Preservation In Stamford

We now take a break from Norwalk preservation to view our neighbor to the south, Stamford, and the latest round in the battle of Bull’s Head. First, the part that I focus on, Whole Foods will not be landing a store in North Stamford. When will they stop looking at the likes of Darien, Stamford and Fairfield and start looking at Norwalk!? But I digress … the report from the Advocate:

The Lord & Taylor store in Bull’s Head is now on the state register of historic places.
lord and taylor
But despite the designation, the building could be torn down and the site redeveloped.

The State Historic Preservation Board voted this month to admit the late-1960s building to the register after hearing testimony on its architectural and historical importance.

“Lord and Taylor . . . were significant trendsetters and played a key role in retailing and retail architecture,” said Cynthia Reeder, a North Stamford resident who filed the application.

Reeder, who opposed a recent development plan for the site, said the application was a separate issue from the redevelopment.

“This is a building that in and of itself has merits from an architectural perspective,” she said “That was only something that heightened my awareness of the building’s significance and of the evolution of the city of Stamford.”

National Realty & Development Corp., a Westchester County-based development firm that owns the Lord & Taylor chain as well as the site, applied last year to tear down the current building and build a bigger one to house an expanded Lord & Taylor, a Whole Foods and other retail stores.

The application was withdrawn in May after the plan met with opposition from its neighbors and some land use board members, but John Orrico, the company’s president, has said the company is still working on a plan for the site.

“It’s an honor designation that to us points more to the significance that Lord & Taylor has had in the Stamford community for the past 40 years,” Orrico said. “But the designation in no way prohibitions us from redeveloping the site”The building, at 110 High Ridge Road, was designed by the Raymond Loewy/William Snaith, Inc., firm.

Loewy, a mid-century industrial designer responsible for the Studebaker and the 1955 Coca-Cola bottle, joined with architect William Snaith to create a subsidiary company devoted to store design for upscale retailers.

Richard Longstreth, director of the Graduate Program in Historic Preservation at George Washington University, said in a letter supporting the application that a case for the store’s importance was straightforward, not only because of the designers’ fame, but also because it was a good example of the type of design.

“Buildings such as this were landmarks of the postwar generation; they substantially redefined the order and complexion of the metropolitan landscape,” he wrote.

Renee Kahn, director of the Stamford-based Historic Neighborhood Preservation Program, Inc., said recent changes to the area, including the trees that have been cut down to build a CVS, helped show off the building’s artistic merit.

“It now appears as conceived, a citadel dominating the crest of the hill and overlooking downtown Stamford and Long Island Sound,” Kahn wrote in a supporting letter.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

  • Anonymous

    Nice to see a city that is proactive about preservation. Too bad the Historical Commission isn’t more proactive – like, going after a state register nomination for the West Ave. Methodist Church. No doubt it is next on the list to be torn down…

  • Anonymous

    The HC has been neutered by the Mayor. Too much proactivity means unhappy property developers. “Liability” seems to be a fairly common term that issues forth from the Mayor’s office when he doesn’t support something. A handy term to hide behind. I think Soo Gunn is lurking back behind that term somewhere too.

  • Anonymous

    No one is looking at Norwalk right now for much.If Norwalks own developers can’t get from the state why should outside developers think their chances are any better.The mayor is responsible for a lot and it shows nightly on the news and the papers now if he could only do something to show good faith with his residents maybe we would have more businesses coming to Norwalk instead of leaving.Norwalk is no longer a detination the nightly news for the last year or so has indicated that so nothing should surprise Norwalk its simply the way it is.Crime is up and business is down.

    Downtown Sono has more vacant building space than it did last year at this time.Whats that tell you?

  • Anonymous

    I heard CVS is looking at the West Ave Methodist Church site for a new drugstore to compete with Walgreens. That would be an improvement for the neighborhood…

  • Anonymous

    The church should be saved. That’s terrible news.

  • Al Raymond

    I was afraid that would happen.So everyone out there that gives a dame about Norwalk needs to get involved in this.It will take all of us to win this battle, and a lot of time.But that church has been here for a long long time and with some TLC it could be beautiful once again.There must be another use for this wonderful building we must not let this become another 93 East ave.We don`t need anymore drug store`s or another bank Norwalk is full of that.

  • Age of Aquarius

    I believe that Anonymous 4 was being sarcastic. This is how rumors get started.

  • Anonymous

    As long as we allow rumors, I heard they were talking to some other church groups that were interested in buying it and keeping it as a church. It wouldn’t be the first time that happened in Norwalk and it would be be a good use for the building. I am not sure there is enough land with it for the necessary parking. It goes back to the days when most people walked to church. I am surprized they didn’t work out something with the City and sell it for the 95-7 project.

  • Anonymous

    The building needs a ton of work and therefore dollars. I think that is why no one is touching it – which makes it all the more likely to be torn down. Maybe they can put a branch of the Norwalk Inn there.

  • Anonymous

    Prayze Gawd! The Gawd of Hellfahr! Let tha wrychus hand smite that den of ugliness an’ raise them propitty rights way up, up, up beyond those who would put history (we don’ need no esteenkin heestory, meng) above the divahn rights o’ the bidness man! Ah say hayeel and cast them daymons out, them librul daymons an’ preservatoryationists types!

  • norwalker

    The church is listed on the Norwalk Historic Register Inventory. And there are some interested parties looking at the building as it is, so let’s hope for the best.

  • anonymous

    I think Ralph Bloom once referred to the Norwalk Historic Resource Inventory as the “developer’s hit list”.

  • Mr Greenpeace

    The Church, originally built as the St. James Chapel in 1829, the structure was enlarged in 1866 and renamed Trinity Church. Ray and Alice Brock purchased the property in 1964 and made it their home. The building has had several owners since the early 1970s. [4]

    In 1991, Guthrie bought the church that had served as Alice and Ray Brock’s former home, at 4 Van Deusenville Road, Great Barrington, Massachusetts, and converted it to the Guthrie Center, a nondenominational, interfaith meeting place.

    Too bad Norwalk isn’t ready for something like this it would be nice to rewrite the caption above for yet another historic church.

    All you needed back in those days was a war no one wanted and some insight to preservation sound familiar?

    I Also know if your a postcard collector a hot collectable will probably be the church because the way Norwalk works it will be a matter of time before it becomes a strip mall.

  • Anonymous

    It’s simple folks, if a property is up for sale and you want to preserve it, buy it. That’s all it takes. Otherwise let the people who actually contribute to improving the quality of life get on with business.

  • Anonymous

    You’re saying Handrinos contributes to the quality of life here in Norwalk? I would say a fair number of people would disagree.

    Basically, your argument is: if you own property and run a business in Norwalk, you’re improving the quality of life. What about the strip joint in Liberty Square? The massage parlors on West Avenue and Main Avenue? Are they improving the quality of life for Norwalk residents?

    “That’s all it takes.” Right. You damn well know that many non-profit organizations can hardly afford to stay focused on their missions and when it comes to facing off against big business, they’re at even more of a disadvantage. The game is skewed towards the business owner. Witness Kelo vs. New London.

    When the time comes and a property developer wants the City to exercise eminent domain to grab your house, don’t come crying on this blog for any sympathy. It’s simple, folks.

  • Anonymous

    Hey 14 – let’s get rid of the all the zoning laws that restrict development. I want to build a strip mall next door to your house!

  • Anonymous

    Purchasing a building to build something else is improving the quality of life.

  • http://n anonymous

    The whining must stop.

  • Anonymous

    #17 you just don’t get it – in fact, I think you are pretty much out in your own selfish world of ego, ego, ego…

  • NTTW

    What’s up with all the cracked out looking Hair / “beauty” salons in Norwalk? Are they fronts for drug operations?

  • http://www.leefleming.com/neurotwitch lee

    You know, there’s a Whole Foods that is essentially in Norwalk, they bought out Wild Oats (which bought the Food Emporium building). On the Post Road right on the Westport/Norwalk border.

  • turfgrrl

    Lee: Yes there is a Whole Foods on the Norwalk/Westport line, however there is not a grocery store (large) in South Norwalk. There’s a natural fit for one somewhere in the urban corridor of Norwalk, there was once two Pathmarks. A Whole Foods would be a welcome retailer addition. It’s mind boggling to me that lower density towns would be more attractive a location than Norwalk.