YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: More irresponsibility From the BOE


by turfgrrl


April 9th, 2007 · 8 Comments

Today’s advocate promotes the Norwalk Board of Ed’s blog. Which has few posts that of course lack any details. They should be applauded for embracing the blog medium, but in doing so they should be posting the budget and examining that, rather than relying on the platitudes of Dr. Corda. Remember, we identified plenty of lines items to cut that are not student programs. They keep circling back to the scare tactics. Why is that? Is it really so hard to agree to cut postage usage? Or have the admin staff pay for their own memberships? Is it really so difficult?

Here’s their latest round:

Saturday APril 7, 2007

Mis Information
As another city budget year winds down, it seems there is much
mis-information circulating here in Norwalk. I write this letter to
clarify facts as they pertain to the Board of Education budget request.

Last year, the Board of Education budget was approved with an increase
of just over 2%, the lowest increase in the state. Everyone was
thrilled. But, this carried with it a problem for this year, one that
was made clear by the Superintendent to the Board of Education, Board
of Estimate and Taxation and the Common Council. The warning: next
year’s budget would be artificially high due to the use of one-time
funds to keep last year’s budget artificially low. Now it’s next
year.

Fact 1. It will cost over 5.5% to maintain programs that currently
exist. That is the same budget, the same programs that were approved by all City boards last year.

Fact 2. The Board of Education budget, as it now stands, is a 6.2%
increase. This includes some modest improvements, mainly designed to
keep students out of study halls and put them into classes in Brien
McMahon and Norwalk High Schools. Interested students have already
signed up, literally hundreds of them, for the added classes. The
classes may have to be cancelled.

Fact 3. The budget as it now stands, with a smaller increase, will
mean over 3 million dollars of reductions. Reductions suggested by the
Superintendent the include requested improvements, athletics,
academically talented positions, literacy specialist positions, and
many, many more.

Fact 4. The initial budget request for the Board of Education was a
7.7% increase. This was based on information available in the fall.
Current updated information and refined estimates have reduced the
increase to 6.2%. The City has been kept informed of this information
as it became available.

This is my 16th year on the Board of Education. Each budget year
presents challenges, but this year is different. The increase seems
high, but keep in mind last year’s was artificially low. What is
important is the product we provide for our students, and how we choose to invest in them.

Over the last 6 years our school system has made great progress.
Curriculum has been rewritten for every subject area. Millions of
dollars has been invested in new and renovated facilities and
textbooks. New teacher and administrator evaluation plans now hold
people accountable. And a district improvement plan that is being used
as a model for the state has been approved.

But the approved budget, as it stands, can’t even support what we
now have in place and results in a step backward. It just doesn’t make
sense. Especially in light of the cost, an added $2 a week, maybe even
less.

The Common Council can allow more funding to the Board of Education at their April 10 meeting. Let your Council representative know your
thoughts, at the meeting, or before. Do it for our students, all 11,000
of them.

Thomas J. Vetter

Posted by Norwalk Board of Education at 10:25 AM

Please Become Involved
It’s fair to say that the Board of Education’s budget process has been more difficult this year than in recent memory, and that the stakes are high, as they always are. Those involved on both sides of the debate cite statistics to justify their positions and the financial techniques available to provide remedy. This discussion is necessary and expected. It’s much more difficult to quantify the effect of the debate on those directly impacted by it, no matter what the eventual outcome. Students are aware that the adults wield the financial power. They are aware that the results of the debate will indicate what priority their education has in the minds of these adults, as are others who are less directly, but no less significantly affected by the results - homeowners, business owners, realtors, and politicians, to name a few.

There can be no reasonable debate regarding the magnitude of the cuts that will be necessitated by the budget that seems likely to be approved. There can be and is plenty of debate regarding where these cuts should be made. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and I won’t use this forum to try to influence that debate. But I will cite one statistic. The budget Dr. Corda requested will cost the average Norwalk homeowner approximately $100 more per year than the one that the Common Council and Board of Estimate seem likely to approve.

The email address and telephone number for every Common Council member can be found at the following link: http://norwalkct.org/comcouncil.htm. If you think it’s worth an additional $100 to support the budget Dr. Corda has requested, please contact your Common Council representative and ask him or her to raise the cap that has been set on next year’s spending. If you think that an additional $100 is too much, I encourage you to contact your representative to let your feelings be known. Either way, I encourage you to participate. The message we are about to send regarding how Norwalk’s residents feel about education will be loud, and it will be clear. Let’s make sure it truly represents our values.

Rob Polley

Posted by Norwalk Board of Education at 8:53 AM

Tags: Education · Local · Norwalk

8 Responses so far “Norwalk: More irresponsibility From the BOE”



  • 1 anonymous // Apr 9, 2007 at 9:54 am

    Thanks for posting this. I do think that the cap should be raised, but I also question why the budget is so top heavy. I don’t want sports cut. That’s why I want the cap raised.

  • 2 Why frighten the parents // Apr 9, 2007 at 10:00 am

    Do you honestly think Sal Corda will actually raise the wrath of the parents by cutting the sports and Academically talented budgets?

    That is his tactic to scare support into parents.

    But would he really do this? Doubtful- those parents are his pawns and he need their support so he can continue to have his SOLE CONTROL over the $140MM + budget.

  • 3 Speak Up, write and be heard // Apr 9, 2007 at 10:14 am

    The Board of Ed blog is encouraging parents to write the council members.

    The regular public also needs to write the entire counsel and SHOW UP a the hearing.

    They need to hear both sides - not just from parents who have been frightened by Sal Corda

    Here is the email list of the council members to make it easy for you to write them all.

    Common Council Members:
    carvin06854@yahoo.com
    dhempstead@hotmail.com
    dsutton@optonline.com
    glbriggs@optonline.net
    hgrant813@sbcglobal.net
    jtromano1@yahoo.com’
    kevin.poruban@sbcglobal.net
    krummel_william_m@sbcglobal.net
    kstraniti@optonline.net
    mmiklave@aol.com
    mwjava@aol.com
    nicholaskydes@yahoo.com
    ricksly56@yahoo.com

    You might want to also include

    the Mayor:
    rmoccia@norwalkct.org

    and the Board of Education members:

    Board of Education members:
    greg.burnett@sbcglobal.net
    jpullan@optonline.net
    mrivas1219@yahoo.com
    rfuller6@optonline.net
    robert.polley@snet.net
    susanhamilton203@sbcglobal.net
    vettert@snet.net
    brucekim@optonline.net
    rosan3@aol.com

  • 4 anonymous // Apr 9, 2007 at 11:14 am

    They say they have a blog, but they don’t let you post questions and comments there. So I’ll ask here: Can a BOE person please explain why they keep spending money to buy new textbooks without consulting the teachers? Please answer this, don’t defend the budget. Just answer the question.

  • 5 Curriculum question // Apr 9, 2007 at 11:57 am

    Do the two high schools have different curriculum?

    Why do the Housemasters get involved with the curriculum if it is handled by a team in the central office?

    Input could be from the teachers who teach, better than from the HouseMasters — assuming the teachers are competent –and if they are not, then why are they teaching?

  • 6 anonymous // Apr 9, 2007 at 4:13 pm

    Curriculum question- Housemasters assess teachers to make sure that they are teaching to the curriculum. Years ago there were supervisors that would do this and they would travel to each school and assess teachers in their content area. Dr. Jassie, Mr Mola, and others were cut when they hired the 8 elementary principals. In other towns they still have supervisors and only one elementary school principal. Some towns have senior teachers do the assessments and they do not hire supervisors or assisstant superintendants. And as far as our teachers being competent- we are and would like to try something like the above mentioned before cutting any of us who deal directly with the student population. Also No the two high schools and Briggs have the same curriculum to follow.

  • 7 ENrwlker // Apr 9, 2007 at 5:57 pm

    The line about ‘wouldn’t you spend just $100 more on education?’ makes the latest BoE spending extravaganza seem so reaonable. Until you realize that we already spend more per student than every other city in the 9-member DRG group we’re placed in by the State. And pay higher teacher and administrator salaries than any of those other cities. But yet have mediocre test score results for our kids in comparison to that group, many of whose cities outperform ours despite having higher poverty levels than Norwalk and spending far less on education. The problem with the ‘just $100′ argument is that it turns into ‘just $100 more’ (or, more usually, $200 more) EVERY YEAR, so end up right where we are — spending THOUSANDS more than other cities but getting nothing better for spending all the money. We need a new Board of Education, with members who can think of better ways to spend the money they have, rather than ONLY being able to tell us to give them more.

  • 8 I'll keep my $100 or $200 or $1000 // Apr 9, 2007 at 6:36 pm

    If Sal can so fast and furiously fill up offices with staff and spend money on his decor- then let him unfill the offices.

    He is playing fast and easy with our money and trying to make us feel bad that we don’t want to give him more.

    Sure, he can try to just get a penny from everyone in the US, then maybe he would be happy.

    It would be one thing if parents wanted their kids in the schools, but if that were the case we would not have 80% minorities and have to have “magnet schools” to try to convince some parents to stay in the system.

    Nawwww…he is not pulling the wool over our eyes. He had his chance and lots of money to try to fix things. Norwalk High is a disaster- see the pipes? The central office staff is talking about how bad it all is- the teachers are miserable and the parents are freaked about sports.

    This is a mess and getting rid of Sal Corda might be the solution.