YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: They Write, I Write, We All Write About Norwalk


by turfgrrl


March 20th, 2007 · 65 Comments

A little self promotion here, today’s Hour and Advocate feature articles about this site and yours truly and the mysterious workings that fuel the blog coverage of Norwalk. Overall, the coverage is nice and positive, except for Democratic Town Chair Galen Wells, who had this to say From Matt Breslow’s Advocate article:

But Democratic Town Committee Chairwoman Galen Wells said a problem with blogs by Lightfield and others is the lack of oversight by an editor to ensure accuracy.

“Much of what she says is just plain not true,” Wells said.

There are people Lightfield doesn’t like, Wells said.

The blog has included “incredible negative postings” about Wells and state Rep. Bruce Morris, D-Norwalk, and Lightfield has written “awful” postings about former Democratic Mayor Alex Knopp, Wells said.

Clearly Wells is not reading the posts, because otherwise she wouldn’t ignorantly claim that “much” of what I write is untrue. First off, much of what I write often starts from newspaper articles, that I quote directly, like I just did. Then I make an observation about it, like I’m doing, that explains what I think about it. I’m thinking Wells is not reading, because the alternative is that she’s just reflecting the usual incompetency that I am troubled by … oh wait …

OK, I’m having a little fun there. But seriously, here’s me saying awful things about Knopp:

Democratic Town Chair, and childhood buddy of Alex Knopp, Galen Wells wants us to believe that the past was mighty rosier than it really was. She said to Patrick Linsey of The Hour that Alex has a “vision” for Norwalk.
“Wells said. “I think now that he’s been gone for a while, people can put aside ‘Oh he was grumpy to me,’ and think of what’s best for Norwalk.”. I think that people are smart enough to remember things as they really were and see that Norwalk City Hall is a much better place now. City Hall is the people’s government and it helps to have someone as mayor who genuinely likes people. It’s not something you can just pick up out of the back pages of “Political Life For Dummies” book. After all, you can’t really teach an old dog new tricks. the rest of the post

Ok, Galen, you got me. You said Knopp was “grumpy”, I implied he didn’t like people. Ooooo, awfulness in full bloom here.

But enough about me, there’s trouble in them dar hills.

State Senator Bob Duffs-D bill to get a timeline out of the Super 7 project stalls in the purgatory of committee active non action. Meaning, the political whippersnappers up in Hartford decided that this hot potato was too hot to force of a kill vote in committee, so they let it die by not acting upon it. I guess they think by not voting against it, and not voting for it, and not getting to a full floor vote that no one will be called on it next election time. Such silliness really. Duff is going to have to do a better job of gaining other legislators on board to apply the regional pressure to get this one moving. It didn’t help that the DOT couldn’t figure out how much land they owned already (first 40%, now 60%), and that a vocal opponent sits on the committee. But after enough strip malls dot the landscape on slowly widening route 7, positions should be a-changing. A new 15,000 square foot retail space to be built sign popped up next to the car dealership just the other day. Keep at it Senator Duff!

Todd Bryant is back with in the news with a CPR maneuver on Fodor Farm. When we last took the pulse of this story, the report that was to trigger all sorts of city hall action missed its filing deadline. The solution? Create a new report cover. I kid you not. From The Hour:

As such, study committee members vowed to re-date the report’s cover letter, make necessary copies of the report and its maps, and FedEx the materials to the state commission by Wednesday. Bryant said that’s the deadline for having the council consider the report at its April 4 meeting.

“Onward and upward,”said Marilyn C. Robinson, member of the study committee. The action, in effect, will attempt to re-circulate the report before the state Commission on Culture and Tourism, the city’s Planning and Zoning commissions, and the public.

Mayor Moccia has in effect moved onward, and instead said to The Hour, “I’m just waiting for Land Use to come up with their final
recommendations,” Moccia said last week. “The deadline (for the historic district plan) was missed and that’s that.” The crux of the issue is whether to create a new historic district of the 3 houses and former farm land, or whether to manage the property through existing mechanisms. Both plans call for selling of the houses as part of a deed restricted preservation program. There’s no controversy about what to do with the former farm land, which everyone agrees to maintain as city owned open space. Except that the Study committee wants that to be historic open space, or something like that, whatever that means. With the ongoing issues finding time and money to deal with the current city owned properties like the Norwalk Museum, one hopes that whatever plan moves forward is a realistic one.

Source: Norwalk Advocate, Blog from ‘Turfgrrl’ chronicles city politics, By Matt Breslow, March 20 2007

Source: The Hour, Putting the blog in local politics By Patrick Linsey, March 20 2007
Source: The Hour, Super 7’ bill dies en route to full legislature By Patrick Linsey, March 20 2007
Source: The Hour, Committee’s push for historic district not over By Robert Koch, March 20 2007

Tags: In the News · Local · Norwalk

65 Responses so far “Norwalk: They Write, I Write, We All Write About Norwalk”


Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All



  • 1 anon // Mar 20, 2007 at 8:23 am

    It’s nice to see you in the news Turfgrrl. I hope this brings in some more readers, but especially more commenters. There’s a great discussion venue here.

  • 2 jed722 // Mar 20, 2007 at 8:36 am

    I also think you’re harsh on Alex. But let’s all be realistic here, there’s no love in Norwalk for him either. Slow-Mo may be better likable, but that doesn’t make him a better mayor.

  • 3 Anonymous // Mar 20, 2007 at 8:58 am

    Turf keep the heat up! Your oversight is truly a gift to Norwalk!

  • 4 bendebear // Mar 20, 2007 at 9:38 am

    Glad I read The Hour this morning and was informed about your web blog. Will definitely add to my favorites.
    Interestingly in the same paper was an article about the continuing committee(or whatever it is) witch hunt regarding racism in the Fire Dept. I thought this had been resolved and put to bed by the outside consulting firm we paid $8,000.00 to investigate.
    That fireman played the race card and got a great settlement when he should have been fired years ago. Imagine, he showed up for work drunk 5 times, according to newspaper accounts, and was still on the job!
    I’m not a Fireman and don’t know any of them but I think this committee has an axe to grind with the Dept.

  • 5 Anonymous // Mar 20, 2007 at 11:16 am

    funny how the article didn’t go into why you got booted from CTLP…and I love for you to provide us with a location where we can verify your traffic stats.

    you lied at CTLP which is why you were finally kicked off that blog and you continue to lie here. obviously, the reporter didn’t check out your older posts on CTLP before writing his article.

  • 6 turfgrrl // Mar 20, 2007 at 11:34 am

    anonymous 5: Can’t you just go back to CTLP and whine there? We tend to prefer discussion here rather than trolls.
  • 7 anonymous // Mar 20, 2007 at 12:46 pm

    Anon 5 - People agree and disagree throughout this blog’s commentary but unsubstantiated, unspecific accusations. like yours, are a waste of our time. Turfgrrl’s bias comes through loud and strong but it’s refreshing and adds to the debate. Her style’s one reason why I followed her here from CLP - that plus I’m especially interested in Norwalk issues - which as I recall was a major criticism aimed at her posts on CLP.

  • 8 Mr Greenpeace // Mar 20, 2007 at 12:52 pm

    After the fire and explosion shook So Norwalk Jan 26 of this year no one asked or reported why it took over a 1/2 hour to report it to the fire dept, this incindent was taken care of by the EPA and OSHA regional offices and not Norwalk or the state of CT. itself why? (it wasn’t until the Federal offices were notified a week later did Ct respond) No one asked if anyone had cracked chimneys or foundations, no one asked about what the children inhale or exposed to accross the street in Meadow Gardens and other residential homes all the time. No one reported the tons of chemicals business in So Norwalk can legally release into the air (its all on the EPA website folks) no one has asked or reported whats in the storm drains or the air around these 20 plus sites in So Norwalk, No one has asked what the brownfield study group is up to,no one has asked whats in the rainbow colors flowing into Long Island sound, no one wants to know I guess,,most don’t know, most don’t live in So Norwalk do they.This site is awesome it doesn’t fit into any fiscal budget and will uncover much more than she said he said I bet,,this information by the way is all fact sad part is its only the start If Mr Greenpeace is allowed to stay and leave comments.

  • 9 turfgrrl // Mar 20, 2007 at 12:59 pm

    Welcome aboard Mr. Greenpeace. Everyone is welcome to stay and leave comments. I only ask that people try to keep things civil. What fire and explosion are you referring to? Can you provide links to the EPA site you mention? Tell us what you know.
  • 10 anonymous // Mar 20, 2007 at 1:12 pm

    Good job turffie. The press coverage is great and I am sure it will add thousands to your everyday readership. If Galen Wells believes that she has been unfairly treated in the Pagano’s Seafood/Summer Jobs incident, why doesn’t she tell her side of the story. She continues to not reach out and confront the story. Is it true ? If not, then what happened ? Shooting the messenger is not the way to make it go away. Keep up the good work and pressure turffieee. The public’s got your back on this.

  • 11 SouthMain // Mar 20, 2007 at 1:15 pm

    Great site. Glad to meet you through your blog. I read all the Norwalk posts. My head is spinning. I wish our local papers kept an archive like this. I’d like to see the original articles you reference too. I read the papers daily, and your stuff is more real. Let’s talk turkey here.

  • 12 Mr Greenpeace // Mar 20, 2007 at 3:09 pm

    thank you for having me, www.epa.gov simply hook onto region 1 and after a little surfing you will find maps, charts information all on So Norwalk, I will admit some of the stats on the epa webside is old but just the same they point out the amount of sites they monitor just in So Norwalk alone, bear in mind it does not cover the power plant in any great detail..for those who live here its the blinking light down the street from downtown SoNo does once in a while spew large amounts of black smoke out of its stack and usaully drifts east.

    The Hour reported in thier Jan 28 2007 edition about the fire and explosion, downplayed by a fire dept spokesman as not a major issue. It happens all the time the dispatcher said, why did so many people call for an explosion that rocked thier house, was this time that bad? Why did they ( the junk yard) let the fire dept ride around the area for a 1/2 hour before they called them? the fire previous to this one weeks before took the fire dept many gallons of water and hours to put out a fire on frozen earth in a pile of debris (wonder where the water went, wonder what was burning ) this was also not reported to the federal agency,,then again its not any ones fault is it? If the fire dept charged for going to the fire like most cities do we would have some more money to spend on the firefighters thier safety and equipment.

    Brings another point up, a firefighter helps secure homeland grant the news reported, http://www.firehouse.com has a list of all the fire depts in Ct who has received money I wish the powers to be would help the fireman get others they deserve,We could use a grant writer, the city is big enough.To go on the firehouse site and see where money does go it would surprise one to see smaller towns get more and other cities get even more than us,why is that? the facts are there people just log on. The more people that are involved it enhances the chances we as a city have of getting more money for various depts.I take nothing away from the firefighter who did work on securing the grant, he has by far done more than most and deserves a thank you.

    while I am at it the fire engine that got stuck responding at a fire during the storm ( 2:30 am or so) the other morning , maybe they should have had a plow and sand truck with them, that would be a standard in any city during a storm like that when all depts are on the same page. ( this was a car fire where water turned to ice within minutes ) the condition of the streets was an issue with the fire dept they reported it as such. It seems that the fire dept needs more priority at times by other depts when these guys risk life and limb for us.( my observation)

    Not having a police cruiser to direct traffic on a 4 lane highway in the middle of the day while the fire dept is in the middle of the street on a car fire a couple of months ago said a lot,,not available was the words used by dispatch. (pictures were in the news) story was not told though.(my opinion)

    You will find facts like this around budget time are not discussed, why is that? The money has already been earmarked, any new issue would only create chaos,,telling the taxpayers what they need or will need should be a priority,,We are seeing an increase in the need for public service, this will take more money more equipment, more personal, more training and this is needed before we build any more buildings I would imagine.

    So where are the reports detailing the increased demand, to protect and serve the residents?

    some facts can be found on the www.firehouse.com site showing the increase of incidents accross the country including Ct.

    I won’t wear out my welcome but with all the things going on why did it take so long to tell us all there is radon in some schools,the test usually takes 2 days not two months, and its absurd to report where in the building its the highest, do your homework if its present it can be anywhere anytime radon does not pick what room it goes into path of least resistance is rule of thumb. Besides young children have a smaller lung capacity and effects them faster, another consideration should of been noted ,they may have it at home as well Norwalk does have a history of it ask real estate agents ,, and this is not my opinion.

    Mr Greenpeace

  • 13 dem4life // Mar 20, 2007 at 3:31 pm

    Figures Mike Coffey is a fan of this blog. He is progressive and adaptable and this is the new agora for the 21st century. I like how our political officials are reading, and I’m ashamed that my party leader thinks blogs are bad. But as a proud dem I’ll be watching what you write turfgrrl so keep it accurate. I’d love more details on how you think gutting the historical commission is good for Norwalk?

  • 14 anonymoose // Mar 20, 2007 at 4:08 pm

    “Fight for your opinions, but do not believe that they contain the whole truth, or the only truth.” Charles A. Dana

  • 15 ctlawyer // Mar 20, 2007 at 4:11 pm

    Lots of new people here. Good for you turfgrrl.

  • 16 Mr Greenpeace // Mar 20, 2007 at 4:18 pm

    here is a link all should read ,,its what you may find in Norwalk

    Http://www.glrppr.org/hubs/subsection.cfm?hub=506&subsec=11&nav=11

    Once you have read it think about the children that could be exposed to some of these items the pros have listed ,,bear in mind all the others that can be exposed as well..by air by water by truck tire when leaving these sites that contain pollutants.

    i trust my link is good

    Mr Greenpeace

  • 17 Watchdog // Mar 20, 2007 at 5:08 pm

    Oh, man. Looks like you opened the floodgates, TG! Can you believe number 5? What crap, eh? Don’t people know what a blog is, for gad’s sakes? It’s rambling, pure and simple. From the start, this has been YOUR blog open to commentaries. Over a short period of time, YOUR blog has evolved to a civilized community of blog-mongers who engage each other in respectful debate. Gotta love it. Seems you have more “power” than you would think, Turfie. Your blog apparently is a threat to those who would claim unfettered speech as a campaign logo. Keep up the good work, Turfie.

  • 18 Mike Coffey // Mar 20, 2007 at 5:35 pm

    Turfgirl,

    Thank you for this excellent site. This is a great day for open communication and allowing people to discuss issues in a forum that encourages thoughts to be exchanged in a non-partisan setting.

    I look forward to participating and posting on this site in the future and encourage people to call or email me if they wish to discuss any city issues in greater detail.

    Keep up the good work.

    Best Wishes,

    Mike Coffey
    mwjava@aol.com
    849-9404

  • 19 AnonNorwalk // Mar 20, 2007 at 5:51 pm

    RE:I’m not a Fireman and don’t know any of them but I think this committee has an axe to grind with the Dept.

    This committee is doing what they got elected to do. Investigate any wrong doing in an City Dept. Too bad the Fire Coommission didn’t do their job. Too bad Alex Knopp didn’t do his job. Too bad it all has to fall on this body to do whats expected of elected officials and those with high profile positions. There is no axe to grind, from what I can see, there have been alegations made that need to be investigated. and if no wrongdoing was committed, Those who wish to state their case and show this committee that there is no racial bias, no discrimination or any other problems that they have been privy to, they need to come forward. One should look at those on the committee to see that 2 of them are huge supporters of the fireman and the dept and only want whats right for everyone.

  • 20 turfgrrl // Mar 20, 2007 at 6:54 pm

    southmain: thanks and welcome aboard.

    mr. greenpeace: You’ve raised many topics here. Are you saying the fire/explosion was at the junkyard on meadow? It seems to me that there should be a procedure in place for bad weather response handling. Is there? Does any one of our Council people want to look into it? Again, thanks for posting. The firehouse site was interesting. The EPA stuff will take longer to take a look at, but feel free to add updates or other items of interest.

  • 21 turfgrrl // Mar 20, 2007 at 6:58 pm

    dem4life: I think my posts on the historical commission outline my position, which is/was that the mix of personalities and issues was counterproductive. That being said, there’s been some interesting discussion on that subject, and also some progress on creating a Wall Street area Historical District despite the concerns raised by preservationists. Only time will tell if the new composition is good or not. I hope you participate in the discussion.
  • 22 turfgrrl // Mar 20, 2007 at 7:02 pm

    watchdog: I suspect anonymous 5 is one of the gadflys from the old blog who didn’t bother to read anything here before the drive by post. Lots of new people today, and hope that the discussions continue.
  • 23 turfgrrl // Mar 20, 2007 at 7:07 pm

    Mike, thanks for posting today and for reading and (perhaps) posting before. I hope you enjoy the blog and interacting here, and appreciate your breaking the ice.
  • 24 SouthMain // Mar 20, 2007 at 7:16 pm

    Thanks for the response.

  • 25 anonymous // Mar 20, 2007 at 7:30 pm

    It is great that people are talkiing about your site Turfgrrl. And it is about time people are saying what they feel about Norwalk. It was a great place to grow up for me and I love working with friends that go back years. Some of the changes have been for the good others need to be revisited. Keep us informed.

  • 26 indiga // Mar 20, 2007 at 7:45 pm

    Well, now that the politicians have seen this as another place to preen, I think I will bow out. Why can’t they just lurk on the blog like normal people? If I want to hear the party line, I can read The Hour…or go to that glad-handing, made-for-self-congratulations event known as the “bipartisan meeting.”

  • 27 Mr Greenpeace // Mar 20, 2007 at 7:54 pm

    thanks for the kind words, it took two calls one to the town and one to the state to realize nothing was going to happen to correct a potential disaster. The third call to Duffs office and a fourth to Morris’s office was still going nowhere.So it was a obvious to call the Region office’s of the EPA and OSHA and talk to the two department heads that have closed, cleaned up and worked on some of the most major cleanups in federal history to start the ball rolling..The first picture that needed to be painted was how many people are effected by this, how many are living in areas where federal funds are used for housing,,this brought an imediate response.But not by anyone in the Ct. state house.

    Not using sand this year on our streets was a good move so if hazardous material is found in some of these storm drainage basins it won’t cost that much to dispose of…which opens another can of worms,,who is qualified to work on removing haz mat material for the highway dept? yes one of the areas that the streets fill up with water is on Meadow st right where all the focus is on now.

    Hazardous material is found in most sediment in the street, contains asbestos from brake pads along with chemical runnoff from lawn applications that is a given.Now that the collection pods are in place who gets to remove them at what cost? I trust highway workers won’t without respirators, o2 meters checking the hole for oxygen, and explosive content along with a safety plan so no one gets hurt will.I’m sure there will be a trained staff to do this.

    By the ton is usually the way to dispose of contaminated dirt and I was under the impression there could be up to a 1/2 of ton of dirt in these pods,,was money allocated for such disposal ..I never did read the end product result just the hand shaking and smiling when they were installed.I’m for the environment I’m pointing this all out in more detailed way then I have read..I am totally open to thought on this.

    so before our dedicated workers on the highway dept find themselves in a hole that could harm or kill them them I would only assume this has all been worked out so far for worker protetction to be supervised by qualified people, with OSHA’S blessings of course.

    There has to be others that know the full picture I don’t so when my words are read take them with a grain of salt, but if I am right on any one account I fear it will cost us all money we don’t have when the day comes,,

    anyone want to hear my take on the old police station? what I see there from the outside makes me worry, it should any taxpayer as well..

    I hope its ok to leave an email for ones who want to write that may be affected by the environment, my area is full of cancer and sickness and until a politician shows me he cares not only at election time but all the time I can’t say I would vote for anyone again.

    norwalk.news@yahoo.com

    Mr Greanpeace

  • 28 Watchdog // Mar 20, 2007 at 8:03 pm

    Hey, Indiga… I’m on the floor with your “lurk like normal people.” Brilliant. I understand exactly what you mean. It’s too stiff now.. kinda like you have to throw on a decent shirt now when sweats worked just fine before. Heck, no one even bothered to brush their teeth. Come on, Indiga… please stay. I, for one, will miss your cheeky comments. Whattaya say?

  • 29 Joanne Romano // Mar 20, 2007 at 8:03 pm

    Indiga RE:Well, now that the politicians have seen this as another place to preen. So sorry, I will be happy to lurk in the background. Just wanted Turf to know that I thought it was a good site..POOF outta here!

  • 30 Mike Coffey // Mar 20, 2007 at 8:27 pm

    The next bi-partisan meeting of the council will be on 3/27 at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers at City Hall. All are invited. Nick Kydes is bringing the pizza. We will be discussing DR SPOCC and whatever else is on the councilmembers and residents minds.

    Hope to see you all there.

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All