YourCT.com header image 2

War and Peace and War and Peace


by turfgrrl


April 5th, 2007 · 48 Comments

Though not quite as illustrative as Tolstoy might have penned, last night offered up the usual dramas that make some days very easy to post about. At City Hall we had a trio of meetings that continued the ongoing saga over whether the BOE will ever create an understanding of the 07-08 budget amongst its own members. The BET, unanimously adopted their recommended budget which came under the cap set by the Common Council. Which means that the remaining Norwalk-outers (although unidentified in The Hour) who said they were poised to ask the council to raise the cap, have demonstrated a complete failure to grasp the budgeting process. The BET set the budget allocations, not the Council, and so raising the cap doesn’t really do anything, particularly since the BET came in with a budget under the cap, unanimously.

Over in another room Council member Bill Krummel recognized that fixing the flooding is the top priority. On hand were Council members Nick Kydes, and Carvin Hilliard who each expressed support for the flooding victims. The only issue still being hotly debated here was over the pace of fixing the problems. Diane Cece rejected DPW director Hal Alvord’s contention that the $15 million requested couldn’t be spent in one year to alleviate the flooding faster. Strangely while Moccia contends that federal and state funds are not available for fixing the flooding issues, the town of Fairfield’s State Reps have House Bill 5454: a $17 million state bond issuance for the DEP to fund the Rooster River Flood Control project which includes a new drainage system for Southport. Maybe its easier to tie the Fairfield flooding issues to the river and thus make it a state issue, but it sure looks like Fairfield is on the ball about about getting state funds for drainage system improvements.

The third meeting concerned the Ethics Committee review of the mess that Anne Carbone wrought. As usual, the details reveal serious judgement issues, with Carbone at first denying that the she had lodged a zoning violation complaint and then later admitting to it.

The other event of yesterday evening was the Democracy For America (DFA) meeting held at the Silver Star Diner. The DFA is one of the growing grass roots organizations that sprang from Howard Dean’s presidential run. The group hosted two students from Wilton High School to discuss the details of what happened to their play “Voice in Conflict” that was unceremoniously banned from production by Wilton High School Principal Tom Canty. According to the students, while military recruiters roam the cafeteria in hopes of recruiting students to join a branch of service, the Principal prefered that the students not talk about the Iraq war. It seems that Canty hasn’t quite understood the idea of freedom of speech, and censorship. But the blame lies with the 1988 Hazelwood v. KuhlmeierSupreme Court decision that said school officials have some grounds for providing editorial control over student speech as long as it related to pedagogical concerns. Some states have sought to explicitly protect student free speech by passing “anti-Hazelwood” laws. The play will be produced, but not at Wilton High School. The Culture Project has agreed to product an off broadway show on June 3rd and 10th. Michael Geake offered a venue in SoNo on memorial day to the students.

The other speaker, was Democratic State Party Chair, Nancy DiNardo, who weathered the complaints from DFA members that the Democratic party didn’t do enough for Ned Lamont. Despite the remaining hard core Lamonistas, there were enough people who recognized that it was time to move on, and focus on the activities that will unite Democrats towards legislative achievements and election wins. With the presidential primaries looming on the horizon that will be a tall task.

The chief complaint for the DFA members seemed to be access to the Democratic town committees and to the state central committee. DiNardo explained the process, and held a back and forth conversation with audience members about specific towns who are alleged to be “less than openly democratic.” Norwalk Democratic Town Chair Galen Wells decided to open up the Norwalk State Central Committee positions on the spot by announcing that they were open, and that anyone could call her to seek the position. This will probably be news to current State Central position holders Gwen Briggs and Ken Slapin.

I suspect that Ken Slapin will not be happy about Galen’s recent conversion to an open selection process. I was surprised to see Alex Knopp make a brief appearance at the event. Since one of the subjects was about who was going to challenge Congresscritter Chris Shays, I was curious to see if Knopp was going to chase after that spot. Instead DiNardo indicated that Greenwich DTC chair Jim Hymes and Stamford State Rep Jim Shapiro were the only ones still expressing interest.

source: The Hour, Moccia: No ‘rainy day’ draw for ed budget, By ANNA GUSTAFSON, April, 5, 2007
source: The Hour, Residents:Boost city funds to halt flooding, By ROBERT KOCH, April, 5, 2007
source: The Hour, Zoning official subject of Ethics Committee probe, By PATRICK R. LINSEY, April, 5, 2007

Tags: In the News · Local · Norwalk

48 Responses so far “War and Peace and War and Peace”



  • 1 anon // Apr 5, 2007 at 1:30 pm

    Democrats seem to have a general problem understanding budgets. Where do you think “tax and spend liberal” originated?

  • 2 anonymoose // Apr 5, 2007 at 1:41 pm

    Wells seems to forget that she doesn’t choose DSCC members. They would be elected by the State convention delegates representing the 25th State Senatorial District. Or is she announcing the retirement of Briggs and Slapin? That would be good since they have no influence at DSCC anyway. Has she spoken to Darien or will she just fumble along as usual?

  • 3 norwalkdem // Apr 5, 2007 at 2:49 pm

    Ken Slapin is a respected leader of our party. Ms. Wells is not.

  • 4 Jen // Apr 5, 2007 at 4:00 pm

    I was shocked when I heard Chairwoman Wells say the “DSCC slots were open”. Maybe, she wants to “open” them to true progressives- which is not a bad thing. However, if she is going after Slapin and Briggs for political gain- then she should step down.

    Who will be the next Norwalk DTC Chair?

  • 5 anonymous // Apr 5, 2007 at 4:11 pm

    Alex is hankering to micromange the Norwalk dems and sending out the clueless to do his bidding. Your next DTC chair is the one we have now…….Alex.

  • 6 anon // Apr 5, 2007 at 4:13 pm

    norwalkdem - Slapin has lost all respect in the Democratic Party, local, and state.

  • 7 Jen // Apr 5, 2007 at 4:25 pm

    Alex Knopp is not a progressive Democrat (DINO) and Mr. Slapin seems like a nice man.

  • 8 Anonymous // Apr 5, 2007 at 4:41 pm

    anon-6

    Why do you say Ken Slapin has lost all respect?

  • 9 anonymous // Apr 5, 2007 at 4:46 pm

    C’mon who doesn’t think Ken should have been put out to pasture years ago? Name one thing he’s done for the party that anyone cared about?

  • 10 Anonymous // Apr 5, 2007 at 4:57 pm

    The DSCC is the retirement home for old politicos. Mr. Slapin brings food and drinks to pollworkers-does that count for anything? Hey, dont bite the hand that feeds you.

  • 11 Anonymous // Apr 5, 2007 at 4:59 pm

    We dems have to stop criticizing eachother and start pulling together, otherwise its mayor Moccia for the next two years.

  • 12 Anonymous // Apr 5, 2007 at 5:02 pm

    And people like Slapin just vote for the status quo instead of supporting progressive candidtes. Sorry bringing sandwiches to poll workers doesn’t cut it.

  • 13 dem4life // Apr 5, 2007 at 5:21 pm

    Turfgirl sure knows how to stir the pot. How about looking at how the Republicans stacked the deck to push through 93 East ave.?

  • 14 Anonymous // Apr 5, 2007 at 6:37 pm

    Dem4life: Exactly what has been pushed through for 93 East Avenue, the matter was approved by Zoning by appointees not just made by Moccia, the matter is now in court and the City has done nothing to push anything through, It may be that Republicans have their own thoughts about the rights of private property owners and use the use of historical Emiment Domain, but again rumour, inuendo not facts. So outline just what the City did to push anything through from a legal point of view. or from a legislative point of view or from any point of view. What public statement did any Republican including the Mayor make about the whole matter, don’t talk about statements he made 6 years ago or prior to him be elected. Also he did not hold a meeting between Tod Bryant and owners trying to reach a compromise? So list what was pushed, again, we want facts.

  • 15 Sean // Apr 5, 2007 at 6:40 pm

    Is it time to dump Galen Wells? Democrats should wake up and ask her to step down.

  • 16 anon // Apr 5, 2007 at 8:01 pm

    “Why do you say Ken Slapin has lost all respect?” Slapin does nothing but stir up trouble. Ask any Dem who knows him. He accomplishes nothing positive. And delivering food (that is paid for by the DTC, not him) is the only thing he does do. He is not feeding poll workers, he is just gossiping his way across town. He never makes a phone call, or helps any campaign, just kvetch and stir the pot. Enough already! Time for him to go!

  • 17 savit // Apr 5, 2007 at 8:11 pm

    A few facts re 93 East Avenue (I happen to have been rather close to the case). In terms of the city working for the Inn, there were FOI violations in citing the meetings to settle the initial appeal. There was lack of disclosure to the ZBA about what they were signing. You would think it might be important to give the ZBA the fact that the granted varinace was deemed illegal by the CT courts not just once but twice. Then there was the retaliation against the Historical Commission and the Commissioners who spoke out about the preservation of the house — retalation which started, coincidently, just at the time that the HC held the public hearing about 93 East Avenue. Then there was the uncanny similarity between statements by Corporation Counsel and the Mayor in the press and the strategy presented by the Norwalk Inn’s attorneys at the trial — while Corporation Counsel had repeatedly affirmed to the office of the AG that the city was not involved in the case nor working with the Inn’s attorneys. Then there is the question of why Corporation COunsel did not take action to quash a clearly too broad subpoena from the Norwalk Inn requesting information from the HC. Ugh…I could go on but there is simply too much — all of it run out of our Mayor’s office in the interest of supporting his friends at the Inn. The much-touted meeting brokered by the mayor was ineffective since the Inn did not hold up its part of teh bargain to withdraw the demoltion permit while discussions were taking place. They took no aciton on their part and continued to work toward demoltion by emptying out the tenants. They would notn listen to the 3 or 4 other (professionally developed) options offered for their consideration. And now there appears to be active destraution of the house. I suppose the logic is to make it such an eyesore that there won’t be anything left saving. The outcome of the court case will be very interesting since it is, in truth, a test of the CT Environmental Preservation Act re historic resources.

  • 18 Anonymous // Apr 5, 2007 at 8:13 pm

    Ken “meals on wheels” Slapin is good at his job. His drinks are always cold and his are sandwiches are always fresh. The DTC might want him gone for questioning the cost of election day food. Everybody knows Mr. Slapin is in charge of the food. Keep the food coming Kenny.

  • 19 indiga // Apr 5, 2007 at 9:29 pm

    Save it, savit. No one on this site cares what happens to 93 East Avenue. Is the owner a good Republican? Is he a friend of the Mayor’s? Does he “play nice”? Good enough. Let him do whatever he wants.

    And, please, a quick proofread on your posts. No sense in letting them think preservationists can’t spell…

  • 20 anonymous // Apr 5, 2007 at 9:35 pm

    Just heard it: supposedly Alex (aka COVER UP) Knopp is getting a job with the state ethics commission or something like it in Hartford. No kidding. I heard it from a lobbyist friend of mine who is well connected and in the know.

  • 21 anonymous // Apr 5, 2007 at 9:37 pm

    Turfie:

    Why were you surprised that Alex Knopp was at the event last night ??

    Please explain.

  • 22 anon // Apr 5, 2007 at 9:41 pm

    18.
    Slapin is in charge of nothing. He just delivers as he is told to do. You have a very strange way of judging the performance of a so-called party worker. Is sandwich delivery part of the job description for DSCC? We should have higher standards than chief-kibitzer and sandwich-delivery person. How about someone with new ideas and an interest in party unity and encouraging people - not criticizing everyone and demanding that things must be done his way or the highway. Wake up and Get real!

  • 23 Anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 12:40 am

    Anon-

    Ken Slapin is perfect for this do nothing group (DSCC). Mr. Slapin delivering food and drinks to pollworkers is a very important function. Chairwoman Wells is wrong for picking on him.

    Keep the food coming Kenny!

  • 24 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 4:53 am

    Ken Slapin is a good man. He should have been elected to the state house over bob duff. unfortunately he was hand picked by wells, knopp and their group. I am amazed that people would criticize a man such as him who has spent his life helping people as a councilman and commissioner.

  • 25 anon // Apr 6, 2007 at 6:39 am

    I agree with you 24. Bob Duff doesn’t care for progressive issues, or unions, or working families. Ken does and has consistently advanced and supported candidates who do. They call Duff miniKnopp for a reason.

  • 26 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 7:04 am

    At least the Dems get sandwiches delivered to the polls! As a Republican I would like to point out that they share, too!

  • 27 anon // Apr 6, 2007 at 9:10 am

    Enough discussion of an old man’s ability to deliver sandwiches.

  • 28 Anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 9:33 am

    Thank you savit. There are some here who appreciate hearing facts about this issue.

  • 29 anon // Apr 6, 2007 at 1:19 pm

    indiga and savit,
    I don’t see why we don’t take advantage of exposing all the corruption with this Republican administration. I don’t see our comments being deleted, and I don’t see any strong arguments against our position. Maybe even her turfiness will post some of our evidence.

  • 30 indiga // Apr 6, 2007 at 1:59 pm

    anon 29 — this could be a task for an ethics committee — if we had one that was truly independent, non-political, and not in bed wiht the “old boy” network….big “if”.

  • 31 anon // Apr 6, 2007 at 2:25 pm

    Pardon me, but corruption is a very strong label that requires strong evidence to support it. An opposing viewpoint is not enough to warrant corruption. Why, exactly, is the present administraton corrupt? Would you not better accept that the entire political process has become flawed?

  • 32 indiga // Apr 6, 2007 at 3:30 pm

    City Hall seems to be run like high school cliques — but with higher stakes. The “in-crowd” gets favors and the rules are bent when it comes to “friends”. The rules are bent again — but in the opposite direction — to punish perceived “enemies.” Worse yet, it’s done behind the scenes and in a sneaky way that(if you don’t look too close)seems OK. Notice that “sunshine week” was barely mentioned in Norwalk? Moccia and the Moccia Democrats like their citizens fuzzy about what’s going on and ready to buy into the image of the smiling “suit” we see in the papers.

  • 33 Anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 4:10 pm

    Indiga: Once aain the smears. What does like High School mean? Why do you not ask the City Hall workers what they think about the Mayor in comparison to his precedessor. He at least does not throw files at them, does not order secretaries to go to the men’s room to find a department head because he wanted him right then and there. The questioin is again, if we eliminate the Inn which everyone has misrepsented the facts on, and no matter when asked for facts, its only innuendos or misstatements. Where are the rules bent and this inside stuff, look at what has happened. The Parking Authority is out of debt, the Redevolpment projects are finally moving forward, we have a Arts & Culture Committee, the streets are cleaner, Wall street now has an anuual block party, Wall Street has bike patrols, there were more Police hired. We have the first Women Fire Commsioner, perhaps the first women Deputy Chief,the Summer Youth program is moving ahead better than ever. He has esatablished new relations with the minotity community. We have the Carriage house theater at Cranbury Park, he worked hard and even people in Rowayton give him credit for expediting the easement agreements to help preserve the Harte property. It appears thanks to him and LARRY CAFERO, THERE MAY BE A ACCEPTABELE COMPROMISE ON THE WHITE BARN PROPERTY. He is working to ban trucks from 136. We have a grants coordinator who has helped secure some funds and has applied for many grants and at least we have accurate followp, unlike the previous adminstration.How about being the first adminstration to take on the flooding after testimony in front on several boards said that Alex ignored their complaints for years. The list goes on, so other than you thinking that entre community was worried about your firiends not being appointed to the Historical Commission, which believe me, most people cared less. All you can do is rumour spread about corruption, in crowd etc. By the way at least this Mayor smiles, and despite what you think the people like him. From the PTO’s to business to the insitutions in town. And he never refused to shake hands with a 93 year old women.
    So keep being nasty, worrying about where he lives, that he is corrupt,, he is an empty suit, he is this he is that, what he is is the Mayor and in all likehood will be again. Do I agree with him on everything, no, he supported joing the illegal gun coalition, which I think infringes on rights to bear arms, I also think that some department heads should have been replaced.
    But overall he has done well. Also, an old addage, when persons or a person start accusing people of corruption without proof, and make irrsponsible charges, it is usally a reflection of their own moral corruption because they do it, they assume everyone else does. I have a final suggestion, why not reveal your true name and challenge the Mayor to a public debate to answer your charges, of course then you would have to offer proof. But absent that, keep doing what your are doing if it makes you feel better in your life.

  • 34 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 4:27 pm

    #33. Right on! I like the Mayor. He has a caring personality and goes forward to fix things. And Yes I have seen him smile too!

  • 35 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 4:44 pm

    Can someone please tell me what got under indiga and savit’s claws? I would like to know exactly which republican’s you consider corrupt and why? If you disagree with what some are doing keep it at that but don’t generalize. Seems to me if you have so much distain for the republicans the perhaps you ought to name them. would you like to name the corrupt ones? Ok, we get it you have a problem with the Mayor but geez, you keep trying to wipe out an entire party. Sounds like a little political maneuvering to get the Democrats back in place by bombarding the entire opposite party. In case you hadn’t noticed, Norwalkers have a mind of their own and they will decide as a whole who is and who isn’t doind their job and it will show in the upcoming elction.

  • 36 anon // Apr 6, 2007 at 5:07 pm

    The corruption of due process for starters. Peter Nolin has his hands in many a subjective ruling concerning East ave.

  • 37 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 5:15 pm

    Peter Nolin is Corporation Council and if you have ever been at a council meeting you would notice that he checks and rechecks everything by the book. No-one seemed to question the last Corporation Council on anything. Ok so you got the mayor and peter Nolin out of the way so who’s next? Of course I haven’t read and concrete evidence that either of these people have done anything corupt and by the way, Peter Nolin is a very respected attorney who looks at every detail and bases his judgements on facts.

  • 38 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 5:18 pm

    Hey has anyone heard if it is true that Alex Knopp is interviewing for a job in Hartford ?

    The last interview he had was for SWRPA and his own appointee, Laurel Lindstrom wouldn’t even vote for him. Now she is running on his ticket with him for mayor. How is that for politics.

  • 39 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 5:20 pm

    Cut it out ! Alex is a good man and would be great as a mayor for another term. I think many of you are just jealous of him.

  • 40 ENrwlker // Apr 6, 2007 at 5:23 pm

    This “corruption” stuff is very weak. City Hall has an “in crowd” … things are done “behind the scenes” … we see pictures of “smiling suit[s] in the papers”? That’s a description of every administration, Republican or Democratic, in the history of the City. The Corporation Counsel issues “subjective rulings”? What is being corrupted here is the word “corruption”. If you want to see genuine corruption, go to Bridgeport or Waterbury. Just because someone does something or issues an opinion that you disagree with doesn’t make them guilty of “corruption.” Some of you people need to lighten up …

  • 41 Anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 5:35 pm

    Once agin lies, Peter Nolin made no subjective rulings on East Avenue, that I know of, but gave details, all he did was to bring forth the Court Decision from 1989, that there was no Historical District as the there were problems with manner in which poperty owners in the District voted. Therfore 93 East avenue was not in an Historical district. As far as quashing a subpeona, here we go again, the defandantsts in the matter wanted inforamtion and the Hisotrical radicals invovled were afraid that they would have to produce information about their own consipriacy, if they knew anything about the legal process, it is not that easy to quash a subpeona and in the mind of many there was nothing out of the odinary about the request for info, can you imagine the hullabaloo if the historical people’s lawyer issued a subpeona and Peter tried to quash ther request. OH MY, by the way have you noticed how the anti Moccia people shifted gears, never answered previous questons about so called corruption, no facts, now they try smearing a reputable lawyer. Shift, slide, devert but never the facts. You really should be ashamed. Vote for Knopp, vote for whoever, but for God;s sake you make it understandable why people from both sides of the aisle do not want to enter political life, you really need to get a life.

  • 42 anonymous // Apr 7, 2007 at 9:38 pm

    Where are all the Alex Cover Up Knopp Sympathizers ?? It seems that they are on hiatus.

    Come on out to play. Why aren’t you people defending him regarding the 14 year old and the Pagano’s Seafood scandal ?? Are two separate scandals within one week and the summer of 2005 too much to overcome. Cover up is usually quite talkative. Cat got your tongue, Alex ?? How about another public statement, this time throwing another supporter of yours under the bus.

    Is it true that he is trying to get a job in Hartford with the state ethics commission ?? Just asking, since it appears rather ironic given his recent involvement in these incidents.

  • 43 anonymous // Apr 8, 2007 at 8:02 am

    I cannot believe galen wells is throwing ken slapin off the state committee at this months dem committee meeting. Mr Slapin is a good man and this should not be allowed to occur.

  • 44 anonymous // Apr 8, 2007 at 9:28 am

    Ken Slapin should return as the DTC leader. He would be a large upgrade over Mrs. Wells.

    When I served on the DTC with Ken as leader none of the stuff going on now would have been tolerated.

    It is really something that the Knopp-Wells-Duff party leadership wants to dispose of Ken. I guess they all want various levels of revenge against him.

  • 45 Anonymous // Apr 8, 2007 at 9:39 am

    Does Ken Slapin have another year left on his term?

  • 46 Norwalker // Apr 8, 2007 at 11:34 am

    Someone should ask why Connecticut Renaissance moved from Wall St development area to Byington Pl. Were they, perhaps asked to move because of their clientel?

  • 47 indiga // Apr 9, 2007 at 8:39 am

    ah, anon 41, how sweet of you to leap to the defense of Corporation Counsel about 93 East Avenue. But how wrong. First of all, local historic district issue is 100% irrlevant; National Historic District is 100% relevant and the basis for the AG’s involvement. Nolin knew the facts about local vs national and mislead public with his quotes in the paper. I suppose that’s what lawyers do: serve the interests of their client — but shouldn’t that have been Norwalk not the Norwalk Inn? Perhaps he got confused due to the Mayor’s residency at the Inn.

    And decent lawyers will automatically advise their client that a subpeone that is a “fishing expedition” is too broad. The City Corporation Counsel did not do his job in representing the HC as he is suppossed to. He allowed the Inn’s lawyers to run the show in the interests of further initimidating the HC.

    This is not smear; I am simply shedding some “sunshine” on the matter. Maybe this is a job for the ethics committee. But how do you think an ethics committe made up of council members would find if investigating the Mayor and the Corporation Counsel? Hmmm…

  • 48 anonymous // Apr 9, 2007 at 1:20 pm

    Is it true that Alex Cover Up Knopp is trying to get a job in Hartford with the state ethics commission ?? Just asking, since it appears rather ironic given his recent involvement in the summer jobs fiasco and fire fighter cover up.