YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: 93 East Ave. In Historic District


by turfgrrl


April 11th, 2007 · 5 Comments

According to the National Register of Historic Places from the US Department of Interior, the house at 93 East ave is a contributing structure to the nationally recognized Norwalk Green Historic District. And there’s a map showing the boundaries of that district and with the identification of the buildings that are included.

Historic Distric Listing

That would be lot 13 according to the map

small map

Buildings in this historic district can get a 20% federal tax credit. The guidelines for what can be done with federally designated historic buildings, according to the Dept. of Interior website, are administered locally, and can be viewed here..

It seems that rehabilitation, including the commercial use as a hotel, is allowed under the guidelines.

What is Rehabilitation?

“Rehabilitation” is defined in the regulations governing Historic Preservation Certifications (36 CFR Part 67) as:

The process of returning a building or buildings to a state of utility, through repair or alteration, which makes possible an efficient use while preserving those portions and features of the building and its site and environment which are significant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values.

center>

This vacant gas station (above) was rehabilitated for use as a coffee shop (below). Photos: Bob Olin, Sherman Perk

Rehabilitation not only encourages the repair of historic buildings, it allows appropriate alterations to ensure their efficient contemporary use. Examples include the continued use of hotels, stores, and private residences, as well as the adaptation of vacant schools into apartments, warehouses into offices, and industrial buildings into commercial space.

The steps for obtaining a federal designation don’t seem that complicated, and are outlined here. From the statute:

(c) The agency shall, in consultation
with the State Historic Preservation
Officer, apply the National Register
Criteria for Evaluation contained in 36
CFR 60.6 to all potentially eligible
properties that may be affected by the
proposed action. If a property appears
to meet the Criteria and the State His-
toric Preservation Officer agrees, the
agency should follow the procedures in
§63.3. If there is a question whether the
Criteria are met, the agency shall com-
plete the procedures in §63.3(d). A ques-
tion on whether a property meets the
Criteria exists when the agency and
the State Historic Preservation Officer
disagree or when the agency deter-
mines that a question exists. The De-
partment of the Interior will provide
general and specific advice concerning
the identification of historic properties
and will bring to the attention of a
Federal agency any information re-
ceived from the public regarding poten-
tial historic properties in the area af-
fected by its plans or projects.

I’m sure that the debate will continue in the comments. If there are other documents or links that would aide everyone to follow the discussion, please let me know.

Tags: Local · Norwalk · current affairs

5 Responses so far “Norwalk: 93 East Ave. In Historic District”



  • 1 indiga // Apr 11, 2007 at 11:31 am

    Excellent. I truly believe that presrvation is about aligning growth, economic development, and the retention of Norwalk’s neighborhoods in a way that makes sense for owners, developers and the community.

  • 2 Anonymous // Apr 11, 2007 at 12:05 pm

    Strange how the apologists for the Norwalk Inn are silent today. Kudos to Turffy for presenting both sides.

  • 3 ENrwlker // Apr 11, 2007 at 3:25 pm

    OK, so we’re all agreed that (i) a National Register Historic District was declared for the area shown on the map and (ii) the attempt at creating a State / Local Historic District for approximately the same area was overturned by the CT Supreme Court. We therefore have no local mechanism regarding changes to structures within the Historic District. The Guidelines listed above appear to relate to tax credits, not local regulations. So I’m trying to connect this to the discussions about 93 East Avenue and the Historical Commission. It seems that the only local regulatory provision regarding historic structures is the 90-day demolition delay. This was invoked by the Historical Commission but has now run out. So there doesn’t seem to be anything more that the Historical Commission could do now regarding 93 East Avenue.

    So the matter of the Norwalk Inn’s plans is now before the courts only, correct? Correct me if I’m wrong here on this sequence:

    1. Inn gets ZBA variances to allow expansion that would include demolition of 93 East Avenue.

    2. Inn gets Zoning Commission permit based on variances granted in (1).

    3. Next-door neighbor sues Inn and ZBA over access rights. No other parties file suit over ZBA approval?

    Now I get hazy. I seem to recall reading that the Inn and the next-door neighbor reached a settlement that would let the ZBA approval stand, but other parties then intervened in the case under CEPA? Or is there a separate suit apart from the ZBA appeal? I know the Attorney General is involved, too, but I’m not clear how.

  • 4 indiga // Apr 11, 2007 at 4:38 pm

    Enorwalker…I appreciate your interest in getting all the infomration but the full story is more of an epic than can be covered in a blog post. If you really are interested (and aren’t afraid of blowing your anonymity) you can talk to any of the board members of the Norwalk Preservation Trust. It’s a fascinating story with multiple players, high drama, depths of pathos, moments of comedy — but much too much to fully cover here.

  • 5 savit // Apr 12, 2007 at 11:22 pm

    Thanks for the fair and balanced…BTW, I’mn jealous. You’ve got better information than I do. Where did you find all that?