Comments on: House is Deliberating on Medical Marijuana Bill

By: Museum Pro

Museum Pro — Thu, 24 May 2007 17:45:47 +0000

Why make it legal for medical use, when you can force people to buy it on the street and contribute to the tax free underground economy?
If I had a friend or relative suffering from pain, and Pot would give them relief from pain, I would do all I could to help them obtain the Marijuana they needed, and would be proud to have a death certificate indicating the cause of death waas a drug overdose rather then the long time suffering of Cancer or other vile illness – I am convinced Cancer is still here until it is not profitable for the drug companies, doctors and politicians – then it will be cured until another illness steps in to create more profit.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 24 May 2007 11:40:28 +0000

I’m sure the Feds will find some way to impose their draconian authority on this State initiative – they’ve done it before.

And what was up with Toni Boucher attempting to add not one, not two, but fifty amendments to this bill?

As for where to get seeds, anyone with the initiative (hey guys, that’s cancer patients) can find out where to get them without making a drug deal, baby. Can you say “mail order?” What a bunch of moralizing morons.

By: Annonymous

Annonymous — Thu, 24 May 2007 04:16:12 +0000

Saw a name of a representative from outside of Norwalk who didn’t mind hitting the free base pipe in their youth.

Voted no!

By: turfgrrl

turfgrrl — Thu, 24 May 2007 01:49:21 +0000

The House final vote is in 89-58, with 4 not voting, the bill passes. Link to full story The Norwalk Delegation all voted against the bill.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 23 May 2007 21:38:24 +0000

Meanwhile, kids can go buy a pack of smokes at the corner store or a six-pack. Of course, those legal drugs don’t have a huge system of attorney- and court-related revenues that are generated from them, like pot busts do.