Beer Pong, Blumenthal And Wii

Back in the day when I walked two miles to school in the snow, uphill, both ways, year round– the game of choice, late Friday every  night, was quarters. A simple game, a hard top table, a cup or glass and beer. Shot glasses and Tequila for the adventurous. It was quite popular, supplanting the older games of loser drinks, insert activity here, or winner chooses who drinks, insert activity here. The equipment was simple every day objects and a lack of imagination. Perfect for college in other words. In high school the game of choice was called buying beer, which for those keeping track, er, never mind.

Somewhere deep in the annals of history, someone with a degree of imagination more than quarters, took the concept of tossing a ping pong ball into a small bowl with a goldfish and beer and turned it into beer pong. The wiki explains a somewhat different origins, but since nothing can be verified– ahem, the game essentially has no rules other than arranging cups at two ends of a table and creating teams of two who compete by tossing a ping pong ball into the other sides cups. Which happen to have some beer in them. Which if the ball lands in the cup, you get to drink. Simple enough. Yet some video game company decided that the game was worthy of being video-gamed. And thus was born Frat Party Games, and the Wii version of beer pong. Because assembling a bunch of cups, a table and beer can be too much effort.

The Wii, if you are unfamiliar with the latest in video game consoles, is somewhat different from its video testosterone cousins X-Box and Playstation, in that it doesn’t 3-D every graphic animation with fake realism, and instead provides a wireless wand like controller than is motion sensative. Which means that the games sense the movement of the controller and the gameplay reacts. Great for sporting games, golf, baseball, bowling and my personal favorite, boxing. Oh yes, I love nothing more than cranking up the Wii and jumping into the ring to box with the glee knowing my opponent will never lay a glove on me. The Wii is fun, video games are fun, but video games are not reality. And this is something that Connecticut’s Attorney General clearly doesn’t get.

AG Blumenthal has taken exception to JV Games naming of their Wii game, Beer Pong. So they changed it to Pong Toss. I guess Blumenthal is unfamiliar with the connotation of the word toss, as in cookies, which really cuts to the the results of a bad round of Beer Pong. Score 1-0 for JV Games. Today Blumenthal, according to an AP report, objects to the Entertainment Software Rating Board giving “Pong Toss” a teen rating. Probably because the action of the game is to score points, instead of as in real life, drink. Check out the gameplay here:

Blumenthal has his boxers in a twist over the depiction of beer mugs and kegs in the background. The AP:

Blumenthal sent a second letter to the board on Monday, asking that other video games that contain alcohol content be given an adult rating, for users 18 years old and older.

He criticized the board for saying the appearance of alcohol in the game was minimal. Blumenthal said the name “Beer Pong” directly refers to a drinking game. Also, beer is depicted in the graphics used for the game’s title, some of the beer pong tables in the game displayed images of kegs and mugs of beer, and there’s a full bar in the background.

“The whole basis for the games is heavy alcohol consumption – simply not appropriate for teenagers and deserving more consideration by the Board,” Blumenthal wrote.

In a written statement, Eliot Mizrachi, spokesman for the Entertainment Software Rating Board, said the board’s role is not that of a censor.

“Our job is to impartially and consistently label content about which there may be a diversity of views so consumers can make informed choices for themselves and their families,” he said. “‘Pong Toss’ involves nothing more than players tossing virtual pingpong balls into plastic cups, which hardly qualifies it for our most restrictive rating of AO (Adults Only, for 18 years old and older).”

Ah yes, the world, as in the entire United States must conform to the paranoia of Connecticut’s Attorney General whose lurid imagination sees great harm that someone under the age of 18 might see a virtual beer mug on a television set. I guess all those beer bottles in ads are not suggestive at all, or did I miss Blumenthal’s attempt at banning beer advertising recently? Let’s take a look at some retro gaming milestones.

leisure suit larry

Here’s a screen shot of Larry Laffer in a bar. The premise of the game was: “In general, the games follow Larry’s escapades as he attempts (and mostly fails) to convince a variety of young nubile women (rendered with increasing sophistication throughout the series) to have sex with him”

Of course when Leisure Suit Larry first came out there was no ESRB, and access to the game was mostly determined by access to a computer and buying the game. Which is the point at which anyone who cares about the content of any entertainment product should be able to discern whether said content is acceptable for their precious offspring. Games these days are the not so affordable $45-60 range. And any game called Beer Pong, plopped on the conveyor belt at the local Walmart by a 13 year old, should normally elicit some sort of parental conversation right? But Blumenthal thinks parents are too dumb to figure that out for themselves. Er, maybe he’s right, some people just keep voting for him after all.

The constant pressure by politicians with over-sized egos isn’t new. In the 1950’s it was the ban on comic books put forth after Dr. Fredric Wertham published Seduction of the Innocent, whose premise was that comic book reading causes juvenile delinquency. The Senate held hearings and the Comics Code Authority created, and promptly censored such classic titles like Vault of Horror and Tales From the Crypt. La plus ça change …

Apparently generations of kids running around playing cowboys and indians or cops and robbers, with the classic goal of “bang your dead” led to generations of kids running around in later life wielding semi-automatics and killing people. Just like video games like Joust caused people to jump on the nearest ostrich with a lance and impale them. Or Final Fight led legions of spandex clad street fighting.

Whenever these bastions of banning stab their pointdexter views of the world on mere entertainment products, they fail to provide one example, one actual real life example of any entertainment product influencing the behaviors of kids. Whether its the “Banned in Boston” list of books, comics or video games, the reality is they are censoring imaginative expressions. That is wrong. Beer Pong is a mindless game. It is can be played by anyone with or without beer. To liken a virtual version played in the privacy of homes as something that promotes heavy alcohol consumption just suggests to me that someone must have lost quite a few rounds of quarters years ago. And still being a sore loser about it.

source: Courant, ‘Beer Pong’ game’s teen-friendly rating criticized, by AP, July 7, 2008

  • Robert F

    If beer pong wasn’t already so popular, a game company wouldn’t bother releasing a video console version.

    In other words, teens already know about beer pong without someone manufacturing the virtual version. The release of the game will not contribute to or encourage teen drinking; they already know how.

    Those that wish to behave in accordance with the law play Dew Pong, using Mountain Dew in place of beer. There’s enough caffeine and sugar in Mountain Dew to get heavy consumers giddy and capable of staying up late.

    This is just Blumey exercising his ego over the masses of the stupid.

  • Fred S

    Well said.

  • anon

    What about thumper, fuzzy duck, and biz-buz.

  • anon

    And let’s not forget zoom, schwartz, and profigliano. Ah, for the days of higher education. We even got exercize with dizzy bats.

  • Aunt Bertha

    Three nouns I never thought I would see together.

  • Anonymous

    No way Blumenthal ever played quarters.

  • Fred S

    That freakin Zelot, I bet he wakes up everyday wishing he could burn witches and anyone else that doesn’t see things his way.

  • Mandy

    or burn books! Have not heard of a good book burning lately. That J. K. Rowling is outta control making kids actually want to read. How dare she! :)

  • Anonymous

    “F” “U” Blumen-troll ! And stop wasting taxpayer’s gas money shooting up to Hartford from Greenwich everyday in you Chauffeur-driven fat gas guzzler. Move in with your Hartford mistress or mister…or whatever three days a week and save us a pile of dough.

  • Mike

    Ok..I’m really trying to To understand this..

    So he’s saying if a kid plays and tosses a ping pong ball in the cup they will be encouraged to binge drink beer?!?

    Ok, if that’s the theory he is following, I grew up watching Tom and Jerry, Bugs, Roadrunner, Felix the cat etc.

    So by his theory I should of been encourage to go out and hit people off the head with Acme rockets, anvils and frying pans???!!! I must of not paid attention watching these cartoons every day, TWICE A DAY for years!

  • voice of reason

    Sorry guys but he has a point – what they did is illegal – just in the packaging. They named it Beer Pong and then rated it T for Teen. Last time I looked it was against the law for teens to drink. They continued at the end with the frat party games, which, believe it or not, CT campuses are now dry because of a 21 year old drinking age. I’m sure frats still have parties but it’s his job to make sure advertising stays within legal ranges. This crosses the border. Rate it M and take the frat stuff out and I would think they would stay on the market no problem. Not really that big of a deal. Their fault for pushing beyond the limits. They knew the market but knew it was an illegal market so they shouldn’t have done it. They got caught.

  • hysterical preservation

    Same with the Norwalk Inn. They are breaking State law by demolishing a structure that the judge ruled protected. B. is simply upholding the CT environmental protection law (in that case). That’s what we elected him to do — whether you agree with the law or not.

  • turfgrrl

    voice of reason: It’s a game, just like Grand Theft Auto is a game, which btw stealing cars is illegal. Somehow I don’t think the name of a video game incites people to break the law. And beer, is advertised all over the real world. As for UCONN, hrmm, law school, bullets and bubbly, yeah I think they’ve moved beyond toga, toga, toga.

  • Anonymous

    I read this in this morning’s Advocate and thought great! Someone finally sent a message to Chris Handrinos. Sadly, I realized my mistake when I saw “Darien” in the headline. Still… it’s a great idea. Hmm.

    Oh, right. This is a thread about Blumenthal and video games. I could see Handrinos pitching the concept: Rock Em Knock Em Down. Kind of a Grand Theft Auto but instead of a hot rod and drug dealers you get a bulldozer and incompetent, knuckleheaded City Hall cronies.

    Vandal mars lawn in Darien
    By Kate King
    Special Correspondent
    Stamford Advocate

    DARIEN – A 35-foot phallic symbol was discovered burned into a home’s front lawn last week, police said yesterday.

    The design was created with a “grass-killing substance,” Police Capt. Fred Komm said.

    “Something was placed onto the grass, or poured onto the grass that killed it,” he said.

    Police believe the incident occurred overnight. The symbol was discovered the morning of June 30, by the resident, a Middlesex Middle School teacher.

    “I have no idea what the motivation might have been,” Komm said.

    The incident was under investigation.

  • anon

    Let’s not forget Whale”s Tails, Cardinal Puff, and flip cup. Oh how I want to go back to college now.

  • voice of reason

    turfgrrl – I know you were trying to disagree with me but in fact you just proved my point. I stated they needed to change the rating. If you looked at Grand Theft Auto, it is rated M, as I suggested the solution was for Beer Pong. Beer is in the real world but not in a game advertised for teens when the drinking age is 21. Completely mixed messages and the man is doing what CT pays him to do.
    Now, if you want to debate lowering the drinking age back to 18, that’s a whole different topic!

  • turfgrrl

    voice of reason: No I proved my point. At 18 it is still illegal to steal a car. At ages 21, 33, 45 and 72 it is still illegal to steal a car. And no, if Blumenthal wants to ban video games in CT, that’s one thing. To censor video games for the entire country, point to what law he says he can do that.

  • Willie T

    Damm Turfie you had to walk only 2 miles? I had to go 5 miles and the last mile was thru a swamp. Loaded with snakes spiders and gators..Did I mention I really hate snakes. I hate snakes….

  • voice of reason

    Two things turfgrrl: first it was interesting that on my comcast home page, this article came up today titled “Drinking Games Prove Deadly to College Students” and the first student it talked about was a 20 year old who died after playing beer pong. Here is the link:
    http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-national/20080707/Drinking.Deaths/

    Secondly, here is the quote from the article you posted.
    “Blumenthal sent a second letter to the board on Monday, asking that other video games that contain alcohol content be given an adult rating, for users 18 years old and older.” So unless we are reading two different things,he is not trying to BAN the game, just trying to make it available only to those that can legally drink. He wrote to the board that rates games (a national organization)because it is their job to change it to be within the laws of the states in which it is sold.
    So, you think he’s wrong for trying to protect 13 year old children? With all the violence and hate that they see in the world, with all the alcoholic families kids grow up in and abusive families, with guns being shot and people being shot…what is the sense in anyone trying any more. Is that it? They see so much and live through so much why should we bother? One man can’t change the world so why should he bother? So you people sit around and be bitter and complain about someone caring what children see and play. I support him in his effort to protect children. I think they are still worth it. In CT and the rest of the world.
    Sorry…I kind of went off on a little tangent there but that’s how I feel.

  • anon

    Of course it’s awful that anyone died as a result of alcohol. But to blame the game, and not his ability to limit his consumption is wrong.

  • voice of reason

    I would never blame a video game – it’s pure stupidity. But if kids learn at an early age through a video game that it’s fun and ok are they more susceptible to being stupid and causing harm to themselves? That’s why the rating is called M for Mature, because you are supposed to be more mature and more capable of differentiating right from wrong. And unfortunately, that is the nature of the beast of alcohol, you can lose your ability to know when you have had enough – especially when you are playing a game such as beer pong.

  • Lindsay

    Voice of reason has it right. It is illegal to advertise or market beer in areas or at times where a certain % of the general audience/public is under the legal drinking age. I work in the wines and spirits industry and marketing a game with “beer” in the title to the general public which largely includes minors is in fact illegal. Not to mention irresponsible. If you do some research you will not see manufacturer-sponsored ads in or near schools or during kids/teens TV programs so why should other forms if entertainment be any different? I can bore you with the actual legal verbage if youd like.

  • anon

    I believe that in order for it to be considered it an advertisement it would have to be an actual brand. For instance, Duff’s beer on the Simpsons is not an advertisement because it is not an actual product. Similarly, if the game beer pong only has generic beer kegs and bottles, it is not an advertisement and not prohibited.

  • turfgrrl

    voice of reason: Yeah I think he’s wrong. Parents are responsible for what 13 year olds buy. Not Dick Blumenthal. Furthermore, for the record, I am against game ratings in general and its cousin the movie and television rating. None of the ratings do anything to protect children. Fantasy worlds of fiction do nothing about the real life issues, of parental neglect, poverty, domestic violence, and bad driving. Otherwise, with all the racing games out there, you’d think our teens would be better drivers. Clearly there’s no correlation between behavior and entertainment influences. It’s a very slippery slope to start down when we start blaming entertainment products for any behavior.

  • turfgrrl

    Lindsay: Except that video games are not heavily marketed to teens. Infact:
    LOS ANGELES (Reuters) — Contrary to a popular stereotype, the average video game player is not a teenage skateboarder but a more mature fun-seeker old enough to be his dad, according to a survey released Wednesday.
    A survey compiled by the Entertainment Software Association and released at E3, the video game industry’s major trade show in Los Angeles, found that a slight majority of video game players are now over 18 years of age.

    In fact, the average age of game players was 29 and the average age of buyers was 36, with men making up 59% of the playing audience.

    This has been true for a number of years. And considering the price of video games, makes perfect sense.

  • norwalker

    Why does everyone want to ignore the law by adding their own morals to the mix. Stop bashing the man who has been elected to enforce the law or go out and vote to change the laws. So what you are saying is it’s ok for underage drinking or at least to promote it and it’s okay to just ignore laws regarding historic preservation So what you people want is for everything to fit your agendas and forget about the rest of us.

  • Lindsay

    You can argue and post as many articles as you’d like. The FACT is, beer and anything mentioning beer or any other type of alcohol for that matter, where an ad for a specific brand or not, must adhere to a certain marketing code.
    Just because the laws are not effective does not mean they can or should be broken. The same applies to cigarettes and any other controlled substance. You may not like it and you be against it but thats your own personal choice. And I applaud Blumenthal for his efforts of increasing awareness of this game. Half the time parents dont know what their 13 year olds are spending their allowances on when they drop them off at the mall, or they buy them whatever they want without looking at it.
    And if you think theres no correlation between entertainment and behavior influences you are living under a rock!! Im actually shocked by your ignorance. Marilyn Manson and the “goth” look? Hannah Montana and pink karaeoke machines and pink plastic guitars? Choose a rapper, any rapper, and the hip-hop scene? Why is the hip-hop community the largest consumer of Hennessy cognac? Kurt Cobain and the 90 “grunge” look? Do you have any marketing education WHATsoever? Hello? Real world to Turfgrrl? According to your logic the fashions, styles, music, celebrity magazines, etc apparently have no effect on kids attitudes and behaviors because theyre all so busy listening to their parents. If that was the case, the world would be a lot different. Not to mention I wouldnt make nearly as much money as I currently do.

  • turfgrrl

    Lindsay: You really think dressing like a goth equates to behaviors that break the law? LOL. Get real. I’d love to see that one in court, “you see your honor, I was dressed like Speed Racer and so I decided to pretend my toyota corolla was the Mach 5, and drove down the street hoping to reach 200 MPH.”

    Hey, I’m going to don my pirate hat and head down to the nearest marina and pillage me up some bottle of rum. LOL.

  • voice of reason

    Wow turfgrrl – You are being very unreasonable to honestly think that media doesn’t influence behavior. Why on earth do you think companies pay for advertising in the first place? Do you remember Columbine and all of the follow-up school shootings that were blamed on the incredible media coverage given to Columbine and those subsequent ones so they stopped giving such tremendous coverage to try to stop the terror in our schools? It was like a domino effect. Media is very powerful. Don’t underestimate it. You of all people should know that – look at what you do. This is media.

  • anon

    Lindsay, I think you are wrong on your interepretation of alcohol and cigarette advertising. By mere use and display of an item without brand recognition does not qualify as illegal advertisement. If that were the case, mere smoking of cigarettes or drinking of wine or beer on a tv show or movie would make it r rated.

  • Lindsay

    It equates to a behavior, PERIOD and that is my point. Whether someone breaks the law or not is their choice of how to act. People DO speed, smoke, act out, use foul language, drugs, get involved in gangs, because theyre trying to emulate someone else they perceive as “cool”. Just because YOU dont does not mean a very impressionable 13 year old will not. So Im not the one who needs to “get real”. Ever heard of CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENTS? Entertainers are EXTREMELY powerful influencers of behavior, both good and bad. How you can say entertainment does not influence behavior is beyond me, when pretty much every product has an actress, musician, sports figure, comedian, endorsing it. Guess you’ve never watched golf or been to been to Times Square.

    #30 You are semi-correct. Smoking and drinking on TV and in movies can only be shown during certain hours and/or where a certain percentage of the audience of the program is over the legal age, like I said above. Even though the act of smoking or drinking is not an advertisement, it must adhere to certain codes, ineffective though it may be. So in a way, it is “R rated”. Ever notice the disclosures before a program which alerts the viewer of drinking, sexual conduct, drug use, etc? This is why.

    Just because the Wii is promoting a game with a non-branded product does not make it acceptable. Whether they call it beer pong or miller lite pong is not the issue. It may not be illegal but it is irresponsible and good for Blumenthal for drawing attention to it. Parents needs to be made aware of their kids can be exposed to virtual drinking games to in places they may not necessarily expect.

  • turfgrrl

    voice of reason: Media? We are talking about entertainment products, as in books, movies, television shows, comics and video games. Works of fiction.

    Long before there was Columbine, there were crackpots with rifles tacking out people at McDonald’s and office parks. There was even a trend of people shooting at the post office, hence the now ubiquitous term, “going postal.”

    There are plenty of bad ideas out there, requiring subjective interpretation on their merits. But to regulate, ban or label those ideas is the rights of individuals, not a government. Especially not a government that has cherished the right to free speech.

  • turfgrrl

    Lindsay: You are conflating real people with fictional worlds. You are making an argument that celebrity culture influences, and forgetting that this is not about real people, but fake people in a virtual world. It’s a game. It’s also a freedom of speech issue. I’ll repeat what I said above:

    There are plenty of bad ideas out there, requiring subjective interpretation on their merits. But to regulate, ban or label those ideas is the rights of individuals, not a government. Especially not a government that has cherished the right to free speech.

  • Lindsay

    It is clear you do not understand the definition of media. All of those “entertainment products” are a form of media. Print media, broadcast media, mass media, published media. Just because its not news media does not make it weak.
    Television shoes, which according to your statement above does not qualify as media, is a medium for both fictional and non-fictional entertainment. Television Show = Sex and the City = fictional entertainment = massive increase of young women moving to NYC and buying Manolos = every beverage alcohol supplier out there selling cosmopolitan mix. Again, I repeat: entertainment (even fictional) influences real world behavior.

  • Lindsay

    A game is fake people in a virtual world, yet celebrities are real people in the real world?
    Right.

  • turfgrrl

    Lindsay: I’m actually being pretty specific of what I’m defining and making an argument about. You are conflating that argument. Last I looked, influencing someone to buy something is not an illegal behavior. In fact some “entertainment products” soley exist to influence commercial consumption. But that’s not what this issue is about. It’s about the government stepping in and labeling content for you. It’s about individual rights to make decisions about behavior.

  • wayne’s world

    Isn’t the whole point of drinking games to get drunk, do stupid stuff, throw-up and have a wicked hangover the next day when you wake up in a stranger’s bed? Now that’s an educational experience whether you’re 13 or 30. Unless Beer Pong simulates that, what’s the point?

  • Lindsay

    Its also about BEER, a government regulated product. If it was chocolate pong or mac and cheese pong they wouldnt care, but its a GAME including BEER in the name and THAT is why theyre stepping in. It needs to be marketed and sold responsibly. There is obviously no point in my trying to educate you as to why the government is stepping in. Theyre not doing it to be controlling brain washing a-holes.
    Theyre doing it so parents are aware of the risks this game can impose on childrens behavior.
    Welcome to my world of booze and marketing.

  • wayne’s world

    In fact, I think it should be MANDATORY for 13 year olds to play drinking games and get blind drunk. That way, by the time they get driver’s licenses, the blush (so to speak) will have worn off and they’ll be less likely to kill themselves and others by doing stupid drunk stuff in a car.

  • Marquee Mark

    Just my two cents and I’m outta here—Sorry Lindsay and Co.–despite your obvious fervor on this issue, I have to totally agree with Turfgrrl on this one–she is correct about going down the slippery slope of surpressing free speech–there is enough of that going on in the Bush administration without our white knight AG getting in the act–He is not “protecting” anyone here–he is CAMPAIGNING a la Tipper Gore in her younger and more ambitious years. How about protecting me from getting gouged by the utility companies in this state?? Wonder if he still hangs out with his buddy Eliot Spitzer–talk about PROTECTION!!!

  • anon

    I would call it Root-beer pong and combine the name of beer pong and its alternative name Root as in beiruit and tell bloomin-loser to kiss my @ss.

  • Anonymous

    This is grandstanding by Blumenthal. Is there any confusion about what beer pong is? We need a rating to help figure it out?

  • voice of reason

    Marquee Mark – They aren’t just exercising their right to free speech. If they were up on a soap box talking about it or on a blog like we are, that would be free speech. They are allowed to sell it to children. I don’t have a problem with the game. Just market it to the right people. They did the same thing with cigarettes and regular advertisements for alcohol when people too young to actually use them weren’t allowed to be pictured in the ads. Why should games be allowed to be sold to them? It’s along the same line of common sense thinking.
    Whether you feel it is government trying to rule or not, we live in a country, state and city that is governed by rules so I suggest you all get used to it or move to, I don’t know, maybe the moon.

  • anon

    If you weren’t sure that we need less government before, now we are. What a waste of taxpayers money.

  • anon

    I think a child who plays this game will actually drink less. If they play a lot and get really good, they will be a much better player in real life and actually have to drink less than the players who did not play this video game.

  • voice of reason

    well, seeing as they can buy mature rated games at 17, they would still have plenty of time to practice. And it’s a a good point – I think video games do help with coordination skills so maybe they would be the ones to drink less in beer pong. I do like the point you make anon. But I still don’t think I would want a 13 year old playing it. And no, I don’t have any and even if I did, they would never be allowed to buy it but the point is it shouldn’t be a fight a parent should have to fight. There sadly are too many parents who won’t fight.

  • Marquee Mark

    Sorry–said I wouldn’t be back–but it was what VOR said about moving to the moon….Turfgrrl–how about some “Knights in White Satin”..never reaching the end…got to be on the Tube somewhere…and Voice…it is a cruel-hearted orb!

  • anon

    How the Grinch Stole Christmas should not be allowed on TV before 10pm. Lord knows I had to drink a lot of “Who-drinks”.

  • voice of reason

    Now I’m out – alcoholism is a disease. That is a documented fact and the earlier kids start, the more problems they will have. I don’t find it something to joke about. If you had ever worked with a teen with an alcohol or drug problem perhaps you would feel differently and be glad someone was trying to protect them in some small way for a few precious years. And yes, I couldn’t agree more, it is a cruel-hearted orb. Brrr, it’s cold on here.

  • Fred S.

    Has anyone seen the video?
    Outside of the game having the word “Beer” in its name, where is the drinking? Where is the influence? Please somebody tell me how this VIDEO GAME is influencing drinking, not somebody going to a bar and wanting to drink but this VIDEO GAME.
    I saw a picture of a keg with wings and a mug, which is the only alcohol reference I saw.

    Are you telling me that your parenting skills are so abysmal, that your children’s minds are so pathetically weak that a picture of a keg with wings and a beer mug will turn them to alcoholism?
    By the mere sight of this they will want to drink alcohol… I’m absolutely speechless, ok not that speechless.
    You all are injecting your own preconceived notions into something that doesn’t exist.
    The name of the game is “Beer Pong”, the only tie in this has with real world “Beer Pong” is throwing a ball into a cup, nothing else.
    It doesn’t tell you to drink, it doesn’t show anyone drinking, and it doesn’t show anyone drunk. So all this controversy is about the word “Beer”, when do we start censoring that word.