More Arguing Over 93 East Ave.
Arguments in that legal sorta way, are winding down or up depending on your point of view over the fate of 93 East Ave, alternatively known as the Grumman-St. John House, or the house that’s falling apart on East Ave. The last three days offers insight into the court procedings. I’ll summarize.
Handrinos: I want to tear it down.
State of Connecticut: You are in technical violations of laws governing historic properties.
Handrinos: I don’t care.
Expert Witness For The Prosecution: Human hands destroyed the property and you failed to fix it back up.
Handrinos: I don’t care, maybe you did the vandalism, I want to tear it down.
Expert Witness For The Defense: Did anyone actually see anyone vandalize the property? Maybe ghosts did it.
Actual Quote By Handrinos: “You accused me of doing something that is not true, maybe you did that.”
State of Connecticut: You have to be kidding me.
In delightful irony, the cover of Preservation Magazine,
a companion publication to Demolition Magazine, features: Historic Hotels: 3 Amazing Comebacks. Demolition magazine is featuring on its cover, recycling.
In many ways, legal arguments follow the natural form of arguments between parents and teens. I’ve think we’ve all been there at one point or another, on one end of another. I’ll summarize.
Parent: Take Out the garbage.
Teen: Okay.
next day …
Parent: What did you do today?
Teen: Nothing.
Parent: Did you take out the garbage?
Teen: shrugs.
Parent: If you don’t take out the garbage then I’m going to take away your allowance.
Teen: I don’t care. Stop bugging me.
Parent: You live in my house.
Teen: Later.
These arguments between parents and teens can go on, or escalate, and sometimes even get resolved. Just like the legal equivalents, that just formalize the process a bit with fines and court orders, that bear about as much weight as losing that allowance. You see if you’re a teen, you have all the time in the world to figure out how not to take out the garbage.