YourCT.com header image 2

Norwalk: Common Council MTG


by turfgrrl


March 14th, 2007 · 21 Comments

I decided to use the Norwalk Common Council Meeting of 03/12/07 as test of live blogging, sort of. Following the BET meeting the other night, I realized that in taking hand written notes, I still had to craft the post. That took a wee bit of time, so I figured that nothing much was happening at the Common Council meeting so it would be a good test.

Ah well, the audience size should have been a tip off. The meeting opened with the color guard presentation by Girl Scout Troop, possibly celebrating their 75th anniversary. A nice reminder that the work of the council will largely affect this generation more than the current one in terms of the long term investments in infrastructure and quality of life here in Norwalk. Mayor Richard Moccia proclaimed this week to be Girl Scout Week and a couple of the girls read aloud the proclamation.

Rick McQuaid-R thanked the troops for performing, and rattled off all the troops [ Troop 112 form columbus 280 from columbus 464 a muti-town troop and 685 from Naramake school (and I missed one) ]

This happy, council as a united government of the people moment, quickly went away with the mundane task of approving the last council meeting minutes. In the end, they voted to table minutes from last meeting because Matt Miklave-D questioned whether E1 was in the consent calendar, or not.

Then onto the public Portion of Meeting. I paraphrased most of this, and apologize to anyone whose name I misspelt and to the Englsih language which I routinely mangle.

Marilyn Robinson spoke first. She was the former president of the historical commission, and reminded the council of that. She was speaking about Bill Krummel no longer being the council member assigned to the Historical Commission. On the agenda was the item that Richard McQuaid was being nominated. She said, “Bill Krummel has done a wonderful job.” She mentioned that Krummel chairs some committee that she questions what the impact will be on that committee should he no longer be the appointee.

Gail Wall spoke next. She reminded the council that she was speaking as Vice Chair Historical Commission, and thanked Krummel for his service. To Wall, Krummel “brought a lot of passion and interest.” She was concerned that the makeup of historical commission is unbalanced 6 republicans 2 democrats, and 2 unaffilates. She asked that the council table the appointment. She asked that the council, “Select a council member that has a strong interest in historical community.” She suggested either Gwenn Briggs, Carvin Hilliard, Bill Krummel and Kevin Poruban.” This change, according to her, was not in best interest of the city. It’s funny that she included Kevin Poruban as a selectee, since he didn’t win his seat, he replaced a council member who moved out of Norwalk.

Next up was Marny Smith who was here to thank the council for something she thought they would do tonight. She is president of the Norwalk Land Trust, and spoke in appreciation of the conservation easement on the 10 acre Hart peninsula property. She thanked Fred Bondi, Gwenn Briggs, Mike Coffey and all of the council for understanding the value to natural open space.

Then we got a series of lawyers.

Brian Daly: He represents Devon Acura, and read the owner comments. Devon Acura took initiative to improve their property, which effectively improved the west ave neighborhood. About 20 thousand people come annually to purchase or service cars there. An auto dealership requires showroom and parking facilities, including ready access to the car inventory and to view cars etc. The parking component is essential to the business. He said there was a great deal of positive talks with integration but the conceptual plan before the council does reflect those conversations. The plan needs to be changed to integrate Devon Acua. [this plan is on display in hallway of city hall] The property size has been reduced from what Devon currently has, and designated as small business or restaurant. The plan also asks for condemnation which puts Devon out of business. Seligsen hasn’t presented an updated plan. Redevelopment was never intended to impact good businesses, such as Devon which is a $40 million a year business.

John Louisos: Attorney for Curry Tire. He made a point of reminding the council that Curry Tire was established 1929, and survived great depression. Since May 2006 outlined legal flaws with plan, procedural flaws. He read them really fast, so I didn’t quote catch them, but so here they are:
1. does not comply section 8-125 for blight (presented may 2006)
2. 8-125 no factual basis qualifies as redevelopment area
3. essential to complete adequate ???
4. 8-27 no public hearing 8-125
5. Defective not a substandard, deteriorating, or ….
6. Admitted goals and objectives, to create west ave economic social destination and urban ???
7. Defective because it does not contribute crime and disease
8. Economic and social liability continuation?
9. Approval was void in May, because eminent domain was not authorized

Essentially he summarized these procedural defects, and so the council shouldn’t vote for this. Client has shown all the errors, and the council should not allow a perpetual fiefdom on redevelopment agency of the city. Ha. That was a good line, but the guy really speaks to fast.

Charles Willinger: Attorney for 3 owners within West ave, 4 Merwin st llc, S and S management inc 16 chapel street, and European auto center llc, 535 west ave. Clients advised that that have appeared before the council and other agencies and that they want to stay in this area, and none of those concerns have been acknowledged. Willinger claimed they got nothing but an “Insulting offer from developer”. Nothing inherently fair or just with eminent domain. Particularly when city’ intention is to turn over private property to private developer. Be fair or litigate, like maritime motors. Now these clients will fight in terms of land use approvals, on many levels and challenging the plan. The decision as to which way we go is up to the council.

Stanley Selgisen: Okay he’s not a lawyer, but a developer. He opened with the brief historical bio of over past 20 years, he’s been active in trying ot keep west ave alive. (Interesting because West ave hasn’t exactly ever been dead.) He developed Loehman’s plaza, maintained it, improved west ave corridor, done other projects, Costco Circuit City, Sports Authority the building in front of Costco, (Norwalk Hospital). He reminded the council that a great deal of money has been spent, 76 meetings have been held. He regrets that he wasn’t able to fight local businesses owners that were fighting a Macy’s going to the Norwalk mall. Considers this project to be his legacy to Norwalk. In any kind of redevelopment plan, you never are going to satisfy everyone. His intention to work with every property owner. It’s interesting that he brings up the Macy’s because anyone who has spend a little time watching department store consolidations has seen the promise of big department store failings, particularly in Connecticut. G. Fox? Filene’s? I could even say Bradless, Caldor’s and Ames. My point is that developers always seem to focus on the big chains at the expense of the little guy. I am troubled by this, and immediately make a post about eminent domain and post it from the meeting.

Frank Zullo: He was representing Seligsen, which he said started in 1998. He pointed out that they have worked closely with the RDA and the city to make certain that they were aware of the concerns. He repeated that many changes made to plan. Many people in support of the plan are not here tonight, but have expressed this at many meetings previously held. Is concerned about condemnation, but will be “fair and reasonable as possible. Zullo pointed out that Seligsen already owns 50-60% of the property already. Planning committee supported this plan unanimously.

Ed Schmidt: Representing 1428 wall street and 12 main st, the northern half of the Wall street plan. Schmidt objected to extension of time for the use of eminent domain. His argument centered on statutes that said that a legislative body can specify the time that real property can be acquired, can be extended, provided the owner consents to that request. He emphatically stated the the owners have not consented to the extension therefore the council can’t vote on the plan. he urged the council to seek a written opinion on this statutes, which seems like a big deal. In addition to objecting to the extension, he claimed that a modified plan not presented to the owner. He urged the council to table to the plan, and document these procedures so that it was clear who did what should litigation occur.

That concluded the public portion. The council then voted unanimously to appoint Frank Geraghty to Harbor Management Commission. And then they voted to appoint Carvin Hilliard and Kelly Stranitti to the Housing Partnership Commission, and David Turner to the planning commission. Larry Bentley was reappointed to the Licensing Appeals Board – unanimously as well.

The Historical Commisssion appointment drew some interesting audience mutterings and changed from Rick McQuaid to Doug Hempstead.

Kevin Poruban said that he was not aware that postion was coming up and wanted to submit his name. Perhaps he shouldn’t have become a Norwalk-outer. Bill Krummel said this was a very important appointment and reassured Doug Hempstead he held nothing against him but he was concerned that other council people have not had opportunity to be considered for this positon. He motioned to table the the nomination. It failed.

Matt Miklave spoke next and thanked Krummel for his service after initially being reluctant to see him on commission (I think his first impression was probably right) Miklave said that Hempstead will do a wonderful job on commission, but has to comment on the procedure on the appointment. Miklave accused the council of having a behind the scenes deals on the deal and doesn’t think his voice his heard on any issue and thinks that’s a problem. He makes a motion to table too and that fails.

Mike Coffey said ok if other council people want to be considered they should have said so. After some confusion they end up with three names to consider. Hempstead, Poruban and Briggs. Briggs then withdraws her name, and Hempstead wins the nomination after Poruban fails to gather more than 5 votes. It must be frustrating for Poruban to keep getting the lowest vote totals.

Miklave then wants to speak about the consent calendar. He suggests that no one in the audience is fully aware of what the vote is on and mentions that the at the last meeting the Norwalk transit authority left and the debate happened later when they weren’t there. Ok, he probably has a good point, but this stuff is posted on the internet, and you can grab an agenda at the start of the meeting, and Miklave just took too long explaining his point. Coffey seemed annoyed with this, and rereads the consent calendar item by item according to the agenda. It is painful to listen to.

Now there’s a debate going on and Hempstead suggests that they only read the stuff not on consent at the outside to stave off the inevitable Miklave and Nick Kydes showdown. It doesn’t work so it falls to Mayor Moccia to stop it, which it eventually does. Coffey points out that they’ve spent 20 minutes talking about this and they motion to approve the consent calendar.

Matt Miklave tackles the next item which was the West Ave plan approval, and rhetorically asks when is it appropriate to execute eminent domain. He starts by explaining that there the council has offered up different ways to address eminent domain, wall street versus west ave. Undoing the legislation passed for wall street ceded back the authority to the council as a vote on property by property basis. He ends with saying that a vote for resolution is a vote against eminent domain. This was another example of taking too much time to get a point across. Lawyers like to do that. So does Sal Corda. I am thinking that I have now subjected myself to 2 nights of this and clearly must be insane.

But it ends and they vote for it. They finally get to the vote on giving the Hart Peninsula to the Norwalk Land Trust. While this is starting, the lawyers are all leaving noisily and slowly. Fred Bondi remarks that “attorneys in the audience should donate to the land trust.” This started some good natured ribbing amongst the council members. Gwen Briggs promised to make a big donation to the Norwalk Land Trust. Doug Hempstead suggests to Gwen that they won’t take Walter Briggs. Rick McQuaid said apologetically that although they waster time earlier and were not on their best behavior, the council realized that this was an important issue and that they are capable of working together in a nonpartisan fashion to make things like this happen. Joann Roman remarked that she wasn’t aware of the Hart Peninsula and was happy to receive the many emails in support and was happy to vote on something positive for the people of Norwalk. I think every council member spoke in support of this. Mayor Moccia suggested that they skip the dull signing process in his office and instead hold it at the community center. he also said he’s give a donation to the land trust. Bondi said he’d give a check to the land trust too, and Moccia quipped that Bondi would have to give a signed check.

With that the meeting was adjourned.

Update: I fixed some minor typos and added a few articles and conjunctions so that the grammar police would not have major heart attacks, only a minor stroke. Live blogging and editing afterwards was difficult, and I’m not sure I captured what I wanted. But it was a worthwhile experiment.

Tags: In the News · Local · Norwalk

21 Responses so far “Norwalk: Common Council MTG”



  • 1 Watchdog // Mar 14, 2007 at 6:58 am

    Morning, Turfie! Great assessment of the night’s events. Thanks from one who did not attend and is reassured by you as to why. Um.. tell me… in reference to the above text: “Bull” Krummel said this was a very important appointment,” was this a typo or a bit of exaggerated hyperbole on your part?

  • 2 turfgrrl // Mar 14, 2007 at 8:41 am

    watchdog: It was an unintentional typo, which I since corrected, but you know what they say about the subconscious …
  • 3 Anonymous // Mar 14, 2007 at 11:42 am

    Turfie:Good job.
    Keep up the good coverage.

  • 4 Anonymous // Mar 14, 2007 at 11:49 am

    I think with a changing of the guard on the Historic Commission, they just might lose their previous title of the hysterical commission. It is a welcome sight, and the COmmon Council is to be commended for not bowing to political pressure and selecting someone like DOug Hempstead who will help tremendously on that Commission.

    Peter Bondi seems to be doing a great job and changing a dysfuntional commission back into a respectable one. Only a few more members that need to leave before all normalcy is restored.

    Maybe if the ragin’ cajun’ runs for mayor she will step down from the board in order to devote her full time attention to her mayoral bid. As someone who previously served on that commission with her, it will be a relief to that commission when that day occurs.

  • 5 anon // Mar 14, 2007 at 12:34 pm

    Museum curator files ethics complaint with Norwalk

    By Ryan Jockers
    Staff Writer

    September 29, 2004

    NORWALK — Norwalk Museum Curator Susan Gunn has filed a formal complaint
    with the city that alleges unethical conduct by a Historical Commission
    member and intent by the commission to fire her.

    The document, a 28-page sworn affidavit by Gunn, accompanied by voluminous
    backup materials, was delivered to Louis Ciccarello, the city’s corporation
    counsel, on Friday. Historical Commission Chairwoman Marilyn Robinson, Mayor
    Alex Knopp and Common Council members also received the document.
    The document specifically alleges that Ralph Bloom, the former Norwalk
    Museum curator and a current Historical Commission member, violated the
    city’s ethics code by voting on issues involving the museum, a city-owned
    entity that leases the former South Norwalk City Hall on North Main Street
    from the Norwalk Museum Partnership, of which Bloom is a partner.
    It also alleges Bloom, from 1992 to 1997, deposited “city money” — checks
    made payable to the Norwalk Museum — into a bank account for the Friends of
    the Norwalk Museum, a nonprofit organization separate from the city, which
    had run a “tag sale shop” in the museum.

    Bloom has been a treasurer and director of the friends organization, which
    is a member of the Norwalk Museum Partnership.

    The friends made a $300,000 investment in the partnership, according to
    Gunn’s affidavit. She cites a 1999 “internal memorandum” from the state
    attorney general’s office that says: “On the face of it, it doesn’t seem
    appropriate for Friends, of which Bloom is a director and Treasurer as well
    as an employee of the Museum, to use its money to prop up a business in
    which Bloom has a substantial financial interest.”
    However, the memo also says the friends may have been wise in giving money
    to the partnership, which had the resources to renovate the building, and it
    was not clear whether the loan represented a conflict of interest.
    Gunn’s affidavit also claims that when Bloom was curator, he accepted
    donations that he did not record and that he is attempting to remove items
    from the museum that belong to the city.
    Bloom said yesterday that he did not want to comment on Gunn’s affidavit
    until he sought legal counsel. He said he had not been given a copy of the
    document but was aware he is “mentioned thoroughly.”

    Gunn’s affidavit recounts her tempestuous relationship with commission
    leaders since becoming curator in 2000 and includes public testimony and
    e-mails from her father, Colin Gunn, and friend Michael Bromley, who also is
    a museum volunteer, to a special city historic preservation committee and to
    commissioners that allege Bloom’s unethical conduct.
    Knopp formed the special committee to settle a disagreement regarding the
    commission’s authority over Gunn. In May, he said the curator reports to and
    receives direction from the commission.
    Gunn filed the Sept. 24 complaint, which was prepared by the law firm Carey
    & Associates of Southport, in accordance with a state “whistleblower” law
    that protects employees, who disclose their employer’s illegal activities or
    unethical practices, from being disciplined.

    The affidavit culminates with Gunn saying she believes the Historical
    Commission, at its meeting tonight at 7:30 in the Norwalk Museum, will
    accuse her of insubordination and possibly recommend her firing to Knopp.
    A Sept. 19 e-mail from Commissioner Elizabeth Booth to Robinson and Gunn,
    which is included in the affidavit, states that Gunn’s allowing of an
    assessment of the museum collection to continue two weeks ago despite
    Robinson’s request to postpone it “appears to be an act of insubordination.”
    The museum won an $8,000 Conservation Assessment Program grant in April,
    enabling it to hire professional conservators to assess the condition of the
    collection and make recommendations for improvements. The commission,
    Robinson has said, sought to postpone the assessment because it wanted Gunn
    to conduct an inventory of the collection first.
    In the affidavit, Gunn claims she received the request to postpone the assessment too late — the preservation consultant, Millie O’Connell, had
    arrived in Norwalk from Boston and began her work Sept. 14, the day Gunn had
    publicized. Robinson said yesterday the commission is not planning to request Gunn’s dismissal tonight. She said the commission may hold an executive session tonight to discuss personnel, “but not for the purpose to ask her to resign.”

    Robinson became chairwoman early this year after the former chairwoman, Diane Rochelle, whom Gunn once formally complained to the city of having harassed and humiliated her in public, did not seek reappointment. Regarding Gunn’s allegations of Bloom’s unethical conduct, Robinson said: “Why would we reprimand her? If it is legitimate, someone will look into it. If it’s not found to be legitimate, then it’s not legitimate.”

    She said she does not perceive Bloom’s serving on the commission, being a partner of the museum’s landlord and being a director of the nonprofit Friends — which once gave the partnership a $300,000 loan — to be a conflict of interest.

    “I’m not saying I wouldn’t listen to someone who had a good point,” she said. “From what I know, the mayor appointed him . . . and he hasn’t voted on any monetary item that would be a benefit to him. I have no problem.” Fred Bondi, a Common Council member, said he believes there is a conflict of interest and that the council should form its three-member ethics committee to look into the allegations. Bondi voted against Bloom’s appointment to the Historical Commission. Bruce Kimmel, the Common Council president, said yesterday he could not comment on the document, as the city’s legal department is handling it.

    Knopp said, “I have no comment on this document because it appears to threaten litigation, and it has been referred to corporation counsel.” Ciccarello, the corporation counsel, did not return phone calls seeking comment. Mark Carey, the attorney representing Gunn in the complaint, said yesterday he would not comment.

    Southern Connecticut Newspapers

  • 6 indiga // Mar 14, 2007 at 3:21 pm

    The Mayor saw it as “hysterical commission” because it had more BALLS than he did in standing up for neighborhoods and preservation. Now he’s got his “geldings” in place and all is peaceful….and since the curator has formalized her job as a TRUE “no show”, it’s REALLY peaceful. $60K plus to never be there. What a great gig.

  • 7 Norwalk Taxpayer // Mar 14, 2007 at 4:46 pm

    The hysterical commission had balls? No, it was the the lack of balls that made the old group shrill and useless. Actually if the commissioners that expired had the balls to stand up to Marilyn Robinson and Gail Wall, then they probably would still be on the commission. Ralph Bloom worked hard, but just went along for the ride. Whoever posted the news clip clearly has a historical perspective on the endless shenanigans that these two created. And I’m no fan of Sue Gunn, who just aided and abetted this endless circus. Here’s clue, everyone is tired of the bickering and sniping and negativiy. Grow up, be responsible and do postive things.

  • 8 Anonymous // Mar 14, 2007 at 6:01 pm

    Thank you for your insight, #7. A psychiatrist would have a field day with why SOME people scramble for “power” and/or fame at low levels such as civic organizations. Notice I said some. I’m certain you know who they are. Sadly enough, the dysfunction that reveals itself in group work and collaboration directly correlates to the negative dynamics in one’s homelife. It is so disturbing that we have to put up with unbalanced personalities who spit and sputter rather than build and support. Bah. It is downright sickening.

  • 9 anon // Mar 14, 2007 at 6:38 pm

    Even Alex would refer to Marilyn and Gail as the “harpies.” Anyone he tried to convince to serve on the commission wouldn’t do it.

  • 10 indiga // Mar 14, 2007 at 6:47 pm

    OK…how’s this? I’m POSITIVE that the Mayor placed his “geldings” on the Historical Commission to show his SUPPORT for teardowns and uncontrolled development in Norwalk’s oldest neighborhoods. He’s BUILDING his coalition among those who are lining their own pockets. Upbeat enough for ya?

  • 11 Norwalk Taxpayer // Mar 14, 2007 at 7:00 pm

    I’m positive that Peter Bondi was a favor to Fred Bondi, on matters entirely unrealted to uncontrolled development in Norwalk’s oldest neighborhoods. You want to curb development, why not start asking Walter Briggs and Alex Knopp why they sold off development rights to the highest bidder.

  • 12 intheknow // Mar 14, 2007 at 8:07 pm

    To indigna
    1) Be careful slander is a sue able offense.
    2) Please name Geldings
    3. Provide proof or connections that lead directly or even indirectly to the money.
    4) I assume you’re talking about every person put on the Historical Commission.
    5) Do not owners of property have rights, it is their land bought with their money.I assume eminent domain is OK in your books.
    6) What have you personally done to change policy and how?
    7) It sounds to me that you feel only individuals who believe in YOUR philosophy should be appointed. What provision gives you the exclusive right? Please note statutes and life experiences that allow that. Most importantly wouldn’t you do it if you could?

  • 13 anonymous // Mar 14, 2007 at 8:42 pm

    The ragin’ cajun has no use for the leadership of either Alex or Galen - thus she is off creating her own political party and if all else fails is seeking out a new Dem Chair. Good luck! no one wants the job.

  • 14 Anon // Mar 14, 2007 at 8:57 pm

    WHO is this ragin cajin? I surely hope he/she doesn’t represent taxpayers on a board or agency!

  • 15 turfgrrl // Mar 14, 2007 at 9:06 pm

    I think that would be Gail Wall and not James Carville, although both hail from Louisiana. Gail Wall is on the historical commission, vice chair, in fact and noted at last night’s meeting that the board was unbalanced, with 6 Republicans. She is a registered Republican.
  • 16 Anon // Mar 14, 2007 at 9:11 pm

    Hold on now…. according to a previous comment… am I to understand that this lone woman from Louisiana is likely to run for Mayor on an independent ticket? How long has she resided in Norwalk?

  • 17 turfgrrl // Mar 14, 2007 at 9:27 pm

    Gail Wall has been involved with the save cranbury organization, the Norwalk historical society and likely other organizations for a number of years.
  • 18 anonymous // Mar 14, 2007 at 10:41 pm

    Talk about developers with their hands in council members pants, why not go back and examine the finance committee of Gwen Briggs in her 2005 election. The records are available in the City CLerk’s Office if one wants to sit down and review them. Bruce Beinfield, a principal of Spinnaker Development was a member of Gwen Brigg’s campaign committee while Walter was the Chair of the Planning Commission. She has been a tireless supporter of paving over Norwalk for developer profits.

  • 19 indiga // Mar 15, 2007 at 8:56 am

    Intheknow (not) —
    1) “proof is on the plaintiff”…
    2-7) You must have me confused with someone in the current Moccia the mooch administration.

  • 20 Watchdog // Mar 15, 2007 at 4:35 pm

    Okay kids…let’s all try to play nice now.

  • 21 turfgrrl // Mar 15, 2007 at 4:41 pm

    Hiya Watchdog. I added the previous next post links to the top of the page. Let me know if that works for you, or if you’d like it somewhere else too, or instead of.