YourCT.com header image 2

Wednesday Open Thread; To Cap or Not To Cap


by turfgrrl


April 4th, 2007 · 64 Comments

Looks like the Norwalk-outers lose one of their own in the “Corda’s Last Stand” resolution being proposed by Matt Miklave, Gwenn Briggs, Doug Sutton and Kevin Poruban. Bill Krummel has seen the light, or rather the sewage, and skipped out of the battle of little budget horn. Bruce Kimmel has adopted the “bring home the bacon” meme, stating “Along with that, we need to press our state legislators into bringing the bacon home to Norwalk to fund our school system.” The that he was referring to was the Corda Compromise plan, where he said, “To raise the cap would require a tax increase, whereas my proposal and (Corda’s) proposal would not,” Kimmel said. “It would be a good idea for the (schools) superintendent to sit down with the mayor and the finance director and come down with a hard number anywhere from $1 million to $1.5 million.”

So let’s see if Kimmel and Corda can manage to communicate to the outers that “Fully funding the BOE budget with an additional $3.2 million” is not even on the table because Corda has dropped the additional funding request to $1 - 1.5 million. And Corda dropped this because, miracles upon miracles, they found budget savings. ANd they found budget savings because they were forced to by the budget recommendations by the BET.

So what sort of budget savings could be made? Mike Lyons, BET member, provided a few documents that might provide some ideas.

Reduceable Line Items

Background Facts

Tonight there’s a public hearing by the council’s Planning Committee at 8 p.m. on the capital budget of $12.2 million. The capital budget plan calls for the city borrowing $6.1 million.

Also tonight Democracy For America hosts Democratic Party Chairwoman Nancy Dinardo at the Silverstar diner at 7pm.

And finally, the famous “nail house” stand off has reached its conclusion, with with a negotiated agreement that has their house being demolished.

Feel free to use the comments to talk about anything.

Tags: In the News

64 Responses so far “Wednesday Open Thread; To Cap or Not To Cap”


Pages: [1] 2 » Show All



  • 1 Mary Pugh // Apr 4, 2007 at 2:51 pm

    To Mike Lyons- thanks for giving this budget some perspective.

    The era of BET “rubber stamping” these budgets based on fear mongering amongst the student and parent population-

    We need thinkers, not BobbleHeads reviewing all these spending trends and looking at ratios.

    I sent a quick analytical template spreadsheet to the BOE and some Bd of Est members in an attempt to draw some clarity and attention to the actual numbers…versus the “artificial panic” created.

    If one could look at the spending against education vs spending against entertainment/babysitting….I think the public would create an uproar- that is the travesty of all this spending….it is analogous to giving the children candy, pop, and cake with a piece of cheese…..instead of veggies, meat and milk. They might love it, but it is not good for them.

    Let’s treat our children like students, not hoodlums that need to be placated with entertainment at school.

    Get the scores up with a HUGE emphasis on EDUCATION, not playtime.

    Although, my other beef…is we need more Physical Education and nutrition counseling in the schools- for everyone…not just the kids who join team sports.

  • 2 anon // Apr 4, 2007 at 3:38 pm

    Applause for the Council members and BET members who were willing to force the BOE to take a second and third look at the budget. This should always be the case. Too many good citizens who support education are intimidated into staying silent when we all know that we can’t carry any more local property taxes.

    Let’s make sure that everyone can be heard, all avenues are examined and budget debates are just that, debates, not fights. Parents are being told to take a hard-nosed stand, administrators and BOE members want everyone to panic and we can’t compromise under those conditions.

    There is always a way to take another look and have cooler heads prevail. We all want the best for our children and for the city as a whole. We can tackle our problems, fix our infrastructure and improve our schools. Let’s find the way without anger and recrimination. It looks like a compromise will be found and we can move on :)

  • 3 Mary Pugh // Apr 4, 2007 at 6:49 pm

    Oh, I think a little “I’m mad as H***, and I’m not going to take it anymore,” might be appropriate here.

    LOL

  • 4 Mary Pugh // Apr 4, 2007 at 7:18 pm

    Oops….typo on my first post…I did not mean BET- I meant BOE (Bd of Education). The Bd of Ed needs to serve ad the “Results Accountability team” for our education spending…not Corda’s lapdogs. Every dollar needs to be closely reviewed for results and versus objectives…what are we trying to achieve.

    Someday, I will be able to proof my typing…. not sure when.

    ….s,o;e

  • 5 Norwalker // Apr 4, 2007 at 7:39 pm

    Once again, Mary talking to herself and having a “wonderful” debate.

  • 6 Mary Pugh // Apr 4, 2007 at 7:44 pm

    Actually….that post was directed to Mike who made it very clear…that the spending is seriously out of whack. A quick read of his short analysis is enough to make even the most die hard “Cordite” pause for a second…and possibly think.

    …but you knew that…lol

    Mary

  • 7 anonymous // Apr 4, 2007 at 9:15 pm

    Mary, I like it when you speak. However, I must let you know there is little if any Pl ay Time in school anymore. Our days are filled with lesson plans that need to be taught, forget about snow storms and vacations the material has to be presented. Forget about spring fever and getting your driver’s test the material has to be taught and tested. Play time and recess are from the 60’s and 70’s. Ask any hard working teacher from Kindergarten right through to AP English we are doing our job. Why not be mad as H*** at the BOE and the Central Office that seems to have no watchdog evaluating their preformance?

  • 8 Mary Pugh // Apr 4, 2007 at 9:39 pm

    Playtime= the non academic courses, the sports, afterschool, etc.

    The teachers teaching academics….are like the unsung heroes…who “not sure if this is a myth” but spend their money for supplies to teach….amazing.

    Meanwhile we worry about ballfields, new kilns, etc.

    Education now is a far cry from what we had as kids- less than half the student teacher ratio, so many sports activities it would make a head spin the choices, the art programs, the music, the depth of “child care” that is absorbed by the school system.

    I do think kids need PHYS ED…but the plethora of sports options amazes me. Parents have told me that these sports help their kids with college apps (well then have a parent supported program for that- the pay for play)… and then a leader told me that minorities count on the sports programs for scholarships.

    Question: how many minority students have gotten scholarships for sports in the last few years? If it is few, then perhaps the money spent for those programs would be better spent providing scholarships or work programs to earn money for college.

    I don’t have the answers; but the BOE has yet to justify the spending of the last few years ….where the public understands it.

  • 9 anonymous // Apr 4, 2007 at 10:43 pm

    If anyone is privy to the NFT newsletter that is printed for teachers, it is interesting to note the union president’s article regarding Corda’s pro-administrative stance and to hell with those who directly impact upon the kids. Let’s be clear that there is education and then is administration.

  • 10 anonymous // Apr 4, 2007 at 10:47 pm

    Bravo, #7! Let’s get that ball rolling! Where is the accountability for Central Office? Where is the accountability for principals? Vice-principals? WHERE?

  • 11 Anonymous // Apr 4, 2007 at 11:15 pm

    Mary Pugh-now you are attacking minority students.

  • 12 Mary Pugh // Apr 5, 2007 at 6:04 am

    Anon 11: two suggestions as you go on the attack:
    1. Learn to read
    1. Stop hiding

  • 13 Mary Pugh // Apr 5, 2007 at 6:05 am

    Anon 11: two suggestions as you go on the attack:
    1. Learn to read
    2. Stop hiding

  • 14 Norwalker // Apr 5, 2007 at 6:24 am

    Mary’s so knowledgeable because she sent her children to private school. It is one thing to scrutinize the budget and another to declare yourself the expert on education. You must excuse her since Mary has a lot of ideas but a very scattered way of presenting them. Unfortunately they are not presented as ideas but as the be-all, end-all of the debate. How about opening your mind to other possibilities Mary? How about accepting the idea that you don’t know everything? And stop criticizing other people’s ability to read. This is a blog, not your classroom where you get to lecture.

  • 15 anon // Apr 5, 2007 at 6:45 am

    Mary, Mary, Mary…

    This is the internet. Let’s not be so serious. Frankly, some of us find it odd that anyone would come forward and state their name here. When the name shadows the opinion, or.. worse, when the opinion shadows the name, we lose the message. This forum gives everyone an even playing field and we need to stop thinking we each are oh, so important enough that anyone cares to know our names. If Mayor Moccia or Dr. Corda want to lurk, let them have their say without preconceived judgment. Even Turfgrrl has a handle, because she knows how to play the game.

  • 16 Mary Pugh // Apr 5, 2007 at 7:43 am

    Norwalker:

    Does the word “condescending” mean much to you? I don’t need your excuses for my posts - LOL. But thanks for declaring me the “expert”- I certainly would not consider myself the expert on education - simply someone who wants the budgets to be scrutinized- carefully. Lyons did a great job of shining some light on the subject and I would love to see more of that type of analysis.

    FWIW: My children went to both public and private schools - as if that is relevant to the discussion.

    When someone suggests I am “attacking minorities”- from reading my post(s) then they do need a reading lesson- because that is not correct.

    Anon: Game? I don’t play games…but have at it. An honest opinion tied to the source is worth something. A dig by someone too afraid to own it…is not worth much at all.

    JMHO

  • 17 anon // Apr 5, 2007 at 3:46 pm

    Expertise is in the eye of the beholder. There are reasons why some of us lurk and omse of us post only outside of work, and with handles. The atmosphere in some of our schools is oppressive.

  • 18 anonymous // Apr 5, 2007 at 5:16 pm

    Very True Anon 17. And Mary I beg to pardon your point of Art and Music being non academic. There have been many studies on children that have had really fine experiences in the Arts. These children use multiple intelligences to work out problems and are more apt to do well in Higher Order Thinking skills. If we take the time to understand a persons culture through his/her music, dance and art we will understand where they come from and where they are headed in the world. I loved Art and Music it gave my soul great joy to learn about the masters and to hear and sing music that was presented to us. It was with those teachers I felt most at ease and willing to learn. Please don’t put them into the same catagory as after school sports.

  • 19 anon // Apr 5, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    I don’t think it was me being critical of art and music programs. I teach one of those subjects and I was careless in my typing previously. I know it is okay on these blogs, but I cringe at the sight of them.

  • 20 anonymous // Apr 5, 2007 at 5:49 pm

    Don’t worry anon, we all do it and if Turfy doesn’t set the most galling examples, we might all have to be more careful. :)

  • 21 anonymous // Apr 5, 2007 at 8:51 pm

    Open Thread… Spend less on administators. More on teachers. More on fixing the pipe lines that have broken even in the schools. Take a good look at what needs to be done and do it. It really is that simple. Oh, and have a nice night.

  • 22 anonymous // Apr 5, 2007 at 9:04 pm

    I’ll say it again… drop the vp’s or at the very least, have them double up between schools. Let’s see… 19 schools… 19 vice principals at minimum $85,000… that’s approximately $1,615,000 in the kitty.

  • 23 Lurking and Loving It // Apr 5, 2007 at 9:10 pm

    #14 - Wait a minute now. Am I to understand that Mary is a teacher? Oh, forgive me. Let me go to the horse’s mouth.

    Mary, are you a teacher?

  • 24 anon parent // Apr 5, 2007 at 11:36 pm

    How about doing what Victor herbert tried to do , put the administrators back in the schools where they belong.Unfortunately the BOE hog tied him and drove hom out of town with a hot prod. I might add that cost the city dearly but you can see what happens to those who try to make the BOE accountable for their actions.

  • 25 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 4:57 am

    I think Mary is going to run for the council as a republican with views such as hers. I think she would be great and would knock off William Krummel or Gwyneth Briggs.

  • 26 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 6:35 am

    Mary should run for the Board of Ed since she at least has a clue about budgets. It’s time for talented people to step up and run instead of the current lame people. Too many democrats on the board, Mary would be a breath of fresh air.

  • 27 anon // Apr 6, 2007 at 9:38 am

    Thank you Mary for your posts. I think you have identified the core problem with a education system that focuses on activities instead of learning. I too hope you run for the boe.

  • 28 anon // Apr 6, 2007 at 10:18 am

    25. You hit it on the head…she is actually a “republican”. And No she is not a teacher just likes to lecture.

  • 29 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 11:36 am

    #24. Victor Herbert was a mess. He had the same thing happen to him in Arizona before he came to Norwalk. His Assisst. Superintendant learned well from him (Riccio) after Norwalk sent him packing he ended up in Torrington where they had to buy out his contract. There are people out there that make this their big payoff. And for some reason they get hired over and over again. I hear that the new Superintendant in Milford has problems already with out even starting his first day. Why are no background checks being done. Heck, they do a background check on you if you are going to buy a kitchen table at Eathan Allen. But for one of the highest paying jobs a city has you are not REALLY CHECKED OUT WELL??? Go figure.

  • 30 Lurking and Loving It // Apr 6, 2007 at 3:04 pm

    I’m trying to figure what is meant by the useless activities referred to by Mary Pugh. First of all, the CMT does not allow our teachers to fill time with random sponge activities. Our poor kids are over-drilled and over-assessed, as it is, when it comes to test material. On the flip side, kids are reading at their own reading levels and are challenged to create extensions of their own reading through various modes such as PowerPoint presentations. Today, Kindergarten students are expected to read leveled text in readiness for the CMT, which is given in grade three. Never before have we pushed children to such an extent. Please be careful when you attack the teaching and learning process today. Many statements have been made denouncing the validity of fiscal responsibility in our public schools. While, there is a realistic need for administration accountability, teachers are over assessed by unassessed evaluators and the general outcome has become increasingly evident. This low morale breeds an insidious lack of motivation and it is motivation that is sorely needed to excite students about learning. yes, there is much to fix in our schools, but it basically boils down to lack of support, which ranges from fiscal support in the classroom to emotional support for teachers. Please be cautious when criticizing our public schools. Teachers need your support. Every teacher I know does a fantastic job with the little support they receive.

  • 31 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 4:21 pm

    #30. Thank you! We teachers love you lurking here!

  • 32 Becky // Apr 6, 2007 at 5:03 pm

    Someone brought up looking at the number of vice principals in residence in the elementary schools. Could someone explain to me why an elementary school much less one with less than 400 students needs a full time vice principal? Couldn’t the salary and benefits be of much better use in the high schools where the student to teacher ratio may go up this year..where there are going to be teacher cutbacks in the next academic year…where kids have to sometimes wait 2 or 3 years to take a class they need like health because there are not enough classes available..because there are not enough teachers ? Could someone explain when the vice-principal position was established and why it was thought they were needed..and why do we still have them if the budget is so very tight?

  • 33 anon parent // Apr 6, 2007 at 5:06 pm

    Teachers! That is the key word here. They teach, they nurture and they care about our kids. They get no respect from the higherarchy and they are threatened with losing their jobs if they speak up. This seems to be way things are going on these days in Norwalk. Teachers have been told to shut up or get out. They are being censored and it is a damn shame. They know whats going on but fear the repercussions of standing up and coming forward. The teachers are being told not to come forward with any information about what is happening in our schools and not to talk to the public or the elected officials about the waste and other problems they have to live with on a daily basis. they know what its all about and they can’t speak up or their jobs will be the ones on the line. All the while they are still giving 100% to our kids. They know how many kids don’t belong in our schools and its not the handful that Corda would have you believe. They must pay out of their pockets in order to make sure each and every student has the tools they need to succeed and they do it willingly because they believe in our kids. All the while the fat cats at the top are raking in the big bucks and sitting behind their desks barking orders. Accountabilty is not a new word here, its one that is practiced by every major and minor business in existance and to say that sports and music and extracuricular or special education, gifted classes and any other classes that make for a well rounded child should be the ones to be cut because they are not important is criminal. We need to think very hard when we hire administrators because it is our teachers and kids who are suffering from their decisions. they still go home with the same paycheck whether our kids learn or not. Can any teachers give us a clue as to how many out of district pupils we have in the system and can any teachers shed some light on what exactly do these high paid administrators do? That would be a very refreshing topic. But make sure you answer these questions from your home computers or the big guys on the 3rd floor will be lurking in the back ground.

  • 34 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 5:45 pm

    Anon Parent. Thank you for your thoughts of kindness and support for teachers. I have been teaching many years and I see no need for vice principals in the elementary schools when there is an excellent principal. The vice principals were brought in about 2002 or 2003 by Corda. I think because some of the principals were not that well liked and did not work with their faculty and staff in a professional way. I might point out that some of those principals were not the first pick of the search committees but were approved by Corda. As for the out-of-towners I believe there are more than a hand full. Watch the schools in the morning we have students that in really bad weather are dropped off at 6:30am one hour before school starts. This is not a safe practice but as the teachers are walking in at this time so are students who say their mom or dad work in Norwalk and they drop them off before making it to their job. So as a teacher you bring that information to the office and then it is up to them to run with it. More times than not, the students provide the office with a relatives address and phone number for proof. When we do a mailing or have to call home we get a lot of returns and this number is not in service at this time responses. As for Accountability, central office should step up and take it.

  • 35 anon parent // Apr 6, 2007 at 6:30 pm

    AMEN! Thank you! Anymore comments from the teachers?
    You’re safe here and everyone is listening! The more that share their thoughts, the more help citizens have in understanding what is going on.

  • 36 Lurking and Loving It // Apr 6, 2007 at 9:01 pm

    This isn’t easy, you know. This is a very painful topic for teachers. The vice-principals came about as the necessary evil to the new evaluation plan for teachers, which is totally flawed. The evaluation plan had good intent, but with all due respect, it was built on supporting teachers and improving teaching strategies. Instead, the “plan” has become a dangerous weapon in the hands of those who would use it for their own agendas. Teachers are bullied and threatened by administrators who are, themselves, not evaluated. Rumor has it that the superintendent set the dogs loose to drive the veterans out. This is a very hurtful notion, indeed. Does it makes sense to drive our valued veterans out who have almost arrived at that point where they deserve to leave with a sense of dignity and gratitude for their service? Can it really be true that more money is available to principals who drive teachers into retirement? Then, of course, if this is true, isn’t it ironic that central is now filled with administrators who are working toward a second retirement package? Is this a system that works? Is this accountability? All we know is that test scores continue to suffer with or without money. It is simple logic that teachers need to feel secure enough and valued enough to make their students feel valued. The funny thing is.. it isn’t just about test scores. Teachers have to be caregivers on a daily basis. If vice-principals cannot lend this type of support where it is truly needed, their purpose has outstayed its welcome. Support our teachers!

  • 37 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 9:34 pm

    I hope the people are reading this and understanding whats going on and stand up for our teachers and demand that these practices are nipped in the bud now!
    As someone who works closely with the teachers, I can tell you how dedicated they are to our kids and how they fear for their jobs. they are threatened with diciplinary actions and they are threatened with job loss to make room for more handpicked candidates. They can’t voice their concerns because no-one is listening. Are we going to help them or help the administration by falling under their threats and giving them more money to put their cronies in place? We are the taxpayers and we should have a say as to who teaches our kids. We cannot sit back and let Corda and friends terroized our kids with threats of program cuts and we cannot allow Corda to run rampant over this city with his hand picked followers who are metering out the threats and causing dissension in our schools and in this town.

  • 38 itsridiculous // Apr 6, 2007 at 10:04 pm

    HELP WANTED: Brave Council people, willing to do the right thing. Must be courageous & not afraid of the political machine. Ability to challenge the status quo & ask why & why not a plus. Knowledge of storm and sewer pipes, topography & permitting helpful, but will train the right people. Apply in person at the Common Council meeting April 10 and sponsor a resolution to fully fund the 5 year storm water management plan this year. NOTE: this is a temporary position. Participation in the sponsorship of the resolution may result in early termination in November. EOE - all candidates will be considered regardless of race, creed, gender, religious or political affiliation.

  • 39 A BOE person // Apr 6, 2007 at 10:13 pm

    It is impossible to justify an “executive assistant to the superintendent” and elementary assistants in schools that have less than 400 students. This is Norwalk, not New York or Chicago. We need to use our heads and put the services where the students are — in the classrooms.

    A human relations employee who is in Hartford much of the time has no right to collect a Norwalk BOE check.

    Has no one paid attention to the newspaper story about the number of high school students who are in study halls? They need to be in classes but there aren’t enough teachers for them.

  • 40 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 10:24 pm

    I sure hope people are listening now!

  • 41 anonymous // Apr 6, 2007 at 11:49 pm

    It is time for change. Change is good.

  • 42 anonanonm // Apr 7, 2007 at 5:23 am

    Can the problem with our schools stem from the top- not just Corda but the levels of admin that he has put into place?

    The low scores that Norwalk has versus the state and other like schools is unacceptable. Excuse like “minorities” “ESL” and ” special ed” do not explain why the scores are lower than similiar towns with the same student composition.

    How do we determine what changes need to be made? - throwing money at the problem apparently was not the solution (did the money go to more admin and more admin and more admin??)

    Would a survey of the teachers will bring out that there is a severe morale issue? Reading the teacher comments here gives a sense that teachers are not happy with the admin over them. What is the issue with the evaluations and the evaluators?

    Teachers who are fearful or feeling unvalued might have a DIRECT negative effect on the students- the quality of teaching suffers.

    Throwing a few PRIDE slogan type programs in might help, but the bigger issue could be the excess of admin versus the need for more teaching hours. Study hall is not a replacement for teaching time.

    Suggest the BOE get to the bottom of the teacher morale issue with some surveys and possibly some brainstorming focus groups with teachers and students about how the SYSTEM can be improved.

    Maybe hiring to fill in the vacant admin spots at this point should be put on hold until it is determined that there is a need for those administrators.

    Is the Norwalk school system (teachers) feeling invaded by high priced “out of towners” who are not invested in the town but who have greater authority over the daily teaching methods/evaluations?

    What is really going on?

    Is Corda feeling that he can get whatever budget he wants by using the threat of parental outrage? It has worked well for him in the past, he just overdid it this time with the lack of logical reasons for the huge increase.

    Why is everyone screaming to “fully fund” such increases without the introspection on a line item basis by school of the spending?

    So many questions- and so much misplaced trust - the BOE seems to assume Corda knows what he is doing - are they his puppets? Has anyone asked the teachers to evaluate his performance?

  • 43 anonymous // Apr 7, 2007 at 7:45 am

    These are all excellent ideas anonanonm. This type of thinking, such as evaluating the evaluators is something that the BOE should be exploring. I fear that the mindset of the current crop is incapable of such action.

    The demand to fully fund the budget without a healthy line item review that has been clearly demonstrated is shocking. The BOE is not responding to rational requests such as you and others have outlined. That is a shame.

  • 44 anonymous // Apr 7, 2007 at 8:05 am

    anonanonm:#42-Well said. Layers upon layers of admin have been added since Corda’s rein and yet our kids are sitting in study halls instead of in classes. Why is it that every time we read an incident in the papers concerning teens do we always find that one or more of the students attending our schools DO NOT LIVE HERE! murders, stabbings, gang fights etc. these kids don’t live in this town, they use our kids money and some, not all are the very core of the problems that we see going on with our kids and our teachers have to endure their behaviour as if they were our own, but hey, keep filling the pockets of the administrators who sit back and do nothing about it. I think its time they start earning their pay. Get out to the buses and see who is getting off of them from other towns and I don’t mean the school buses, be at the surrounding areas of the schools in the morning and see who is being dropped off that don’t belong in our schools, sit at the train station and see who gets off and onto a wheels bus that takes them to our schools. Overseeing our schools and protecting our taxes isn’t a 9-5 jobn with dinner parties and catered lunches, getting down in the trenches and rolling up their sleeves, now this would be a good start. Stop telling us that our minority students can’t leasrn, stop making excuses for the low testing scores, stop sitting atop city hall like the grand marshall and his entourage and start doing something. Get rid of the layers upon layers of beaurocracy that has been added sine the Corda team rolled into town. Stand up for our teachers and our kids. The only way to do this is to start hiring our own people, they know the score but can’t talk about it or do anything about it for fear of retribution. Wake up Norwalk, lets take our schools back and do the right thing for Norwalk. A vote of no confidence is in order and a complete investigation of the threats to teachers should be in order and stop ranting and raving athe common council for finally having people on it who have brought alot to our attention and have made more than a few sit up and listen. The cap is good for all of Norwalk and I for one would have to think twice about electing anyone who couldn’t stand up for the right thing. We finally got a council who has a backbone.

  • 45 anonymous // Apr 7, 2007 at 8:18 am

    Who evaluates Corda and the top layer of his admin? Oh right, its his lapdogs on the BOE! That should tell you something!

  • 46 anon // Apr 7, 2007 at 8:29 am

    anonanonm, you provide an excellent case for questioning the performance of Corda. So will our BOE rise to the challenge put before them here?

  • 47 anonanonm // Apr 7, 2007 at 8:39 am

    What is the process for evaluating Corda’s performance? What objectives are the superintendent supposed to meet? Has he met those objectives?

    For example: how is he doing in regard to:
    Managing the budget?
    Managing admin - centralized vs local, etc.
    Teacher morale?
    Teacher turnover?
    Teacher skills, evaluation?
    Student scores? “high academic achievement”
    Students graduating?
    Student attendance?
    Students accepted to college; quality of college acceptance?
    Student morale?
    Managing discipline fairly?
    Develop master plan?
    Maintain a secure, healthy environment for learning?
    Communication with the BOE,public, the parents, the students? Goals, Results, Budgets, line item spending, etc.?
    Scope? Pre-school, elem, middle, HS, adult ed??

    The list is not all inclusive, others can certainly suggest other ways to consider his effect/leadership/guardianship of our one of our most precious tasks- the education of Norwalk’s students.

    Has the current BOE stood their ground with him on any issues?

    Does he provide them with the information they need to review his performance- have they ever asked for that information?

  • 48 anonymous // Apr 7, 2007 at 8:39 am

    #42 & #44 very heart felt and interesting posts. You are right get people to the schools in the am hours and see what #34 has said. Teachers are tired of the out-of-towners coming in and trying to make our town something it has never been - a Brigeport South or a Bronx North. We love our students and respect their lives and cultures. When we see a student that is not doing their best we ask them about what is going on in their life and try to help. When I was a kid that is what I remember best about Norwalk teachers-they really cared about me as a person! Ask any grown up how many principals they remember or what was the name of the Superintendant of Schools. The only way they might know this information is if the Admin. lived in their neighborhood and had kids at the same time going to school with them. We have lost the town feel and we are headed to feeling like a big city. I don’t think Corda understands this, or maybe he does. Divide and conquer. But what has he won with some of his principal choices he has lost tenured teachers that were out standing with many more teaching years left in them. They were bullied out and replaced with teachers that are new and need more support to be mentored through the BEST program. Now there are not that many teachers that take on student teachers because when they do this they are not recognized as Master (new term Distinguished)teachers by their evaluators. In the over all teachers would like to teach once you get observed and you are not recognized for the good you do for your school you feel attacked and taken for granted.

  • 49 anonymous // Apr 7, 2007 at 8:46 am

    NORWALK STUDENTS TO PAY THE PRICE-This is the headlines on the commentary page of the Hour today.
    Again and again Sal Corda proves once again how versed he is on SCARE TACTICS and it all comes down to one thing, CUT PROGRAMS AND TEACERS!

  • 50 anon // Apr 7, 2007 at 9:02 am

    Consider how long and tedious this letter is. I can’t even begin to guess how long it took to write his last two editorials. Is this what Dr. Corda’s backers consider time well spent on our schools?

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All