YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk-Outers Need A History Lesson


by turfgrrl


April 12th, 2007 · 9 Comments

Today’s Hour leads with a story on how the Norwalk-outers now want to form their own caucus. The Norwalk-outers is a term I coined on 11/16/3006 when the five walked out of the Democratic caucus meeting over a disagreement over electing the leadership for the council. Let’s take a look at the wayback machine:

Once again, the local newspapers, The Hour and The Norwalk Advocate, served up news generated by the discord of the Norwalk Democratic Party.The Hour, which keeps its content behind a subscription wall, reports:

Frustration over leadership reappointments led to the walkout of half the Common Council’s Democrats before Tuesday night’s meeting, Councilwoman Gwenn Briggs confirmed Wednesday.

Briggs was one of five to skip the meeting after she said Democrats deadlocked 5-5 on whether to reappoint Michael W. Coffey council president and Carvin J. Hilliard majority leader, she said. Both are Democrats.

“I nominated (Democratic Councilwoman) Phyllis Bolden for the position of majority leader,” she said, calling the nomination “a compromise.” After a recess in the caucus, Briggs said Bolden withdrew her name. Bolden later attended the council meeting and voted for Coffey and Hilliard.

Leadership on the council should be rotated to give more members experience, said Briggs and Galen Wells, chairwoman of the Democratic Town Committee. Wells said friction in the council is the result of Coffey and his allies. (source: The Hour)

Meanwhile the Norwalk Advocate reported:

Democratic Town Committee Chairwoman Galen Wells said some council members have complained about Coffey and Hilliard’s leadership and failure to consult with other Democrats.

“It’s suddenly fashionable to cloak anything you do that’s uncooperative with your peers as ‘bipartisanship,’ ” Wells said.

Some Democrats in recent months also have expressed concerns that Coffey is too cozy with Republican Mayor Richard Moccia, who defeated Democrat Alex Knopp last year by 176 votes.

But with the Republicans winning only five council seats, observers expected a Democrat majority to set the agenda and run the city. Instead, Democrats have been divided for several months. (source: Norwalk Advocate)

The Advocate and Hour report that Coffey called the five Norwalk-outers, and they all pledged to work together and move forward. Which is exactly what they pledged to do each time they made the news with internal bickering over largely partisan parliamentary maneuvers.

The Hour, Leadership beef root of Dem council flap by Robert Koch & Patrick Linsey 11/16/06
Norwalk Adovcate, Coffey vows to settle fellow Dems’ divide, by Brian Lockhart 11/16/06
Norwalk Adovcater, Lawmaker to shoppers: Check your receipts by By Matt Breslow 11/16/06 posted by turfgrrl at 11/16/2006 08:06:00 AM

Since that original walk out, just about every mention in the newspapers reveals that they as a group or individually have not attended committee meetings or caucuses and then complain about not being “heard.” I could cite every article, but that list is long and I think my point is made here.

I’m not sure what they hope to gain by continuing along this path of squandering the Democratic majority they hold on the council over issues that have nothing to do with the majority of work they are supposed to do on the council. They have spent nearly 6 months of squabbling instead of pulling together as a party, and with an election looming in the fall, you would think that they might want to appear, oh statesmanlike, and pander a bit more to the voting public.

Norwalk’s majority party is the U. There are more Us registered to vote (U meaning unaffiliated) than either Republicans or Democrats. Norwalk also has a history of independent parties. In the most recent election last year, Norwalk had the lowest voter turnout of the cities most demographically like us, (Stamford, Danbury) not to mention our bordering towns (Darien, Westport, Wilton & New Canaan).

These are all important things to keep in mind when trying to figure out who actually elected you into office. And if there was one big lesson to be learned in the 2005 municipal election, it was the unprecedented result that gave the council a Democratic majority and a Republican mayor. Norwalk is not a town that is trending towards being more liberal or conservative but rather Norwalk is desperately searching for leadership from any politician to fix the systemic problems that are harming a great many of our residents.

In the words of Fiorello LaGuardia: “there is no Democratic or Republican way to pick up garbage.” And we can add fix pot holes, pave roads, plow the streets, fix the flooding, parking, traffic and along the way not spend too much, raise the taxes too much or conversely spend to little or not raise revenues to cover operations.

In reality there really isn’t any disagreement in our 15 council people about what Norwalk needs. They are all in agreement that infrastructure spending and educational spending are critical to the health of the city. It’s just that a few people haven’t yet figured out that there really is no Democratic or Republican way to go about doing that.

source: The Hour, ‘Fed up’ council Dems contemplate alternative caucus, By PATRICK R. LINSEY, April 12, 2007

Tags: Current affairs · Norwalk

9 Responses so far “Norwalk-Outers Need A History Lesson”



  • 1 anonymous // Apr 12, 2007 at 7:51 am

    Well said. I am one of those voters who looks first for whether a candidate will be good for Norwalk. I’ll also add that I didn’t vote for Moccia the last election, but I did vote for two of the “outers”, and many of the others. I also I’m engaged in my community (I don’t want to be identified), and I want to see the people elected do their best to improve Norwalk without bankrupting me or the city.

    The education budget has grown out of control. I applaud those that saw that, and attempted to do something about it. I wish all the council people would hold the board of education accountable for the spending waste. That is what we the voters were asking for.

  • 2 anonymous // Apr 12, 2007 at 8:36 am

    I totally agree with TG and #1. All these council people are perfectly capable of working together on the issues facing our city. The bickering is embarrassing and counterproductive. Hopefully, come election time, people will remember that Romano, Coffey, Hempstead, Bondi along with several others on the council grappled with real issues. What real issues have Maclave or Briggs grappled with?

  • 3 Katie // Apr 12, 2007 at 10:41 am

    Turgirl, I couldn’t have said it better myself and thank you for bringing this up. There are way too many egos involved. Norwalk is a small ‘city’ in the big picture and really our elected officials need to come together as a representative group and do what makes sense to move Norwalk ahead instead of spending so much time making useless points. It reminds of high school cliques.

    There are so many great things about Norwalk so everyone really needs to accentuate the positive, not the negative. We all really could get more done this way.

  • 4 Jen // Apr 12, 2007 at 11:03 am

    Amen- This is behavior is really not helpful.

  • 5 Concerned Citizen // Apr 12, 2007 at 11:19 am

    I find refreshing to know that the majority of our council wants to work together WITHOUT the letter that usually follows a name (D or R). It renews my confidence in our city’s government when our elected officials can make party loyalty secondary to that of the public good. Krummel, Puroban, Miklave, Sutton & Briggs have not contributted a single inniative since this council convened. For this group, it seems Party Partisanship out-weighs achieving positive goals for the people of Norwalk. I heard thoughout the years that your party affiliation is more defined on a federal level (President, US Senators & Congressmen, etc.) but when it comes to local government politics, party affiliation doesn’t mean that much at all. Well, we can CERTAINLY see it here in Norwalk, can’t we? I have nothing but HIGH PRAISE for those council representatives that have choosen to take the high road for doing the Hard NON-PARTISAN work for the greater good of the people of Norwalk and not making a circus and sham of our local government with partisan bickering. Don’t we see enough of this on the federal level in both houses of Congress? Thank you Mike Coffey, Doug Hempsted, Kelly Straniti, Fred Bondi, Herb Grant, Joanne Romano, Phylis Bolden, Rick McQuaid, Nick Kydes & Carvin Hilliard for your values for the common good of Norwalk & her citizens. I for one, will certainly not forget you in November.

  • 6 just1guysopinion // Apr 12, 2007 at 12:49 pm

    I find this whole situation unfortunate. I echo the sentiments of others above and turfgrrl. However, I do know some of the “Norwalk-outers” and I find them to be reasonable and intelligent people. I know Mr. Coffey and he is a reasonable and intelligent person as well. I think these two factions of the Dems should get together and try and iron out their differences. Perhaps it has gone beyond repair, I don’t know. But I think this hurts the Dems significantly and the City as a whole. Mr. Miklave and Mr. Coffey can you at least sit down and talk to try and work together?

  • 7 indythinker // Apr 12, 2007 at 4:57 pm

    Its nice to see that people appreciate what the council is doing, however, we need to look at what some feel is badmouthing a few of them. What was that article all about in todays paper anyway? We didn’t elect these people for their partisan values, we elected them to serve Norwalk. walking out of meetings and granstanding just doesn’t help. Come on guys and gals, can’t you just get along? This council is one of the best ones this town has seen a very long time and its criminal to see some of the antics that happen. When was the last time a council had the backbone this one has? We’ve always seen a few here and there over the years who would put politics aside and do their job but now when we actually think we voted the right way we need to think again. Why would these people trample on all the good they have done with such childish behavior? Hello council men and women, get over it. We finally have a reasonable budget that we taxpayers can live with and it took alot of work and compromise to get here. Stop the bickering or we can stop it for you.

  • 8 itsridiculous // Apr 12, 2007 at 9:25 pm

    If so much were not at stake, and the situation not juvenile and ridiculous, I’d say that watching this council in action has become entertainment, rather than enlightenment. Skip the pizza… bring on the popcorn and Raisinettes. I can hardly wait for the October sweeps and cliffhanger in November……..Not even NBC could come up with a sitcom like this one for the fall lineup.

  • 9 itsridiculous // Apr 12, 2007 at 11:19 pm

    Phone ringing off the hook….this just in… Hempstead & Corda at the battle of the budget cap increase at tonight’s Finance Committee meeting. After finding that a resolution is not an action item at this week’s council meeting, the resolution to increase the cap & give Corda his money went in as a motion at the committee level, and after heated debate, the word on the street is that an action item to raise the cap by over $2 million dollars will be voted on in a special meeting of the common council! My guess is the special meeting will be held Monday evening, so as to meet the deadline of voting on a final budget no later than April 17. Anybody who knows how this works feel free to jump in and help me out here. NOTE TO SELF: Do not skip any committee or council meetings ever again. I would loved to have seen this one, vis a vis my comment #8 above. Extra butter, anyone?