Where O’ Where Did The Trucks Go?

The Advocate reports on the aftermath of the truck ban. Before we plunge into the truck issue, let’s review the chief story of 2008. The price of gas. In recent weeks, we’ve seen gas prices fall so now they graze right at the $4.00/gallon mark for regular unleaded. Diesel, maintains its lofty near $5.00/gallon average. I lead with this because trucks run on diesel. And truck drivers are besides themselves on the cost of fuel. So much so that all sorts of technology, tire inflation and just plain driving more slowly have been employed by shippin companies eying that bottom line. I even wrote about this earlier in the summer. So before the People’s Republic of Rowayton gets all excited about the lack of trucks in route 136, let’s take a look at how the chief purveyors of trucks in the area have been doing, from the Wall Street Journal.

United Parcel Service Inc., after recording one of its steepest quarterly profit declines in a decade, said it is bracing for the economic slowdown to extend into next year and will impose a broad hiring freeze, deeper cost cuts and unspecified realignments of its delivery network

That was a 21% profit decline for the last quarter for UPS. FedEx posted similar and Tavio Hedley, staff economoist at the American Trucking Assoications (ATA) said to CNBC,  “For many carriers, diesel has now surpassed labor as the number one operating cost.”

Hedley also said to CNBC that “the ATA recorded 935 trucking bankruptcies among companies with fleets of five or more trucks in the first quarter, the highest level since the third quarter of 2001.”

So it shouldn’t come as a surprise that there are less Trucks on Route 136. Yet the Advocate reports:

Living at Highland Avenue and McKinney Street on Route 136, Sattler watched trucks swing around the 90-degree turn to the village center, sometimes seeing their tires lift off the ground as they careened around the corner.

“I would walk the kids to school in the morning, and at the same time the UPS trucks would come through. Occasionally during the holiday season, we would see up to 35 trucks in a row,” said Sattler, who joined a group of Darien and Rowayton residents called Stop Thru Trucks.

The State Traffic Commission banned through-trucks a year ago, after nearly two decades of trying to block trucks from traversing the waterside community.

“It’s great. It’s a whole new life,” Sattler said.

Residents complained that too many trucks were racing on their way to businesses such as UPS and FedEx on Martin Luther King Jr. Drive and other trucking and hauling outfits in South Norwalk.

Some companies still are sneaking trucks through, but the ban is working, residents said.

“The change was immediate and very, very noticeable,” said Richard Truitt, who has lived on Covewood Drive for 20 years. “People are still walking around town, saying that this is an amazingly different place. The problem has totally gone away.”

Truitt said he counted 57 UPS delivery trucks one morning last summer from 9:10 to 9:40 a.m.
Besides UPS, the trucks that morning included dump trucks, garbage trucks, food delivery trucks, carting trucks and a crane truck, said Mike Barbis, commissioner of the Sixth Taxing District. A study by Stop Thru Trucks counted 138 large trucks going north by the village fire station from 8:30 to 10 a.m. one fall day in 2006, Barbis said.

“Every 20th vehicle would have been some kind of truck,” Barbis said. “You couldn’t sit here and have a conversation. They were flying.”

Meanwhile, residents along Route 136 east of MLK haven’t exactly seen a reduction of truck traffic.  It’s interesting to note that while some residents of the People’s Republic of Rowayton  were concerned about the traffic that garbage trucks would add to Meadow street, they have yet to be seemingly concerned about the number of other trucks along route 136 heading through the center of South Norwalk.

source: Advocate, Advocates of ban on trucks declare victory, By John Nickerson , August 11, 2008

  • norwalker

    One morning after the recent bru-ha-ha about the trucks on 136, I happened to be parked on No. Main Street at 8:45 waiting for a store to open. I was shocked at the number of heavy trucks, DPW and otherwise, that came barrelling through the narrow main streets. I waited for more than 45 minutes and really worried as cars began to park on both sides of the street and these monsters continued to come through. Seems pretty dangerous to me and certainly does not add to the character of SONO. So what is the solution?

  • Anonymous

    Just ask the residents who live along Flax Hill about where the trucks went to since the ban. While I’m happy for the residents of Rowayton, the problem was just dumped on South Norwalk. And, with such poor leadership by our state rep. Bruce Morris, it will just stay that way.

  • norwalk dem

    I am happy for Rowayton, but the heavy truck traffic has shifted to narrow Fairfield Ave. and Flax Hill, as truckers seek the shortest routes to the highway instead of staying on the wider MLK/West Ave as we were promised by everyone from Rowayton and Darien. I think they really didn’t care where the trucks would go, as long as they were removed from their areas.

    It would be much easier to ban heavy thru trucks on these residential city streets (Flax Hill and Fairfield), since they are not state highways like 136, and so it would just require a little pressure on DPW from Common Council members and other elected officials.

    There are numerous bus stops and heavy pedestrian traffic on these streets. The streets are lined with residential buildings, and now all night heavy trucks rattle the neighborhood.

    This is a no-brainer to fix this quality of life issue. Let’s see how long it will take.

  • Anonymous

    Why do these trucks travel on Flax Hill and Fairfield Ave. when it’s just a stone’s throw from MLK Ave. to the highway entrance on West Ave.? Why go all that way out of their way on what’s essentially back roads just to get to Connecticut Avenue, when they can merely hop onto the highway and get there faster/safer?

  • Anonymous

    Must say, #4 your wrong. We in Rowayton stood up and fought for a better quality of life. Truck traffic is like electricity. It will find the path of least resistance.

    I would encourage you to formally study (like we did) the impact of the trucks in your area.

    I think everyone would agree that using the Flax hill corridor as a cut through is unacceptable.

    Also, it is well documented that everyone involved in the Rowayton petition against trucks on Rt. 136 wanted the trucks to use MLK as it was intended, not local roads.

  • anonymous

    Let’s ban all trucks from Norwalk.

  • norwalk dem

    To answer your question, #4, the trucks use Flax Hill and Fairfield and even tiny back streets to get to the onramps onto 95 at exits 13 and 14, for two reasons. One, there are 7 traffic lights on west Ave. that they can avoid day or night if they turn up onto Fairfield or Flax Hill at the intersection of MLK and Washington Street, and two, at rush hour in the AM they can avoid the daily morning backup on 95 at West Ave., and jump onto 95 farther to the south where it starts to move again.

    The night time shortcut is a nerve rattling and earth shaking event in these residential neighborhoods, especially on the steep hills that create acceleration and braking noise worse than any highway. Check it out if you don’t believe me. Between 11pm and 4 AM on Fairfield and Flax Hill.

    The morning shortcut is espercially dangerous for school kids and neighborhood residents who are now battling huge rigs besides the normal morning traffic. Check it out if you don’t believe me. Between 7 and 9 on Fairfield.

  • Anonymous

    Once again, the town should ban trucks from Flax Hill. This would be very easy.