Rock Salt Prices Up

All accross the country rock salt prices are up. The Advocate runs a sotry on how it affects municiaplities locally. I wonder, what’s happening globally. From the Motely Fool in February:

Compass Minerals (NYSE: CMP), which was spun out of Mosaic (NYSE: MOS) earlier this decade, is a sultan of salt. Its rock salt mine in Goderich, Ontario, is the largest in the world, and Compass’ various facilities spit out more than 10 million tons of salt per year. The company’s highway deicing segment accounts for the majority of sales volume, but higher prices for more refined consumer and industrial salts make for a relatively even revenue split.

My main takeaways from Compass’ annual report filed with the SEC are that its salt business offers:

  • stable demand and cash flows across economic cycles
  • low-cost, high-grade mines with long reserve lives, and
  • the ability to steadily raise prices over time

cmpthumbnailchart.png

Remember Oil prices? Remember investors? Co-inky-dink? I think not. Take a look at the stock price for Compass over the lat year compared to the S & P.

From the Advocate:

Other municipalities are feeling the pinch as well. In Darien, town officials purchased 500 tons of salt from Morton at 71.77 cents per ton. Price increases for salt are common, but this year’s spike was much higher than usual, Darien Assistant Director of Public Works Darren Oustafine said. From 2006 to 2007, the price rose only 1.49 cents per ton. In comparison, this year the town experienced a jump of 22.38 cents, a 32 percent increase.

Fortunately, Darien still has a salt reserve from last year, Oustafine said. The stockpile is likely to last through the winter, but Darien officials are willing to add to the salt budget if this winter brings more icy weather than expected, he said.

“If we need more money we get it because we can’t leave ice on the roads,” Oustafine said. “We have a budget that we work from every year, but we never know how much it’s going to snow.”
Gov. M. Jodi Rell has asked the state Department of Consumer Protection to investigate the price increase. Rich Harris, a spokesman for the governor’s office, said the office does not suspect price fixing.

“Nobody is suggesting there’s any kind of market manipulation here,” Harris said.

source: Advocate, Municipalities feel the pinch of higher rock salt costs, By Magdalene Perez, 12/01/2008

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

  • Anonymous

    Would of been nice if the rock salt usage in Norwalk was also reported.Whats one more phone call.Now that its over $70 dollars a ton maybe Norwalk should condsider some more sand this year.Come on The Advocate we expect better.

    February 12, 2007
    Richard A. Moccia, Mayor
    Members of the Board of Estimate and Taxation
    Members of the Common Council

    Citizens of the City:
    In accordance with Section 1-239 of the City Code, I am pleased to transmit the requested budget from
    each department of the City, together with my recommendations relative thereto.

    Savings
    of $80,000 are projected due to the
    acquisition of new salt spreading
    equipment and a move to an all-salt
    policy for winter maintenance.

    The budget for the purchase and disposal of sand has been reduced based on
    savings anticipated in this area from moving to an all-salt program for snow and
    ice control.

    Could we have a little sand with that salt Mr Mayor?

  • Old Timer

    Alvord claims the all salt ice-control program saves money and results in a lot less sand in the storm drain systems and then into the harbor. They try to salt early and keep the snow and ice from building up. The sand mix with salt was not really effective at melkting the sbnow and ice or in preventing slipping, they say.

  • Anonymous

    We went to all salt about the time this contract ran out.Has everyone forgot we have a program literally hanging in our storm drains?

    Maybe what Mr Alvord should explain
    road sand and other debris, must be cleaned out periodically in those storm drain sponges.That contract to have outside vendors do it has ended as the shelf life of the sponges probably have also.

    It’s a device that hangs inside catch basins and traps oil and road debris and kills bacteria. The product is currently being tested as a pilot program in 275 storm water drains in Norwalk. A federal grant was paying for that project.
    On May 18 2006 , Sal Longo of Longo & Longo presented the Smart Sponge unit, a box with an inside mesh-lined basket and a wall made of Smart Sponge material that hangs just under the catch basin cover and filters storm water washing through. “When the water flows through, it removes trash and debris in the basket; as the water filters through it removes hydrocarbons (oil products) and fecal coliform (bacteria),” said Mr. Longo.

    Most of that debris was road sand, other silt and dirt, and leaves and branches, but they also found knives, syringes and other trash as well, he said. It costs approximately $1,250 to install each unit and keep it cleaned out and maintained,the figures are old the cost has risen dramatically besides the life of these sponges rarely last 2 years.

    Norwalk never had a service plan attached to the federal grant,no one is left to clean them out other than Norwalks DPW and our new vacume trucks the Blog reported on many months ago.

    It was also asked on the blog’ Did you know that the move to all salt from a salt and sand mixture generated a cost benefit analysis savings 192k projected reduction?

    So as one can see there is more to just the cost of salt when it comes to how the Norwalk DPW does business.

  • Anonymous

    Why not grind up old seashells and mix that with the salt instead of sand? It would still give a lot of grit for traction and at the same time if it gets washed into the harbor it’s no big deal since it came from the harbor to begin with? After all, we used to pave our streets with crushed seashells in bygone years. If it was good enough then, it ought to be good enough now. And it’s a completely renewable resource, so it won’t cost a huge amount of money to replenish.

    Gee, I bet nobody ever thought of THAT……

  • Anonymous

    Seashells will work on a lot of things your right,there are a few more like fly ash from power plants and spreading a sugar beet juice-based concoction called Geo-Melt on its streets to combat ice is now used also.The mixture of sugar beet juice and granular salt is less corrosive and works in lower temperatures.

  • Old Timer

    #5 Anonymous:
    Please do not suggest putting fly ash anywhere it could get washed into the harbor, it is highly toxic.

  • Anonymous

    Oh please, the harbor is full of PCBs and mercury from the dead hatting industry, nothing we put in it now is going to make it any worse.

  • Vet Park Junkie

    Oh! I now know why we seem to have so many Mad Hatters in town!

  • Secondhand Rose

    Well, if you eat any seafood caught in Norwalk Harbor, then Lord help you….. but then again, Norwalk natives have known that for years. It’s these new residents who think catching fish or dredging clams from Norwalk’s coastline is so wonderful. You want to eat safe fish, you’d better plan to go far beyond Long Island where the water is cleaner. I for one wouldn’t trust a fish, a clam, a mussel or a lobster if it was caught ANYWHERE within Long Island Sound, but ESPECIALLY if it was caught off Norwalk beaches or outside of the Harbor.

  • Anonymous

    Jan of 2007

    To treat snow and icy conditions, the Ct DOT will be using sodium chloride, in solid and liquid form, and liquid calcium chloride.

    Rock salt will be treated with liquid calcium chloride or salt brine as it is dispensed from plow trucks onto the roadway.

    The liquid gives the rock salt an adhesive quality to prevent it from bouncing off the pavement.

    It also activates the salt causing snow to melt into salt brine leading to melting of even more snow.

    So how much of this calcium chloride is Norwalk using and what is its cost?

    Has all of our trucks been equiped with this delivery system?

  • John Frank

    There is a very comprehensive program working to ensure the quality of the shellfish taken from Norwalk Harbor, and other parts of the Sound. There are no better shellfish available anywhere.
    Shellfishing in, and around, Norwalk is a multi-million dollar business, dependent on excellent water quality. There are a few places that have residue from improper discharge into the harbor, and shellfishing anywhere near them is not allowed, but the water quality, and shellfish are better now than they have been in many years. Norwalk shellfish are highly prized and routinely shipped all over the world.

  • Anonymous

    The Ct DEP said that the Norwalk River would be off limits until the sewage flushed itself out from the last spill,the Dept of Ag in Milford was also involved .Have they given the all clear to those fishermen by the Aquarium and the shellfish beds along the river?I thought once Cashman started it was going to distrub sediment in the surrounding area or has that all passed?It has been looking better the last year or so until a few mishaps.

  • Anonymous

    That’s easy for you to say. I still wouldn’t eat any shellfish from Norwalk Harbor. I don’t know about you, but I’d like to live cancer-free until I die from old age, thankyouverymuch.

  • Anonymous

    I think once out of the harbor your safe,most problems come from the Norwalk river I think.

  • John Frank

    #12 Thanks for the quote. You demonstrate my statement about a very comprehensive program. The DEP and the Dept of Agriculture, bureau of aquaculture are two state agencies involved in safeguarding our shellfish as safe to eat. Aquaculture is the lead state agency and they are very conservative about re-opening shellfishing after any event that affects water quality. A heavy rain closes the beds and they won’t allow re-opening until they are satisfied with tests of water quality and shellfish meats. As of the end of October, they had parts of the harbor closed 194 days, with the rest closed for 49 days, this year. Water quality testing is continuous. As sources of pollution are identified, other agencies, both City, State, and Federal get involved in correcting problems. We maintain a local phone number 838-9807 that is updated by Norwalk Health Dept.whenever there is a change in shellfishing conditions. (Open or closed) Parts of the inner harbor are permanently closed to shellfishing, but open for finfishing. Every bag of commercially harvested shellfish is tagged to identify the harvestor, date and place of harvest, etc. Norwalk shellfish commission issues charts that show where shellfishing is allowed, when conditions are good, and local commercial companies transplant clams for us to places that are easy to reach by wading a short distance from shore. Any shellfish legally taken from Norwalk waters are safe to eat.

  • Anonymous

    Another quote by the DEP was they had no idea when the last sewage spill transpired and the records didn’t show what the news articles showed.The DEP and AG in Milford hasn’t a lot of trust with Norwalk hence the stepped up accountability.When Norwalk was responsible for closing other towns they too have become more diligent in making sure they too are polution free from Norwalks mistakes or equipment failure.Something so important to Norwalk it seems now the people in charge have more of a bite to ensure quality over good press.Its about time the city reconizes what the Shellfish commision does and plans on without a substantial budget for testing or planning.

    Now we see a lot of the coastal communities capping dock space along the coast and taking a more proactive look at Long Island sound,now lets addresss the drain sponges that were so great,were so costly and now need to be replaced.Other programs that cost the same but have more of a positive spin and results on our waterways need to be looked at.

  • Anonymous

    Is calcium chloride good for the harbor?

  • John Frank

    Norwalk is still responsible for closing both Westport and Darien.
    Calcium chloride is not particularly good for the harbor, but is seen as a lot less damaging than other chemicals. The further up the river you go, the less salt water ocurs and the water becomes freash water. Putting salt into fresh water streams is not good for fresh water fish, but a lot depends on how much salt. DPW claims they use the least damaging salt they can get, I don’t know if it is calcium chloride.

  • Anonymous

    Thanks John,so maybe in our case the less expensive sand in some areas just might not be bad after all.