What is Larry Cafero Thinking?

There are many occasions, where I wonder what our Norwalk legislative delegation is thinking about. Clearly, in the face of a suffocating $8 billion dollar deficit, you would hope that they would be thinking about how to cut expenses. As Minority Leader of the House, Larry Cafero gets lots of ink time. So we start with his latest comments on decriminalizing the possession of less than half an ounce of pot. Call it the martini equivalent.

House Republican leader Lawrence Cafero of Norwalk spoke strongly against changing the law, saying that he has seen drugs ruin numerous lives during the past 16 years that he has served as the expulsion officer for the Norwalk public schools. High-achieving students who once received grades of As and Bs in their classes often fall to Cs and Ds after they have become regular marijuana smokers, Cafero said.

“I’ve seen kids who are getting high at 7 in the morning, sometimes at 12 years old,” Cafero told the committee. “It ruins a lot of lives. It ruins a lot of families. … It’s not a matter of efficiency. It’s not a matter of money. It’s a matter of lives.”

Hey if I were Cafero, I’d be more concerned about the skills of teachers falling because they have to fill out an inane amount of paperwork just to teach in this state if he were all that concerned about grades in schools. If Cafero is so concerned about lives being ruined, than he perhaps should be more concerned about families who have to choose between paying for groceries and paying for health care. See, I too can make one of those bombastic correlations that sound exploitative. I’ve seen kids drinking at 7 AM in the morning, as young as 12 even, and I don’t see a legislative rush to decriminalize a half ounce of tequila. Should we even bother talking about Ritilin prescriptions, in kids at 7 AM, as young as 12?

Meanwhile, the Democrats have produced their budget plan. Shh. The details are not released yet. So why do we have anticipatory comments? Slow news days people. Bunnies with 2 noses and Chimp attack victim updates in the newspaper of the capitol abound. Here’s Cafero on the un-revealed Democratic legislative answer to Rell’s budget:

“It is unfortunate that our repeated pleas and requests to play an active role in developing a bipartisan budget have gone unheeded to this point,” said House Republican leader Larry Cafero of Norwalk.

Does Cafero think he’s Jay Cutler or something? Senate Republican Minority Leader John McKinney:

“Despite their promises of bipartisanship, the Democrats have drafted a budget proposal behind closed doors and without Republican input,” said Senate Republican leader John McKinney of Fairfield. “I fear the Democrat budget, while having some cuts, has not done the hard work of making government smaller and more efficient. It instead relies on borrowing and increasing taxes on families and small businesses.”

Was it a little over a month ago that Cafero was singing the praises of bi-partisanship?

The 143 to 0 vote came shortly before 11 p.m. Wednesday after an all-day session that included behind-the-scenes negotiating and maneuvering by Republicans, Democrats, and the governor’s office. The Senate was expected to approve the budget by early Thursday morning.

In an unusual speech on the House floor, Republican leader Lawrence Cafero of Norwalk thanked House Speaker Christopher Donovan, a Democrat, for the bipartisan spirit that allowed legislators to come together on a deficit-cutting plan that is normally marked with high tension and partisan clashes.

“Today is a good day,” Cafero said at about 10:45 p.m. “It’s not a perfect day. … It’s a plan. It’s a start. … We’re going to have plenty of times when we’re going to be mad at each other and call each other names.”

Well I think the headline question is all settled now.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

  • anonymous

    His comments are just the typical political scare blather rhetoric: OMG – there are so many ten year olds smoking pot and their grades are dropping and its destroying the family values as espoused by the likes of Newt Gingrich.

    What is most disapppointing about Cafero was his inability to steer more federal stimulus dollars to Norwalk. Once again, Rell, Moccia and Cafero have failed us.

  • Anonymous

    Let’s see… my taxes are going up because my wife and I just barely qualify for the $250k threshold. Maybe I should never have quit smoking pot so I could stay in the “Happy Idiot” category…

  • Anonymous

    #1-or really? Tell me what the dems are doing? I certainly hope that you and your spouse do not make $250,000.00 per yr or more because you just got drop kicked to the curb.

    Whatever you believe about marijuana is irrelevant because apparently you are unaware of just how many youngsters are actually drinking/smoking starting as early as 11 yrs old. I guess you don’t pay too close attention to what your kids are saying. Parents are supposed to be so up to date on what is going on and don’t even know or care what their kids are really doing.

    Try listening to what your kids are talking about and you might be quite shocked. This is eveident in all schools and at parties etc. Who’s to blame? I don’t know, ask yourself that question, you might come up with the answer.

    A better choice would be that anyone under the age of 21 caught with any amount of marijuana would be treated the same way as those who are caught as underage drinkers. or if they decide to change the drinking age to 18 like it should be, (I always believed that if you are old enough to lay your life on the line for your country you should be able to make adult decisions).

    Its not just Cafero who believes in this. Parents feign surprise/embarrasement/are mortified when their kids get caught drinking or doing something illegal but if they paid closer attention to what their kids are saying/doing they could avoid these situations and make it less necessary for legislators to concentrate on bills like this and pay more attention to not screwing the taxpayers unfairly.

    How do they justify picking a number like $250.000 to heap higher taxes on? what people making less than that(myself included) don’t use city and state services? We don’t drive on the highways or use the roads/railways? So why should these people get higher taxes levied on them? Great way to push more people out of Connecticut and into places where they can actually enjoy the benefit of the money they work for.

    The blame game gets old. Write your legislators if you oppose something. Keep writing til they hear you. If that doesn’t work, camp out on their front lawn in Hartford. That should get someones attention.

  • Anonymous

    I agree 100% with Cafero, to make any amount marijuana legal is the last thing we need.

  • Anonymous

    Cafero is right. Turfgrrl, when you want to attack a person’s position on a topic, stick to the immediate topic. After saying his thinking about marijuana is wrong, you used as “arguments” the following: teachers who have too much paperwork to do, the choice between paying for groceries and paying for health care, kids who drink (already illegal, by the way) and kids who take (presumably prescribed) Ritalin. A person can make great arguments on either side of any of these other issues, but they have nothing to do with marijuana laws. Stick to the merits of the argument and then ask him if he has taken or will take a stand on each of the issues you mentioned.

  • Publius

    Bravo to Larry for speaking the truth to all the potheads out there. Reading through this entire web posting, I did not see one single good reason to decriminalize pot.

    • turfgrrl

      Publius: The truth? Hack politcal speak. Oh let’s just quote what the Economist says on the subject: That is the kind of promise politicians love to make. It assuages the sense of moral panic that has been the handmaiden of prohibition for a century. It is intended to reassure the parents of teenagers across the world. Yet it is a hugely irresponsible promise, because it cannot be fulfilled. But read the whole editorial about how this endless war on drugs is a failure, both from an economic policy, the US alone wastes some $40 billion a year on the “war on drugs”, imagine how many bailouts of banks that could fund!

  • Drock

    Larry Ca-zero dollars is a clown! His comments on pot shows- how out of touch really is! Maybe- he needs to have someone run against him. Anybody- want a part time job – Hartford?

  • Chump

    Larry C. also tends to tell “Tall Tales”.

    Larry’s father is a good man. How Dr. Cafero came to have a dingbat son like Larry is beyond me.

    When Larry ran most recently I chose to vote for the “unknown” candidate running against Larry. Would rather throw my vote away than give it to Larry.

    As for the Mayoral race – Mayor Moooochia needs to get bounced out. He’s a MO-ron. And the constituants follow him around like he’s John Lennon and Gandhi all rolled into one.

    My proposal is to get one of Connecticut’s death row inmates to run. Probably would beat the pant’s off of Moooochie POOO Mochia “I don’t care about victims of crime” Mayor Mochia.

    • turfgrrl

      Chump: Larry Cafero ran unopposed in the last election. Much of what you are posting in the comments here has nothing to do with the topic of the thread, and you seem fixated on addressing some personal issues here. This is not the forum for it.

  • Anonymous

    Wow Chump,
    You have alot to say about alot of people. Do you know anyone you are talking about? Larry has served his constituents well and will continue to do so. I don’t see you ragging on any of the dems in your rants. Seems you have an agenda here that is quite transparent.

    Care to weigh in on Dodd or the outragous budget the dems are trying to jam down our throats? I guess we’ll be listening to you gibberish all the way to election day.

    Too bad, Larry isn’t running this year so why not pick apart the rest of the party that is. I’m sure it will give you great pleasure.

    Your rants are getting tiresome. But I guess that the good ? thing about America, everyone has an opinion and gets to air them in a public forum. Of course there’s another saying about opinions that that wouldn’t look good in a public forum so I will leave it at that.

  • Anonymous

    turfgrrl: You have deleted other postings that you considered to be blatant personal attacks, so why not delete Chump’s, especially since most of what he/she wrote is irrelevant to this thread?

  • Publius

    Turffie: Amazingly you focus on the cost of combatting drugs but not on the cost of drug usage. Let’s add up the costs of all the wreckage drug usage inflicts on individuals, families and society at large. Here is a suggestion. Why don’t you debate Ginger Katz about all this?

  • Secondhand Rose

    You know why I started using pot when I was 22? Because I looked around at all my friends who had been using since high school – and I realized that NOTHING BAD WAS HAPPENING TO THEM. All the “horror stories” we were being spoon-fed in health class year after year turned out to be complete and utter lies. And out of all those people, myself included, I don’t know one single person who was ever arrested for drug use; not one of them ever lost a job because of drug use; not one of them ever got a traffic ticket because of drug use; not one of them ever committed a crime because of drug use. But every single one of them went to college and graduated; every one of them owns a house; several of them own businesses and the rest of them have had successful careers; most of them have kids who are college graduates. They’ve all had happy, successful lives.

    Show me someone who’s been *drinking* since high school who can claim the same.

    Most of the kids I knew who were drinking in high school back in 1974 have become alcoholics. Quite a few of them have become career criminals. Many of them have had more than 3 traffic accidents attributable to alcohol abuse. I know of at least one who killed himself by running into a tree on St. Mary’s Lane the night of graduation because he got drunk at a graduation party. Another one killed himself a few years later on Rowayton Avenue. Quite a few of them are on their 2nd and 3rd marriages. At least 2 of them became wife abusers.

  • Anonymous

    Secondhand Rose: Your thinking is flawed. While I don’t dispute what you said about everyone you know, the number of people you know isn’t large enough a sample for a scientific study. And by the way, I can make the same claims for people I know who drink alcohol.

    The fact is that neither alcohol nor marijuana is good for us. Unlike the governor, however, I would support legislation that would legalize the possession and use of marijuana by chemotherapy patients.

  • drug policy reform advocate

    You are entirely correct on this issue, TG, Larry’s grandstanding in not helpful in the least. Drug addiction is a serious and complex problem, and prohibition has only made it worse. Of course no one is advocating making pot legal for minors. Adults, however, should be able to obtain virtually any drug they want or need with governernment regulation to mitigate the harm. This is known as “harm reduction.” Putting people in jail for using drugs is stupendously tragic, because in jail you can get ANY drug from the guards. What a waste of taxpayer money and peoples’ lives! I worked on drug prevention for many years and it is a tremendously complex issue also. Programs like the one Ginger Katz espouses have repeatededly proven to be ineffective-think DARE, Just Say No and Scared Straight. Ginger Katz getting $1M of the stimulus funding is also tragic-just think of how many teachers and other useful jobs that money could have funded.

  • Anonymous

    Ginger Katz is getting $1 million of our stimulus money? Are you sure?

    I have seen her program and I cannot believe that it is effective. She tells her truly tragic story, cries and then opens for questions, and she has been doing this for years, making it her livelihood. I can’t imagine who helped her get the funding; I hope it wasn’t someone from Norwalk.

  • Anonymous

    I have been smoking pot for over thirty years and I never got hooked on it…why do you think Larry doesn’t want to decriminalize weed…because he’s a lawyer…look at how much money these snakes make defending some poor kid that got caught with a lousy joint or two…gimme a break.

  • Anonymous

    I hear ya, I’ve been smoking Lucky Strikes for 30 years and never got hooked on them.

  • Ex Cop

    Thirty years and not hooked ? When you can honestly claim thirty days without, then tell us how harmless marijuana is. Neither marijuana nor alcohol should be available to children and any medical professional can explain why. The same medical professional can also tell horror stories about misadventures of folks who really believed they were not addicted and in full control. Possession of small amounts is already effectively de-criminalized. Courts routinely send first offenders for treatment rather than criminal sanctions.

  • Secondhand Rose

    I wasn’t hooked. The day I decided to stop, I just put it down and never went back to it. Didn’t bother me in the least to just walk away. It’s been somethng like 20 years or more now, and I don’t even miss it.

    And alcohol? I can nurse a single drink through an entire wedding reception. I think I drink alcohol maybe once a year, if that. It’s easy to see what alcohol can do to people; just sit in a bar for a few hours and watch the humans change into obnoxious morons in a matter of 30 minutes while they compete to see who can fall down fastest or get sick the quickest – or who just turns into a drooling idiot because he/she can.

    Frankly, I don’t believe anything any cop or “ex-cop” tells me about drugs. Most cops live and work within the dregs of society and in a matter of a few years become totally jaded on human life, viewing the entire human race as scum simply because they spend all their time with the criminal element. Their viewpoint is completely compromised.

  • drug policy reform advocate

    Here is the info on the stimulus money from an earlier post by Turfgirl:
    “3/16/09

    Under the omnibus bill, $143,000 will go to Norwalk public schools to improve technology and equipment; and $300,000 will go to Family ReEntry to pay for employment and training programs for ex-offenders transitioning from the criminal justice system. Courage to Speak Foundation will receive $950,000 to pay for substance abuse prevention initiatives; and Norwalk Hospital will get $285,000 for facilities and equipment enhancements, according to Lieberman’s office.”

    Ginger Katz is a fantastic lobbyist-you have to give her that…and Larry Cafero is her champion.

  • Anonymous

    For the kind of money that Ginger Katz is getting, there should be data to demonstrate the effectiveness of the program. Does anyone know of any studies?

  • drug policy reform advocate

    I can tell you that when Ginger got her last pile of funding from the Feds, $750K in 2008, she said that there would be research done to prove how effective her programs are. I wonder if anything is happening along those lines. Of course research is useless unless it’s independent and scientifically measured.

  • Anonymous

    How much does she pay herself and her husband?

  • Martha

    oops…wrong thread

  • nwlknative

    $750,000.00 in 2008 and $950,000.00 in 2009. That’s a lot of money for an individual to receive in two years. I hope someone is auditing where the money is being spent. I would rather see my tax dollars spent on helping recovering addicts with housing/jobs/counseling.

  • CTYankee

    I agree with Ex Cop #20 that substances be banned from children – N.Q.A. However I have to say that possession of Cannabis by adults should be no different than EtOH.

    Out ‘modern’ drug laws are simply a morality farce run amok. Billions of $$$ wasted and the drugs still flow freely, as evidenced by the fact that a child of 12 can get them at 7:AM {ouch!}

    Society will ‘grow up’, and attitudes will swing with the pendulum. How many more billion$ must be wasted?

    ——

    I wouldn’t dare suggest that we ask the Katz what was happening in their home at the time that they were *completely ignorant* to their son’s drug use… But I don’t believe I’d be too far off base by suggesting that guilt is part of the motivation that drives their efforts to this day.

    As I said, it’s a lot of $$$ — but when you’re fighting the moral fight no one is supposed to keep score against you…

  • Avatar

    Dear Publius (and others) -

    Some good reasons for not merely decriminalizing marijuana, but legalizing it, to boot…

    1) Grant ADULTS the same choice regarding marijuana as ADULTS have with alcohol and nicotine (with the same penalties for their illegal use – DUI & providing to minors).
    2) Remove marijuana from the hands of organized crime.
    3) Create a regulated taxable industry.
    4) Unclog the justice system from frivolous misdemeanors.

    Go ahead – have at it.

  • CTYankee

    Hey Avatar,

    Why express it as *granting of rights* when in actuality the current status is that the government has *trampled the rights* of free adults!

    I should be candid, I’m very much opposed to drug use, and even more so to drug abuse. I would allow drug users to die in the streets and ‘nary shed a tear.

    My entire argument is based on each and every individual (competent adult person) freedom to choose how they live their own life. The only imperative restriction I’d place on rights is: “Harm none, do as you will.” and “Take responsibility for your actions.”

    Some would say that makes me an Anarchist, but I think of it as a form of Libertarianism. See I feel there should be harsh punishments for willful felonies. However most of out body of law is composed of misdemeanors elevated to felonies. We suffer so much crime, because so many normal activities have been declared criminal.

    End the Nanny State; Support the FairTax!