
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Krugman&#8217;s Dire Conclusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourct.com/2008/08/krugmans-dire-conclusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourct.com/2008/08/krugmans-dire-conclusion/</link>
	<description>Connecticut Political Commentary, News and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Wolkon - Author of The New Game</title>
		<link>http://www.yourct.com/2008/08/krugmans-dire-conclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-93642</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Wolkon - Author of The New Game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourct.com/new/2008/08/09/krugmans-dire-conclusion/#comment-93642</guid>
		<description>Can we please count the money? How much is out there? We print more dollars as the underlying assets of our country depreciate in real value. Does the Fed really think they are bigger than the market. The dollar is about to look like the peso and then it is ONLY a question of how strong is your local economy? Global trade is now too expensive for the masses. Speaking of masses, massive unemployment in both financial services (only &quot;growth&quot; industry in U.S. for last 5 years, not a good thing since it is inflationary in nature; i.e. money makes more money, but less food) and government (largest employer in the U.S.; such socialistic character is unsustainable) is about to occur. What to do? The auto and steel industries will begin to manufacture windmills, solar panels and trains instead of houses and cars. Silicon Valley will be the leading innovator in the renewable energy revolution (where the &quot;real&quot; profits will be) and Wall Street will finally find a sustainable mortage business in renewable energy (duh!). State Pension and other &quot;long-only&quot; savings and retirement funds will buy renewable energy until it is coming out of their ears along with making significant investments in local farms as the social and financial returns on local farming profits will be too large to pass up (global food and transportation costs will experience hyperinflation while land prices for local farms will continue to decrease in price). Great opportunity for our state pension funds to make sustainable double digit returns .

Renewable energy (oxymoron) assets will prove to be the only true guarantor as they are backed by mother nature. Would you rather have solar panels and mother nature as your collateral or a guarantee from the same guys that guarantee Fannie, Freddie and Sallie - our very own Wizard of Oz; The Fed.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we please count the money? How much is out there? We print more dollars as the underlying assets of our country depreciate in real value. Does the Fed really think they are bigger than the market. The dollar is about to look like the peso and then it is ONLY a question of how strong is your local economy? Global trade is now too expensive for the masses. Speaking of masses, massive unemployment in both financial services (only &#8220;growth&#8221; industry in U.S. for last 5 years, not a good thing since it is inflationary in nature; i.e. money makes more money, but less food) and government (largest employer in the U.S.; such socialistic character is unsustainable) is about to occur. What to do? The auto and steel industries will begin to manufacture windmills, solar panels and trains instead of houses and cars. Silicon Valley will be the leading innovator in the renewable energy revolution (where the &#8220;real&#8221; profits will be) and Wall Street will finally find a sustainable mortage business in renewable energy (duh!). State Pension and other &#8220;long-only&#8221; savings and retirement funds will buy renewable energy until it is coming out of their ears along with making significant investments in local farms as the social and financial returns on local farming profits will be too large to pass up (global food and transportation costs will experience hyperinflation while land prices for local farms will continue to decrease in price). Great opportunity for our state pension funds to make sustainable double digit returns .</p>
<p>Renewable energy (oxymoron) assets will prove to be the only true guarantor as they are backed by mother nature. Would you rather have solar panels and mother nature as your collateral or a guarantee from the same guys that guarantee Fannie, Freddie and Sallie &#8211; our very own Wizard of Oz; The Fed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles the Hammer</title>
		<link>http://www.yourct.com/2008/08/krugmans-dire-conclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-93144</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles the Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourct.com/new/2008/08/09/krugmans-dire-conclusion/#comment-93144</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect, it is unlikely to find any reasonable assessment of either politics or economics in the pages of the LA Times or the NY Times.  One measure of economic reality that might dawn upon both newspapers is evident in the thousands of employees they must lay off in the face of their diminished circulation.  The market is voting with an exodus of eyes unwilling to pay for continued devotion to leftist dogma.</p>
<p>Mr. Krugman reveals himself unintentionally when he recounts a chance meeting at the AutoZone auto parts store where, he sees a friend buying a tire pressure gauge, “I ask him if his consciousness has been raised by Obama.”  The mere fact that Krugman, once paid $50,000 a year as an Enron consultant, dares to insert himself as a good-faith, unbiased observer is absurd on its face.  But, I imagined my response to such an insulting inquiry:</p>
<p>“Oh yes Paul, I could not possibly have thought to economize or conserve on my own.  Whenever I have trouble with my household budget or my car, I go straight to the editorial page of the Times or to Obama’s web site for clarification (you putz!). We proletarian types can hardly be trusted to operate in our own self-interest without the wise guidance of lawyers from Harvard or economists from Princeton.  I thank you for never taking partisan political pot shots at the president for his adherence to supply-side economic theory.  Tax cuts are bad as you’ve repeatedly stated in your columns and I am proud to be in THE state that most heavily taxes fuel.  Most of us started tinkering with our cars and driving habits before gas crossed the $3.00 mark.  A friend of mine in the trucking business was inspecting tire wear on one his five rigs the other day, when he tapped the tire thumper on his forehead exclaiming, “Dang! Obama’s right! If I would just inflate my tires correctly, I won’t have to sell a kidney to keep on truckin’ !” By the way Paul, let me know if Mr. Obama has any more golden conservation tips like, “drive slower”, “accelerate at a gradual pace”, or “plan your errands so that you can do multiple things in one trip”.  I so enjoy receiving pedestrian advice in a pedantic, condescending tone.  Hey, in case any of your pals need work, I understand that they’re hiring Ivy League grads to replace the pit crews at Indy and Daytona.  You guys just know everything!” </p>
<p> So never mind Krugman’s fake neutrality in the face of his unbridled bid for a position in a Democratic administration.  Forget his ill-conceived critique of every single tax cut.  He’s just a guy down at AutoZone (right) lobbying for a logical approach to energy policy.  What crap!  Paul Krugman is a central planner, a socialist, and an opportunist.  His real concern is for, surprise, Paul Krugman!  A competent plan for energy in America might include a respect for consumers. Free people in free markets have a better batting average than “experts” dictating from some central bureau.   Exploration for new sources of fossil fuel must be a part any plan that embraces reality. Drilling for oil is not evil, nor is mining coal.  Nuclear electrification is a must.  All other sources must be pursued as well.  No adjustment can be “off the table”.  Each has its environmental and economic  trade-off.  Conservation and good stewardship of resources are also important.  But, you already knew that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.yourct.com/2008/08/krugmans-dire-conclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-93033</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourct.com/new/2008/08/09/krugmans-dire-conclusion/#comment-93033</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s right under our noses, for heaven&#039;s sakes. Olive oil, people. How many opened bottles do you have in the pantry? It&#039;s cheaper and you can ingest it, if necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s right under our noses, for heaven&#8217;s sakes. Olive oil, people. How many opened bottles do you have in the pantry? It&#8217;s cheaper and you can ingest it, if necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.yourct.com/2008/08/krugmans-dire-conclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-92842</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 19:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourct.com/new/2008/08/09/krugmans-dire-conclusion/#comment-92842</guid>
		<description>What about oilfields that lie under China? Don&#039;t tell me there aren&#039;t any; they had dinosaurs just like any other continent did. Why not open up drilling in China? In fact, why doesn&#039;t CHINA open up drilling in China?

&quot;Gas guzzling SUVs&quot;. I always get a good laugh out of this comment, because it&#039;s almost always made by some envious cheap little 4-cylinder driver who can&#039;t afford to buy an SUV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about oilfields that lie under China? Don&#8217;t tell me there aren&#8217;t any; they had dinosaurs just like any other continent did. Why not open up drilling in China? In fact, why doesn&#8217;t CHINA open up drilling in China?</p>
<p>&#8220;Gas guzzling SUVs&#8221;. I always get a good laugh out of this comment, because it&#8217;s almost always made by some envious cheap little 4-cylinder driver who can&#8217;t afford to buy an SUV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.yourct.com/2008/08/krugmans-dire-conclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-92835</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 19:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourct.com/new/2008/08/09/krugmans-dire-conclusion/#comment-92835</guid>
		<description>Oil is NOT a fossil fuel and is renewable:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59991

So Viet Nam can add a bizzilion more putt-putts and China a gazzilion more Hummers and it wouldn&#039;t matter a hill of rice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oil is NOT a fossil fuel and is renewable:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59991" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59991</a></p>
<p>So Viet Nam can add a bizzilion more putt-putts and China a gazzilion more Hummers and it wouldn&#8217;t matter a hill of rice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris MC</title>
		<link>http://www.yourct.com/2008/08/krugmans-dire-conclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-92818</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris MC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourct.com/new/2008/08/09/krugmans-dire-conclusion/#comment-92818</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t anybody here agree that supply-side economics is a valid description for present day economics; or consider themselves a &quot;supply-sider&quot;; or think that supply-side economics is good economic policy for the US?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t anybody here agree that supply-side economics is a valid description for present day economics; or consider themselves a &#8220;supply-sider&#8221;; or think that supply-side economics is good economic policy for the US?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rufus</title>
		<link>http://www.yourct.com/2008/08/krugmans-dire-conclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-92811</link>
		<dc:creator>Rufus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourct.com/new/2008/08/09/krugmans-dire-conclusion/#comment-92811</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with trying to encourage people to use common sense?  Read my lips, we cannot drill ourselves out of the stupidity of SUVs, et al.  China is adding 25000 cars a day, Vietnam is adding 3500 scooters a day, India is adding 500+ cars a day. Off shore rigs are SOLD out for 5+ yrs.  The ONLY answer is to do ALL of the following.  Conserve, increase CAFE standards, discourage SUVs, drill when possible, but it is of little consequence - time to end the era of the fossil fuels asap.  Gore and swiftboat Pickens agree on that - nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with trying to encourage people to use common sense?  Read my lips, we cannot drill ourselves out of the stupidity of SUVs, et al.  China is adding 25000 cars a day, Vietnam is adding 3500 scooters a day, India is adding 500+ cars a day. Off shore rigs are SOLD out for 5+ yrs.  The ONLY answer is to do ALL of the following.  Conserve, increase CAFE standards, discourage SUVs, drill when possible, but it is of little consequence &#8211; time to end the era of the fossil fuels asap.  Gore and swiftboat Pickens agree on that &#8211; nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.yourct.com/2008/08/krugmans-dire-conclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-92808</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourct.com/new/2008/08/09/krugmans-dire-conclusion/#comment-92808</guid>
		<description>Krugman is no economist if he doesn&#039;t understand that drilling is going to increase the supply of oil which in turn will lower prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krugman is no economist if he doesn&#8217;t understand that drilling is going to increase the supply of oil which in turn will lower prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

