
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ned Lamont Thinks He&#8217;d Be A Good Governor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourct.com/2009/11/ned-lamont-thinks-hed-be-a-good-governor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourct.com/2009/11/ned-lamont-thinks-hed-be-a-good-governor/</link>
	<description>Connecticut Political Commentary, News and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnstorm</title>
		<link>http://www.yourct.com/2009/11/ned-lamont-thinks-hed-be-a-good-governor/comment-page-1/#comment-159949</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourct.com/new/?p=5425#comment-159949</guid>
		<description>No Blarney, I&#039;m not Mikey. While I agree with him on certain fundamental issues, I&#039;m not into his approach OR his political party. My overzealous characterization was a direct response to your &quot;tax&amp; spend crazy&quot; and your obvious  distain for &quot;liberals&quot; . If there&#039;s one thing I can&#039;t tolerate it&#039;s intolerance (and yes, I recognize the dichotomy). The political &quot;right&quot; has had an annoying tendency (ever since Saint Ronnie made it popular) to try and pin simplistic labels on opposing views, in a sorry effort to discredit and misrepresent any other opinions besides their own. You do it, Beck, Rush, Hannity, Coulter and others do it. And then you ponder aloud why there is no civil discourse these days. It doesn&#039;t happen because you ( and many others like you) have turned the fertile grounds of  true debate into a toxic waste dump.
God forbid somebody from &quot;the other side&quot; has to point this out to you.

Besides, I&#039;ve been called a lot worse things in my life besides &quot;Mikey&quot;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Blarney, I&#8217;m not Mikey. While I agree with him on certain fundamental issues, I&#8217;m not into his approach OR his political party. My overzealous characterization was a direct response to your &#8220;tax&amp; spend crazy&#8221; and your obvious  distain for &#8220;liberals&#8221; . If there&#8217;s one thing I can&#8217;t tolerate it&#8217;s intolerance (and yes, I recognize the dichotomy). The political &#8220;right&#8221; has had an annoying tendency (ever since Saint Ronnie made it popular) to try and pin simplistic labels on opposing views, in a sorry effort to discredit and misrepresent any other opinions besides their own. You do it, Beck, Rush, Hannity, Coulter and others do it. And then you ponder aloud why there is no civil discourse these days. It doesn&#8217;t happen because you ( and many others like you) have turned the fertile grounds of  true debate into a toxic waste dump.<br />
God forbid somebody from &#8220;the other side&#8221; has to point this out to you.</p>
<p>Besides, I&#8217;ve been called a lot worse things in my life besides &#8220;Mikey&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secondhand Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.yourct.com/2009/11/ned-lamont-thinks-hed-be-a-good-governor/comment-page-1/#comment-159946</link>
		<dc:creator>Secondhand Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourct.com/new/?p=5425#comment-159946</guid>
		<description>No, he&#039;s not Mikey. Mikey has gone back to wherever it was that he came from. Now that the election is over, I guess he figures his job is done, and he&#039;s evaporated from the boards. Either that, or he&#039;s posting under yet another name. At one point he was having a 6-way conversation with himself over at The Hour&#039;s website. LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, he&#8217;s not Mikey. Mikey has gone back to wherever it was that he came from. Now that the election is over, I guess he figures his job is done, and he&#8217;s evaporated from the boards. Either that, or he&#8217;s posting under yet another name. At one point he was having a 6-way conversation with himself over at The Hour&#8217;s website. LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NorwalkSpectator</title>
		<link>http://www.yourct.com/2009/11/ned-lamont-thinks-hed-be-a-good-governor/comment-page-1/#comment-159922</link>
		<dc:creator>NorwalkSpectator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourct.com/new/?p=5425#comment-159922</guid>
		<description>Blarney, I don&#039;t think Barnstorm is Mikey, Mikey was rude and Barnstorm has been polite, up until Post 2.   Mikey was into wild eyed hysteria, Barnstorm is not.  Mikey discounted anyone who didn&#039;t agree with him as less than an idiot. Barnstorm has pointed out his views, but respected those who viewed things differently.  So, if Barnstorm got hacked, I&#039;d suspect Mikey, but I don&#039;t think Barnstorm and Mikey are one and the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blarney, I don&#8217;t think Barnstorm is Mikey, Mikey was rude and Barnstorm has been polite, up until Post 2.   Mikey was into wild eyed hysteria, Barnstorm is not.  Mikey discounted anyone who didn&#8217;t agree with him as less than an idiot. Barnstorm has pointed out his views, but respected those who viewed things differently.  So, if Barnstorm got hacked, I&#8217;d suspect Mikey, but I don&#8217;t think Barnstorm and Mikey are one and the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLARNEY</title>
		<link>http://www.yourct.com/2009/11/ned-lamont-thinks-hed-be-a-good-governor/comment-page-1/#comment-159891</link>
		<dc:creator>BLARNEY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourct.com/new/?p=5425#comment-159891</guid>
		<description>He is a Liberal Democrat.  Case closed

PS

Barnstorm are you really Mikey in drag?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is a Liberal Democrat.  Case closed</p>
<p>PS</p>
<p>Barnstorm are you really Mikey in drag?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnstorm</title>
		<link>http://www.yourct.com/2009/11/ned-lamont-thinks-hed-be-a-good-governor/comment-page-1/#comment-159879</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourct.com/new/?p=5425#comment-159879</guid>
		<description>At least he&#039;s not a head up his own butt teabagger. Actually, I fail to see anything in Lamont&#039;s record that would justify your characterization of him as a tax and spend anything. He&#039;s certainly no crazier than ANY politician.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least he&#8217;s not a head up his own butt teabagger. Actually, I fail to see anything in Lamont&#8217;s record that would justify your characterization of him as a tax and spend anything. He&#8217;s certainly no crazier than ANY politician.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLARNEY SKANK</title>
		<link>http://www.yourct.com/2009/11/ned-lamont-thinks-hed-be-a-good-governor/comment-page-1/#comment-159616</link>
		<dc:creator>BLARNEY SKANK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourct.com/new/?p=5425#comment-159616</guid>
		<description>LAMONT!  Is he kidding?  He is another tax &amp; spend crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LAMONT!  Is he kidding?  He is another tax &amp; spend crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

