Taxis, Angels and Hats

It would seem that South Norwalk is the generator of most news these days. And despite the the seemingly endless stream of problems that are discussed, voter turnout in South Norwalk is the lowest in the city. Which then leads me to note, that I’m not all that surprised that news story number one has the headline; No point person so far for Guardian Angels chapter in Norwalk.

So what do make of the issue? Much ado about politics. Because at the end of the day, it was the political flunkies guised as District B Dems driving the issue, and not the people of South Norwalk. And once you understand that most of District B is completely uninterested in the political machinations of the District B Dems then you understand why not a single person stepped up to organize a Guardian Angel chapter. Let’s look at the excuses, reported by the Hour, from last night’s meeting:

Among those asked to serve as point person was Vito Bochicchio, owner of Eveready Transportation. He, however, cited his “battles” with the city over the relocation of taxi services at the South Norwalk Train Station, and with the state Department of Transportation — he’s seeking permission to operate additional taxis — as reasons not to get too heavily involved.

“Although I do feel (the Guardian Angels) is a wonderful cause that I’m going to be involved in, I am stretched too thin. I have 75 cabs at five locations,” Bochicchio said afterward. “I am going to get involved in this thing (the Guardian Angels) as much as I can with the spare time that I have because it’s a great cause.”

Martha Dumas, a South Norwalk resident who last month spoke in favor of bringing the Guardian Angels to Norwalk, said she would “get involved but not as a point person.”

Lacking a volunteer to spearhead the effort, District B Democrats unanimously passed a resolution reiterating their support for bringing the Guardian Angels to Norwalk.

Interestingly, Vito Bochicchio, owner of Eveready  Taxis, all of 5 taxis  operate in Norwalk, has his hands full on another South Norwalk issue. The infamous Taxi cab queue at the South Norwalk train station. From The Hour:

On Friday, Mayor Richard A. Moccia met with taxi company owners and Bobby Burgess, District B Democratic chairman, to discuss cabbies’ complaints about the city’s new taxi station on the westbound side.

On May 12, the city mandated that cabbies vacate the parking lot on the eastbound side of the station and queue up in designated spaces along State Street on the westbound side. Taxi company owners and others say the changeover has hurt commuters and forced cabbies to drive about aimlessly awaiting fares.

Now, a dispatching area, in a location near the station, could be in the works.

“We have identified a tentative solution that will satisfy the city and satisfy the taxi owners,” Burgess said. “We came up with a site near the train station, where the taxi owners were satisfied and the mayor was satisfied, on the west side, and it won’t interfere with existing traffic. I’m 90 percent sure it can be a workable solution.”

Burgess labeled Friday’s talks as “fruitful.” Moccia described them as “productive.”

Without disclosing its location, they said an area near the train station is under consideration as an area where the extra taxis might be able to wait for fares.

“I’d rather not say right now, because we just want to make sure everything is kosher,” said Moccia, referring to the location. “I think by the end of the week we should know.”

Burgess said Friday’s talks also addressed accommodating handi-capped taxi riders and giving taxis space on the eastbound side of the train station, if and when the station is rebuilt.

Lloyd Mellad, owner of Lloyd’s Taxi of Darien/Norwalk Yellow Cab and Vito Bochicchio, owner of Eveready Transportation, were among those attending the meeting, according to Burgess.

Public works officials and the Parking Authority deemed cabbies’ use of the parking lot outside the eastbound side of the station as unsafe and disorderly. As a part of the changeover to the westbound side, the authority assigned a “starter” to work outside the train station to direct commuters to the taxis.

Cabbies and taxi company owners labeled the May 12 changeover as counter intuitive, as train riders returning from Manhattan in the afternoon now must cross through the tunnel inside the train station to catch a taxi.

Looking forward, Moccia said taxi company owners will have a say in the future of the train station. The city recently launched a $250,000 intermodal transportation study aimed at upgrading the train station to better link train, auto, taxi, bus, shuttle, rail, bicycle and pedestrian traffic.

Might taxis someday be able to queue up on the eastbound side of the station?

“That’s a possibility because we may have a larger area over there, and we may be able to accommodate more cabs,” Moccia said. But “we’re still talking seven or eight years away. In the meantime, we want to make what we have work. We want to help (taxi) businesses succeed and provide a service to people who do want the cabs.”

According to Moccia, that will entail posting information on the Parking Authority Web site.

“If we could put information on our Web site, for the Parking Authority, (such as) here are the cab companies, here are their numbers, you can get picked up on the (eastbound) side, if you call in advance, things of that nature,” Moccia said.

Burgess said taxi company owners and city officials will meet again to discuss the potential dispatching area and other issues as details emerge. From there, the solutions will go to the public hearing, he said.

Last I looked Bobby Burgess wasn’t elected to any office that could call a public hearing. But in the absence of other voices from SoNo, the likes of Burgess keep focusing on the same old tactics, at the expense of actually contributing towards making SoNo a better place. There’s an old Texan expression to cover that, all hat and no cattle. Or maybe its talking through your hat.  In any case, SoNo needs new leadership.

source: The Hour,  No point person so far for Guardian Angels chapter in Norwalk, By ROBERT KOCH, June 3, 2008

source: The Hour,  Cab dispatch area considered near train station, By ROBERT KOCH, June 3, 2008

  • MGeake

    As for the Guardian Angels, we had a room full of Indians, but no Chief. That doesn’t mean the effort dies, just that we need to find somebody to do a whole lot of work — and take a whole lot of flak — for no reward other than knowing you’ve done good for the community.

    The Chambers were full on May 22nd, and there has been plenty of comment out here, so any takers? I simply cannot do this, as it would potentially conflict with my chairman ship of Health, Welfare; Public Safety, and Emergency Management. But as I said in the paper, I will get involved with any mentoring or CyberAngels programs that arise from this.

  • old timer

    Why is the City so involved in micro-managing the Taxis ? Why should they be subsidized with a place to park and hang out ? It makes sense to mark off some Taxi spaces where there is a real need, like BOTH sides of the RR station. That doesn’t mean the City needs to provide parking, dispatch, or advertizing for all of them. Taxis are private business, not a City service. Combined dispatch would save them money, but the City should not be involved. Taxis on the road or parked legally all over town would provide faster response to calls and attract more business. If I had a Taxi business, I would keep cars where the calls come from, and they don’t all come from South Norwalk.

  • disgusted taxpayer

    You will never get good leadership in District B until those who live there see what is aqctually happening behind the scenes. When the good people of District B realize that the Moriss’s, the Burgess’ and the rest of that cronyism party are doing them a huge diservice, then and only then will the good people allow the proverbial wool to be lifted from their eyes. As far as the Guardian Angels go, Its not just District B who believes something needs to be done. There were people from all sections of Norwalk that were in favor of bringing in some type of neighborhood crime watch throughout the city. Unfortunatly there are those that have blinders on to the real crime that happens each and every day in this town. The Angels have programs for all types of crime, from cybercrime to domestic to gangs and street crime. So whats the problem? Should we just all pick up and move and leave because no one wants to face the truth? Vito Bocchicchio was at the meeting along with the rest but like all others is afraid of retribution just like everyone else because at the end of the day it all comes down to politics and power. If Vito wants to continue to run his taxi’s in Norwalk he needs to watch who’s toes he steps on and that goes for anyone else who will dare to buck the system.

  • Anonymous

    It will take time, might even take the time needed to see the current crime reports like most cities have on a daily basis.West Hartford now details their police reports and daily roll call of crime by the week on line.Your able to see what crimes and where that effect the quality of life in their city.It should be encouraged to look at that city now that they built for a tax base to spend on their public safety.

    Starting a chapter right away may not be as feasable as bringing the Angels in to work on programs funded by grants for our schools and work with selected groups and clergy to teach our younger youth the choices they have before gangs and crime look good to them.Start them young was also a theme at the may 22 meeting most of walked away with some lessons the same lessons we trust our police dept and mayor will learn from as well.It wasn’t just a meeting to talk about a chapter it was informative if only our own police dept could talk like that knowing the streets in Norwalk to pass on to the residents it would be if anything a conficence booster knowing our cities protection was in qualified hands at times.

    The people at the meeting did not miss out on the information given the 22 the mayor and the chief did it was a shame.

    One thing that has been implemented is some accountability.Once our mayor and cheif started talking to the press its always their words that come back and bite them in the ass.Just like parking at the train station more than one set of residents are working towards resolve showing managemnet they were misinformed or way off base by their arogance towards voters.

    As far as leadership our mayor has come out to say he is responsible for the current upswing on Wall st yet downtown Sono’s open air street festival is missing in the mix isn’t it?Now we will sport a vibrant city allowing downtown Sono to turn into a ghost town full of empty run down buildngs hosting homeless and crimminals from all over the city.

    The city launched a $250,000 dollar study we can only hope the report doesn’t suggest another $300,000 dollar police station at the train station we all know through mass emailing what the mayors doing with the old police station.

    For all those effected by crime at the train station,help will be on its way or things of that nature we can only assume.

    I wonder why voter turnout is so low in South Norwalk a good question that deserves some thought.It does give for the most part a large percent of the public services and has most of the public resources like the methadone clinic,DSC,Health Clinic,NEON,the homeless shelter and public housing.You also have to consider 65 percent of the fire police and EMT services in the city goes to South Norwalk.Still its a great place to live right down the street from downtown Sono and Vets park what more could the residents ask for.

  • anonymous

    Can anyone explain why the chair of ward B and Bob Duff’s campaign manager are lobbying for Everyeady ? Don’t they have to register with the state if they are lobbying ? If state funds are involved Bob Duff’s campaign manager dont they have to file lobbying disclosure reports ? Why haven’t they filed them ?

  • anonymous

    testing

  • anonymous

    testing 2

  • anonymous 2

    testing

  • anonymous 2

    testing 5

  • anonymous

    test

  • test post

    test

  • Anonymous

    testing 1 2 3

  • Anonymous

    what posting #4 didn’t add that is so great about south Norwalk is the fact that the city now wants the transfer station there was well on meadow st .It will be great for any resident who has always been insulated from the troubles of South Norwalk in order to throw out your trash you will have to see whats going on after all.Roll up your windows and lock your doors I’d say.

  • Anonymous

    The Advocate had an article on the train station as well,Andrew Glickson, commissioner of the transit district spoke on some issues as well.Robert Koch’s article missed some facts that should of been noted.Read the Advocates spin on the station (on line for free)and the other players involved its not as self serving as the Hour but informative to who is doing the study who is paying for it and comments from others who are just involved in the process of making the train station better.Its nice to see both papers contributing to the news of Norwalk we do need all the sources available to the residents.

    The blog also aids in reporting the news as well its an awesome vehicle for that.

    meet the commuter day this Thursday at the S.
    Nowalk train station in the morning during rush hour. It would be great
    if people could come then and voice their complaints or even pass them along how both newspapers missed this I don’t know.

  • What is the Story ?

    Can anyone explain why the chair of ward B and Bob Duff’s campaign manager are lobbying for Everyeady ? Don’t they have to register with the state if they are lobbying ? If state funds are involved Bob Duff’s campaign manager dont they have to file lobbying disclosure reports ? Why haven’t they filed them ?

  • Transportation Scandal a Brewing ? Papadakos lookin like a good option

    This is from the State website on registering as a lobbyist. Looks like Robert Burgess and Bob Duff’s campaign manager for this year and last years “transportation forum” need to have registered as lobbyists with the State. Hopefully, they did, but if they didnt looks like could be trouble. Steve Papadakos looks pretty good with this transportation scandal. Hopefully, it gets looked into.

    Do I need to register as a lobbyist with the Office of State Ethics?

    You are required by law to register as a lobbyist with the Office of State Ethics (OSE) if you:

    * Expend or agree to expend $2,000 or more in a calendar year on lobbying; OR
    * Receive or agree to receive $2,000 or more in a calendar year for lobbying.

    This $2,000 registration threshold applies to any combination of the following activities:

    * Legislative Lobbying – any lobbying that affects legislation, even if you contact an executive branch official as part of your efforts
    * Administrative Lobbying – any lobbying that affects, among other things, the rules or regulations of an executive agency, and the actions of an executive or quasi-public agency regarding a contract, grant, award, purchasing agreement, etc.
    * Activities in Furtherance of Lobbying – expenditures for research, reports, polls, media buys, activities fostering good will, office expenses, secretarial or paralegal salaries, etc.; essentially the activities that support the actual lobbying efforts

    If you meet this monetary threshold, you must register with the OSE. Registration is biennially (every two years) or prior to the commencement of lobbying. Everyone must register on or before January 15, 2007.

    What type of lobbyist am I?

    A Client Lobbyist is the party paying for lobbying services on its behalf. In other words, the client lobbyist is expending or agreeing to expend the threshold amount of $2,000 in a calendar year.

    A Communicator Lobbyist receives payment and does the actual lobbying legwork (i.e., communicating). A Communicator Lobbyist receives or agrees to receive $2,000 for lobbying activities in a calendar year. Communicator Lobbyists can take different forms:

    1. Individual
    2. Member of a Business Organization (e.g., a firm or association that employs a number of lobbyists)
    3. In-house Communicator (a lobbyist who is a salaried employee of a Client Lobbyist)

    What form should I use to register with the OSE as a lobbyist?

    Complete registration involves three parts: (1) the appropriate registration form; (2) the appropriate signature page; and (3) proper payment.

    Client Lobbyists and In-house Communicator Lobbyists register with the ETH-1B form.

    Individual and Business Organization Communicator Lobbyists register with the ETH-1A form.

    What financial reports do I need to file and when?

    In addition to the registration form(s), registered lobbyists need to file periodic financial reports.

    Client Lobbyists file the ETH-2D form. This form gathers information such as compensation, sales tax and money expended in connection with lobbying; expenditures benefiting a public official or his/her staff or immediate family; all other lobbying expenditures; and the fundamental terms of any lobbying contract or agreement.

    The ETH-2D is filed quarterly, with the 3rd and 4th quarters combined. The next report is due on January 10, 2007 for the period of July 1 – December 31, 2006.

    The ETH-2D must be filed monthly IF:

    * The Legislature is in session and
    * You have expended or agreed to expend $100 or more for Legislative Lobbying or in furtherance of legislative lobbying

    Communicator Lobbyists file the ETH-2A and ETH-2B forms. The ETH-2A records compensation, reimbursements from the client lobbyist and sales tax. The ETH-2B form records unreimbursed expenditures of $10 or more for the benefit of a public official, his/her staff or immediate family. This form also records payments of necessary expenses of $10 or more.

    Communicator Lobbyists file on January 10 of each year.

    IF you make unreimbursed expenditures of $10 or more for the benefit of a public official, a member of his/her staff, or his immediate family, you must also file per the paying Client Lobbyist’s schedule (either monthly or quarterly).

    Communicator Lobbyists also file an ETH-2C, but only when they are registered to lobby for an unregistered governmental entity (e.g., a municipal agency).

    Where can I go for assistance with registration and financial filings?

    OSE staff is readily available to assist you with the registration and filing process. Please contact our office at 860-566-4472, Monday-Friday, 8:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.

    Additionally, the OSE has established an e-mail address specifically for your registration and reporting questions. Please send an e-mail to lobbyist.OSE@ct.gov for written guidance or response.

    The OSE also provides plain-English guides to the Lobbyist Code, as well as a procedures manual for lobbyist recordkeeping and audit. Please click on the following links to access these guides:

    * Guide to the Code of Ethics for Client Lobbyists
    * Guide to the Code of Ethics for Communicator Lobbyists
    * Procedure Manual for Lobbyist Recordkeeping and Audit

    Note: the Ethics Code exempts from registration certain classes of persons. See below for a list of these exemptions, including significant exemptions to the definition of “administrative lobbying.” If you have any questions as to whether or not you are required to register contact us at (860) 566-4472 or e-mail:lobbyist.ose@ct.gov.

    Persons Exempt From Lobbyist Registration
    (subsection 1-91(1) (1-8), General Statutes)

    LOBBYIST shall not include:

    1. A public official, employee of a branch of state government or a subdivision thereof, or elected or appointed official of a municipality or his designee, other than an independent contractor, who is acting within the scope of his authority or employment;
    2. A publisher, owner or an employee of the press, radio, or television while disseminating news or editorial comment to the general public in the ordinary course of business;
    3. An individual representing himself or another person before the legislature or a state agency other than for the purpose of influencing legislative or administrative action;
    4. Any individual or employee who receives no compensation or reimbursement specifically for lobbying and who limits his activities solely to formal appearances to give testimony before public sessions of committees of the general assembly or public hearings of state agencies and who, if he testifies, registers his appearance in the records of such committees or agencies;
    5. A member of an advisory board acting within the scope of his appointment;
    6. A senator or representative in congress acting within the scope of his office;
    7. Any person who receives no compensation or reimbursement specifically for lobbying and who spends no more than five hours in furtherance of lobbying unless such person (A) exclusive of salary, receives compensation or makes expenditures, or both, of two thousand dollars or more in any calendar year for lobbying or the combined amount thereof is two thousand dollars or more in any such calendar year or (B) expends fifty dollars or more for the benefit of a public official in the legislative or executive branch, a member of his staff or immediate family;
    8. A communicator lobbyist who receives or agrees to receive compensation, reimbursement, or both, the aggregate amount of which is less than $2,000 from each client in any calendar year.

    In addition, subsection 1-91(k), General Statutes, provides that the term “lobbying” does not include: (1) communications by or on behalf of a party to, or an intervenor in, a “contested case,” (2) communications by a representative of a vendor or by an employee of a registered client lobbyist who acts as a salesperson and does not otherwise engage in lobbying regarding any administrative action, (3) communications by an attorney made while engaging in the practice of law and regarding any matter other than legislative action or any rule or regulation, or (4) other communications exempted by regulations adopted by the commission.

    EXPERT WITNESS: Office of State Ethics Regulations (Section 1-92-44) also extend an exemption to retained expert witnesses (defined below) who are compensated or reimbursed specifically for their testimony. Expert witnesses must file statement of intent to provide testimony with the Office of State Ethics, in accordance with subsection 1-92-44(4), below.

    Sec. 1-92-44: Expert witnesses are individuals who appear before legislative committees or executive agencies to give testimony on subjects concerning which said individuals have specialized or technical expertise, beyond the ken of the average layman, obtained through knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education. The term “lobbyist” does not include an expert witness who provides legislative or administrative testimony where such testimony becomes part of the record of any legislative, regulatory, or administrative agency’s public proceeding: (1) which is conducted as an open public hearing for which notice is given pursuant to applicable law; and (2) of which a record is created in a manner which makes possible the creation of a transcript; and (3) with respect to which full public access is provided according to law, to such record or transcript and to all written material which becomes part of the record; and (4) prior to which a statement of intent to provide testimony as an expert witness, with a summary of his or her credentials in support thereof, shall have been filed with the Office of State Ethics.

    10/06

  • Anonymous

    No one has mentioned the fact that SNEW had an agreement with the City for those spaces in front of the S. Norwalk station. What has happened to that agreement?

    Just yesterday when I got a taxi cab home from the S. Norwalk station, I heard a story of how a woman the night before had called from the station for a cab and was quite upset because she couldn’t find the cab. She was told that the cab was on the Westbound side. She replied, “We have suitcases and asked to be picked up on the Eastbound side. She was told by the cabbie that he couldn’t pick her up on the Eastbound side because he would get in trouble. He told her to walk down the hill (with her suitcases) to Monroe Street and he would pick her up.

    Good job by the un-commuters, Moccia & Bondi!!!! Is it really all about Mico-management? Or did someone miss a payment?

  • Papadakos for Senate

    Horrible to think democratic party leaders are selling their support for projects if they get paid. More horrible if Sen. Duff’s campaign manager/consultant is involved. Someone has got to look at this. Steve Papadakos is the person who will reform this type of behavior.

  • old timer

    #17 If that story is accurate, there has been a real problem in communication. Licensed Taxis can pickup anywhere. The City, in its collective wisdom, has tried to control where they hangout while waiting for calls. If the companies were well managed, they would wait for calls near where people regularly call for taxis and the City would not get involved.

  • Anonymous

    #17 please understand the city is planning for the future not for the residents or taxpayers at this point.We have all kinds of money for traffic planning and calming yet no one available to do the work becuase most of the city engineers are working on Waypoint.So simply get use to an arogant city hall not thinking of the residents just the developers.Get use to the leadership not taking the time to consider its taxpayers there is no time to think clearly just get it done and go on to the next fiasco.

  • 1 of the SMD 3

    Looking at the calendar I see the 10th is quickly approaching. As most residents of the 2nd District know, SNEW electric bills must be paid by the 10th to recieve the 10% discount that we have enjoyed for many many years. Many people wait until the last moment to pay thier bills, and oh boy what a show it’s going to be.

    Since the Parking Authority siezed ALL but 3 or 4 parking spaces on State Street, it should be interesting to see where all the SNEW customers will be parking.

  • Number 17

    #19,20 & 21 Today when I was at the S. Norwalk Station late (8:48 there were no taxis or anyone in the spaces accept for a Channel 12 news van and a group of 5 people waiting for a Taxi (I’m guessing. When a Taxi arrived they pounced on it. I wonder if there will be anyhting on news 12 today (fair and unbiased).

    #20 You are right in your posting. Isn’t it interesting that the City would get a $200,000 grant to put a Fashion Kiosk in the station instead of a combined Taxi dispatch office? But I guess that would be for the commuters, instead of the non-commuters who are Know-it-alls!

    I read that the mayor didn’t attend the Guardian Angels meeting because he was busy at a fashion show instead! If he was modeling, I hope his undies weren’t dingy. Imagine, a stupid fashion show and ignoring the public too boot! What a poor excuse!

    #18 You’re dreaming! Duff has more integrity in his little finger, than Papadakos has in his whole life! Get real!

  • concerned taxpayer

    Figures that Duff would bend the rulez for his campane manager and not report her for bending lobbying disclosure. Reel astate now taxi and limasines. His only saving grace is his opposition to gay marriage.

  • #18

    Papadakos’ little finger must be sore from all that typing…

  • #18

    Wow, #23. Papadakos supports gay marriage! That’s great for a republican!

  • Anonymous

    So big deal that a volunteer on a campaign is a lobbyist. The rethuglicans can’t offer any reasons why their guy would do a better job so they attack someone else. I’m disgusted.

  • Papadakos for Senate

    Leave it to you demorats to protect Bobby Burgess and Bob Duff’s campaign manager. In the Norwalk State Lobbygate FIASCO. Maybe Senator Bob Duff should explain why he was working for her in pushing the cab issue in Hartford while her and Burgess were on the payroll. Sleazy DEMORATS.

  • high road campaigner

    Well, it is pretty easy to see what kind of campaign Papadakos is going to run…

  • Anonymous

    Clean unlike 8on Duff.

  • aanonymous

    throwing it at Papadakos ? HAHAHA!!!!!!! DUFF BURGESS AND DUFF”S CAMPAIGN MANAGER IN TAXIGATE AND YOU ARE THROWING STONES !!!!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!

  • Lets look at the facts

    DUFF’s campaign manager and Bobby Burgess push Bob Duff for a transportation forum last year. This year they do the same. All working for Eveready Taxi on a state issue. Someone could file for papers from Duff and his office and that would give answers. Lobbying forms need to be filed. PAPADAKOS WOULD NOT HAVE DONE THIS FOR HIS FRIENDS.

    Fromm the state site:

    What type of lobbyist am I?

    A Client Lobbyist is the party paying for lobbying services on its behalf. In other words, the client lobbyist is expending or agreeing to expend the threshold amount of $2,000 in a calendar year.

    A Communicator Lobbyist receives payment and does the actual lobbying legwork (i.e., communicating). A Communicator Lobbyist receives or agrees to receive $2,000 for lobbying activities in a calendar year. Communicator Lobbyists can take different forms:

    1. Individual
    2. Member of a Business Organization (e.g., a firm or association that employs a number of lobbyists)
    3. In-house Communicator (a lobbyist who is a salaried employee of a Client Lobbyist)

  • Se. Duff Should Be Ashamed of His actions

    Did Sen. Duff and his unethical unregistered “lobbyists” Burgess and Bob Duff campaign manager have anything to do with this. Nice DEMORAT way to steal from the working class to give to their friends. See what you get when you support Sen. Duff. Sen. Papadakos wouldn’t do this stuff. A request was filed in Hartford for all Sen Duff’s paperwork abd it will tell the story of “Taxigate”.

  • Anonymous

    Maybe the mayor is right about Norwalk,if a maintenance man at the South Norwalk library can be attacked in front of the library security gaurd
    during the day not even the Angels in Norwalk will make dent in the amount of crime we are generating as a city.Its someplace I found safe for my kids but not anymore.The attacker was 53 he came from New Haven so I hope Mr Mayor talks to his parents and seees what he ws doing here via the the Train and makes sure his mother is aware of his actions in South Norwalk.

  • Concerned Taxpayer

    Why hasn’t Duff, his campaign manager, Everyeady Cab or Bob Burgess tell their side of how taxpayers are being ripped off by their unethical lobbying in town. Figure our dollars are being given away by these crooks. Sen. Papadakos would never engage in this type of unethical behavior. Wait until the Freedom of Information materials come back.

  • Anonymous

    The dems seem to busy trying to run a city maybe they are just too busy fixing problems created by the other team who knows? :)

  • SEN. PAPADAKOS WILL RUN THINGS DIFFERENTLY

    The dems are running the city ? LOL. With these unethical behaviors of Bob Duff’s Manager, Bob Duff, and Bob Burgess the only only place theyll be running is to jail for their unethical beahvior. SEN. PAPADAKOS WILL BE PUSHING FOR ETHICS REFORM AND WILL NOT ENGAGE IN UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR LIKE BOB DUFF, HIS MANAGER, VITO EVEREADY, AND BOB BURGESS. HOW COME YOU DEMORATS DONT DEFEND BOB DUFFS AND PEWS ACTIONS ?

  • Anonymous

    I find it fascinating that somebody would anonymously accuse people of an illegal act, yet provide absolutely no proof of the key element of the alleged crime: that the people accused actually received $2,000 to lobby.

    Turfie: without proof, this is libel and all such posts should be removed and the poster blocked.

  • Anti-Smear Tactics

    Steve, instead of smearing Duff, why don’t you tell us about the platform you are running on. What issues are you concerned about? What initiatives would you start, if elected?

  • concerned taxpayer

    Steve isnt smearing Duff. Duff made his bed with Mary Phew, Bob Burgeois, and Vito Foccachia. If they are lobbying without a license that is the truth. Not a smear. Why dont they just clear up this little misconception ? BECAUSE THEY CANT !!!!!

  • Anonymous

    #39: “that is the truth”.

    See #37 — WHERE IS YOUR PROOF?!? Why don’t you clear up this little omission??? BECAUSE YOU CAN’T?????

  • TELL THE TRUTH

    Number 37 is trying to spin this. Blame the people who uncover the unethical behavior. Show us that it is a smear. You prove Finocchio didnt pay Bergess and Puoh to hold “transportation forums” last year and this year. You prove less than 2,000 dollars was spent paying Burgess and Puoh. You prove that Duff did not help District B leader Bergess and his campaign manager Puoh. You should prove it then people would leave it alone. Fact: Bergesss and Puoh are not listed on state lobbying list. Fact: they lobbied for Finocchio and Everyeady Taxi. You should list your facts since the 10,000 daily readers are reading and waiting.

  • Anonymous

    Ah, so in your obviously Republican mind, the Constitution is just a suggestion, and people must prove their innocence.

    It’s clear through your mangling of names and ad hominum attacks that you only care care about scoring political points, not the truth.

    Again, an unsubstatiated criminal accusation or charge about somebody’s character is libel. So far, the only one PROVABLY UNETHICAL is YOU!

  • Anonymous

    #36-just for your and others information, Vito Bocchiccio is a Republican.

  • MGeake

    Turfie, Turfie, Turfie. You know me much better than “[m]uch ado about politics”! It was unfortunate that those who had expressed an interest in actually doing the actual work of forming a Guardian Angels chapter had other obligations on Monday evening, but the fact that no point person was identified just then didn’t mean that one wasn’t just off-stage.

    I’ve already been contacted by several people about volunteering. The organizers will be given all those names, and any new contacts I get will be transferred to them.

  • Anonymous

    A serious assault the other night in South Norwalk simply tells us police can’t be everywhere I’m sure the officers would of found other things to do than to use a rape kit for evidence this is at least the second one in a month last victim was dropped off on Cresent st.Lets not all forget what it is we want a safe street or at least the quality of life to increase for some of us.I can only thank anyone for trying to do something.The police dept has the best officers the best city to protect but who can’t use help.

    Trusting we have all seen the video of the poor victim who got hit by a car on video, its time to make sure all of our camera’s around Norwalk work there was talk from a police officer they don’t all work or work all the time.Before we spend money on shotfinder lets get our other high tech things working right be sensless not to be using what we have already spent money on.Obviously this is not a patrolmens problem and can in no way sound like a bashing give the officers a break give them what they need and if its not working fix it Harry send Dick up in a bucket truck if need be the mayor does enjoy the spotlight.

  • Anonymous

    Dems tap Sellers to lead Angels effort

    NORWALK By ROBERT KOCH Hour Staff Writer South Norwalk Democrats have recruited Donnie R. Sellers,

    I have to tell you the response to that public forum was unbelievable. There were maybe 3-4 naysayers and the rest were all for it. If you think that the cops are against it you may want to rethink that. With dwindling recruitment and retirees coming up many think that a little help from the community will be a great thing. I think the reason there is so much discent with the mayor and the Chief about the Guardians is that they do not want others meddling in Norwalk problems.

  • MGeake

    “others”?

    The Guardian Angels would be Norwalk volunteers!

  • turfgrrl

    Yipes! You guys have been busy here.

    Anonymous 37: There are known financial relationships that bear scrutiny. I looked on the state site and did not see any registered lobbyists. It could be a legit issue, it might be much ado about nothing. Full disclosure clears all.

    MGeake: If Donnie Sellers, a convicted felon, and former Democratic Ward B flunkie is your idea of a good volunteer… I rest my case. Where are the Roodner Court residents willing to patrol their neighborhood? What, not in the District B Democratic fan club?

  • Anonymous

    Maybe Rillings is afraid of outsourcing,city hall is going to do it with the coffee shop, Hal would love to do it with the trash trucks he said so the other night but the pesky unions is probably in the way , who knows what ? with the city Housing trucks using the transfer staion already on meadow st what deals are being struck odd how the taxpayers are the last to find out things that effect them.

    No one should turn their back on a Norwalker determined to see change it will happen but not as fast as it should,you do have to fight city hall don’t you?

  • MGeake

    Ah, so TG doesn’t believe in redemption, second chances, … Donnie’s mistake is far in the past, and was not violent. Do I condone what he was accused of? No, but he has more than paid a price for it.

    Besides, I’m not the one vetting the volunteers, the Guardian Angels in NYC are; all I did was put the two parties in contact with each other. And I suspect the Guardian Angels don’t have a sign that reads “political flunkies need not apply”!

    As for “where are the vounteers”, give Donnie time. Like I said, I’m forwarding all who contact me to him, and I’m not publishing any names here. When the time comes, and they’ve passed the “entrance requirements”, they’ll identify themselves — in little red berets :)