Home Invasion
Every time I see “Home Invasion” in a headline I get irritated. Countries are something you invade, not homes. Except that a home can be your castle, and you certainly can invade castles. I can see why there’s this tendency to use the term, it seems to tell the story in a sensationalized way. Yet does it really?
The act of entering, forced or otherwise, a building is defined by what your typical alleged criminal does within the buulding. Snag a television set and it’s a burglary. Heist some jewelry and night in a tux and you’re a cat burglar. Attack a person, and it’s an assault leading up to murder if the victim dies.
In the history of crime reporting, the term home invasion, rarely makes an appearance. The Boston Strangler, the Manson murders, the Lindbergh kidnapping, the Shephard murder the Clutter family murder, all managed their fair share of lurid crime stories without the mention of any home invasion. The 1959 NY Times crime report of the Clutter murders in fact, prompting Truman Capote to go to Kansas and write In Cold Blood, was quite succinct:
Holcomb, Kan., Nov. 15 [1959] (UPI) — A wealthy wheat farmer, his wife and their two young children were found shot to death today in their home. They had been killed by shotgun blasts at close range after being bound and gagged … There were no signs of a struggle, and nothing had been stolen. The telephone lines had been cut.
According to the wiki, most states don’t recognize home invasion as a crime. Yet after the Cheshire Petit family rape and assault, Congressman Chris Murphy sought to make home invasion a federal crime.
I’m not so sure that we need a home invasion crime defintion. There shouldn’t be a distinction between breaking into a home, or a business. A murder committed in either is horrific enough in it’s own right to stand alone as a criminal prosecuted act.