CT DOT’s Latest Fiasco

Nothing like the scent of a good DOT story to kick off the 2010 Gubernatorial race. And it’s about route 7 too. Not the part that winds its way through southern, as in below I-84 country. But the above the I-84 highway, as in Rell’s hometown. Brookfield. Four corners. Listen to the story of a Governor named Rell, who still hasn’t managed to dig her way out of DOT disasters. Brian Lockhart reports:

The DOT confirmed Friday that improvements to Route 7, which connects Norwalk to Danbury and New Milford, have been delayed for months in Rell’s hometown of Brookfield because of an inaccurate land survey.

A half-mile section of the new Route 7 bypass was put on hold in late summer because the land was steeper than believed, according to DOT officials and project designer SEA Consultants Inc.

The DOT at first cited environmental concerns because the construction area is home to three protected species – the Eastern box turtle, the hog-nosed snake and the slimy salamander.

DOT spokesman Judd Everhart said the agency and SEA Consulting conducted the survey. It’s too soon to say whether penalties will be levied for the error, Everhart said.

SEA Chief Operating Officer Bill Hardy said his company is not at fault.

“SEA did not do the survey. It was provided by the DOT,” Hardy said. “It was aerial . . . And it’s in an area of the roadway that is very heavily treed, therefore the accuracy ended up being less than desirable. . . . You build in some flexibility if the topography varies a little. If it was off a little bit, no big deal. But it was biggerthan could be accommodated in the existing design.”

DOT officials hope that costs associated with the half-mile mistake will be covered by a $10 million contingency fund calculated in the $97 million construction budget for the project. The agency aims to complete the bypass by November 2009. The federal government is funding 90 percent of it.

Rell is committed to seeing the project completed “in a timely fashion,” said her spokesman, Rich Harris.

But state Sen. Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, vice chairman of the legislature’s Transportation Committee, said he wants answers.

“I have a source who has come to my office to discuss some of the problems with the project and I’m trying to figure out the validity of the statements,” Duff said.

The state is widening and upgrading several sections of Route 7 between Norwalk and New Milford to alleviate traffic congestion. The project is an alternative to the controversial “super highway” proposed several decades ago.

The 2.3-mile bypass is being built so Route 7 traffic avoids the congested Brookfield Four Corners, where Routes 25 and 202 converge.

When construction on the northern end was halted in July, the DOT laid the blame on complications related to working in a sensitive habitat and designing tunnels allowing the protected turtles, snakes and salamanders to cross Route 7.

Oh sure, blame it on the slimy salamanders. How about the slimy DOT contractors who bamboozle their way through ineptitude driving up costs and in the end everyone’s taxes?

A few weeks ago, The Advocate received a tip that the faulty survey was to blame.

Everhart, asked to explain the problem, responded in an Oct. 21 e-mail: “Whenever there is a project of this magnitude on a sloped site, there are going to be some issues that come up. . . . Because the slope is steeper in places than it first appeared, we are revising the plans for tunnels for the migratory animals that live there. We are working with the Department of Environmental Protection on resolving these issues (and) doing everything possible to maintain the schedule.”

The DOT and Rell’s office declined to provide details after Duff requested a report late last month.

In the report, which Duff received last week, the DOT said construction of the bypass was halted “because the lay of the land is different than anticipated.”

Duff has asked for explanation and whether the problems will affect federal funding.

Daniel Foley, the DOT district engineer overseeing the Route 7 bypass, downplayed the problems.

“As you get out into the field and see things, you realize there may be some alterations or other changes required,” he said. “We’re nestling this highway into the side of a hill. We’re moving mountains and blasting.”

The rest of the bypass is “really coming along” and he does not anticipate problems with federal aid, Foley said.

“There’s 21/2 other miles of the bypass that are paved right now and I predict soon they’ll have illumination,” Foley said.

source: Advocate, Route 7 work delayed, By Brian Lockhart, November 11, 2008

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

  • Stuck In Traffic Again

    Well, here we go again.
    The DOT with it’s superior wisdom decided to trim trees on the Merritt today…………..
    So much for having a stress free ride to the cemetary.

  • Pluto

    I hadn’t been up Route 7 since forever, can’t even remember, so like a fool, heading up to Danbury yesterday to meet up with some traveling friends, got stuck in the construction (should have taken the back roads but not realizing, and figuring it was a holiday and getting a late start, I went straight for 7). God what a mess! It took me half an hour to get to where Cannon Crossing intersects. Is there any part of this state that isn’t being forever worked on with nothing to show for it? I have a friend who says that orange road construction cone should be the state flower and I think she’s right!

  • Anonymous

    Should have been four lanes to Danbury 30 years ago–Thanks Nimby Wilton!

  • Enjoying it immensely

    The reason Wilton is such a mess is (IMO) this is a payback to the town for holding up Super 7 for so many decades.

    The newest Route 7 construction began in Wilton at the Norwalk line over 3 years ago, and doesn’t appear to have a completion date anywhere in the near future.

    The widening currently ends just on the other side of Cannondale because A)the project is being done in pieces, and B) they’re still trying to figure out how they’re going to widen the section between Cannondale and the Ridgefield border. In most areas there’s not enough room between the roadway and the river and railroad; on the other side they’d have to take a huge chunk out of front yards and business parking lots. A lot of those homes and businesses were built with very little setback, and there are some places where private property might disappear altogether – such as little roadside restaurants, garden stores and so on.

    Frankly, I’m loving the fact that the Wilton section of this project has taken so long. The more it incoveniences the residents of Wilton now, the more likely a Super 7 bill will pass in the future. And I also enjoy thinking about the frustration and annoyance factors that Wiltonites have to deal with during this construction, although it is in no way equal to the frustration and annoyance most commuters have had to deal with for the past 40 years because Wilton saw fit to block the construction of Super 7 in the first place.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with you, #4. Does everyone know that you can bypass a lot of the Route 7 mess going north by turning left at the end of the super 7 connector and driving up Belden Hill Road? Belden Hill ends at Rt. 33, then turn right and that will take you to 7. Every little bit helps, and you can always blow your horn as you are driving through a Wilton residential area just to say “thanks” for stopping Super 7!

  • Boucher’s folly

    Toni Boucher can get a lot of the credit for this mess. Yet Wilton keeps rewarding her. They must be masochists.

    Who knew Wilton was so full of self-flagellation?
    Maybe its the fumes from all the traffic that makes them so wacky.

    Hopefully Duff and the Dems can get Super 7 back on track.

  • Anonymous

    You can also bypass ALL of the construction by going down Route 53 all the way to Danbury, or by driving the back way through New Canaan into NY and then take 35 through Ridgefield and Route 7 into Danbury.

    Not so great at night, but during the day both routes are a pleasant, scenic drive. Kinda like the “old” Route 7 USED to be before they took out all its character and straightened all the curves and flattened all the hills.

    There’s also a way to bypass the Wilton construction by going down past Rolling Hills Country Club. You come out about a mile or two below the Route 107 intersection. Or you can go down by Cobbs Mill Inn and then take Route 57, which comes out on Route 107 in Georgetown. Just turn left and you’ll be back on Route 7 – or you can turn right on Route 107 and then take the shortcut between 107 and 53. There are probably about 6 different ways to bypass most, if not all, of Route 7 from Norwalk to Danbury if you know all the back roads. I haven’t drivin on Route 7 in at least 3 years – not since they started all the construction in Wilton. It just isn’t worth the hassle.

  • Pluto

    Oh, yeah, there are loads of ways, and having commuted to Danbury for 2 years and dated someone in Brewster, I KNOW them, just hadn’t been paying attention ’cause I’ve been so focused on the CL&P Route 1 mess so I was caught before I realized what I was getting into. I’ll be nowhere near Route 7 for a LONG time!

  • Anonymous

    Commutes in general are ridiculous. I grew up in Norwalk but moved to Danbury a few years ago (cheaper rents, more jobs). I remember when the commute from Norwalk to Stamford in the morning lasted only about 20 minutes or so. Nowadays, what is it – an hour?

    I’m currently working in Ridgefield, which is at least a 35 minute commute in the morning – but the same drive home takes me over 45 minutes to an hour most evenings. If I leave my house on the Brookfield line at 8:30 and jump on I84 to Route 7, I can be on Danbury Road within 20-25 minutes if I go right past Route 35 and take New Road instead. I have to backtrack about 5 minutes worth of driving, but I come out across from Pamby Motors and miss the backup going up Route 35. I can make it that way fast enough to still stop at the Dunkin Donuts at Stop & Shop and be at work on time at 9:00am.

    However – I can hardly wait for the snowy season to begin. It will probably take me at least an hour to make the same trip in, and 90 minutes to make the same trip home again.

    I just love commuting.