Norwalk: Kimmel Blasts BOE Secret Meetings Like Corda Contract Renewal

Corda, Lang and Opdahlmanaged to get a secret meeting to negotiate their contract renewals. YOu can’t make this stuff up.

When the Board
of Education’s negotiations
committee met this week,board
member Robert Polley didn’t
know about it, he said. Neither
did District Public Affairs Offi-
cer Sheri McCready, who typi-
cally notices the board’s full
meetings. Committee member
Bruce Kimmel said he did not
know who the committee’s
chairperson was until he
arrived at the meeting.
Sharon Cadden, a former
Norwalk High School PTO Co-
President who regularly attends
full board meetings, said she
didn’t know when this week’s
committee meeting ” or any
other committee meetings ”
took place.
“I’m never aware of them,”
she said.“I’d love to know when
they have committee meetings.
As far as I know they do every-
thing by phone or e-mail.”
Confusion in the aftermath
of this week’s meeting,conduct-
ed in a closed executive session
so the four committee members
could discuss the specifics of
contract renewals for Superin-
tendent Salvatore Corda, Assis-
tant Superintendent of Cur-
riculum and Instruction Karen
Lang,and Chief Operation Offi-
cer Stuart Opdahl,seems to evi-
dence the lack of information
surrounding board committee
meetings.

Here’s the first question for the BOE. Why would you renew any of these contracts? Let’s start with Mr. “Mismanagmeent” Opdahl. You have no construction or financial reports to indicate how the projects under his management are doing. You have been handed a “finished” budget without your input or oversight. Your test scores are not improving and you have schools that the State has cautioned you about.

Here’s what to do. Give Corda one year with a must improve mandate and itemize areas that must be improved. Get rid of Opdahl. Get rid of Lang.

If you bothered to talk to the teachers, you would know why you must act now to save the schools. Otherwise you are just passing the buck through negligence. You may think your stint on the BOE is doing good, but in effect you are harming a generation of school children by allowing gross incompetence to reign unchecked.

But the continue lack of commucation about committee meetings and notcing the public including your own webs site. Egads.

It is an issue Kimmel said he
has discussed with other board
members “for months.”
Kimmel said he’s also trou-
bled by the board’s lack of regu-
lar committee meetings ” the
finance committee did not meet
until after the budget was pre-
sented, and the curriculum
committee has met once in his
two years on the board,he said.

This attitude displayed about committee meetings is absurd. Kimmel is right. Cadden is right. Bishop-Pullan is wrong.

“They don’t want to have
committee meetings, they
don’t always post them,” he
said. “At best, it’s sloppy. At
worst, it’s denying the public
access to what is going on.”
Board Chairwoman Jody
Bishop-Pullan said Tuesday
that she didn’t know whether
the negotiations meeting was
noticed.
She said committee meet-
ings are called on an “as
needed”basis. Some, like the
policy committee, meet fairly
frequently, she said.
Committee meetings must
be posted 72 hours in
advance, and minutes must
be kept, said Peter Nolin, the
city’s corporation counsel.
Committee meetings are
typically noticed through
Corda’s office, Bishop-Pullan
said Wednesday.
Information about meet-
ings is posted in city hall, she
said.
Kimmel said this interpre-
tation of “posting”is not suf-
ficient.
“To conform to the letter of
the law misses the intent of
the law ” in this case, bla-
tantly misses the intent of
the law,”he said.
Kimmel said he thinks all
board meetings should be
noticed in the newspaper or
on the board’s Web site.
“The right thing to do is to
notice it so the public is fully
aware that a meeting take
place,” he said, adding that
posting in the city hall lobby
is not adequate. “If anyone
believes posting a meeting at
city hall is sufficient, they
need to have their head exam-
ined.”
Bishop-Pullan said she
would consider posting com-
mittee meeting notices
online.
“It’s sort of like, you do
whatever you’re legally sup-
posed to do, but if people feel
like their not getting enough
information we can make it
more widespread, that’s not a
problem,”she said.
Kimmel said that philoso-
phy is problematic and com-
mon on the board.
“Conforming to the mini-
mum creates a problem,”he
said. “In my opinion its the
same issue that came up
when they were considering
(eliminating) detailed secre-
tarial services at board meet-
ings.”
Cadden said more public
discussion at committee
meetings could combat mis-
information and improve the
board’s relationship with the
public.
“I often think they don’t
publicize them because
everything is controversial,
and I feel if everything was
more open, and people knew
what was going on, (it would
be less controversial),” she
said.
Bishop-Pullan said the
board doesn’t intend for com-
mittee meetings, which she
said draw few members of
the public, to be closed-door.
“We’re not hiding it,” she
said. “If people feel we need
to make it more obvious we
can certainly do that.”

Yes, Jodi, you are providing cover for the lack of oversight you provide over your staff, Corda, Opdahl and Lang. They report to you, not the other way around.

source:The Hour Board of Education having communication issues , By AMANDA PINTO , July 27 2007

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

  • Anonymous

    A smart Republican BoE candidate would file an FOI complaint.

  • Aunt Bertha

    …but in effect you are harming a generation of school children by allowing gross incompetence to reign unchecked.

    Loved that line! Loved it! Loved it! It looks like you have everyone’s number Turfgrrl, glad to see you calling them on it. Jody should be stronger than she is with her position, she would have the backing of the city.

  • Disgusted

    No doubt, Corda, Lang and Opdahl will get contract extensions and generous raises. If the raises were to be based upon student achievement, they would be getting pay cuts — or warnings that they may be fired.

    I hope that their evaluations will be made public, but I don’t expect that to be the case. I’d like to see what they say about:

    1. Corda’s, Lang’s and Opdahl’s visibility in the schools. How often do they get a first-hand look at the strengths and needs of the schools? The real school system is where the kids and teachers are, not where the central office administrators are.
    2. Corda’s visibility at school events (games, concerts, award ceremonies, etc.) It’s part of the job, people!
    3. Corda’s, Lang’s and Opdahl’s efforts to maintain ongoing communications with administrators, teachers and parents. BOE meetings don’t count for this.
    4. Corda’s, Lang’s and Opdahl’s willingness to change their minds when presented with opposing points of view.

  • Fed up Taxpayer

    Corda has been playing the Norwalk taxpayer for a fool all the way to the bank since he got here!

  • Slayer

    This recent news is upsetting and totally unacceptable. What are the increases in raises based on? Who evaluates them? What is the tool? What is the rubric? How long does the public have to put up with such gross neglience? Why are Huey, Dewey and Louie allowed to shortchange the students, parents,teachers, and administrators? They always end up with a three-year contract because the board always renews for one year. Even if we wanted to get rid of these incompetents, we would have to wait two or three years or buy out their contracts. Remember Dr. Herbert! We cannot afford to do that again.

    Mr. Kimmel, Mrs. Murray, Mrs. Mosby–please help. We must stop the insanity; these scammers must find another district to corrupt.

  • Aunt Bertha

    Slayer you must ask help of ALL the BOE members. You have seen action with the ones you have mentioned. So write thank you notes to them and have them published in the hour and advocate. Then do a call out to the remaining board members and ask them where they stand on all this. Get them to say it in PRINT! All the wishy washy statements coming from the top go unquestioned/challanged.
    Bishop-Pullan said the
    board doesn’t intend for com-
    mittee meetings, which she
    said draw few members of
    the public, to be closed-door.
    Then why were they Jody?
    “We’re not hiding it,” she
    said. “If people feel we need
    to make it more obvious we
    can certainly do that.”
    Then do it Jody…Like the Nike ad…JUST DO IT!

  • Disgusted

    Slayer: Who evaluates them? What is the tool? What is the rubric?

    Apparently, you think that they should be treated like the teachers. Why would that be for King Corda and Queen Karen? They MAKE the rules; you surely don’t expect them to have to follow the same rules!

  • Anne Sullivan

    Why is the evaluation tool for top administrators a secret? It’s not for NPS teachers…….

  • Aunt Bertha

    Disgusted- it is under the BOE’s evalluation that they get pay raises. Is it also the BOE’s RESPONSIBILITY to evaluate them? I know of No rubric or evaluation tool that they are scored against to see the QUALITY of their preformance. It is sad. And it is telling of what little the BOE thinks of themselves as a power of GOOD. I would like to see the BOE grow a backbone and hold Admin. to the same expected job preformance of a teacher in the system.
    PS The BOE has ruled us to work on Election Day and President’s Day, why are they not meeting in public? It is what the city is looking for as they were looking to get us to meet every Monday and Tuesday and now Wednesday before school…next thing you know we will be coming in on Columbus Day and Martin Luther King Jr. Day.

  • Watchingandlistening

    I hope all who read this blog will remember what has transpired this spring when they vote in November!!
    With the support of the “see-nothing” BOE, Corda threatened to destroy our schools if his budget request was reduced. When “push came to shove” all the threats disappeared and the schools will be fine. His INFLATED budget request was forced to be modified and millions were “found”.
    And remember these events when Corda submits his next budget request. HE WILL NOT CHANGE HIS APPROACH unless we elect a real BOE.

  • Truthfull Taxpayer

    #10 Watchingandlistening – People in retail have been telling me for years that before the BoE budget’s fiscal year is over, that these folks run out to spend all of the money left over in the budget on TV’s, Sterios, Computers, and other expensive items because if they don’t spend it, the budget will get CUT in the next fiscal year.

    I remember being at a Council meeting 2 years ago when Mr. Hempstead asked (I can’t recall the amount) that monies left over in a BoE budget be put into a special account to be spent on upcoming school heating bills instead of being released to BoE for the general fund. Mr. Hempstead was 1 of 2 Republicans on the Council at the time.

    I thought it was a very good idea since energy costs had gone up about 30% at the time. No one on the Council backed him up on this issue, and the money was probably spent in the same manner.

    We as taxpayers are getting ripped off left and right by people who act like our tax money is theirs to do what they want with. Many of them don’t live here, and feel they have no financial responsibility when spending our tax money.

    In November, we need to vote for people who feel they are responsible to us the taxpayers!

  • Beach Bum

    Truthful Taxpayer, What you have stated in your 1st paragraph is absolutely true. That mentality exists not only at the BOE but for all government agencies. It’s called the bureaucratic, entitlement approach towards spending.

    If what you also stated about Mr. Hempstead is true, I applaud him. I wish there were more elected officials like him.

  • norwalk teacher

    Please, please, please BoE, please give Corda more guidelines and hold him accountable.

  • P.O’d Parent

    Doesn’t anyone find it amazing that Corda got rid of the BoE Finance Director position? He said it was to “steamline costs”, but this is the biggest pile of dung I have ever heard. He did it so he can manipulate the school budget unheathered. He has inflated every department in his budget so that he can play “musical chairs” (or should I say “musical cash”) and move the cash around as he needs it as the year goes on. So, In essence, Mr Corda is really nothing more than an over-sized squirel saving his nuts (our money). He uses or taxpayer cash as a “Savings book” for when he needs it. Just look at the BoE budget for postage. While in every corporate organization, postage costs are declining due mainly to e-mails, the BoE postage dept has had ridiculous increases. Why? So Mr Corda can move the money out of it when he needs it. How convienent no to have a financial director, Huh? Do you think Mr. Corda invests HIS own money with companies that have NO financial director? Would you? Of course not. Yet this “Dr.” Corda expects us to.

  • Vet Park Junkie

    “Curiouser and curiouser!” cried Alice.

    In an earlier post I posited that accounts might be stuffed for rainy days and then I took a swag at postage. Lo and behold, P.O.’d Parent appears!

    Where can I verify a BoE budget number? A couple of clicks on the city website and I can see that the Police Dept budgeted repair of a sound level meter last year, but I can find nothing on BoE accounts.

    The closest that I get to BoE info are the terse board minutes that border on obfuscation.

    See: http://www.norwalkpublicschools.org/show/announcement?Category=Minutes

    The May 15 minutes have a paragraph on Opdahl funding the Food Service Program with budget transfers and a note of concern being expressed about “the account the money was being transferred from.” (Let’s agree to trim the thread leading to the end of a sentence with a preposition.)

  • Beach Bum

    I think we are all getting carried away in this thread and the other one. To recap: Why do we want to get rid of Corda? He may have misappropiated school funds and seems to hire inept administrators. What needs to be done to get rid of him? Convince those in authority: the mayor, Common Council, or BOE to hire some kind of auditing organization to thoroughly check the books. Having done this should prove that Corda mishandled the budget. This organization must have an immpecable reputation so there’s no chance of “money passing under the table” if you know what I mean!

  • indythinker

    #16-are you kidding? Its election time, do you actually think that an audit would happen now? I think not! That would be something akin to doing ones job and since the BOE does not have to answer to the city for anything, the Council, the Mayor nor anyone else has jurisdition nor authority to do so. Just be thankful the the finance committee,suggested by Mr. Hempstead and passed to the council made the right decision to inform and educate the taxpayers and that some on the council followed through and demanded accountability. Do you honestly believe that those who opposed the cap would now approve an audit? You need to keep in mind who has the majority .

  • Beach Bum

    Indythinker, They, any politican… bureaucrat, do nothing at first. They start thinking. They wonder if it will be a plus on their record. They start the serious thinking when someone takes the initiative (your’re right) usually in a non election year. But, if enough voters DEMAND something to get done now, it will get done! It’s political suicide not to listen to the voters when they are so passionate. Have we forgotten about the immigration bill so soon!

    BTW, We need to know. Where does it say that BOE does not have to obey the Norwalk charter? A recent thread had a section from it which stated that BOE must send detailed monthly expense reports to the mayor. See thread July 16, 2007, “Norwalk: Corda hasn’t turned in his homework.”

    If anyone knows which law supercedes the Norwalk charter, please share it.

  • CYA

    talk, talk, talk…complain, complain complain…but no ones does a darn thing about Opdall and the money games he plays. We have seen him first hand bull shit the Common Counsel, the Mayor, the Board of Ed, and all the other city agencies and committees. But not a single one of you guys and gals has ever challenged him face to face, or planted your feet and stood toe to toe with him. All of you self proclaimed smart leaders, these wise business people, these professionals with huge amounts of private and public sector expereience. The only thing huge is your egos. Shame on you all. Shame on you for blaming everyone else but yourselves, and then the voters. Shame on you for telling everyone that you can’t do a thing about it, that it must be resolved on election day. Most of you are all acting like a bunch of gutless wonders, with no gonads. All talk…no action. Just go away, and stop running your mouths please. Most of you have been grossly ineffective.

  • Mr Greenpeace

    this banter just takes the focus off of other issues that is going to cost the city real money after the elections, where are the issues on dept budgets like the BOE, did everyone forget about the other percents of the city budget,,I missed it when it was written what is the percent of the budget when talking the schools? in an overall city budget,,I heard where the fire was 12.5 is that correct? the police? the DPW? where do I find that breakdown.

    I’m sure if I ran the city I would employ people to focus on this while my other depts sneak by the line well after election time..

    yes your all right I could never run a city or even a lemonade stand, just my mouth………

    CYA your right I do feel some of the blame..ineffective? the jury is still out

  • Silence Dogood

    CYA: What is YOUR reason for not going nose-to-nose with Opdahl and the others? Mine is employment related.

  • Vet Park Junkie
  • Mr Greenpeace

    thankyou Vet Park Junkie

  • CYA

    #21…I am a life long resident and taxpayer. I have seen first hand the same things that our elected officials and committee members have witnessed from Opdall. I have complained to well over twenty of them, and none have ever disagreed or defended the man. They have all shared the same feelings, thoughts and anger. They have all stated that he must go! That he is bad, etc., etc., etc. I have even heard some council members say that they “were out to get him fired for his actions”. But they have done nothing over the last three years to change what they rant and complain about. I do not feel that it is my role or responsibility to take the next step with this mess. I have gone many, many times to my elected reps about this, as well as other appointed people in the city. It is the hands of the CC, Mayor, BOE, and all the other glorious self serving committes to deal with Opdall and his pranks. Frankly I’m tired of hearing the repubs, some dems and others state that the only way to correct the mess is in the hands of voters come November. I view this as chicken dunk. Let me tell everyone what I think……..That nothing is going to happen with the BOE or the high rollers at the schools. It will be business as usual, and we will be hearing and writing the same complaints, and voicing the same anger for the next two or three years, or until Opdall decides to retire, or leave on his terms. I’m truly sorry I feel this way. My congrats to the empty suit leaders of our city.

  • Charles the Hammer

    Blaming the taxpayers for the malfeasance and deception of the current superintendent’s administration is akin to the logical fallacy of “blaming the victim”: “You should’ve locked your car”, “Look at that dress, she was asking for it”, or “He should’ve just given up his wallet.”
    Asserting that anyone discussing this situation is a “gutless wonder” is cynical and, because it’s impossible to know the identities or actions of these posters, it’s also ridiculous.

    Mr. Opdahl’s antics (can you say “loading school shop equipment into a rent-a-truck?”) are an issue only as a reflection of Corda’s imperious regime. Corda, et al “know best”. They can’t be bothered with tedious protocols of democratic oversight and have been abetted by an aloof and passive BOE. Hence, we have grossly inflated budgetary predictions, randomly scheduled committee meetings that discourage civic input and are possibly illegal, improper allocation of funds, mismanaged projects, and a general arrogance that pervades every aspect of running the Norwalk Public Schools. This latest gaggle of “carpetbaggers” has virtually no stake in the town and is disdainful towards parents and teachers. Recall the recent policy proposals concerning attendance, homework, and grading. That “dumbing down” approach springs from elitism and hubris. The peasants will never make the grade so let’s lower the standards.

    “Shifty” Corda has been a disrespectful dissembler to the Town Council and Board of Estimate and Taxation, legitimate bodies of Norwalk’s governance. He has been an absentee landlord, an invisible ghost who frequents the golf course more than our schools. He has decimated the morale of the teaching staff and second-guessed his frontline administrators. He promotes wacky policies that defy common sense. He countenances condescension and shady conduct by his accomplices. The listings of this dubious resume, if truncated, are sufficient for “Shifty” and his merry band to be given a bon voyage party. Corda’s “green tree” contract format insures that we will have to do a buy out. Let’s be sure not to put ourselves in this bind again: Herbert, Corda,…? Fixing this mess is going to require a sea change at BOE on election day. Let’s get it done.

  • Watchdog

    Unfortunately, the only individuals who have jurisdiction over BoE matters are the elected Board of Education members themselves. The Common Council nor the Mayor cannot intervene, save at the appropriate times when they can assert their “power,” so to speak. This was seen at budget time when certain council members fought for a budget cap.

    It is important to understand that the elected board is the focus here and it would behoove all concerned to urge their family and friends to vote accordingly this November. Ideally, the board definitely needs a few lively members who will force discussion with goals toward clarity and “understanding,” as Dr. Corda suggests.

  • Beach Bum

    CYA, If you have been reading any of the previous postings and in other threads, you’ll notice that I and a few other have been trying to figure out who has jurisdiction over Corda and his cronies. COrda directly reports to the BOE elected members. You can talk ’til you are “blue in the face” to the mayor or Common Council. If they have no juridiction over the BOE, then the only thing for them to do is agree with you to shut you up.

    What has also been posted is to give the politicians ideas on how to get rid of Corda or at least rein him in. Will this happen in an election year? Most likely not. But, if many of us voice our opinions in a rational voice constantly and especially on this blog, then the wheels might start to turn this year. Again I remind you what happened to the immigration bill. The President and Senate thought they had a sure win. Until, the voters started voicing their opinions loudly to their elected reps.

    Otherwise in Norwalk, you’ll just have to wait until November’s election and hope the voters kick the current, spineless BOE members out the door.

  • Watchdog

    There are some very interesting discrepancies between schools.

  • Bewildered

    Anyone with suggestions? Is there a plan? Let’s make some suggestions and ask the BOE members to represent the tax payers and take on some of the issues and make some changes.

    Corda reports to the BOE. The BOE is elected by the tax payers. Do we hold the BOE members accountable? When they review Corda and extend the contract and increase his pay, do the tax payers let it be known that they don’t agree? Where does the buck stop? Why does it always feel like the BOE reports to Corda?

    Voting in November is critical. But it doesn’t stop there. We need to keep letting the BOE members know what we think. We need to make them accountable for Corda’s actions. He isn’t king and the BOE is ultimately responsible for what he does. They are the ones who allow these things to happen and Corda to do whatever he wants. Does he know the word NO?

    As for Lang – has anyone evaluated what she has done – other than make expensive changes? Are they any good? Are the students benefitting? What do the teachers think? What do the test scores show? “Queen Lang” spends most of her focus on elementary and more recently with some middle schools. Where is the consistency? Are all schools, all levels, given the same attention? Are any benefitting from the expensive changes that have been made. Are the curriculum changes doin any good?

    And Mr. Opdahl reports to Dr. Corda, so if he is messing up, he and Corda need to be held accountable. Has Corda done anything to evaluate Mr. Opdahl? Does the BOE ever check to make sure that those who report to Dr. Corda are doing their jobs?

    What is the evaluation procedure? For Corda and Lang it seems like a once a year board gets together to sing their praises, extend a contract and give more money. Let’s start setting goals, set measurable goals, evaluate performance, see if promises made were kept, is the district improving, are test scores going up, are grades up, are graduation rates up? Let’s run it more like a business with some business sense. Now it is all about politics.

    And as for them being in a school – any school? Do the folks downtown even know how to get to our schools? They go for the photo ops but do they know the students, the staff, the buildings, the culture of the schools. I bet not. Do they attend any even that doesn’t guarantee them a chance of some positive press? When was the last time that Dr. Lang and Dr. Corda were in a classroom with actual teachers and students in an actual classroom situation? And yet they sit on their thrones and proclaim how it will be. They know best because they have read the reports and studies and they know the DATA. Bull – get into the classrooms and figure out the reality! Ultimately they are accountable to our children.

    November is the first time that we have an opportunity to make a big change with the BOE. Keep working at it until then but if we don’t speak in November it will be status quo.

  • P.O’d Parent

    CYA your are totally wrong to say:

    “It is the hands of the CC, Mayor, BOE, and all the other glorious self serving committes to deal with Opdall and his pranks. Frankly I’m tired of hearing the repubs, some dems and others state that the only way to correct the mess is in the hands of voters come November. I view this as chicken dunk”

    You definitely need to know what the power of command is BEFORE you make stements like the one above. Don’t get me wrong CYA, I total understand your fustration. But it is really the truth that the Mayor & Common Council have no say over the BoE. The BoE is it’s own Entity, They are given 145 million of our tax dollars (close to about 70 cents of every tax dollar by the way) and they spend it as they see fit. That’s why I stated earlier that it is a joke that Corda has removed the Finance Director so he can manipulate the cash with that other waste, Opdahl. The repubs are p.o’d as much as me because they haven’t had anyone on the Borad of Ed for over 7 years. There are a few dems who have the courage to speak out against the rest of their party who have allows to travesty to continue. SO LISTEN UP:

    THE ONLY WAY TO CHANGE THE WAY THE BoE DOES THINGS, IS TO VOTE OUT THE CURRENT CROP AND THEIR WOULD BE SUCCESSORS OUT OF OFFICE THIS NOVEMBER 6TH.

    Ask the candadites the tough questions this fall.

    Stop being so cynical CYA and listen to the fellow posters like WatchDog, Charles the hammer, Vet park junkie & Beach bum.

  • CYA

    P.O’d Parent – While I respect your opinion, I have always believed in the saying that there is always more then one way to skin a cat. I quess my level of expectations exceeded those possible. I know that Noevember is coming, and we the people have an opportunity at that time to vote for a change. But speaking for myself, and without trying to sound cynical, it just seems that the folks we vote into office, whether it be on a national or local level, suddenly become disconnected from their constituents, and go about doing whatever their party tells them to do. Forget about right or wrong, just hold tight to the party line.

  • indythinker

    CYA #19-you are dead wrong in your comments. There are several who have gone head to head with Opdhal, Corda and the BOE and guess what? They were laughed at and ridiculed and told its none of their business. Because the BOE has no alegiance the city and its taxpayers this behavior will continue until someone files a complaint with the state and demands an internal audit.

  • Silence Dogood

    Let’s get rid of Corda before he qualifies for a pension. I’m sure he wants to collect pensions from both NY and CT before he moves to his next position.

  • Truthfull Taxpayer

    #33 Silence Dogood – I’m with you! It appears that the name of the game in Norwalk is: How to get the highest $$$ amount and highest ### number of pensions as possible off of the taxpayer’s backs. It’s disgusting and it’s time that these individuals know that the taxpayers are on to them! We have to throw the incumbent BoE members out in November.

  • Vet Park Junkie

    Humm… I guess that I posted my musings on the school budget on the wrong thread. Sorry, I don’t want to thwart the critical CMT discussion. I’ll resurrect this thread to share some further thoughts.

    In comparing the 2005-06 budget to actual expenses for that year, money was subtracted from 44 accounts in the amount of $3,866,962 and $3,757,164 was added to 59 accounts. There is the $109,798 overall that was not spent. The numbers foot. There are 107 accounts total. The average subtraction by account is $87,866 and the average addition is $63,681. The amount of shuffling between accounts is almost 3% of the total budget. To ground our law-and-order types, this is equivalent to reallocating almost 40% of our police patrol operations.

    I sure wish that there was some more detail so that I wouldn’t have to thrash at this high level. Director of Finance needed for school district?

    Again, I’ll offer the spreadsheets so that someone can validate my numbers. Tonight, hopefully, I’ll do a comparison of the 2006-07 budget request to the 2007-08 initial budget request.

  • Beach Bum

    Vet Park Junkie, For those of us who are not familiar with accepted accounting practices, what do you think all this money shuffling around means? Are there any obvious relationships among these accounts? Is the postage expense account used the way Corda used it in his prior position? It would be very interesting if he repeats himself. (Isn’t this how they caught him?) Do well-run organizations have such practices? How can one grossly miscalculate 107 accounts?

    Just a few questions the BOE should be thinking about before Corda’s and Opdahl’s contracts are renewed!

  • Vet Park Junkie

    In the interest of disclosure, Beach Bum is a relative. Our phone conversation this afternoon went, “What are you trying to do? Keep a dead thread alive?”

    The answer was “No! I have no idea where you are going with this stuff. What does it mean?”

    Wow… VPJ is talking to himself.

    Anyway, I wouldn’t call what I was doing accounting. It was simple data mining. Why no accounting? Take a look at the posted reports and there isn’t much there to base any decision. I feel that this is on purpose. So I dragged out the histograms, trend charts, and a modified Pugh technique.

    What do we have to work with?

    The basic “detail” report has columns for annual numbers. For this year, actual expenses are reported for the 2005-2006 school year. Budget numbers are reported for the 2006-2007 school year and the 2007-2008 school year. Did you get that? The only actual expenses are old. What is missing? Well, there is no easy way to compare any budget to actual. Why would you want to do that? To see if one can rely on the budget numbers. It took me hours and I have been doing this for thirty years.

    Would I rely on the budget numbers, I answer “probably not.” When I see $1.5 million taken from the budget for teacher salaries and fringe benefits and find no way to see where it went, I start loosing faith. When I see $3.8 million moving around, faith dissipates further. In a normal financial report, I’d expect explanations. There are none.

    It reminds me of a time when a new account manager burst into the Chief Credit Officer’s room announcing, “The budget numbers are off!” The reply was “What did you expect? They’ve been off for ten years.” We liquidated that company.

    Back to the most recent school budget report. What else is missing? No actual numbers for the school year 2006-2007. “Oh! But the school year isn’t finished when the budget is due!” Bullshit. Ever hear of monthly plan against actual reports? Those are missing.

    Two reports were filed this year — One before the budget increase was reduced and one after. The one after the Lyons bite has an additional line item – the amount of the reduction. No attempt was made to change the original budget numbers. If I tried this in business, I would be fired before the elevator got to the first floor.

    When I stare at next year’s budget, I get the impression that it is a “top down” report. I mean, it looks like the numbers come from HQ and are then parceled out to the schools. It should be that budgets come from the schools and are aggregated at HQ. I’ll repeat – impression only. I don’t see any breakouts by school. Where are they?

    The trend lines are interesting.

    Remember the issue around faulty intercoms in the school? The account for “clocks and intercoms” goes up over 300% in year 1, up to 450% percent in year 2, and then drops. I guess that they were fixed.

    What about textbooks? Looking at the number from 2004-05 to 07-08, soft-covered books go up a whopping 620% over the four years. Bookbinding goes up 250%. Looks like the message from the public got heard? Well, textbooks budget drops 33%. So, overall we have a 27% drop in the budget for the combined textbook number. Being cynical, expect the “We have no money for textbooks!” argument next year.

    I also predict the same argument for instructional equipment. That’s been dropping consistently. I guess that the PTO will have to collect for that line item.

    What’s my take from eight hours of crunching the numbers. Too much is missing. I’d take the budget estimates with a grain of salt. The relationship between Corda and Opdahl is not healthy for the district’s finances. Get a real Director of Finance.

    Time to hone the message? Anyone have some more data to look at?