. Housemasters at the high school level when they work to the best of what the job requires they are helpful to all- the faculty, Staff and student population. I would like to remind Mr. Fuller that a classroom of high school students (28) is packed. I welcome you all into the high schools to take a class as a sub for a day. Former mayor Mr. Irwin was a frequent sub at BMHS, ask him if 28 in a class is doable. I know that is the contract, however, we are mainstreaming many different types of students that need more attention. Try having 4 emotional problems, 2 handicapped children and 6 students on a team plus the rest that are anywhere from average to gifted that we have to plan for…some of us do that every day with a smile and great love for our students. So make it worse by making every class loaded to 28. It is crazy.

  • 23 Jen // Apr 17, 2007 at 3:50 pm

    Thank you, Norwalk Democrats for supporting H.B.7395.- you guys rock!

  • 24 Anonymous // Apr 17, 2007 at 3:56 pm

    35 is a large average class size, and that is what the baby boom generation experienced.

  • 25 Anonymous // Apr 17, 2007 at 4:26 pm

    Alex Knopp misses first DTC meeting, hold the press op. Maybe he’s looking for the DCF report in his 40 boxes.

  • 26 Anonymous // Apr 17, 2007 at 4:39 pm

    Anon-25 Alex FLIP -FLOP Knopp would not show up -because the DTC was voting on something meaningful. Alex Knopp is a real joke- and everyone know it.

    You know Alex- you lost because you are not a progressive.

  • 27 anonymous // Apr 17, 2007 at 4:56 pm

    Bravo, number 22! Well said, well said. But, let’s not give them more money to waste. That’s at the core of the issue.

  • 28 anonymous // Apr 17, 2007 at 4:59 pm

    Don’t you think that if they had a choice to either reduce classroom size or get rid of vice-principals, they would choose to keep the administrators? Oh wait. That’s already been stated. That the very thing people don’t see. Impact on the kids and lessen the work load of catalog shoppers.

  • 29 Who is managing the managers? // Apr 17, 2007 at 5:11 pm

    The BOE is charged with the watchdog function. Those members have to be extremely vigilant, particularly with a feisty, charismatic, out of towner who uses threats to get his way.

    They, and ONLY they can stop his losesome ways. They can insist on accountability, on meaningful measurement.

    WHEN the BOE abdicates their responsibility, it is left to the PUBLIC to decide what the next action is.

    How does is the BOE created? Oh, they are ELECTED!

    So, I suppose the PUBLIC does have SOME control.

    But only if they exercise it.

    Putting pressure on the BOE to PUBLISH the budget, explain the budget and control the spending is the PUBLIC’s role.

    Understand that the PTO leaders are under the same spell and spew the rhetoric provided to them by Corda- the keeper of the
    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    + $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    and he can’t get enough $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ to get he job done. There isn’t enough $$$$ when the leadership is faulty.

  • 30 anonymous // Apr 17, 2007 at 5:18 pm

    So who’s going tonight to help the cause? There’s a feeling in the air that certain council members will stage another show, which, by the way, boggles the mind. Who are they trying to impress? Who is more important to them then the taxpayers? Who? Who is it who matters more? The sharp tongued PTO harpies? The sleepers on the BoE? Dr. Corda?

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All