Yegads $400k In Savings In An Election Year

Tonight we differ from our normal Common Council coverage because, sadly, the battery on my macbook was expended on the whirlwind of meetings concerning pARTy in the park. What’s that? Norwalk’s Art Commission is hosting a one day arts festival on June 20th. Click over here for more details.

So it was the old fashioned, blogger with a pen in the council chambers. And the common council meeting only ran long because of an executive session where they discussed something with no action. See the agenda here for details.

Everything was on consent except for a minor accounting transfer of about $23k which Bill Krummel wanted you to know that the money was for ordinance employees, that would be non union employees, in 5 departments. Otherwise known as Directors of departments. The money was to cover raises voted on in April of 2008. Krummel wanted to know why they should get raises when the city was facing layoffs. The Mayor wanted to know why Krummel was bringing up layoffs when the city had been working on avoiding layoffs.

This line of questioning and was the most excitement of the meeting, but in the end, the issue was merely an accounting transfer, as Phylis Bolden stated, “to balance the books.” Apparently the city puts money in contingency accounts until it is needed. But before then, based on the routine employee activities, payroll accounts typically accrue unspent funds. In this case there wasn’t any accrual they could automatically use, so they needed to dip into the contingency account.

Meanwhile one of the items on the agenda that should have sparked discussion was the apparent $400k in bond refinancing savings. Remember when there was all that concern over bonding refinancing on Waypointe?

Well here’s the item on consent:

6. Resolution with respect to the issuance and sale of not exceeding $18,700,000 city of Norwalk,Connecticut General Obligation Bonds, series 2009.

Note that there’s nothing there to indicate that there’s a $400k savings. Nothing on the May 14th Finance Committee agenda either. Were it not for the Mayor and Council member Doug Hempstead actually mentioning to me that there was this savings, I wouldn’t have known about it, and neither would you.

The amazing thing is that its an election year. The Mayor and the council members are running for reelection. You’d think that they’d all like to grab some positive news items every once in awhile! Especially when cities all around Norwalk are making lay offs, and hiking property taxes by double digits.

Channel 79 will provide all this scintallating council action.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

  • Councilwoman Bolden

    Hi, here’s a piece of kickoff; an email from Mr. Hamilton that helped to explain some bond refunding activity. Hope this helps in the information department.
    Thanks – Phyllis

    Common Council Members:

    As you may recall from the bond refunding that we conducted earlier this year, there were some bond maturities that we were unable to refund in February, but for which the market was close to achieving our 2.0% savings threshold. For this reason, we asked the Common Council to approve a somewhat larger authorization amount, so if the market turned in our direction, we would be able to quickly refund the remaining maturities.

    The market for high-grade municipal bonds has fluctuated, but an opportunity arose for us to capture some additional savings, and we priced a refunding deal this afternoon. This transaction involves refunding a principal amount of $18,350,000. The Net Present Value savings on these refunding bonds is $399,753, or 2.17%. The nominal savings is $417,005. Approx. $340,000 of the savings will be realized in FY 2009-10. Given the continuing uncertainty concerning State aid for next year, these funds may very will be needed to fill a shortfall in State aid. (Please note: these are not the absolute final numbers, because they will be affected by the final escrow earnings and the securities in the escrow are still being procured. However, we expect that the final escrow earnings will meet or exceed these savings targets).

    We appreciate the wise decision of the Council to pre-approve this refunding last February, which has allowed us the flexibility to move quickly to capture these savings. I am sending this email in accordance with the instructions from the Council at the time of approval that I notify you, if we were to execute a follow up refunding.

    Tom Hamilton
    Director of Finance

  • Fred Wilms

    I commend the Common Council for its foresight in approving the larger authorization amount. That has allowed us to acheive an extra $400,000 in savings. One reason for the muted reactions however is there may be further negative news coming out of Hartford. We have been hearing that aid to Norwalk may come in lower than expected. If that happens, the $400,000 would be needed to absorb that loss.

  • anonymous

    Gov. Rell sent some of her negative news to Norwalk about closing the Courthouse in Norwalk. Is our republican mayor and our republican rep. going to actually do something to intercede with her or just bend over again?

  • BAD NEWS

    Is is true that the “shelter” is moving into the building on Chestnut St next to packit???
    WTF?

  • Secondhand Rose

    Norwalk functioned quite well without a courthouse for many decades. I’m sure we as a city can suck it up and termporarily work without a courthouse again if we are forced to. No need for huge drama over this.

  • Old Timer

    Rose:
    How far back are you looking ? I can’t recall anytime there was no court in Norwalk. Norwalk had a courtroom on the second floor of the City Hall on North Main st long ago. Major criminal cases went to a higher level court in Bridgeport. The police station in Mathews park was built with a court on the second floor and it opened in the early 60′s, handling the same level of criminal and MV cases with major cases being bound over to a higher court.

  • Secondhand Rose

    There was a Probate court but no “regular” court that I know of in the 1970s and 80s; if you had to go to court, such as for a traffic violation, you went to Stamford. The Norwalk courthouse wasn’t even built until the 1980s.

  • Anon

    And what about the jobs that will be lost, if the courthouse closes.

    We may not have had a courthouse until the 1980′s, but our population has increased significantly since then. How could Stamford handle such an increase, I wonder. Not to mention the parking.

  • Old Timer

    Now that you say that, there was a short period when Norwalk did not have a functioning courtroom. They closed the court upsatairs in the police station and everything went to Stamford for a while before the courthouse on Belden was built, in the late 70′s.
    The volume of business that is handled in the Norwalk court is tremendous. Where will all those cases go ? The Governor expects closing the Norwalk court will save a lot of money and cut out a lot of jobs, but the savings in Norwalk will be largely offset by extra expense to run the Stamford court with all the Norwalk workload going there..

  • Anonymous

    Old Timer – I recall the courtroom upstairs in the police headquarters. Wow, that brings back memories. Not that I was a guest there, mind you, but I do remember an elementary school field trip visit to the police station.

  • We have to start somewhere..

    With the upcoming budget shortfall fast becoming a reality, we need to cut costs! If the courthouse on Belden Ave is costing the citizens of CT too much, then close it! In all the times I’ve been called for Jury Duty in the last 38 yrs, I’ve been to Norwalk (1) time! All the rest have been to Stamford.
    Thank God we have a responsible Governor in Hartford! She is trying her best not to let the far left wacko Democrats spend us into oblivoin like that discrace that resides in the White House!
    It’s time to slap down the tax & SPEND assholes that have put us in our current situation.
    We need to put an end to the scum sucking cronies like Acorn, the Unions, and the far left of the democrat party that have done their best to destroy Capitalism and change our country to a Socialist nightmare that we may never recover from.